Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

design-documentation(设计文档)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

design-documentation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,980。

总安装 2,424周安装 70GitHub Stars 636下载 792核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:design-documentation(设计文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro
仓库路径:skills/design-documentation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于创建系统级技术蓝图,衔接需求与实现之间的设计决策。适合记录架构选择、组件交互及复杂集成场景下的设计逻辑。提供标准模板和结构化框架,确保文档覆盖关键维度和评审要点。需基于已批准的需求阶段开展工作,避免在未对齐目标时推进细节设计。

design-documentation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/design-documentation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

design-documentation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

design-documentation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

design-documentation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

design-documentation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

design-documentation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,424 次,近一周安装 70 次,下载 792 次,GitHub 636 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

design-documentation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
design-documentation

设计文档 · 本页

2,424636接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Design Documentation

Create technical blueprints that bridge requirements and implementation. This skill teaches how to document architecture decisions, component design, and system interactions.

When to Use This Skill

Use design documentation when:

  • Requirements phase is complete and approved
  • You need to plan technical implementation
  • Multiple developers will work on the feature
  • Architecture decisions need documentation
  • The feature involves complex integrations

Design Document Structure

Standard Template

# Design Document: [Feature Name]

## Overview
[High-level summary of the feature and approach]

## Architecture
[System architecture and component overview]

## Components and Interfaces
[Detailed component descriptions and interactions]

## Data Models
[Data structures and relationships]

## Error Handling
[Error scenarios and response strategies]

## Testing Strategy
[Testing approach and quality assurance]

Step-by-Step Process

Step 1: Requirements Analysis

Before designing, ensure you understand:

  • All functional requirements
  • Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
  • Constraints (technology stack, timeline, resources)
  • Integration points with existing systems

Analysis Questions:

  • What does the system need to do?
  • What are the performance expectations?
  • What existing code/systems does this touch?
  • What are the security requirements?
  • What could go wrong?

Step 2: Research and Context Building

Identify areas needing research:

  • Technology choices and alternatives
  • Third-party integrations and APIs
  • Best practices for similar systems
  • Security and compliance considerations

Research Documentation:

## Research Findings

### [Topic]
**Sources:** [Links/references]
**Key Insights:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Impact on Design:** [How this affects our approach]

Step 3: Define System Architecture

Document the high-level structure:

## Architecture

### System Overview
[How the overall system works]

### Component Architecture
[Major components and their responsibilities]

### Data Flow
[How information moves through the system]

### Technology Decisions
[Key technology choices and rationale]

Architecture Diagram (Mermaid):

graph TD
    A[Client] --> B[API Gateway]
    B --> C[Auth Service]
    B --> D[Feature Service]
    D --> E[Database]
    D --> F[Cache]

Step 4: Design Components and Interfaces

For each major component:

## Components and Interfaces

### [Component Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]

**Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]

**Interfaces:**
- Input: [What it receives]
- Output: [What it produces]
- Dependencies: [What it requires]

**API Definition:**

interface ComponentName { method(input: InputType): Promise<OutputType>; }

Step 5: Define Data Models

Document all data structures:

## Data Models

### [Entity Name]
**Purpose:** [What this entity represents]

**Properties:**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| id | string | Yes | Unique identifier |
| name | string | Yes | Display name |
| createdAt | Date | Yes | Creation timestamp |

**Validation Rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]

**Relationships:**
- [Relationship to other entities]

**Example:**

{ "id": "abc123", "name": "Example", "createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z" }

Step 6: Plan Error Handling

Document error scenarios:

## Error Handling

### Error Categories
1. **Validation Errors:** Invalid user input
2. **Authentication Errors:** Unauthorized access
3. **External Service Errors:** Third-party failures
4. **System Errors:** Internal failures

### Error Response Strategy

| Error Type | HTTP Code | User Message | System Action |
|------------|-----------|--------------|---------------|
| Validation | 400 | Specific field error | Log, return details |
| Auth | 401 | "Please log in" | Redirect to login |
| Not Found | 404 | "Resource not found" | Log, return error |
| Server | 500 | "Something went wrong" | Log, alert, retry |

### Recovery Mechanisms
- [Retry strategies]
- [Fallback behaviors]
- [Circuit breaker patterns]

Step 7: Define Testing Strategy

## Testing Strategy

### Unit Testing
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
- **Focus Areas:** [Critical business logic]
- **Mocking Strategy:** [What to mock]

### Integration Testing
- **Scope:** [Component interactions to test]
- **Environment:** [Test environment setup]
- **Data Strategy:** [Test data approach]

### End-to-End Testing
- **Critical Paths:** [User journeys to test]
- **Tools:** [Testing tools]

### Performance Testing
- **Load Targets:** [Expected load]
- **Benchmarks:** [Performance requirements]

Decision Documentation

Document key decisions using this template:

### Decision: [Brief Title]

**Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]

**Options Considered:**

**Option 1: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]

**Option 2: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]

**Decision:** [Chosen option]

**Rationale:** [Why this option was selected]

**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]

Common Design Decisions

API Design

### Decision: API Architecture

**Options:**
1. **REST API** - Standard HTTP methods, well-understood
2. **GraphQL** - Flexible queries, single endpoint
3. **RPC-style** - Direct operation mapping

**Decision:** REST API
**Rationale:** Standard CRUD operations, team familiarity, good tooling support

Data Storage

### Decision: Database Choice

**Options:**
1. **PostgreSQL** - ACID compliance, complex queries
2. **MongoDB** - Schema flexibility, horizontal scaling
3. **Redis** - High performance, limited queries

**Decision:** PostgreSQL with JSON columns
**Rationale:** Data consistency needs + flexibility for user preferences

Authentication

### Decision: Authentication Strategy

**Options:**
1. **Session-based** - Server-controlled, simple
2. **JWT tokens** - Stateless, scalable
3. **OAuth 2.0** - External provider, no password management

**Decision:** JWT with refresh token rotation
**Rationale:** Scalability requirements, API-first architecture

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing design:

Completeness:

  • All requirements addressed in design
  • Major system components defined
  • Data models cover all entities
  • Error handling covers expected failures
  • Testing strategy addresses all layers

Clarity:

  • Design decisions clearly explained
  • Component responsibilities well-defined
  • Interfaces between components specified
  • Technical choices include rationale

Feasibility:

  • Design is technically achievable
  • Performance requirements can be met
  • Security requirements addressed
  • Implementation complexity reasonable

Traceability:

  • Design elements map to requirements
  • All requirements covered by design
  • Testing validates requirement fulfillment

Common Pitfalls

  1. Over-Engineering: Design for current requirements, not hypothetical futures
  2. Under-Specified Interfaces: Define clear component boundaries
  3. Ignoring Non-Functional Requirements: Address performance, security, scalability
  4. Technology-First Design: Let requirements drive technology choices
  5. Insufficient Error Handling: Plan for failures, not just happy paths

Example: User Profile Design

# Design Document: User Profile Management

## Overview
Enable users to view and edit their profile information, including personal details, preferences, and profile picture.

## Architecture

### Component Architecture

┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │ Client │────▶│ Profile API │────▶│ Database │ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌──────────────┐ │ Image Store │ └──────────────┘

### Technology Stack
- API: Node.js with Express
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Image Storage: S3-compatible object storage
- Cache: Redis for session data

## Components

### ProfileService
**Purpose:** Manage user profile CRUD operations

**Interface:**

interface ProfileService { getProfile(userId: string): Promise<UserProfile>; updateProfile(userId: string, data: ProfileUpdate): Promise<UserProfile>; uploadAvatar(userId: string, image: File): Promise<string>; deleteAvatar(userId: string): Promise<void>; }


## Data Models

### UserProfile

| Field | Type | Required | Validation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| id | UUID | Yes | Auto-generated |
| email | string | Yes | Valid email format |
| displayName | string | Yes | 2-50 characters |
| bio | string | No | Max 500 characters |
| avatarUrl | string | No | Valid URL |
| preferences | JSON | No | Valid JSON object |
| updatedAt | timestamp | Yes | Auto-updated |

## Error Handling

| Scenario | Response | Action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Profile not found | 404 | Return error message |
| Invalid update data | 400 | Return validation errors |
| Image too large | 413 | Return size limit error |
| Unauthorized | 401 | Redirect to login |

## Testing Strategy

- Unit tests for validation logic
- Integration tests for API endpoints
- E2E test for profile edit flow

Next Steps

After completing design:

  1. Get design review and approval
  2. Move to Task Planning phase
  3. Break design into implementation tasks
  4. Begin systematic implementation

平台分布

Claude Code

30.4%
按下载量换算241

OpenCode

23.31%
按下载量换算185

Codex

17.2%
按下载量换算136

Gemini CLI

12.89%
按下载量换算102

windsurf

8.12%
按下载量换算64

Antigravity

3.31%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills