Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

dex(右旋糖酐)

dex 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

dex 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 197。

总安装 10,181周安装 420GitHub Stars 297下载 3,326核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dex(右旋糖酐)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dcramer/dex
仓库路径:skills/dex
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dcramer/dex --skill dex
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dcramer/dex --skill dex

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

dex 用于协调开发任务流转,将 Issue 转化为结构化 Ticket 进行管理。每个任务包含名称、背景和结果三部分,确保上下文完整可追溯。适用于 GitHub 仓库协作流程优化,提升代码变更和 PR 审查效率。需配合 npx 使用或通过 PATH 配置全局调用,依赖本地 git 环境。

dex 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dex

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dcramer/dex --skill dex;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

dex 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dcramer/dex --skill dex。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dex 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dex 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

dex 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

dex 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 10,181 次,近一周安装 420 次,下载 3,326 次,GitHub 297 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dex 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
dex

右旋糖酐 · 本页

10,181297只读MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Agent Coordination with dex

Command Invocation

Use dex directly for all commands. If not on PATH, use npx @zeeg/dex instead.

command -v dex &>/dev/null && echo "use: dex" || echo "use: npx @zeeg/dex"

Core Principle: Tickets, Not Todos

Dex tasks are tickets - structured artifacts with comprehensive context:

  • Name: One-line summary (issue title)
  • Description: Full background, requirements, approach (issue body)
  • Result: Implementation details, decisions, outcomes (PR description)

Think: "Would someone understand the what, why, and how from this task alone?"

Dex Tasks are Ephemeral

Never reference dex task IDs in external artifacts (commits, PRs, docs). Task IDs like abc123 become meaningless once tasks are completed. Describe the work itself, not the task that tracked it.

When to Use dex

Use dex when:

  • Breaking down complexity into subtasks
  • Work spans multiple sessions
  • Context needs to persist for handoffs
  • Recording decisions for future reference

Skip dex when:

  • Work is a single atomic action
  • Everything fits in one session with no follow-up
  • Overhead exceeds value

dex vs Built-in Task Tools

Some AI agents (like Claude Code) have built-in task tools. These are session-only and not the same as dex.

dexBuilt-in Task Tools
PersistenceFiles in .dex/Session-only
ContextRich (description + context + result)Basic
Hierarchy3-level (epic → task → subtask)Flat

Use dex for persistent work. Use built-in task tools for ephemeral in-session tracking only.

Basic Workflow

Create a Task

dex create "Short name" --description "Full implementation context"

Description should include: what needs to be done, why, implementation approach, and acceptance criteria. See examples.md for good/bad examples.

List and View Tasks

dex list                  # Pending tasks
dex list --ready          # Unblocked tasks
dex show <id>             # Full details

Complete a Task

dex complete <id> --result "What was accomplished" --commit <sha>

GitHub/Shortcut-linked tasks require either --commit <sha> or --no-commit:

  • Use --commit <sha> when you have code changes (issue closes when merged)
  • Use --no-commit for non-code tasks like planning or design (issue stays open)

Always verify before completing. Results must include evidence: test counts, build status, manual testing outcomes. See verification.md for the full checklist.

Edit and Delete

dex edit <id> --description "Updated description"
dex delete <id>

For full CLI reference including blockers, see cli-reference.md.

Understanding Task Fields

Tasks have two text fields:

  • Name: Brief one-line summary (shown in dex list)
  • Description: Full details - requirements, approach, acceptance criteria (shown with --full)

When you run dex show <id>, the description may be truncated. The CLI will hint at --full if there's more content.

Gathering Context

When picking up a task, gather all relevant context:

dex show <id> --full              # Full task details
dex show <parent-id> --full       # Parent context (if applicable)
dex show <blocker-id> --full      # What blockers accomplished

Before starting, verify you can answer:

  • What needs to be done specifically?
  • Why is this needed?
  • How should it be implemented?
  • When is it done (acceptance criteria)?

If any answer is unclear:

  1. Check parent task or completed blockers for more details
  2. Suggest entering plan mode to flesh out requirements before starting

Proceed without full context when:

  • Task is trivial/atomic (e.g., "Add.gitignore entry")
  • Conversation already provides the missing context
  • Description itself is sufficiently detailed

Task Hierarchies

Three levels: Epic (large initiative) → Task (significant work) → Subtask (atomic step).

Choosing the right level:

  • Small feature (1-2 files) → Single task
  • Medium feature (3-7 steps) → Task with subtasks
  • Large initiative (5+ tasks) → Epic with tasks
# Create subtask under parent
dex create --parent <id> "Subtask name" --description "..."

For detailed hierarchy guidance, see hierarchies.md.

Recording Results

Complete tasks immediately after implementing AND verifying:

  • Capture decisions while fresh
  • Note deviations from plan
  • Document verification performed
  • Create follow-up tasks for tech debt

Your result must include explicit verification evidence. Don't just describe what you did—prove it works. See verification.md.

Commit Messages with GitHub Issues

When a task is linked to a GitHub issue (shown in dex show output), include issue references in commit messages:

  • Root tasks (the task itself has GitHub metadata): Use Fixes #N

- This closes the issue when merged

  • Subtasks (parent/ancestor has GitHub metadata): Use Refs #N

- This links to the issue without closing it

Check dex show <id> for GitHub issue info before committing. The "(via parent)" indicator means use Refs, direct metadata means use Fixes.

Best Practices

  1. Right-size tasks: Completable in one focused session
  2. Clear completion criteria: Description should define "done"
  3. Don't over-decompose: 3-7 children per parent
  4. Action-oriented descriptions: Start with verbs ("Add", "Fix", "Update")
  5. Verify before completing: Tests passing, manual testing done

Additional Resources

平台分布

Claude Code

25.53%
按下载量换算849

OpenCode

21.31%
按下载量换算709

Codex

17.68%
按下载量换算588

Cursor

13.91%
按下载量换算463

Gemini CLI

7.07%
按下载量换算235

Antigravity

3.05%
按下载量换算101

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills