Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

design-justice(设计正义)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

design-justice 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 35,294。

总安装 2,109周安装 87GitHub Stars 98下载 689核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:design-justice(设计正义)
来源仓库:https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills
仓库路径:skills/design-justice
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill design-justice
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill design-justice

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

以公平为中心的数字设计理念,服务边缘群体并惠及主流用户。融合 Sasha Costanza-Chock 的设计正义理论与创伤知情设计原则。适用于服务康复人群、政府科技与健康门户等敏感领域。

安装方式:GitHub,命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill design-justice。注意:强调最受影响群体的中心地位,避免将用户需求视为边缘案例。

来源仓库内路径:skills/design-justice

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill design-j…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

design-justice 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill design-justice。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

design-justice 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

design-justice 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

design-justice 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

design-justice 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,109 次,近一周安装 87 次,下载 689 次,GitHub 98 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

design-justice 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
design-justice

设计正义 · 本页

2,10998操作浏览器MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Design Justice: Equity-Centered Digital Design

Design for the margins, benefit the center. If it works for someone with no stable phone, unstable housing, trauma history, and low digital literacy → it works better for everyone.

Philosophy

Design Justice (Sasha Costanza-Chock) + Trauma-Informed Design + Digital Equity Design

Core principle: The people most impacted by design decisions should be centered in the design process, not treated as edge cases.

When to Use

✅ Use for:

  • Apps serving recovery/reentry populations
  • Government/civic tech applications
  • Healthcare portals for vulnerable populations
  • Housing/benefits applications
  • Legal aid and court self-help tools
  • Nonprofit service delivery platforms
  • Any app used on shared/public devices

❌ NOT for:

  • Enterprise B2B SaaS (different constraints)
  • Marketing funnel optimization
  • Gamification/engagement maximization
  • Social media features
  • General "make it pretty" UX requests

Decision Tree: Which Pattern Applies?

User has unstable phone number?
├── YES → See: Authentication Without Stable Phones
└── NO → Standard auth OK

User may lose internet mid-task?
├── YES → See: Offline-First Design
└── NO → Standard web patterns OK

User may be on shared/public device?
├── YES → See: Shared Device Privacy
└── NO → Standard session management OK

Form is complex or emotionally difficult?
├── YES → See: Trauma-Informed Forms
└── NO → Standard form patterns OK

User has history of system trauma?
├── YES → Apply ALL trauma-informed patterns
└── UNKNOWN → Assume YES for civic/legal/benefits apps

Pattern 1: Authentication Without Stable Phones

Anti-Pattern: Phone-First Auth

Novice thinking: "Everyone has a phone, SMS 2FA is secure"

Reality:

  • 25% of formerly incarcerated people lack stable phone access
  • Phone numbers change frequently during housing instability
  • Prepaid phones get disconnected for non-payment
  • SMS 2FA locks people out of critical services

Timeline:

  • Pre-2020: SMS 2FA considered best practice
  • 2020+: Code for America documented access barriers
  • 2024+: Email-first + backup codes emerging as standard for civic tech

Correct Patterns

NeedPatternImplementation
Primary authEmail-firstEmail is identifier, phone optional
2FAMultiple pathwaysEmail OR backup codes OR case worker verification
RecoveryPrintable codesOne-time codes that can be written down
BypassTrusted intermediaryCase managers verify via org email
Essential accessNo-signup modeCore features work without account

Implementation Checklist

□ Email is primary identifier (phone optional)
□ Backup codes can be printed/written
□ Case worker recovery pathway exists
□ Core features work without login
□ Sessions are not device-locked
□ Phone number changes don't lock accounts
□ "Forgot password" has non-SMS option

Pattern 2: Offline-First / Intermittent Access

Anti-Pattern: Always-Online Assumption

Novice thinking: "Just show 'No connection' error"

Reality:

  • Public library computers have session limits
  • Mobile data runs out mid-month
  • Shelter wifi is unreliable
  • Users may have ONE chance to complete a form

Correct Patterns

NeedPatternImplementation
Data persistenceLocal-firstSave to localStorage/IndexedDB immediately
Form stateAuto-saveSave every field change, not just on submit
SubmissionBackground syncQueue actions, sync when connection returns
UI feedbackOptimistic updatesUpdate UI immediately, sync in background
ProgressResume anywhereLet users pick up exactly where they left off
StatusVisible sync state"Saved locally" / "Syncing..." / "Up to date"
DegradationGraceful offlineCore features work without network

Implementation Checklist

□ PWA with service worker caching
□ All form data saves to localStorage on every change
□ Clear sync status indicator visible
□ Offline mode tested (airplane mode)
□ Background sync when connection returns
□ No data loss on connection drop (verified)
□ Multi-step flows don't timeout
□ Minimal asset downloads (text-first views available)

Code Pattern: Auto-Save Hook

// Save form state on every change
function useAutoSave(key: string, data: any) {
  useEffect(() => {
    localStorage.setItem(key, JSON.stringify({
      data,
      savedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
      synced: false
    }));
  }, [key, data]);

  // Return saved data on mount
  return useMemo(() => {
    const saved = localStorage.getItem(key);
    return saved ? JSON.parse(saved).data : null;
  }, [key]);
}

Pattern 3: Shared/Public Device Privacy

Anti-Pattern: Persistent Sessions

Novice thinking: "Remember me improves UX"

Reality:

  • Library computers used by multiple people
  • Shelter computers are shared
  • Previous user's data visible = safety risk
  • Domestic violence survivors need privacy

Correct Patterns

NeedPatternImplementation
Default statePrivacy mode ONDon't auto-save sensitive info
LogoutProminent buttonMake it obvious, not buried in menu
TimeoutWarning + auto-logout"5 min left. Continue?"
FormsNo autofill defaultDisable browser autofill on sensitive fields
Mode toggle"Public computer?"One-click extra privacy mode
CookiesSession-only optionClear on browser close

Implementation Checklist

□ "Remember me" is UNCHECKED by default
□ Logout button visible on every page
□ Session timeout with save-progress warning
□ Sensitive fields have autocomplete="off"
□ Incognito mode suggested in UI for public computers
□ No cached personal data after logout
□ "Working on a shared computer?" toggle available

Pattern 4: Trauma-Informed Forms & Flows

Anti-Pattern: Bureaucratic Interrogation

Novice thinking: "Collect all info upfront for efficiency"

Reality:

  • Long forms trigger overwhelm and abandonment
  • Red error text is shame-triggering
  • Legal jargon creates anxiety
  • Surprise requirements feel like traps
  • "Tell your story" boxes are cognitively overwhelming

Correct Patterns

NeedPatternImplementation
LengthChunked progressBreak into short sections, save each
LanguagePlain language6th-8th grade reading level
ComplexityOne question/pageFor difficult topics
ProgressClear indicators"Step 2 of 5" always visible
ValidationForgiving inputAuto-format, accept variations
DefaultsSmart prefillPre-fill what you can infer
HelpInline, not hiddenHelp text visible, not in modals
FlowSkip and returnNever force-block on optional fields

Tone Guidelines

✅ Use:

  • Person-first language: "Person with a conviction"
  • Transparent timelines: "We'll review in 3-5 days"
  • Acknowledgment: "This process can be frustrating"
  • Affirming: "You're making progress"

❌ Avoid:

  • Shame language: "Your criminal past..."
  • Vague timelines: "We'll get back to you"
  • Blame: "You didn't complete..."
  • Guilt assumptions: "Your offense..."

Color & Visual Guidelines

✅ Calm palette:
- Success: Soft green (#4a9d9e), not aggressive lime
- Warning: Warm amber (#d4a03a), not alarming yellow
- Error: Muted terracotta (#c97a5d), not aggressive red
- Background: Cream/warm neutrals

❌ Avoid:
- Aggressive red for errors
- High-contrast warning colors
- Flashing or pulsing elements
- Visual "alarm" states

Implementation Checklist

□ No form longer than 5 fields per page
□ Progress indicator on all multi-step flows
□ Help text inline, not in tooltips/modals
□ Forgiving validation (formats automatically)
□ No required fields that aren't truly required
□ "Skip for now" on optional sections
□ Calm color palette (no aggressive reds)
□ Person-first language throughout
□ Clear "what happens next" on every screen

Pattern 5: Expungement/Record Clearance Specific

Anti-Pattern: Assuming User Knowledge

Novice thinking: "They know their case numbers"

Reality:

  • People don't remember case numbers from years ago
  • Legal terminology is confusing
  • County/jurisdiction boundaries are unclear
  • Documents may be inaccessible

Correct Patterns

NeedPatternImplementation
EligibilityChecker firstShow if qualified BEFORE collecting info
DocumentsMultiple upload methodsEmail, fax, mail, in-person, photo
LocationAuto-detectionDon't make them figure out jurisdiction
RecordsLookup toolsHelp them find their own case numbers
TermsPlain languageDefine every legal term
TimelineExplicit expectations"Most cases take 60-90 days"
FeesWaiver prominentFee waiver should be default path

Implementation Checklist

□ Eligibility checker before signup/info collection
□ Case number lookup tool or "I don't know" option
□ County auto-detected from address
□ Document upload alternatives (not just scan)
□ Legal terms have inline definitions
□ Expected timeline stated clearly
□ Fee waiver is default, not hidden option
□ "Not eligible" includes explanation WHY

Code for America Principles

The gold standard for civic tech:

  1. Automatic > Petition-based - Don't require action from people with records
  2. No-cost by default - Fee waivers automatic, not applied for
  3. Government does the work - Don't burden individuals
  4. Co-design with impacted people - Not just user research ON them
  5. Assume gaps in data - Design around incomplete records
  6. Backend automation - Minimal staff time, no manual bottlenecks

Quick Audit Checklist

Run this against any civic/legal/benefits application:

AUTHENTICATION
□ Can user sign up with just email?
□ Is there a non-SMS account recovery option?
□ Do core features work without login?

OFFLINE/INTERMITTENT
□ Does form data survive connection loss?
□ Is there visible "saved" indicator?
□ Can user resume exactly where they left off?

SHARED DEVICES
□ Is "remember me" unchecked by default?
□ Is logout button prominent?
□ Does session timeout with warning?

FORMS
□ Is reading level ≤8th grade?
□ Are there ≤5 fields per page?
□ Is help text inline (not hidden)?
□ Are required fields truly required?

TONE
□ Is language person-first?
□ Are timelines explicit?
□ Is error messaging non-blaming?
□ Are colors calm (no aggressive red)?

LEGAL/EXPUNGEMENT SPECIFIC
□ Is eligibility checked first?
□ Are fee waivers prominent?
□ Is "I don't know my case number" handled?

References

  • /references/authentication-patterns.md - Detailed auth implementation
  • /references/offline-first-patterns.md - PWA and sync patterns
  • /references/trauma-informed-language.md - Tone and word choice guide
  • /references/code-for-america-learnings.md - CfA case studies

Key Readings

  • Design Justice Network principles
  • Code for America's design principles
  • C4 Innovations equity work (homeless response systems)
  • Innovation Unit's digital access for rough sleepers
  • Sasha Costanza-Chock: "Design Justice" (2020)

平台分布

Claude Code

27.1%
按下载量换算187

windsurf

22.71%
按下载量换算156

Codex

18.88%
按下载量换算130

Antigravity

12.58%
按下载量换算87

OpenCode

8.16%
按下载量换算56

Cursor

3.49%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills