Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

dependencies-audit(依赖审计)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

dependencies-audit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,920。

总安装 2,281周安装 98GitHub Stars 4下载 707核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dependencies-audit(依赖审计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cognitedata/dune-skills
仓库路径:skills/dependencies-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cognitedata/dune-skills --skill dependencies-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cognitedata/dune-skills --skill dependencies-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于全面审计依赖项的安全性与合规性,识别漏洞与过时包。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,支持 GitHub 安装。可检测许可证问题、供应链风险及依赖冲突,并生成 review-packages.md。通过命令行调用,自动扫描 package.json 等依赖文件。

输出为结构化报告,需人工复核后采取修复措施。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dependencies-audit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/cognitedata/dune-skills --skill dependencies-a…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dependencies-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/cognitedata/dune-skills --skill dependencies-audit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dependencies-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dependencies-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

dependencies-audit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

dependencies-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,281 次,近一周安装 98 次,下载 707 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dependencies-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
dependencies-audit

依赖审计 · 本页

2,2814需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Dependencies Fix

Find and fix all dependency issues in $ARGUMENTS (or the root package.json if no argument is given) — vulnerabilities, outdated packages, deprecated dependencies, license problems, and supply-chain risks. This skill produces the review-packages.md artifact required by the Dune app review process.


Step 1 — Read and list all dependencies

# List all dependencies and devDependencies
node -e "
  const pkg = require('./package.json');
  console.log('=== Dependencies ===');
  Object.entries(pkg.dependencies || {}).forEach(([name, ver]) => console.log(name + ' @ ' + ver));
  console.log('\\n=== Dev Dependencies ===');
  Object.entries(pkg.devDependencies || {}).forEach(([name, ver]) => console.log(name + ' @ ' + ver));
"

Record the total count of dependencies and devDependencies.


Step 2 — Look up npm metadata and update outdated packages

For each package, gather:

  • Latest version on npm
  • Weekly downloads
  • Last publish date
  • Deprecated flag
# Batch lookup — run for each package (example for a single package)
npm view <package-name> --json 2>/dev/null | node -e "
  const data = JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('/dev/stdin','utf8'));
  console.log(JSON.stringify({
    name: data.name,
    latest: data['dist-tags']?.latest,
    modified: data.time?.modified,
    deprecated: data.deprecated || false,
  }));
"

# For weekly downloads, use the npm API
curl -s "https://api.npmjs.org/downloads/point/last-week/<package-name>" | node -e "
  const data = JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('/dev/stdin','utf8'));
  console.log(data.downloads);
"

For efficiency, batch multiple lookups. If the project has many dependencies, use a script:

node -e "
  const { execSync } = require('child_process');
  const pkg = require('./package.json');
  const allDeps = { ...pkg.dependencies, ...pkg.devDependencies };

  for (const [name, usedVersion] of Object.entries(allDeps)) {
    try {
      const info = JSON.parse(execSync('npm view ' + name + ' --json 2>/dev/null', { encoding: 'utf8' }));
      const latest = info['dist-tags']?.latest || 'unknown';
      const modified = info.time?.modified || 'unknown';
      const deprecated = info.deprecated ? 'YES' : 'No';
      console.log([name, usedVersion, latest, modified, deprecated].join(' | '));
    } catch {
      console.log(name + ' | ' + usedVersion + ' | LOOKUP FAILED');
    }
  }
"

Fix: Update outdated packages

For each package that is >1 major version behind, update it:

pnpm update <package>@latest

For packages that are 1+ minor versions behind, update to latest minor:

pnpm update <package>

After updating, run pnpm install and pnpm run build to verify nothing breaks. If a major update breaks the build, revert that specific update and note it as a manual-fix item.


Step 3 — Run security audit and fix vulnerabilities

# Run audit with the project's package manager
pnpm audit --json 2>/dev/null || npm audit --json 2>/dev/null

# Also run production-only audit (what ships to users)
pnpm audit --prod --json 2>/dev/null || npm audit --production --json 2>/dev/null

Parse the JSON output for:

  • Severity counts (critical, high, moderate, low)
  • Per-vulnerability details (package, severity, title, patched version, advisory URL)

Any package with a known CVE is an automatic Fail in the health column.

Fix: Resolve vulnerabilities

Run pnpm audit fix to auto-fix what's possible. For remaining high/critical CVEs that can't be auto-fixed, manually update the vulnerable package in package.json to the patched version and run pnpm install. If the patched version has breaking changes, apply the minimum code changes needed to adapt. If a vulnerability is in a transitive dependency, use pnpm overrides in package.json to force the patched version:

{
  "pnpm": {
    "overrides": {
      "vulnerable-package": ">=2.1.0"
    }
  }
}

After applying fixes, re-run pnpm audit to confirm the vulnerabilities are resolved. Run pnpm run build to verify nothing breaks.


Step 4 — Assign health scores and fix Fail-scored packages

For each package, assign a health indicator:

HealthCriteria
Pass>100k weekly downloads AND updated within last 12 months AND not deprecated AND version is current or near-current (within 1 major)
Warn10k–100k weekly downloads OR >12 months since last publish OR >1 major version behind
Fail<10k weekly downloads OR no update in 2+ years OR deprecated OR known CVE

Edge cases:

  • @cognite/* packages: trust Cognite-internal packages even if download counts are low
  • @types/* packages: trust DefinitelyTyped packages; focus on whether the version matches the main package
  • Newly published packages (<6 months old): flag as Warn for review, not auto-Fail on low downloads

Fix: Replace Fail-scored packages

For each Fail-scored package:

  • If deprecated: find and install the recommended replacement. Update all imports across the codebase.
  • If unmaintained (2+ years): find an actively maintained alternative with equivalent functionality. Replace it.
  • **If low downloads and not @cognite/*:** evaluate whether it's truly needed. If a native JS/TS equivalent exists or the functionality is simple, remove the dependency and implement inline.

After each replacement, run pnpm install and pnpm run build to verify the replacement works.


Step 5 — Check for supply-chain risks and mitigate

# Check for install scripts (preinstall, postinstall, prepare)
node -e "
  const { execSync } = require('child_process');
  const pkg = require('./package.json');
  const allDeps = Object.keys({ ...pkg.dependencies, ...pkg.devDependencies });

  for (const name of allDeps) {
    try {
      const info = JSON.parse(execSync('npm view ' + name + ' --json 2>/dev/null', { encoding: 'utf8' }));
      const scripts = info.scripts || {};
      const risky = ['preinstall', 'install', 'postinstall'].filter(s => scripts[s]);
      if (risky.length > 0) {
        console.log('INSTALL SCRIPT: ' + name + ' — ' + risky.join(', '));
      }
    } catch {}
  }
"

# Check for packages with very few maintainers (single point of failure)
# This is informational, not blocking

Fix: Evaluate and mitigate install script risks

For each dependency with install scripts, determine if the script is legitimate (e.g., native module compilation for sharp, esbuild, better-sqlite3). Known build tools and native module packages are expected to have install scripts.

If the package is not a known build tool and has suspicious install scripts, replace it with a safer alternative. After replacement, run pnpm install and pnpm run build to verify.


Step 6 — Check license compatibility and replace problematic packages

# List all licenses
npx license-checker --summary 2>/dev/null || node -e "
  const { execSync } = require('child_process');
  const pkg = require('./package.json');
  const allDeps = Object.keys({ ...pkg.dependencies, ...pkg.devDependencies });

  for (const name of allDeps) {
    try {
      const info = JSON.parse(execSync('npm view ' + name + ' --json 2>/dev/null', { encoding: 'utf8' }));
      console.log(name + ': ' + (info.license || 'UNKNOWN'));
    } catch {}
  }
"

Acceptable licenses for Dune apps (commercial distribution):

  • MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC, 0BSD, Unlicense, CC0-1.0

Licenses that need legal review:

  • GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0, MPL-2.0, EUPL-1.1
  • Any "UNKNOWN" or missing license

Fix: Replace packages with problematic licenses

For each package with a copyleft license (GPL, AGPL) or unknown license in production dependencies, find an MIT/Apache-2.0 licensed alternative and replace it. Update all imports across the codebase.

For devDependencies with copyleft licenses, these are lower risk but still flag for awareness.

After each replacement, run pnpm install and pnpm run build to verify.


Step 7 — Generate the review-packages.md artifact (post-fix state)

Re-run the metadata lookups after all fixes have been applied to capture the post-fix state. Then produce the output in the format required by the Dune app review process:

## Package audit: [app name]

### Dependencies

| Package | Used version | Latest | Weekly downloads | Last published | Deprecated | CVEs | Health |
| ------- | ------------ | ------ | ---------------- | -------------- | ---------- | ---- | ------ |
| react | ^18.2.0 | 18.3.1 | 25M | 2024-04-26 | No | 0 | Pass |
| some-old-lib | ^1.0.0 | 1.0.3 | 5k | 2021-03-15 | No | 0 | Fail |

### Dev Dependencies

| Package | Used version | Latest | Weekly downloads | Last published | Deprecated | CVEs | Health |
| ------- | ------------ | ------ | ---------------- | -------------- | ---------- | ---- | ------ |
| vitest | ^1.6.0 | 2.0.1 | 8M | 2024-07-01 | No | 0 | Pass |

### Security audit

| Severity | Count |
| -------- | ----- |
| Critical | 0 |
| High | 0 |
| Moderate | 0 |
| Low | 0 |

#### Vulnerabilities

| Package | Severity | Title | Patched in | Advisory |
| ------- | -------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- |
| (none found) | — | — | — | — |

### License summary

| License | Count | Packages |
| ------- | ----- | -------- |
| MIT | 45 | react, react-dom, ... |
| Apache-2.0 | 3 | ... |

### Supply-chain flags

| Package | Risk | Details |
| ------- | ---- | ------- |
| (none found) | — | — |

Step 8 — Report remaining issues

Summarize what was fixed and what remains:

Fixed

CategoryCountDetails
Packages updatedNlist of packages and version changes
CVEs resolvedNlist of CVEs fixed
Deprecated deps replacedNold package -> new package
License issues resolvedNold package -> new package

Remaining (could not auto-fix)

List only issues that could not be automatically fixed:

  • Breaking changes from major updates that need manual code adaptation
  • Licenses that need legal review (e.g., LGPL in transitive dependencies)
  • Packages with no maintained alternative available
  • Vulnerabilities with no patched version available yet

For each remaining item, explain why it could not be auto-fixed and what the app author needs to do.


Done

State the overall health verdict: how many Pass/Warn/Fail after fixes, how many issues were resolved, and any remaining items that need manual attention from the app author.

平台分布

Codex

36.08%
按下载量换算255

Claude

31.8%
按下载量换算225

Cursor

19.44%
按下载量换算137

Gemini CLI

10.15%
按下载量换算72

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills