Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

do-work做工作

Agent Skill

do-work 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,922

周安装

280

GitHub Stars

93

下载量

2,173
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:do-work(做工作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bladnman/do-work
仓库路径:skills/do-work
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work

简介

do-work 统一管理任务捕获与处理流程,创建 UR 文件夹保存原始请求与 REQ 文件队列。

  • do 动作必产 UR 目录与 REQ 配对文件,确保原始输入完整归档。
  • verify 动作自动检查覆盖率缺口并补充缺失项,形成闭环管理。
  • cleanup 功能自动归并松散 REQ 至对应 UR,关闭已完成请求避免重复处理。
  • do-work 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Do-Work Skill

A unified entry point for task capture and processing.

Actions:

  • do: Capture new tasks/requests → creates UR folder (verbatim input) + REQ files (queue items), always paired, then verifies coverage
  • work: Process pending requests → plans (with plan verification), explores, builds, tests
  • verify: Evaluate captured REQs against original input → coverage check with auto-fix (also runs automatically after capture)
  • cleanup: Consolidate archive → moves loose REQs into UR folders, closes completed URs
Core concept: The do action always produces both a UR folder (preserving the original input) and REQ files (the queue items). Each REQ links back to its UR via user_request frontmatter. This pairing is mandatory for all requests — simple or complex.
Capture ≠ Execute. The do action captures requests. The work action executes them. These are strictly separate operations. After the do action finishes writing files and reporting back, STOP. Do not start processing the queue, do not begin implementation, do not "helpfully" transition into the work action. The user decides when to execute — always. The only exception is if the user explicitly says something like "add this and then run it" or "capture this and start working" in the same invocation.

Routing Decision

Step 1: Parse the Input

Examine what follows "do work":

Check these patterns in order — first match wins:

PriorityPatternExampleRoute
1Empty or bare invocationdo work→ Ask: "Start the work loop?"
2Action verbs onlydo work run, do work go, do work start→ work
3Verify keywordsdo work verify, do work check, do work evaluate→ verify
4Cleanup keywordsdo work cleanup, do work tidy, do work consolidate→ cleanup
5Version keywordsdo work version, do work update, do work check for updates→ version
6Changelog keywordsdo work changelog, do work release notes, do work what's new, do work what's changed, do work updates, do work history→ version
7Descriptive contentdo work add dark mode, do work [meeting notes]→ do

Step 2: Preserve Payload

Critical rule: Never lose the user's content.

Single-word rule: A single word is either a known keyword or ambiguous — it is never "descriptive content."

  • Matches a keyword in the routing table (e.g., "version", "verify", "cleanup") → route to that action directly.
  • Doesn't match any keyword (e.g., "refactor", "optimize") → ambiguous. Ask: "Do you want to add '{word}' as a new request, or did you mean something else?"

Only route to do when the input is clearly descriptive — multiple words, a sentence, a feature request, etc.

If routing is genuinely unclear AND multi-word content was provided:

  • Default to do (adding a task)
  • Hold onto $ARGUMENTS
  • If truly ambiguous, ask: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  • User replies with just "add" or "work" → proceed with original content

Action Verbs (→ Work)

These signal "process the queue": run, go, start, begin, work, process, execute, build, continue, resume

Verify Verbs (→ Verify)

These signal "check request quality": verify, check, evaluate, review requests, review reqs, audit

Note: "check" routes to verify ONLY when used alone or with a target (e.g., "do work check UR-003"). When followed by descriptive content it routes to do (e.g., "do work check if the button works" → do).

Cleanup Verbs (→ Cleanup)

These signal "consolidate the archive": cleanup, clean up, tidy, consolidate, organize archive, fix archive

Changelog Verbs (→ Version)

These signal "show release notes": changelog, release notes, what's new, what's changed, updates, history

Note: "updates" (plural) routes to changelog display. "update" (singular) routes to update check. Both are handled by the version action.

Content Signals (→ Do)

These signal "add a new task":

  • Descriptive text beyond a single verb
  • Feature requests, bug reports, ideas
  • Screenshots or context
  • "add", "create", "I need", "we should"

Examples

Routes to Work

  • do work → "Ready to process the queue?" (confirmation)
  • do work run → Starts work action immediately
  • do work go → Starts work action immediately

Routes to Verify

  • do work verify → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work verify UR-003 → Evaluates specific UR
  • do work check REQ-018 → Evaluates the UR that REQ-018 belongs to
  • do work evaluate → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work review requests → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

Routes to Cleanup

  • do work cleanup → Consolidates archive, closes completed URs
  • do work tidy → Same as cleanup
  • do work consolidate → Same as cleanup

Routes to Changelog (via Version)

  • do work changelog → Displays changelog (newest at bottom)
  • do work release notes → Same as changelog
  • do work what's new → Same as changelog
  • do work updates → Same as changelog
  • do work history → Same as changelog

Routes to Do

  • do work add dark mode → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work the button is broken → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work [400 words] → Creates REQ files + UR folder with full verbatim input

Payload Preservation Rules

When clarification is needed but content was provided:

  1. Do not lose $ARGUMENTS - keep the full payload in context
  2. Ask a simple question: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  3. Accept minimal replies: User says just "add" or "work"
  4. Proceed with original content: Apply the chosen action to the stored arguments
  5. Never ask the user to re-paste content

This enables a two-phase commit pattern:

  1. Capture intent payload
  2. Confirm action

Action References

Follow the detailed instructions in:

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.76%
按下载量换算734

Claude

28.42%
按下载量换算618

Cursor

20.34%
按下载量换算442

Gemini CLI

8.59%
按下载量换算187

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills