Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

doc-bdd(文档 bdd)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

doc-bdd 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 12,657。

总安装 1,176周安装 50GitHub Stars 14下载 412核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:doc-bdd(文档 bdd)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework
仓库路径:skills/doc-bdd
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-bdd
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-bdd

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

创建基于 Gherkin 语法的行为驱动开发(BDD)测试场景。适用于将需求转化为可执行测试用例的中间层文档。依赖 BRD、PRD、EARS 上游输入,生成下游 ADR 与 SYS 基础。需验证上游文档存在性,仅支持指定宿主调用。doc-bdd 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/doc-bdd

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-bdd;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

doc-bdd 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-bdd。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

doc-bdd 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

doc-bdd 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

doc-bdd 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

doc-bdd 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,176 次,近一周安装 50 次,下载 412 次,GitHub 14 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

doc-bdd 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
doc-bdd

文档 bdd · 本页

1,17614需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

doc-bdd

Purpose

Create BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) test scenarios - Layer 4 artifact in the SDD workflow that defines executable test scenarios using Gherkin syntax.

Layer: 4

Upstream: BRD (Layer 1), PRD (Layer 2), EARS (Layer 3)

Downstream: ADR (Layer 5), SYS (Layer 6), REQ (Layer 7)

Prerequisites

Upstream Artifact Verification (CRITICAL)

Before creating this document, you MUST:

  1. List existing upstream artifacts: ls docs/01_BRD/ docs/02_PRD/ docs/03_EARS/ docs/04_BDD/ 2>/dev/null
  2. Reference only existing documents in traceability tags
  3. Use null only when upstream artifact type genuinely doesn't exist
  4. NEVER use placeholders like BRD-XXX or TBD
  5. Do NOT create missing upstream artifacts - skip functionality instead

Before creating BDD, read:

  1. Shared Standards: .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md
  2. Upstream BRD, PRD, EARS: Read artifacts that drive these test scenarios
  3. Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-MVP-TEMPLATE.feature
  4. Creation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-MVP-TEMPLATE.feature
  5. Validation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml

When to Use This Skill

Use doc-bdd when:

  • Have completed BRD (Layer 1), PRD (Layer 2), EARS (Layer 3)
  • Need to define executable test scenarios
  • Validating EARS formal requirements with Given-When-Then format
  • Creating acceptance criteria for features
  • You are at Layer 4 of the SDD workflow

Section-Based Structure (MANDATORY)

All BDD suites MUST use section-based structure. No backward compatibility with legacy formats.

Directory Structure

Nested Folder Rule (MANDATORY): ALL BDD suites MUST use nested folders regardless of size.

docs/04_BDD/
├── BDD-02_knowledge_engine/           # Suite folder (REQUIRED)
│   ├── BDD-02.md              # Index file (MANDATORY)
│   ├── BDD-02.1_ingest.feature        # Section 1
│   ├── BDD-02.2_query.feature         # Section 2
│   ├── BDD-02.3.00_learning.feature   # Aggregator (if 5+ subsections)
│   ├── BDD-02.3.01_learning_path.feature    # Subsection 1
│   ├── BDD-02.3.02_bias_detection.feature   # Subsection 2
│   ├── BDD-02_README.md               # Optional companion
│   └── BDD-02_TRACEABILITY.md         # Optional companion
└── BDD-02_knowledge_engine.feature    # Redirect stub (0 scenarios)

CRITICAL: Never create BDD files directly in docs/04_BDD/ without a nested folder structure.

Three Valid File Patterns (ONLY)

PatternExampleUse When
Section-OnlyBDD-02.14_query_result_filtering.featureStandard section (≤800 lines, ≤12 scenarios)
SubsectionBDD-02.24.01_quality_performance.featureSection requires splitting
AggregatorBDD-02.12.00_query_graph_traversal.featureOrganizing multiple subsections (@redirect, 0 scenarios)

Prohibited Patterns (ERROR)

PatternExampleFix
_partN suffixBDD-02_query_part1.featureUse BDD-02.2.01_query.feature
Single-fileBDD-02_knowledge_engine.feature (with scenarios)Use section-based format
features/ subdirectoryBDD-02_slug/features/Put .feature files at suite folder root

Critical Rules

  1. All .feature files in suite folder - No features/ subdirectory
  2. Index file mandatory: BDD-NN.0_index.md for all suites
  3. Max 800 lines per .feature file (soft limit: 600)
  4. Max 12 scenarios per Feature block
  5. Section metadata tags required: @section, @parent_doc, @index

Gherkin Syntax

Feature File Structure

# Traceability Tags (Gherkin-native, NOT in comments)
@section: 2.14
@parent_doc: BDD-02
@index: BDD-02.md
@brd:BRD.02.0103
@prd:PRD.02.0702
@ears:EARS.02.1401

Feature: BDD-02.14: Query Result Filtering
  As a data analyst
  I want filtered query results
  So that I can focus on relevant data

  Background:
    Given the system timezone is "America/New_York"
    And the current time is "09:30:00" in "America/New_York"

  @primary @functional
  Scenario: Successful filter application
    Given valid filter criteria
    When user applies filter
    Then filtered results are returned
    And response time is less than @threshold:PRD.02.perf.api.p95_latency

Tags Placement (CRITICAL - E041)

Tags MUST be Gherkin-native, NOT in comments.

# INVALID (frameworks cannot parse comment-based tags):
# @brd: BRD.01.0101
# @prd: PRD.01.0101
Feature: My Feature

# VALID (Gherkin-native tags before Feature):
@brd:BRD.01.0101
@prd:PRD.01.0101
@ears:EARS.01.2401
Feature: My Feature

Times and Timezones (MANDATORY)

  • All times include seconds: HH:MM:SS
  • Use IANA timezone format: America/New_York, America/Los_Angeles
  • Avoid ambiguous abbreviations (EST/EDT/PST/PDT)
Given the current time is "14:30:00" in "America/New_York"
And the system timezone is "America/New_York"

Unified Element ID Format (MANDATORY)

Pattern: BDD.{DOC_NUM}.{HASH} (3 segments, dot-separated)

Element TypeCodeExample
Test Scenario14BDD.02.1401
Step15BDD.02.1501
REMOVED PATTERNS - Do NOT use: - SCENARIO-XXX, TS-XXX → Use BDD.NN.14.SS - STEP-XXX → Use BDD.NN.15.SS - TC-XXX → Use BDD.NN.14.SS

ADR-Ready Scoring System

Purpose: Measures BDD maturity and readiness for ADR progression.

Format in Document Control:

| **ADR-Ready Score** | ✅ 95% (Target: ≥90%) |

Status and ADR-Ready Score Mapping

ADR-Ready ScoreRequired Status
≥90%Approved
70-89%In Review
<70%Draft

Scoring Criteria

Scenario Completeness (35%):

  • All EARS statements translated to BDD scenarios: 15%
  • Comprehensive coverage (success/error/edge): 15%
  • Observable verification methods specified: 5%

Testability (30%):

  • Scenarios are automatable: 15%
  • Data-driven Examples tables used: 10%
  • Performance benchmarks quantifiable: 5%

Architecture Requirements Clarity (25%):

  • Performance, security, scalability quality attributes specified: 15%
  • Integration points and external dependencies defined: 10%

Business Validation (10%):

  • Business acceptance criteria traceable: 5%
  • Measurable success outcomes defined: 5%

Quality Gate: Score <90% blocks ADR artifact creation.

Threshold Registry Integration (MANDATORY)

All quantitative values MUST use @threshold: keys. No hardcoded magic numbers.

Inline Step Format

# INVALID (hardcoded):
Then response time is less than 200ms

# VALID (threshold reference):
Then response time is less than @threshold:PRD.035.perf.api.p95_latency

Scenario Tag Format

@threshold:PRD.NN.perf.api.p95_latency
Scenario: API responds within performance threshold

Common Threshold Categories

CategoryBDD UsageExample Key
perf.*Performance validationperf.api.p95_latency
sla.*SLA validationsla.uptime.target
limit.*Rate limit testinglimit.api.requests_per_second
timeout.*Timeout validationtimeout.request.sync

Cumulative Tagging Requirements

Layer 4 (BDD): Must include tags from Layers 1-3 (BRD, PRD, EARS)

Tag Count: 3+ tags (@brd, @prd, @ears)

Format (Gherkin-native tags before Feature):

@brd:BRD.01.0103
@prd:PRD.01.0702
@ears:EARS.01.2401
Feature: Feature Name

Tag Format Convention

NotationFormatArtifactsPurpose
DashTYPE-NNADR, SPEC, CTRTechnical artifacts - document references
DotTYPE.NN.xxxxBRD, PRD, EARS, BDD, SYS, REQHierarchical artifacts - element references

Scenario Types

All 8 categories should be represented:

CategoryTagDescription
Success Path@primaryHappy path scenarios
Alternative Path@alternativeOptional parameters, different workflows
Error Conditions@negativeInvalid inputs, error handling
Edge Cases@edge_case, @boundaryBoundary conditions, limits
Data-Driven@data_drivenParameterized with Examples tables
Integration@integrationExternal system interactions
Quality Attributes@quality_attributePerformance, security, reliability
Failure Recovery@failure_recoveryError recovery, circuit breakers

Success Path Example

@primary @functional
Scenario: User logs in successfully
  Given valid credentials
  When user submits login
  Then user is authenticated

Error Conditions Example

@negative @error_handling
Scenario: Trade rejected due to insufficient funds
  Given account balance is $1000
  When trade requires $5000
  Then trade is rejected
  And error code "INSUFFICIENT_FUNDS" is returned

Edge Cases Example

@edge_case @boundary
Scenario: Trade at exact position limit
  Given current delta is 0.499
  And position limit is 0.50
  When trade increases delta to 0.50
  Then trade is accepted

Data-Driven Example

@data_driven
Scenario Outline: Validate price precision
  Given instrument <symbol>
  When price is <price>
  Then precision should be <decimals> decimal places
  Examples:
    | symbol | price  | decimals |
    | SPY    | 450.25 | 2        |
    | AMZN   | 3250.5 | 1        |

Section Metadata Requirements

All .feature files MUST include section metadata tags:

@section: NN.SS              # Section number (e.g., 2.1, 2.14)
@parent_doc: BDD-NN          # Parent BDD suite (e.g., BDD-02)
@index: BDD-NN.0_index.md    # Index file reference
@brd:BRD.NN.EE.SS            # Upstream BRD element
@prd:PRD.NN.EE.SS            # Upstream PRD element
@ears:EARS.NN.SS.RR          # Upstream EARS requirement

For subsections, add:

@parent_section: NN.SS       # Parent section number

Feature Title Format:

Feature: BDD-NN.SS: Domain Description

Aggregator Files

Use when: Section has 5+ subsections

Requirements:

  • @redirect tag MUST be present
  • 0 scenarios (redirect stub only)
  • List subsections in Feature description
@redirect
@section: 2.12.00
@parent_doc: BDD-02
@index: BDD-02.md

Feature: BDD-02.12: Query Graph Traversal (Aggregator)

  This is a redirect stub. Test scenarios are in subsections:
  - BDD-02.12.01_depth_first.feature - Depth-first traversal tests
  - BDD-02.12.02_breadth_first.feature - Breadth-first traversal tests

Background:
  Given the system timezone is "America/New_York"
  # No scenarios in aggregator - redirect only

Index File Template

Mandatory: BDD-NN.0_index.md for each suite

# BDD-02.0: Knowledge Engine Test Suite Index

## Suite Overview
**Purpose**: Test scenarios for Knowledge Engine functionality
**Scope**: Ingest, Query, Learning, Performance Monitoring

## Section File Map
| Section | File | Scenarios | Lines | Status | Description |
|---------|------|-----------|-------|--------|-------------|
| 02.1 | BDD-02.1_ingest.feature | 8 | 350 | Active | Ingest tests |
| 02.2 | BDD-02.2_query.feature | 10 | 420 | Active | Query tests |

## Traceability Matrix
| BDD Section | Upstream Source | Description |
|-------------|----------------|-------------|
| BDD-02.1 | EARS.02.01-05 | Ingest requirements |
| BDD-02.2 | EARS.02.06-12 | Query requirements |

Creation Process

Step 1: Read Upstream Artifacts

Read BRD, PRD, and EARS to understand requirements to test.

Step 2: Reserve Suite ID

Check docs/04_BDD/ for next available ID (e.g., BDD-01, BDD-02).

ID Numbering Convention: Start with 2 digits and expand only as needed.

  • ✅ Correct: BDD-01, BDD-99, BDD-102
  • ❌ Incorrect: BDD-001, BDD-009 (extra leading zero not required)

Step 3: Create Suite Folder

mkdir -p docs/04_BDD/BDD-02_knowledge_engine/

Step 4: Create Index File

cp ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-SECTION-0-TEMPLATE.md docs/04_BDD/BDD-02_knowledge_engine/BDD-02.md

Step 5: Design Section Split

  • Identify logical domains or EARS groupings
  • Estimate scenarios per section (target: 6-10)
  • Plan for subsections if needed (>800 lines)

Step 6: Create Section Files

cp ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-MVP-TEMPLATE.feature docs/04_BDD/BDD-02_knowledge_engine/BDD-02.1_ingest.feature

Step 7: Add Section Metadata Tags

  • @section, @parent_doc, @index
  • Upstream traceability: @brd, @prd, @ears

Step 8: Write Scenarios

For each requirement from EARS/PRD:

  1. Success path scenario
  2. Error condition scenarios (2-3)
  3. Edge case scenarios (1-2)
  4. Scenario outlines for parameterized tests

Step 9: Replace Magic Numbers with Thresholds

  • Add to PRD threshold registry first if key missing
  • Use @threshold:PRD.NN.category.key format

Step 10: Create Redirect Stub

# Create redirect stub at docs/04_BDD/ root
touch docs/04_BDD/BDD-02_knowledge_engine.feature

Add minimal content with @redirect tag and 0 scenarios.

Step 11: Update Index File

  • List all section files with scenario counts
  • Add traceability matrix

Step 12: Validate BDD Suite

python3 scripts/validate_bdd_suite.py --root BDD

Step 13: Commit Changes

Commit suite folder and redirect stub together.

Validation

Validation Error Codes Reference

CodeDescriptionSeverity
E001Document Control fields missingERROR
E002Gherkin syntax invalidERROR
E003ADR-Ready Score format invalidERROR
E004Upstream traceability tags missingERROR
E041Tags in comments (not Gherkin-native)ERROR
E008Element ID format invalidERROR
CHECK 9.1File naming pattern invalidERROR
CHECK 9.2Prohibited pattern detectedERROR
CHECK 9.3Aggregator requirements not metERROR
CHECK 9.4File size exceeds limitsERROR
CHECK 9.5Section metadata tags missingERROR
CHECK 9.6Index file missingERROR
CHECK 9.7Non-Gherkin content in.feature fileERROR

Manual Checklist

File Structure:

  • All .feature files in suite folder (no features/ subdirectory)
  • Index file exists: BDD-NN.0_index.md
  • Redirect stub at docs/BDD/BDD-NN_slug.feature (0 scenarios)
  • No file exceeds 800 lines
  • No Feature block exceeds 12 scenarios

File Naming:

  • All files match one of 3 valid patterns
  • No prohibited patterns (_partN, single-file)

Tags and Metadata:

  • Tags are Gherkin-native (NOT in comments)
  • Section metadata: @section, @parent_doc, @index
  • Cumulative tags: @brd, @prd, @ears
  • All quantitative values use @threshold: keys
  • Times include seconds (HH:MM:SS) with IANA timezone

Scenarios:

  • All 8 scenario categories represented
  • Given-When-Then structure
  • No subjective language ("fast", "reliable")
  • Observable outcomes in Then steps

Aggregators (if applicable):

  • Has @redirect tag
  • Has 0 scenarios
  • Lists subsections in Feature description

Common Pitfalls

MistakeCorrection
Tags in comments # @brd:Use Gherkin-native @brd: before Feature
ADR-Ready Score: 95%Use ✅ 95% (Target: ≥90%)
response time < 200ms (hardcoded)Use @threshold:PRD.NN.perf.api.p95_latency
.feature in features/ subdirPut at suite folder root
BDD-02_query_part1.featureUse BDD-02.2.01_query.feature
Missing @ears tagAll 3 upstream tags are MANDATORY
Only success scenariosInclude all 8 scenario categories
Status: Approved (with <90% score)Use Status: In Review or Draft
File >800 linesSplit into subsections
09:30 (no seconds)Use 09:30:00
EST timezoneUse America/New_York

Post-Creation Validation (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Execute validation loop IMMEDIATELY after document creation.

Automatic Validation Loop

LOOP:
  1. Run: python scripts/validate_bdd_suite.py --root BDD
  2. IF errors fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
  3. IF warnings fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
  4. IF unfixable issues: Log for manual review
  5. IF clean: Mark VALIDATED, proceed

Quality Gate

Blocking: YES - Cannot proceed to ADR creation until validation passes with 0 errors.


Reserved ID Exemption

Pattern: BDD-00_*.md or BDD-00_*.feature

Scope: Documents with reserved ID 000 are FULLY EXEMPT from validation.

Document Types:

  • Index documents (BDD-00_index.md)
  • Traceability matrix templates
  • Glossaries, registries, checklists

Next Skill

After creating BDD, use:

doc-adr - Create Architecture Decision Records (Layer 5)

The ADR will:

  • Document architectural decisions for topics identified in BRD/PRD
  • Include @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd tags (cumulative)
  • Use Context-Decision-Consequences format
  • Reference BDD scenarios that validate the architecture

Related Resources

  • Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-MVP-TEMPLATE.feature
  • Index Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-SECTION-0-TEMPLATE.md
  • Aggregator Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-AGGREGATOR-TEMPLATE.feature
  • Schema: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml
  • Creation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD-MVP-TEMPLATE.feature
  • Validation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/04_BDD/BDD_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml
  • Shared Standards: .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md
  • ID Standards: ai_dev_ssd_flow/ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md

Quick Reference

ItemValue
PurposeDefine executable test scenarios
Layer4
Tags Required@brd, @prd, @ears (3 tags)
ADR-Ready Score≥90% required for "Approved" status
Element ID FormatBDD.NN.14.SS (scenarios), BDD.NN.15.SS (steps)
File StructureNested suite folder: docs/04_BDD/BDD-NN_{slug}/
Max File Size800 lines (soft: 600)
Max Scenarios12 per Feature block
Time FormatHH:MM:SS with IANA timezone
Quantitative ValuesUse @threshold:PRD.NN.category.key
Next Skilldoc-adr

Version History

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.12026-02-27Migrated frontmatter to metadata; corrected framework reference path to ai_dev_ssd_flowSystem
1.02026-02-08Initial skill definition with YAML frontmatter standardizationSystem

平台分布

Gemini CLI

29.01%
按下载量换算120

Claude Code

23.41%
按下载量换算96

OpenCode

16.84%
按下载量换算69

Antigravity

12.77%
按下载量换算53

Codex

7.84%
按下载量换算32

windsurf

2.97%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills