Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

doc-adr(地址文件)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

doc-adr 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,194。

总安装 1,004周安装 41GitHub Stars 14下载 321核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:doc-adr(地址文件)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework
仓库路径:skills/doc-adr
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-adr
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-adr

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

doc-adr 创建架构决策记录(ADR),作为 SDD 流程第五层的关键工件。必须验证上游 BRD/PRD/EARS/BDD 文档存在性,仅基于已有信息做决策记录。输出包含决策背景、备选方案、取舍理由与未来演进方向的完整叙述。下游驱动 SYS/REQ/Code 层开发,确保技术实现与架构意图保持一致。

doc-adr 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/doc-adr

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-adr;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

doc-adr 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-adr。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

doc-adr 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

doc-adr 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

doc-adr 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

doc-adr 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,004 次,近一周安装 41 次,下载 321 次,GitHub 14 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

doc-adr 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
doc-adr

地址文件 · 本页

1,00414需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

doc-adr

Purpose

Create Architecture Decision Records (ADR) - Layer 5 artifact in the SDD workflow that documents architectural decisions with rationale, alternatives, and consequences.

Layer: 5

Upstream: BRD (Layer 1), PRD (Layer 2), EARS (Layer 3), BDD (Layer 4)

Downstream Artifacts: SYS (Layer 6), REQ (Layer 7), Code (Execution Layer)

Prerequisites

Upstream Artifact Verification (CRITICAL)

Before creating this document, you MUST:

  1. List existing upstream artifacts: ls docs/01_BRD/ docs/02_PRD/ docs/03_EARS/ docs/04_BDD/ docs/05_ADR/ docs/06_SYS/ docs/07_REQ/ 2>/dev/null
  2. Reference only existing documents in traceability tags
  3. Use null only when upstream artifact type genuinely doesn't exist
  4. NEVER use placeholders like BRD-XXX or TBD
  5. Do NOT create missing upstream artifacts - skip functionality instead

Before creating ADR, read:

  1. Shared Standards: .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md
  2. Technology Stack: docs/05_ADR/ADR-00_technology_stack.md (approved technologies)
  3. Upstream BRD, PRD: Read Architecture Decision Requirements sections
  4. Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md
  5. Creation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md
  6. Validation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml
  7. Quality Gate Validation: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR_MVP_QUALITY_GATE_VALIDATION.md

When to Use This Skill

Use doc-adr when:

  • Have identified architectural topics in BRD/PRD Architecture Decision Requirements sections
  • Need to document technology choices with rationale
  • Evaluating alternatives for architectural patterns
  • Making decisions with long-term impact
  • You are at Layer 5 of the SDD workflow

ADR Document Categories

CategoryFilename PatternValidation LevelDescription
Standard ADRADR-NN_{decision_topic}.mdFull (7 checks)Architecture decision records
ADR-REFADR-REF-NN_{slug}.mdReduced (4 checks)Supplementary reference documents

Reserved ID Exemption (ADR-00_*)

Scope: Documents with reserved ID 000 are FULLY EXEMPT from validation.

Pattern: ADR-00_*.md

Document Types: Index, Traceability matrix, Glossaries, Registries, Checklists

Validation Behavior: Skip all checks when filename matches ADR-00_* pattern.

ADR-Specific Guidance

1. ADR Structure (11 Sections Total)

MVP Template: See ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md for complete structure.

#SectionPurpose
1Document ControlMetadata with SYS-Ready Score
2ContextProblem Statement, Technical Context
3DecisionChosen Solution, Key Components, Approach
4Alternatives ConsideredOptions with pros/cons
5ConsequencesPositive/Negative Outcomes, Costs
6Architecture FlowMermaid diagrams, Integration Points
7Implementation AssessmentPhases, Rollback, Monitoring
8VerificationSuccess Criteria, BDD Scenarios
9TraceabilityUpstream/Downstream, Tags, Cross-Links
10Related DecisionsDependencies, Supersessions
11MVP LifecycleIteration guidance

2. ADR Lifecycle States

Proposed: Decision under consideration

  • Still evaluating alternatives
  • Seeking stakeholder feedback
  • Not yet implemented

Accepted: Decision approved and active

  • Chosen as the path forward
  • Implementation can proceed
  • Should be followed by all

Deprecated: Decision no longer recommended

  • Better alternative found
  • Context changed
  • Not deleted (historical record)

Superseded by ADR-XXX: Replaced by newer decision

  • Links to replacing ADR
  • Explains why replaced
  • Maintains audit trail

3. SYS-Ready Scoring System

Purpose: Measures ADR maturity and readiness for progression to System Requirements (SYS) phase.

Format in Document Control:

| **SYS-Ready Score** | ✅ 95% (Target: ≥90%) |

Status and SYS-Ready Score Mapping:

SYS-Ready ScoreRequired Status
≥90%Accepted
70-89%Proposed
<70%Draft

Scoring Criteria:

  • Decision Completeness (30%): Context/Decision/Consequences/Alternatives process
  • Architecture Clarity (35%): Mermaid diagrams (REQUIRED - no text-based diagrams), component responsibilities, cross-cutting concerns
  • Implementation Readiness (20%): Complexity assessment, dependencies, rollback strategies
  • Verification Approach (15%): Testing strategy, success metrics, operational readiness

Quality Gate: Score <90% blocks SYS artifact creation.

4. Element ID Format (MANDATORY)

Pattern: ADR.{DOC_NUM}.{HASH} (3 segments, dot-separated)

Element TypeCodeExample
Decision10ADR.02.1001
Alternative12ADR.02.1201
Consequence13ADR.02.1301

REMOVED PATTERNS - Do NOT use legacy formats:

  • ❌ DEC-XXX → Use ADR.NN.10.SS
  • ❌ ALT-XXX → Use ADR.NN.12.SS
  • ❌ CON-XXX → Use ADR.NN.13.SS

Reference: ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md

5. Threshold Management

Dual Role: ADR documents both reference and define thresholds.

Reference platform-wide thresholds from PRD threshold registry:

performance:
  - "@threshold: PRD.NN.perf.api.p95_latency"
sla:
  - "@threshold: PRD.NN.sla.uptime.target"

Define architecture-specific thresholds unique to this decision:

circuit_breaker:
  - "@threshold: ADR.NN.circuit.failure_threshold"
  - "@threshold: ADR.NN.circuit.recovery_timeout"
retry:
  - "@threshold: ADR.NN.retry.max_attempts"
caching:
  - "@threshold: ADR.NN.cache.ttl_seconds"

6. File Size Limits

  • Target: 800 lines per file
  • Maximum: 1200 lines per file (absolute)
  • If document approaches/exceeds limits, split into section files

Tag Format Convention (By Design)

NotationFormatArtifactsPurpose
DashTYPE-NNADR, SPEC, CTRTechnical artifacts - references to files/documents
DotTYPE.NN.xxxxBRD, PRD, EARS, BDD, SYS, REQ, IMPL, TASKSHierarchical artifacts - references to elements inside documents

Key Distinction:

  • @adr: ADR-033 → Points to the document ADR-033_risk_limit_enforcement.md
  • @brd: BRD.17.0130 → Points to element 01.30 inside document BRD-017.md

Cumulative Tagging Requirements

Layer 5 (ADR): Must include tags from Layers 1-4 (BRD, PRD, EARS, BDD)

Tag Count: 4 tags (@brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd)

Format:

## Traceability

**Required Tags** (Cumulative Tagging Hierarchy - Layer 5):

@brd: BRD.01.0130
@prd: PRD.01.0702
@ears: EARS.01.2501
@bdd: BDD.01.1401

Upstream Sources:

  • BRD-01 - Architecture Decision Requirements
  • PRD-01 - Product requirements
  • EARS-01 - Formal requirements (EARS type code: 25)
  • BDD-01 - Test scenarios (BDD scenario type code: 14)

Upstream/Downstream Artifacts

Upstream Sources:

  • BRD (Layer 1) - Architecture Decision Requirements section
  • PRD (Layer 2) - Architecture Decision Requirements section
  • EARS (Layer 3) - Formal requirements constraints
  • BDD (Layer 4) - Test scenarios validating decision

Downstream Artifacts:

  • SYS (Layer 6) - System requirements implementing decision
  • REQ (Layer 7) - Atomic requirements following decision
  • Code (Execution Layer) - Implementation per decision

Upstream-Only Traceability Policy:

The ADR traceability matrix tracks ADRs and their upstream sources (BRD, PRD, EARS, BDD) only. Downstream documents (SYS, REQ, SPEC) track their own upstream references to ADRs—the ADR matrix does NOT maintain downstream links.

Same-Type Document Relationships (conditional):

  • @related-adr: ADR-NN - ADRs sharing architectural context
  • @depends-adr: ADR-NN - ADR that must be decided first

Cross-Linking Tags (AI-Friendly)

Purpose: Establish lightweight, machine-readable hints for AI discoverability and dependency tracing across ADR documents without blocking validation.

Tags Supported:

  • @depends: ADR-NN — Hard prerequisite; this ADR cannot proceed without the referenced ADR
  • @discoverability: ADR-NN (short rationale) — Related document for AI search and ranking (informational)

ID Format: Document-level IDs follow {DOC_TYPE}-NN per ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md (e.g., ADR-01, ADR-02).

Placement: Add tags to the Traceability section or inline with decision descriptions.

Example:

@depends: ADR-01 (Technology Stack)
@discoverability: ADR-02 (Database Strategy - related architecture decision)

Validator Behavior: Cross-linking tags are recognized and reported as info-level findings (non-blocking). They enable AI/LLM tools to infer relationships and improve search ranking without affecting document approval.

Optional for MVP: Cross-linking tags are optional in MVP templates and are not required for ADR approval; they are purely informational.

Creation Process

Step 1: Identify Decision Topic

From BRD/PRD Architecture Decision Requirements sections, identify topic needing decision.

Step 2: Read Technology Stack

Check docs/05_ADR/ADR-00_technology_stack.md for approved technologies.

Step 3: Reserve ID Number

Check docs/05_ADR/ for next available ID number (e.g., ADR-01, ADR-33).

ID Numbering Convention: Start with 2 digits and expand only as needed.

  • ✅ Correct: ADR-01, ADR-99, ADR-102
  • ❌ Incorrect: ADR-001, ADR-033 (extra leading zero not required)

Special IDs:

  • ADR-000: Reserved for Technology Stack reference
  • ADR-01 onwards: Regular decision records

Step 4: Create ADR Folder and Files

Folder structure (DEFAULT - nested folder per document):

  1. Create folder: docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/ (folder slug MUST match index file slug)
  2. Create index file: docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/ADR-NN.0_{slug}_index.md
  3. Create section files: docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/ADR-NN.S_{section_type}.md

Example (Section-Based Pattern - DEFAULT):

docs/05_ADR/ADR-033_database_selection/
├── ADR-033.0_database_selection_index.md
├── ADR-033.1_context.md
├── ADR-033.2_decision.md
└── ADR-033.3_consequences.md

Monolithic Option (for small documents ≤25KB): docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/ADR-NN_{slug}.md (still in nested folder)

Step 5: Fill Document Control Section

Complete all required metadata fields and initialize Document Revision History table.

Required Fields (7 mandatory):

  • Project Name, Document Version, Date, Document Owner, Prepared By, Status, SYS-Ready Score

Step 6: Document Context (Section 4)

Context Section: Explain the problem and factors:

  • What issue are we addressing?
  • What constraints exist?
  • What requirements drive this decision?
  • Reference upstream BRD/PRD sections

Section 4.1 Problem Statement includes inherited content:

  • Business Driver (from BRD §7.2)
  • Business Constraints (from BRD §7.2)
  • Technical Options Evaluated (from PRD §18)
  • Evaluation Criteria (from PRD §18)

Step 7: State Decision (Section 5)

Decision Section: Clear, concise statement:

  • What are we choosing to do?
  • How will it be implemented?
  • Reference technology stack (ADR-000) if applicable

Step 8: Analyze Consequences (Section 7)

Consequences Section:

  • Positive: Benefits and advantages
  • Negative: Drawbacks and limitations
  • Risks: Potential issues and mitigations

Step 9: Document Alternatives (Section 12)

Alternatives Considered: For each alternative:

  • Name and description
  • Pros and cons
  • Why rejected
  • Fit Score (Poor/Good/Better)

Step 10: Define Verification (Section 11)

Verification Section: How to validate decision:

  • BDD scenarios that test it
  • Success metrics
  • Performance benchmarks

Step 11: Add Relations (Section 14)

Related Decisions Section:

  • Supersedes: Which ADR this replaces
  • Related to: Connected ADRs
  • Influences: Which SYS/REQ depend on this

Step 12: Add Cumulative Tags (Section 16.6)

Include @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd tags (Layers 1-4).

Step 13: Create/Update Traceability Matrix

MANDATORY: Update docs/05_ADR/ADR-00_TRACEABILITY_MATRIX.md

  • Add ADR entry with upstream sources only (BRD, PRD, EARS, BDD)
  • Do NOT add downstream links (SYS, REQ track their own references to ADRs)

Step 14: Commit Changes

Commit ADR and traceability matrix.

Validation

Validation Checks (8 Total)

CheckTypeDescription
CHECK 1ErrorRequired Document Control Fields (7 fields)
CHECK 2ErrorADR Structure Completeness (required sections)
CHECK 3ErrorSYS-Ready Score Validation (format, threshold)
CHECK 4ErrorUpstream Traceability Tags (@brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd)
CHECK 5WarningDecision Quality Assessment
CHECK 6WarningArchitecture Documentation (Mermaid diagrams)
CHECK 7WarningImplementation Readiness
CHECK 8ErrorElement ID Format Compliance (unified 3-segment)

Validation Tiers

TierTypeExit CodeAction
Tier 1Error1Must fix before commit
Tier 2Warning0Recommended to fix
Tier 3Info0No action required

Pre-Commit Hooks

ADR validation is automatically enforced via pre-commit hooks:

- id: adr-core-validator
  name: Validate ADR core checks (validator, framework library)
  entry: bash ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/scripts/adr_core_validator_hook.sh
  stages: [pre-commit]

- id: adr-quality-gate
  name: Validate ADR quality gates
  entry: bash ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/scripts/adr_quality_gate_hook.sh
  stages: [pre-commit]

- id: adr-sys-ready-score
  name: Validate ADR SYS-Ready score (≥90%)
  entry: bash ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/scripts/adr_sys_ready_score_hook.sh
  stages: [pre-commit]

Manual execution (for testing without committing):

pre-commit run adr-core-validator --all-files
pre-commit run adr-quality-gate --all-files
pre-commit run adr-sys-ready-score --all-files

Quality Gates Enforced:

  • ✅ ADR structure compliance (11 sections MVP)
  • ✅ SYS-Ready score ≥90% for Accepted status
  • ✅ Metadata and tags (adr, layer-5-artifact)
  • ✅ Upstream traceability (@brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd)
  • ✅ Element ID format (ADR.NN.xxxx)
  • ✅ No placeholder text in approved documents
  • ✅ Architecture diagrams (Mermaid required)
  • ✅ Decision quality and alternatives analysis

Automated Validation

# Per-document validation (Phase 1)
python ai_dev_ssd_flow/scripts/validate_cross_document.py --document docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_slug.md --auto-fix

# Layer validation (Phase 2) - run when all ADR documents complete
python ai_dev_ssd_flow/scripts/validate_cross_document.py --layer ADR --auto-fix

# Cumulative tagging validation
python ai_dev_ssd_flow/scripts/validate_tags_against_docs.py --artifact ADR-NN --expected-layers brd,prd,ears,bdd --strict

Manual Checklist

  • Document Control section at top with 7 required fields
  • Status field completed (Proposed/Accepted/Deprecated/Superseded)
  • SYS-Ready Score with ✅ emoji and percentage
  • Context explains problem and constraints
  • Decision clearly stated
  • Consequences analyzed (positive, negative, risks)
  • Alternatives considered and documented with rejection rationale
  • Verification approach defined
  • Relations to other ADRs documented
  • Technology Stack (ADR-000) referenced if applicable
  • Cumulative tags: @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd included
  • Element IDs use unified format (ADR.NN.xxxx)
  • No legacy patterns (DEC-XXX, ALT-XXX, CON-XXX)
  • Traceability matrix updated

Post-Creation Validation (MANDATORY - NO CONFIRMATION)

CRITICAL: Execute this validation loop IMMEDIATELY after document creation. Do NOT proceed to next document until validation passes.

Automatic Validation Loop

LOOP:
  1. Run: python ai_dev_ssd_flow/scripts/validate_cross_document.py --document {doc_path} --auto-fix
  2. IF errors fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
  3. IF warnings fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
  4. IF unfixable issues: Log for manual review, continue
  5. IF clean: Mark VALIDATED, proceed

Layer-Specific Upstream Requirements

This LayerRequired Upstream TagsCount
ADR (Layer 5)@brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd4 tags

Auto-Fix Actions (No Confirmation Required)

IssueFix Action
Missing @brd/@prd/@ears/@bdd tagAdd with upstream document reference
Invalid tag formatCorrect to TYPE.NN.xxxx (3-segment) or TYPE-NN format
Legacy element ID (DEC-XXX, ALT-XXX, CON-XXX)Convert to ADR.NN.xxxx format
Broken linkRecalculate path from current location
Missing traceability sectionInsert from template

Validation Codes Reference

CodeDescriptionSeverity
XDOC-001Referenced requirement ID not foundERROR
XDOC-002Missing cumulative tagERROR
XDOC-003Upstream document not foundERROR
XDOC-006Tag format invalidERROR
XDOC-007Gap in cumulative tag chainERROR
XDOC-009Missing traceability sectionERROR

Quality Gate

Blocking: YES - Cannot proceed to SYS creation until Phase 1 validation passes with 0 errors.

Common Pitfalls

  1. No alternatives: Must document why other options rejected
  2. Missing technology stack check: Always check ADR-000 first
  3. Vague consequences: Be specific about impacts
  4. No verification: Must define how to validate decision
  5. Missing cumulative tags: Layer 5 must include Layers 1-4 tags
  6. Legacy element IDs: Use ADR.NN.xxxx not DEC-XXX/ALT-XXX/CON-XXX
  7. Wrong SYS-Ready Score format: Must include ✅ emoji and percentage

ADR-REF Reference Documents

For supplementary documentation related to ADR artifacts:

  • Format: ADR-REF-NNN_{slug}.md
  • Skill: Use doc-ref skill
  • Validation: Reduced (4 checks only)
  • Examples: Technology stack summaries, architecture overviews

ADR-REF Reduced Validation

Applicable Checks (4 total):

  • CHECK 1 (partial): Document Control Fields (required)
  • Document Revision History (required)
  • Status/Context sections only (required)
  • H1 ID match with filename (required)

Exempted (NO SCORES):

  • SYS-Ready Score: NOT APPLICABLE
  • Cumulative tags: NOT REQUIRED
  • CHECK 5-7: Decision quality, architecture, implementation (exempt)
  • All quality gates and downstream readiness metrics: EXEMPT

Purpose: ADR-REF documents are reference targets that other documents link to. They provide supporting information, context, or external references but do not define formal architecture decisions.


Next Skill

After creating ADR, use:

doc-sys - Create System Requirements (Layer 6)

The SYS will:

  • Implement ADR architectural decisions
  • Include @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd, @adr tags (cumulative)
  • Define functional requirements and quality attributes
  • Translate ADR decisions into technical requirements

Related Resources

  • Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md (primary authority)
  • Schema: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml (machine-readable validation)
  • Technology Stack: docs/05_ADR/ADR-00_technology_stack.md
  • ADR Creation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md
  • ADR Validation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/ADR_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml
  • ADR README: ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR/README.md
  • Shared Standards: .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md

Section Templates (DEFAULT for all ADR documents):

  • Structure: docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN/ADR-NN.S_slug.md (nested folder per document)
  • Reference: ai_dev_ssd_flow/ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md (Section-Based File Splitting)
  • Note: Monolithic format allowed for small documents (≤25KB), but MUST still be in nested folder

Quick Reference

ADR Purpose: Document architectural decisions with rationale

Layer: 5

Tags Required: @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd (4 tags)

Format: 11-section MVP structure

SYS-Ready Score: ≥90% required for "Accepted" status

Element ID Format: ADR.NN.xxxx (Decision=10, Alternative=12, Consequence=13)

File Size: 800 lines target, 1200 max

Lifecycle States: Proposed → Accepted → Deprecated/Superseded

Critical: Always check ADR-000 Technology Stack first

Next: doc-sys


Version History

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.32026-03-06Added cross-linking tags documentation, quality gate validation reference, and pre-commit hooks sectionSystem
1.22026-02-27Migrated frontmatter to metadata; normalized ADR references to ai_dev_ssd_flow/05_ADR MVP artifacts and existing validation scriptsSystem
1.12026-02-26Updated to 11-section MVP structure (aligned with ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md v1.1)System
1.02026-02-08Initial skill definition with YAML frontmatter standardizationSystem

平台分布

Codex

38.41%
按下载量换算123

Claude

29.8%
按下载量换算96

Cursor

19.04%
按下载量换算61

Gemini CLI

10.02%
按下载量换算32

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills