Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

dependency-injection(依赖注入)

dependency-injection 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

dependency-injection 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 7,335。

总安装 388周安装 16GitHub Stars 8下载 127核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dependency-injection(依赖注入)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev
仓库路径:skills/dependency-injection
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill dependency-injection
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill dependency-injection

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于 Rails 应用中的依赖注入决策支持。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,支持 GitHub 安装。提供 DI 模式选择树,判断是否需要注入。避免在类内部实例化依赖,提升可测性。dependency-injection 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

输出为结构化决策框架,需结合项目实际调整。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dependency-injection

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill dependenc…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dependency-injection 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill dependency-injectio…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dependency-injection 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dependency-injection 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

dependency-injection 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

dependency-injection 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 388 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 127 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dependency-injection 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
dependency-injection

依赖注入 · 本页

3888接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Dependency Injection — Expert Decisions

Expert decision frameworks for dependency injection choices. Claude knows DI basics — this skill provides judgment calls for when and how to apply DI patterns.


Decision Trees

Do You Need DI?

Is the dependency tested independently?
├─ NO → Is it a pure function or value type?
│  ├─ YES → No DI needed (just call it)
│  └─ NO → Consider DI for future testability
│
└─ YES → How many classes use this dependency?
   ├─ 1 class → Simple constructor injection
   ├─ 2-5 classes → Protocol + constructor injection
   └─ Many classes → Consider lightweight container

The trap: DI everything. If a helper function has no side effects and doesn't need mocking, don't wrap it in a protocol.

Which Injection Pattern?

Who creates the object?
├─ Caller provides dependency
│  └─ Constructor Injection (most common)
│     init(service: ServiceProtocol)
│
├─ Object creates dependency but needs flexibility
│  └─ Default Parameter Injection
│     init(service: ServiceProtocol = Service())
│
├─ Dependency changes during lifetime
│  └─ Property Injection (rare, avoid if possible)
│     var service: ServiceProtocol?
│
└─ Factory creates object with dependencies
   └─ Factory Pattern
      container.makeUserViewModel()

Protocol vs Concrete Type

Will this dependency be mocked in tests?
├─ YES → Protocol
│
└─ NO → Is it from external module?
   ├─ YES → Protocol (wrap for decoupling)
   └─ NO → Is interface likely to change?
      ├─ YES → Protocol
      └─ NO → Concrete type is fine

Rule of thumb: Network, database, analytics, external APIs → Protocol. Date formatters, math utilities → Concrete.

DI Container Complexity

Team size?
├─ Solo/Small (1-3)
│  └─ Default parameters + simple factory
│
├─ Medium (4-10)
│  └─ Simple manual container
│     final class Container {
│         lazy var userService = UserService()
│     }
│
└─ Large (10+)
   └─ Consider Swinject or similar
      (only if manual wiring becomes painful)

NEVER Do

Protocol Design

NEVER create protocols with only one implementation:

// ❌ Protocol just for the sake of it
protocol DateFormatterProtocol {
    func format(_ date: Date) -> String
}

class DateFormatterImpl: DateFormatterProtocol {
    func format(_ date: Date) -> String { ... }
}

// ✅ Just use the type directly
let formatter = DateFormatter()
formatter.dateStyle = .medium

Exception: When wrapping external dependencies for decoupling or testing.

NEVER mirror the entire class interface in a protocol:

// ❌ 1:1 mapping is a code smell
protocol UserServiceProtocol {
    var users: [User] { get }
    var isLoading: Bool { get }
    func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User
    func updateUser(_ user: User) async throws
    func deleteUser(id: String) async throws
    // ...20 more methods
}

// ✅ Minimal interface for what's actually needed
protocol UserFetching {
    func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User
}

NEVER put mutable state requirements in protocols:

// ❌ Forces implementation details
protocol CacheProtocol {
    var storage: [String: Any] { get set }  // Leaks implementation
}

// ✅ Behavior-focused
protocol CacheProtocol {
    func get(key: String) -> Any?
    func set(key: String, value: Any)
}

Constructor Injection

NEVER use property injection when constructor injection works:

// ❌ Object can be in invalid state
class UserViewModel {
    var userService: UserServiceProtocol!  // Can be nil!

    func loadUser() async {
        let user = try? await userService.fetchUser(id: "1")  // Crash if not set!
    }
}

// ✅ Guaranteed valid state
class UserViewModel {
    private let userService: UserServiceProtocol

    init(userService: UserServiceProtocol) {
        self.userService = userService  // Never nil
    }
}

NEVER create objects with many dependencies (> 5):

// ❌ Too many dependencies — class does too much
init(
    userService: UserServiceProtocol,
    authService: AuthServiceProtocol,
    analyticsService: AnalyticsProtocol,
    networkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol,
    cacheManager: CacheProtocol,
    configService: ConfigServiceProtocol,
    featureFlagService: FeatureFlagProtocol
) { ... }

// ✅ Split into smaller, focused classes
// Or create a composite service

Service Locator (Anti-Pattern)

NEVER use Service Locator pattern:

// ❌ Hidden dependencies, runtime errors, untestable
class UserViewModel {
    func loadUser() async {
        let service = ServiceLocator.shared.resolve(UserServiceProtocol.self)!
        // Crashes if not registered
        // Dependency is hidden
        // Can't see what this class needs
    }
}

// ✅ Explicit constructor injection
class UserViewModel {
    private let userService: UserServiceProtocol  // Visible dependency

    init(userService: UserServiceProtocol) {
        self.userService = userService
    }
}

Testing

NEVER create mocks with real side effects:

// ❌ Mock does real work
class MockNetworkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol {
    func request<T>(_ endpoint: Endpoint) async throws -> T {
        // Actually makes network call!
        return try await URLSession.shared.data(from: endpoint.url)
    }
}

// ✅ Mocks return stubbed data
class MockNetworkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol {
    var stubbedResult: Any?
    var stubbedError: Error?

    func request<T>(_ endpoint: Endpoint) async throws -> T {
        if let error = stubbedError { throw error }
        return stubbedResult as! T
    }
}

NEVER test mocks instead of real code:

// ❌ Testing the mock, not the system
func testMockReturnsUser() {
    let mock = MockUserService()
    mock.stubbedUser = User(name: "John")
    XCTAssertEqual(mock.fetchUser().name, "John")  // Tests mock, not app
}

// ✅ Test the system under test
func testViewModelLoadsUser() async {
    let mock = MockUserService()
    mock.stubbedUser = User(name: "John")

    let viewModel = UserViewModel(userService: mock)  // SUT
    await viewModel.loadUser(id: "1")

    XCTAssertEqual(viewModel.user?.name, "John")  // Tests ViewModel
}

Essential Patterns

Default Parameter Injection

// Production uses real, tests inject mock
@MainActor
final class UserViewModel: ObservableObject {
    private let userService: UserServiceProtocol

    init(userService: UserServiceProtocol = UserService()) {
        self.userService = userService
    }
}

// Production
let viewModel = UserViewModel()

// Test
let viewModel = UserViewModel(userService: MockUserService())

Simple Manual Container

@MainActor
final class Container {
    static let shared = Container()

    // Singletons (lazy initialized)
    lazy var networkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol = NetworkManager()
    lazy var authService: AuthServiceProtocol = AuthService(network: networkManager)
    lazy var userService: UserServiceProtocol = UserService(network: networkManager)

    // Factory methods (new instance each time)
    func makeUserViewModel() -> UserViewModel {
        UserViewModel(userService: userService)
    }

    func makeLoginViewModel() -> LoginViewModel {
        LoginViewModel(authService: authService)
    }
}

SwiftUI Environment Injection

// Custom environment key
private struct UserServiceKey: EnvironmentKey {
    static let defaultValue: UserServiceProtocol = UserService()
}

extension EnvironmentValues {
    var userService: UserServiceProtocol {
        get { self[UserServiceKey.self] }
        set { self[UserServiceKey.self] = newValue }
    }
}

// Inject at app level
@main
struct MyApp: App {
    var body: some Scene {
        WindowGroup {
            ContentView()
                .environment(\.userService, Container.shared.userService)
        }
    }
}

// Consume in any view
struct UserView: View {
    @Environment(\.userService) var userService

    var body: some View {
        // Use userService
    }
}

Mock with Verification

final class MockUserService: UserServiceProtocol {
    // Stubbed returns
    var stubbedUser: User?
    var stubbedError: Error?

    // Call tracking
    private(set) var fetchUserCallCount = 0
    private(set) var fetchUserLastId: String?

    func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User {
        fetchUserCallCount += 1
        fetchUserLastId = id

        if let error = stubbedError { throw error }
        guard let user = stubbedUser else {
            throw MockError.notStubbed
        }
        return user
    }
}

// Test with verification
func testFetchesCorrectUser() async {
    let mock = MockUserService()
    mock.stubbedUser = User(id: "123", name: "John")

    let viewModel = UserViewModel(userService: mock)
    await viewModel.loadUser(id: "123")

    XCTAssertEqual(mock.fetchUserCallCount, 1)
    XCTAssertEqual(mock.fetchUserLastId, "123")
}

Quick Reference

When to Use Each Pattern

PatternUse WhenAvoid When
Constructor injectionDefault choiceNever avoid
Default parametersConvenience with testabilityDependency changes at runtime
Property injectionFramework requires it (rare)You have control over init
FactoryObject needs runtime parametersSimple object creation
ContainerMany cross-cutting dependenciesSmall app, few dependencies

Protocol Checklist

  • Will it be mocked? If no, skip protocol
  • Interface is minimal (only needed methods)
  • No mutable state requirements
  • No implementation details leaked
  • Single responsibility

DI Red Flags

SmellProblemFix
Protocol for every classOver-engineeringOnly where needed
Service LocatorHidden dependenciesConstructor injection
> 5 constructor paramsClass does too muchSplit responsibilities
Property injectionObject can be invalidConstructor injection
Mock does real workTests are slow/flakyReturn stubbed data
1:1 protocol:class ratioUnnecessary abstractionRemove unused protocols

SwiftUI DI Comparison

PatternScopeUse For
@EnvironmentView hierarchySystem/app services
@EnvironmentObjectView hierarchyObservable shared state
@StateObject init injectionSingle viewView-specific ViewModel
Container factoryApp-wideComplex dependency graphs

平台分布

Antigravity

26.3%
按下载量换算33

windsurf

24.24%
按下载量换算31

Claude Code

18.78%
按下载量换算24

OpenCode

11.3%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

7.92%
按下载量换算10

Codex

3.22%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills