Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

do-work(做工作)

do-work 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

do-work 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 871。

总安装 6,922周安装 280GitHub Stars 93下载 2,173核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:do-work(做工作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bladnman/do-work
仓库路径:skills/do-work
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

do-work 统一管理任务捕获与处理流程,创建 UR 文件夹保存原始请求与 REQ 文件队列。do 动作必产 UR 目录与 REQ 配对文件,确保原始输入完整归档。verify 动作自动检查覆盖率缺口并补充缺失项,形成闭环管理。cleanup 功能自动归并松散 REQ 至对应 UR,关闭已完成请求避免重复处理。

do-work 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/do-work

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

do-work 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

do-work 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

do-work 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

do-work 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

do-work 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,922 次,近一周安装 280 次,下载 2,173 次,GitHub 93 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

do-work 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
do-work

做工作 · 本页

6,92293只读未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Do-Work Skill

A unified entry point for task capture and processing.

Actions:

  • do: Capture new tasks/requests → creates UR folder (verbatim input) + REQ files (queue items), always paired, then verifies coverage
  • work: Process pending requests → plans (with plan verification), explores, builds, tests
  • verify: Evaluate captured REQs against original input → coverage check with auto-fix (also runs automatically after capture)
  • cleanup: Consolidate archive → moves loose REQs into UR folders, closes completed URs
Core concept: The do action always produces both a UR folder (preserving the original input) and REQ files (the queue items). Each REQ links back to its UR via user_request frontmatter. This pairing is mandatory for all requests — simple or complex.
Capture ≠ Execute. The do action captures requests. The work action executes them. These are strictly separate operations. After the do action finishes writing files and reporting back, STOP. Do not start processing the queue, do not begin implementation, do not "helpfully" transition into the work action. The user decides when to execute — always. The only exception is if the user explicitly says something like "add this and then run it" or "capture this and start working" in the same invocation.

Routing Decision

Step 1: Parse the Input

Examine what follows "do work":

Check these patterns in order — first match wins:

PriorityPatternExampleRoute
1Empty or bare invocationdo work→ Ask: "Start the work loop?"
2Action verbs onlydo work run, do work go, do work start→ work
3Verify keywordsdo work verify, do work check, do work evaluate→ verify
4Cleanup keywordsdo work cleanup, do work tidy, do work consolidate→ cleanup
5Version keywordsdo work version, do work update, do work check for updates→ version
6Changelog keywordsdo work changelog, do work release notes, do work what's new, do work what's changed, do work updates, do work history→ version
7Descriptive contentdo work add dark mode, do work [meeting notes]→ do

Step 2: Preserve Payload

Critical rule: Never lose the user's content.

Single-word rule: A single word is either a known keyword or ambiguous — it is never "descriptive content."

  • Matches a keyword in the routing table (e.g., "version", "verify", "cleanup") → route to that action directly.
  • Doesn't match any keyword (e.g., "refactor", "optimize") → ambiguous. Ask: "Do you want to add '{word}' as a new request, or did you mean something else?"

Only route to do when the input is clearly descriptive — multiple words, a sentence, a feature request, etc.

If routing is genuinely unclear AND multi-word content was provided:

  • Default to do (adding a task)
  • Hold onto $ARGUMENTS
  • If truly ambiguous, ask: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  • User replies with just "add" or "work" → proceed with original content

Action Verbs (→ Work)

These signal "process the queue": run, go, start, begin, work, process, execute, build, continue, resume

Verify Verbs (→ Verify)

These signal "check request quality": verify, check, evaluate, review requests, review reqs, audit

Note: "check" routes to verify ONLY when used alone or with a target (e.g., "do work check UR-003"). When followed by descriptive content it routes to do (e.g., "do work check if the button works" → do).

Cleanup Verbs (→ Cleanup)

These signal "consolidate the archive": cleanup, clean up, tidy, consolidate, organize archive, fix archive

Changelog Verbs (→ Version)

These signal "show release notes": changelog, release notes, what's new, what's changed, updates, history

Note: "updates" (plural) routes to changelog display. "update" (singular) routes to update check. Both are handled by the version action.

Content Signals (→ Do)

These signal "add a new task":

  • Descriptive text beyond a single verb
  • Feature requests, bug reports, ideas
  • Screenshots or context
  • "add", "create", "I need", "we should"

Examples

Routes to Work

  • do work → "Ready to process the queue?" (confirmation)
  • do work run → Starts work action immediately
  • do work go → Starts work action immediately

Routes to Verify

  • do work verify → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work verify UR-003 → Evaluates specific UR
  • do work check REQ-018 → Evaluates the UR that REQ-018 belongs to
  • do work evaluate → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work review requests → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

Routes to Cleanup

  • do work cleanup → Consolidates archive, closes completed URs
  • do work tidy → Same as cleanup
  • do work consolidate → Same as cleanup

Routes to Changelog (via Version)

  • do work changelog → Displays changelog (newest at bottom)
  • do work release notes → Same as changelog
  • do work what's new → Same as changelog
  • do work updates → Same as changelog
  • do work history → Same as changelog

Routes to Do

  • do work add dark mode → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work the button is broken → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work [400 words] → Creates REQ files + UR folder with full verbatim input

Payload Preservation Rules

When clarification is needed but content was provided:

  1. Do not lose $ARGUMENTS - keep the full payload in context
  2. Ask a simple question: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  3. Accept minimal replies: User says just "add" or "work"
  4. Proceed with original content: Apply the chosen action to the stored arguments
  5. Never ask the user to re-paste content

This enables a two-phase commit pattern:

  1. Capture intent payload
  2. Confirm action

Action References

Follow the detailed instructions in:

平台分布

Codex

33.76%
按下载量换算734

Claude

28.42%
按下载量换算618

Cursor

20.34%
按下载量换算442

Gemini CLI

8.59%
按下载量换算187

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills