Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

disqualification-handling(取消资格处理)

disqualification-handling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

disqualification-handling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,884。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 607下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:disqualification-handling(取消资格处理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/disqualification-handling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill disqualification-handling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill disqualification-handling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

处理未通过 ICP 资格验证线索的标准化响应流程。提供礼貌拒绝、转介请求与培育路由三种处理方式。确保每条线索都有明确去向,避免失联体验。支持批量线索分类与自动化回复文案生成。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

disqualification-handling 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/disqualification-handling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill disqualificatio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

disqualification-handling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill disqualification-handling。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

disqualification-handling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

disqualification-handling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

disqualification-handling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

disqualification-handling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次,GitHub 607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

disqualification-handling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
disqualification-handling

取消资格处理 · 本页

222607需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Disqualification Handling

Processes leads that didn't pass ICP qualification. Instead of ignoring them, this composite handles each category appropriately: polite rejection, referral request, or nurture routing. No inbound lead should feel ghosted.

When to Auto-Load

Load this composite when:

  • User says "handle the disqualified leads", "draft rejection emails", "what do we do with the ones that didn't qualify?"
  • inbound-lead-qualification has completed and disqualified/near-miss leads need handling
  • User has a list of leads that don't fit and wants appropriate responses

Architecture

[Disqualified Leads] → Step 1: Categorize → Step 2: Draft Responses → Step 3: Route to Destination
                              ↓                      ↓                         ↓
                     4 handling categories    Tailored email per type    Nurture/CRM/archive

Step 0: Configuration (Once Per Client)

On first run, establish response preferences. Save to clients/<client-name>/config/disqualification-handling.json.

{
  "sender_name": "",
  "sender_title": "",
  "company_name": "",
  "tone": "warm-professional | casual-friendly | formal",
  "nurture_sequence_tool": "Smartlead | HubSpot | Mailchimp | CSV export | none",
  "referral_incentive": "none | mention mutual value | offer resource",
  "include_resource_link": true,
  "resource_url": "",
  "resource_description": "",
  "feedback_survey_url": "",
  "do_not_contact_list": "Supabase | CSV | none"
}

On subsequent runs: Load config silently.


Step 1: Categorize Disqualified Leads

Input

Leads from inbound-lead-qualification with sub-verdicts. Categorize each into one of four handling paths:

Category 1: Right Company, Wrong Person → REFERRAL REQUEST

Trigger: mismatch_type = right_company_wrong_person

  • The company fits ICP but the person who came inbound isn't a buyer/champion/user
  • Example: A marketing intern at a perfect-fit company downloaded a whitepaper
  • Goal: Get an introduction to the right person at that company

Identify the referral target:

  • Using the ICP's buyer personas, determine who at this company we SHOULD be talking to
  • If enrichment data or CRM has other contacts at the company, note them (but still ask for the intro — warmer than cold outreach)

Category 2: Close But Not Quite → NURTURE (FUTURE FIT)

Trigger: sub_verdict = near_miss_nurture OR score 30-49 without a referral opportunity

  • Company is almost ICP but not today — too small, too early stage, wrong geography (but expanding), missing a key requirement that might change
  • Example: A 15-person startup that's clearly growing fast but below your 50-employee minimum
  • Goal: Stay on their radar. When they hit the threshold, you're top of mind.

Category 3: Clearly Outside ICP → POLITE DECLINE

Trigger: sub_verdict = disqualified_polite OR score < 30

  • Not a fit now and unlikely to become one
  • Example: A freelancer, a student, a company in an excluded industry
  • Goal: Decline gracefully. Don't burn bridges — they might refer someone, post about you, or their situation might change unexpectedly.

Category 4: Special Flags → ROUTE DIFFERENTLY

Trigger: sub_verdict = disqualified_competitor OR pipeline_status = existing_customer

  • Competitor employee: Do NOT send a rejection email. Log for competitive intelligence. No outreach.
  • Existing customer: Do NOT treat as disqualified. Route to customer success / account management. May be an upsell or support need.

Output

Each lead tagged with: handling_category, handling_action, referral_target_persona (for Category 1)


Step 2: Draft Responses

Category 1 Response: Referral Request Email

Objective: Thank them, subtly indicate they may not be the right person, and ask for an introduction — without making them feel dismissed.

Structure:

  1. Thank them for their interest (reference what they did — demo request, download, etc.)
  2. Acknowledge their role — show you understand what they do
  3. Pivot to the right person — frame it as "wanting to make sure the right person gets the most value"
  4. Make the ask easy — provide a specific persona/title to connect you with
  5. Offer something in return — a resource relevant to THEIR role (not just the buyer's)

Template framework:

Subject: Thanks for checking us out, [First Name]

Hi [First Name],

Thanks for [downloading our guide on X / requesting a demo / signing up for the trial].
[One sentence connecting their action to a genuine insight — "it's a great resource for
understanding Y."]

I took a look at [Company] — [one sentence showing you understand the company].
Given what [Product] does, I think [target persona title, e.g., "your VP of Engineering"
or "whoever leads infrastructure decisions"] would get the most out of a conversation
with us.

Would you be open to making an introduction? Happy to send you a quick blurb you
can forward, so it's zero effort on your end.

[If resource_link configured: "In the meantime, here's [resource] that might be
useful for [something relevant to THEIR role]."]

Thanks,
[Sender Name]

Rules:

  • Never say "you're not the right person" or "you don't have buying authority"
  • Never use the word "unfortunately" or "however"
  • Frame the referral as maximizing value, not correcting a mistake
  • Keep it under 120 words
  • If you know the specific name of the right person (from enrichment/CRM), mention them: "I think [Name] on your [team] would find this valuable"

Category 2 Response: Nurture Warm-Down Email

Objective: Keep the relationship warm without false promises. Position yourself as a future resource.

Structure:

  1. Thank them for their interest
  2. Be honest (but tactful) about fit — don't say "you're disqualified", say "given where [Company] is today, the timing might not be perfect"
  3. Offer genuine value — share a resource relevant to their current stage/situation
  4. Leave the door open — invite them to reach out when circumstances change
  5. No hard CTA — this is a soft touch, not a sales push

Template framework:

Subject: [First Name] — thanks for your interest in [Product]

Hi [First Name],

Thanks for [action they took]. I looked into [Company] and really like
[genuine compliment — what they're building, their growth, their approach].

Based on where [Company] is right now, I think [honest reason the timing
isn't right, framed positively — e.g., "you'd get the most value from us
once your team scales past X" or "this tends to be most impactful after Y
milestone"].

In the meantime, [here's a resource / I'd recommend / you might find this useful] —
[brief description of why it's relevant to them NOW, not just to your product].

I'll keep an eye on [Company] — would love to reconnect when the timing
is better. Feel free to reach out anytime.

Best,
[Sender Name]

Rules:

  • Never say "disqualified", "not a fit", "don't meet our criteria"
  • Frame timing as the issue, not them — "not yet" beats "not ever"
  • The shared resource should be genuinely useful to them at their current stage, not just a product pitch
  • Keep it under 100 words
  • Warm but not overly familiar

Category 3 Response: Polite Decline Email

Objective: Decline gracefully while leaving a positive impression of your brand.

Structure:

  1. Thank them for their interest
  2. Brief honest explanation — keep it high-level ("we specialize in X and it sounds like you need Y")
  3. Redirect if possible — suggest an alternative tool/service if you know one
  4. Close warmly

Template framework:

Subject: Thanks for reaching out, [First Name]

Hi [First Name],

Thanks for your interest in [Product]. I appreciate you taking the time to
[action they took].

We're focused specifically on [your niche/ICP in plain language], and it
sounds like [their situation — framed neutrally, not critically] might be
a different use case from what we're built for.

[If you know an alternative: "You might want to check out [Alternative] —
they're strong for [their actual need]."]

[If no alternative: "I don't want to waste your time, but if your needs
evolve, we'd be happy to chat."]

Best of luck with [something specific to their situation],
[Sender Name]

Rules:

  • Never apologize ("sorry we can't help") — you're not obligated
  • Never be dismissive or condescending
  • Keep it under 80 words
  • If you can genuinely suggest an alternative, do — it builds goodwill
  • Don't over-explain why they don't fit. One sentence is enough.

Category 4: No Email

  • Competitor: Add to competitive intel tracking. No outbound response. Log: "Competitor employee [Name] from [Company] engaged via [source] on [date]."
  • Existing customer: Draft a brief internal routing note: "Existing customer [Company] ([contact name]) came inbound via [source]. Current plan: [plan]. Account owner: [owner]. Possible upsell signal." Route to CS/AM.

Step 3: Route to Destination

For Each Category:

CategoryEmail ActionCRM ActionSequence Action
Referral RequestDraft ready for human review & sendTag as referral_pendingNone — single touch
NurtureDraft ready for human review & sendTag as nurture_future_fit, set reminder for re-evaluation in 3-6 monthsAdd to nurture drip if configured
Polite DeclineDraft ready for human review & sendTag as disqualified_responded, note reasonNone — single touch
CompetitorNo emailTag as competitor_employee, log in competitive intelNone
Existing CustomerNo sales emailFlag for CS/AM team, note the inbound actionNone

Nurture Sequence Setup (Category 2)

If a nurture sequence tool is configured:

  1. Group nurture leads by their "why not yet" reason — this determines the drip content
  2. Suggest sequence themes:

- "Too small right now" → Growth-stage content, case studies of similar companies that grew into ICP - "Wrong stage" → Stage-appropriate content, milestone-based check-ins - "Missing requirement" → Product update notifications, roadmap content

  1. Add to appropriate sequence or produce a CSV for manual import

Re-Evaluation Triggers

For Category 2 (nurture) leads, define when to re-evaluate:

  • Company raises funding → re-run qualification
  • Company headcount crosses threshold → re-run qualification
  • Person gets promoted → re-run qualification
  • 6 months have passed → manual re-evaluation prompt

If signal composites are active (funding-signal-outreach, hiring-signal-outreach, champion-move-outreach), these triggers happen automatically.


Output Format

Primary: Response Queue for Human Review

## Disqualification Handling: [Date]

### Summary
- **Total disqualified/near-miss leads:** X
- **Referral requests (right co, wrong person):** X
- **Nurture (future fit):** X
- **Polite decline:** X
- **Competitor (no response):** X
- **Existing customer (route to CS):** X

---

### Referral Requests — Review & Send

#### [Name] — [Title] at [Company]
- **Why not them:** [one sentence — e.g., "Marketing coordinator, we need VP Engineering"]
- **Referral target:** [Title/persona we want to reach]
- **Known contacts at company:** [from enrichment/CRM, if any]
- **Draft email:**
  > [email draft]

---

### Nurture — Review & Send

#### [Name] — [Title] at [Company]
- **Why not yet:** [one sentence — e.g., "20 employees, ICP starts at 50"]
- **Re-evaluate when:** [trigger — e.g., "headcount crosses 50" or "6 months"]
- **Draft email:**
  > [email draft]

---

### Polite Decline — Review & Send

#### [Name] — [Title] at [Company]
- **Why not a fit:** [one sentence]
- **Suggested alternative:** [if known]
- **Draft email:**
  > [email draft]

---

### Flagged (No Outreach)

**Competitors:**
- [Name] from [Company] — [what they did] on [date]

**Existing Customers:**
- [Name] from [Company] — [what they did] — Current account owner: [name]

Secondary: CSV Export

Append to the qualification CSV or produce a separate handling CSV:

  • All lead fields + handling_category, handling_action, email_draft, referral_target, nurture_trigger, re_evaluate_date

Save to: clients/<client-name>/leads/disqualification-handling-[date].csv


Handling Edge Cases

Lead who's clearly a bot or spam: Skip all categories. Tag as spam and archive. Don't waste an email draft. Signs: gibberish name, test@test.com, form filled in < 2 seconds, obvious fake company.

Lead who requested a demo but is clearly disqualified: Still draft a polite decline. A demo request deserves a human response even if the answer is no. Consider: if they're a strong referral opportunity (right company), prioritize the referral path over the decline path.

Lead at a competitor's customer: This is NOT a competitor employee — this is someone at a company that uses a competitor. They came inbound, which means they might be looking to switch. Do NOT disqualify. Route back to qualification as a high-priority signal.

Multiple people from the same company, some qualified, some not: For disqualified people at a company where someone else qualified: Draft a softer version that acknowledges "we're already in touch with your team at [Company]" — don't send a rejection to someone whose colleague is in active talks.

Lead who's a journalist, analyst, or investor: Not a customer, but not a "decline" either. Flag separately: "Non-customer interest from [Name], [Role] at [Publication/Fund]. May be PR/AR opportunity." Route to marketing or founder.

Very high-volume batches (50+ disqualified):

  • Category 3 (polite decline) and Category 2 (nurture) can use lighter-touch templates rather than personalized drafts
  • Category 1 (referral requests) should always be personalized — these are the highest-value disqualified leads

Email Hard Rules

All draft emails must follow these rules regardless of category:

  1. No lies. Don't say "we'd love to work with you" if you're declining them.
  2. No guilt. Don't make them feel bad for reaching out.
  3. No jargon. "ICP", "qualification", "disqualified" never appear in emails.
  4. Brevity. Referral < 120 words. Nurture < 100 words. Decline < 80 words.
  5. One CTA maximum. Referral: make the intro. Nurture: check the resource. Decline: none or soft redirect.
  6. No false urgency. These are goodwill emails, not sales emails.
  7. Genuine value. If you offer a resource, it should actually help them — not be a disguised pitch.
  8. Reply-friendly. Write in a way that they COULD reply if they wanted to. No "noreply" energy.

Tools Required

  • Email drafting — references email-drafting capability for tone and structure
  • CRM access — to update lead status, add tags, set reminders
  • Nurture sequence tool — to add leads to drip campaigns (Smartlead, HubSpot, etc.)
  • Supabase client — for pipeline lookups and signal cross-reference
  • Read/Write — for CSV output and config management

平台分布

Codex

36.22%
按下载量换算25

Claude

31.97%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

18.99%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

10.4%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills