Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

detecting-secrets(侦查秘密)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

detecting-secrets 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,122。

总安装 661周安装 27GitHub Stars 84下载 212核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:detecting-secrets(侦查秘密)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins
仓库路径:skills/detecting-secrets
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill detecting-secrets
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill detecting-secrets

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查,适合梳理敏感配置或生成安全复核清单。可分析代码中的 API 密钥、连接字符串和令牌模式,识别常见漏洞。通过命令行安装并使用,需结合具体代码库进行扫描验证。涉及密钥或生产系统时,应确认最小权限和操作边界,避免直接依赖工具输出。

detecting-secrets 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/detecting-secrets

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill detecting-secrets;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

detecting-secrets 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill detecting-secrets。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

detecting-secrets 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

detecting-secrets 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

detecting-secrets 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

detecting-secrets 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 661 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 212 次,GitHub 84 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

detecting-secrets 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
detecting-secrets

侦查秘密 · 本页

66184接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Secret Patterns

Look for these categories of hardcoded secrets in code:

High-Confidence Patterns

TypeExample Patterns
API KeysAKIA[0-9A-Z]{16} (AWS), AIza[0-9A-Za-z_-]{35} (Google), strings assigned to variables named *apiKey*, *api_key*
Connection StringsServer=...;Password=..., mongodb://user:pass@host, postgres://user:pass@host
Private Keys-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----, -----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
Tokensghp_[A-Za-z0-9]{36} (GitHub PAT), xoxb- (Slack bot), sk- (OpenAI)
PasswordsValues assigned to variables named *password*, *passwd*, *secret*, *credential*
CertificatesPFX/P12 files with embedded passwords, PEM files with private keys

Lower-Confidence Patterns (Require Context)

  • Base64-encoded strings in configuration (may be encrypted or may be cleartext secrets)
  • JWT tokens (may be test tokens or production tokens)
  • Hex strings of 32+ characters (may be encryption keys or hashes)
  • URLs with embedded credentials (https://user:pass@host)

Context-Aware Detection

Distinguish real secrets from false positives. Not every pattern match indicates an actual secret — consider context:

Test Fixtures and Mock Data

// NOT a real secret — test fixture with obvious fake value
var testApiKey = "test-api-key-not-real-12345";
var mockPassword = "P@ssword123"; // Used only in unit tests

// REAL secret — production-looking value in non-test code
var apiKey = "sk-proj-abc123def456ghi789jkl012mno345pqr678stu901vwx";

Decision criteria:

  • Is it in a test directory (**/test/**, **/tests/**, **/*.Test/**)?
  • Does the value contain obvious placeholder text ("test", "fake", "mock", "example", "placeholder")?
  • Is the value used in assertions or mock setups?

Example and Placeholder Values

// NOT a real secret — documented example
{
  "apiKey": "YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
}

// REAL secret — actual value in config
{
  "apiKey": "sk-proj-abc123def456ghi789jkl012mno345pqr678stu901vwx"
}

Encrypted or Hashed Values

  • Hashed passwords (bcrypt $2b$, argon2 $argon2id$) are NOT secrets — they're properly stored
  • Encrypted values with proper key management are NOT secrets in the same way
  • But the encryption KEY itself, if hardcoded, IS a secret

Common Hiding Spots

Search these locations when auditing for secrets:

LocationWhat to Look For
appsettings.json / appsettings.Development.jsonConnection strings, API keys, service credentials
.env / .env.localEnvironment variable definitions with real values
web.config / app.configMachine keys, connection strings
docker-compose.yml / DockerfileENV directives with credentials, build args with secrets
CI/CD files (.github/workflows/*.yml)Inline secrets instead of ${{secrets.*}} references
Test seed scripts / migration filesDatabase passwords, service account credentials
Comments and TODO notes"Temporary" credentials left in comments
Default parameter valuesfunction connect(password = "admin123")
Constants filesCentralized credential definitions

GitHub Secret Scanning Integration

# List all secret scanning alerts
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/alerts --jq '.[] | {number, state, secret_type, secret_type_display_name, created_at, push_protection_bypassed}'

# Get details for a specific alert
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/alerts/{alert_number}

# List alerts that bypassed push protection
gh api "/repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/alerts?state=open" --jq '.[] | select(.push_protection_bypassed == true)'

Push protection prevents commits containing detected secrets from being pushed. When someone bypasses push protection, the alert is flagged — review these with extra scrutiny.

Remediation Workflow

When a secret is found in code, follow this sequence:

1. Rotate Immediately

Assume any committed secret is compromised. Even if the repo is private, the secret may have been cached, logged, or accessed by CI/CD systems.

  • Revoke the existing credential
  • Generate a new credential
  • Update the credential wherever it's used (services, deployments)

2. Remove from Code

Replace the hardcoded secret with a secure reference:

// WRONG — hardcoded secret
var connectionString = "Server=prod.db;Password=s3cr3t!";

// CORRECT — environment variable
var connectionString = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("DB_CONNECTION_STRING");

// CORRECT — Azure Key Vault (Bitwarden's approach)
var connectionString = await keyVaultClient.GetSecretAsync("db-connection-string");

3. Remove from Git History (If Needed)

If the secret was committed to a public repo or a repo that will become public:

# Using git filter-repo (preferred over filter-branch)
git filter-repo --path-glob '*.json' --replace-text expressions.txt

# expressions.txt format:
# literal:the-secret-value==>REDACTED

Warning: Rewriting git history is destructive and affects all collaborators. Only do this when the secret was exposed in a public or soon-to-be-public repository.

4. Prevent Recurrence

  • Add patterns to .gitignore for files that should never be committed (.env, *.pfx, appsettings.Development.json)
  • Enable GitHub push protection for the repository
  • Use secret scanning custom patterns for organization-specific secret formats

Secure Alternatives

Bitwarden uses Azure Key Vault for secrets management, provisioned by the BRE team:

Instead OfUse
Hardcoded connection stringsAzure Key Vault secrets
API keys in config filesEnvironment variables set at deployment
Certificates in sourceAzure Key Vault certificates
Shared team credentials in codeManaged identities (Azure)
Secrets in CI/CD workflow filesGitHub Actions secrets (${{secrets.NAME}})

For local development, use user-secrets or .env files that are .gitignored — never commit them.

Critical Rules

  • Assume any committed secret is compromised. Always rotate, even if the repo is private. No exceptions.
  • Never suppress secret scanning alerts without rotation. Dismissing an alert doesn't make the exposure go away.
  • Validation, not just detection. When a potential secret is found, verify it's real before raising an alarm. Check if it's a test value, placeholder, or encrypted content.
  • Check the full commit history. A secret removed in the latest commit may still exist in git history. Use git log -p -S "secret-pattern" to search history.
  • Bitwarden uses Azure Key Vault for secrets management. If a new secret needs to be stored, work with BRE to provision vault access for the repository.

平台分布

Codex

37.39%
按下载量换算79

Claude

31.01%
按下载量换算66

Cursor

16.76%
按下载量换算36

Gemini CLI

8.42%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills