Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

deobfuscating-javascript-malware(deobfuscating JavaScript malware 测试)

用于辅助 Java 项目开发、面向对象设计、Spring 生态、Maven 或 Gradle 依赖和后端工程实践。它适合让 Agent 分析类结构、设计接口、整理服务分层、生成测试或检查常见代码坏味道。使用时需要结合项目已有架构、包结构和依赖版本,不应只按通用教程改代码;涉及数据库、事务、并发或框架配置时,应先确认运行环境和回归测试范围。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 13,117。

总安装 1,004周安装 41GitHub Stars 5,890下载 325核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deobfuscating-javascript-malware(deobfuscating JavaScript malware 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/deobfuscating-javascript-malware
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill deobfuscating-javascript-malware
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill deobfuscating-javascript-malware

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 针对钓鱼页面、电商 skimmer 或恶意附件中的混淆 JavaScript 进行分析。识别字符串拼接、Base64 嵌套等常见混淆手法,还原实际攻击载荷行为。适用于网络安全调查与威胁情报收集,不处理普通压缩或美化代码。

操作前请确保样本来源合法,避免参与非法活动违反法律法规。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/deobfuscating-javascript-malware

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill deobfusc…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,004 次,近一周安装 41 次,下载 325 次,GitHub 5,890 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

deobfuscating-javascript-malware 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 5,890 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
deobfuscating-javascript-malware

deobfuscating JavaScript malware 测试 · 本页

1,0045,890操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Deobfuscating JavaScript Malware

When to Use

  • Investigating a phishing page with obfuscated JavaScript that performs credential harvesting or redirect
  • Analyzing a web skimmer (Magecart-style) injected into an e-commerce site
  • Deobfuscating a JavaScript dropper that downloads and executes second-stage malware
  • Examining malicious email attachments containing HTML files with embedded obfuscated scripts
  • Analyzing browser exploit kits that use heavy JavaScript obfuscation to hide exploit delivery

Do not use for obfuscated JavaScript that is merely minified production code; use a standard beautifier instead.

Prerequisites

  • Node.js 18+ installed for executing and debugging JavaScript in a controlled environment
  • Python 3.8+ with jsbeautifier library for code formatting
  • Browser developer tools (Chrome DevTools) for controlled execution in an isolated browser
  • CyberChef (https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/) for encoding/decoding operations
  • de4js or JStillery for automated JavaScript deobfuscation
  • Isolated analysis VM with no access to production systems or sensitive data

Workflow

Step 1: Safely Extract and Examine the Obfuscated Script

Isolate the malicious JavaScript without executing it:

# Extract JavaScript from HTML file
python3 << 'PYEOF'
from html.parser import HTMLParser

class ScriptExtractor(HTMLParser):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.in_script = False
        self.scripts = []
        self.current = ""

    def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
        if tag == "script":
            self.in_script = True
            self.current = ""

    def handle_endtag(self, tag):
        if tag == "script":
            self.in_script = False
            if self.current.strip():
                self.scripts.append(self.current)

    def handle_data(self, data):
        if self.in_script:
            self.current += data

with open("malicious_page.html") as f:
    parser = ScriptExtractor()
    parser.feed(f.read())

for i, script in enumerate(parser.scripts):
    with open(f"script_{i}.js", "w") as f:
        f.write(script)
    print(f"Extracted script_{i}.js ({len(script)} bytes)")
PYEOF

# Beautify the extracted JavaScript
npx js-beautify script_0.js -o script_0_pretty.js

Step 2: Identify Obfuscation Techniques

Categorize the obfuscation methods used:

Common JavaScript Obfuscation Techniques:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
String Encoding:
  - Hex encoding:          "\x68\x65\x6c\x6c\x6f" -> "hello"
  - Unicode escapes:       "\u0068\u0065\u006c\u006c\u006f" -> "hello"
  - Base64:                atob("aGVsbG8=") -> "hello"
  - charCodeAt/fromCharCode: String.fromCharCode(104,101,108,108,111)
  - Array-based lookup:    var _0x1234 = ["hello","world"]; _0x1234[0]

Eval Chains:
  - eval(atob("..."))
  - eval(unescape("..."))
  - new Function("return " + decoded)()
  - document.write("<script>" + decoded + "</script>")
  - setTimeout(decoded, 0)

Control Flow:
  - Switch-case dispatcher with shuffled case order
  - Opaque predicates (always-true/false conditions)
  - Dead code insertion
  - Variable name mangling (_0x4a3b, _0xab12)

Anti-Analysis:
  - Debugger traps: setInterval(function(){debugger;}, 100)
  - Console detection: overriding console.log
  - Timing checks: performance.now() deltas
  - DevTools detection: window.outerWidth - window.innerWidth > 100

Step 3: Remove Anti-Analysis Protections

Neutralize anti-debugging and anti-analysis traps:

// Remove debugger traps before analysis
// Replace in the obfuscated script:

// Before:
setInterval(function() { debugger; }, 100);

// After (neutralized):
setInterval(function() { /* debugger removed */ }, 100);

// Neutralize DevTools detection
// Before:
if (window.outerWidth - window.innerWidth > 160) { window.location = "about:blank"; }

// After:
if (false) { window.location = "about:blank"; }

// Neutralize timing checks
// Override performance.now to return consistent values
const originalNow = performance.now;
performance.now = function() { return 0; };

Step 4: Decode String Obfuscation Layers

Progressively decode encoded strings:

# Python script to decode common JS obfuscation patterns
import re
import base64
import urllib.parse

def decode_hex_strings(code):
    """Replace \\xNN sequences with ASCII characters"""
    def hex_replace(match):
        hex_str = match.group(0)
        try:
            return bytes.fromhex(hex_str.replace("\\x", "")).decode("ascii")
        except:
            return hex_str
    return re.sub(r'(?:\\x[0-9a-fA-F]{2})+', hex_replace, code)

def decode_unicode_escapes(code):
    """Replace \\uNNNN sequences with characters"""
    def unicode_replace(match):
        return chr(int(match.group(1), 16))
    return re.sub(r'\\u([0-9a-fA-F]{4})', unicode_replace, code)

def decode_charcode_arrays(code):
    """Resolve String.fromCharCode calls"""
    def charcode_replace(match):
        codes = [int(c.strip()) for c in match.group(1).split(",")]
        return '"' + "".join(chr(c) for c in codes) + '"'
    return re.sub(r'String\.fromCharCode\(([0-9,\s]+)\)', charcode_replace, code)

def decode_base64_strings(code):
    """Resolve atob() calls with static strings"""
    def atob_replace(match):
        try:
            decoded = base64.b64decode(match.group(1)).decode("utf-8")
            return f'"{decoded}"'
        except:
            return match.group(0)
    return re.sub(r'atob\(["\']([A-Za-z0-9+/=]+)["\']\)', atob_replace, code)

# Apply all decoders
with open("script_0.js") as f:
    code = f.read()

code = decode_hex_strings(code)
code = decode_unicode_escapes(code)
code = decode_charcode_arrays(code)
code = decode_base64_strings(code)

with open("script_0_decoded.js", "w") as f:
    f.write(code)
print("Decoded strings written to script_0_decoded.js")

Step 5: Resolve Eval Chains Safely

Unwrap eval/Function constructor chains without executing:

// Node.js script to safely resolve eval chains
// Run in isolated environment: node --experimental-vm-modules deobfuscate.js

const vm = require('vm');

// Create sandboxed context with logging
const sandbox = {
    eval: function(code) {
        console.log("=== EVAL INTERCEPTED ===");
        console.log(code.substring(0, 500));
        console.log("========================");
        return code; // Return the code instead of executing it
    },
    document: {
        write: function(html) {
            console.log("=== DOCUMENT.WRITE INTERCEPTED ===");
            console.log(html.substring(0, 500));
        },
        getElementById: function() { return { innerHTML: "" }; }
    },
    window: { location: { href: "" } },
    atob: function(s) { return Buffer.from(s, 'base64').toString(); },
    unescape: unescape,
    setTimeout: function(fn) { if (typeof fn === 'string') console.log("TIMEOUT CODE:", fn); },
    console: console,
    String: String,
    Array: Array,
    parseInt: parseInt,
    RegExp: RegExp,
};

const context = vm.createContext(sandbox);

// Load and execute the obfuscated script in sandbox
const fs = require('fs');
const code = fs.readFileSync('script_0.js', 'utf8');

try {
    vm.runInContext(code, context, { timeout: 5000 });
} catch(e) {
    console.log("Execution error (expected):", e.message);
}

Step 6: Analyze the Deobfuscated Payload

Examine the revealed malicious logic:

Deobfuscated Malware Categories and IOC Extraction:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Credential Harvester:
  - Form action URLs (exfiltration endpoints)
  - XMLHttpRequest/fetch destinations
  - Targeted input field names (username, password, cc_number)

Web Skimmer (Magecart):
  - Payment form overlay injection
  - Card data exfiltration URLs
  - Keylogger event listeners (onkeypress, oninput)

Redirect Script:
  - Destination URLs in location.href assignments
  - Conditional redirects based on user-agent or referrer
  - Cloaking logic (show benign content to bots)

Exploit Kit Landing:
  - Browser/plugin version checks
  - Exploit payload URLs
  - Shellcode embedded as arrays or encoded strings

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Eval ChainNested layers of eval(), Function(), or document.write() calls that each decode one layer of obfuscation before passing to the next
String Array RotationObfuscation technique storing all strings in a shuffled array and accessing them by computed index to hide string literals
Dead Code InsertionAdding non-functional code blocks that never execute to increase analysis complexity and confuse pattern matching
Opaque PredicateConditional expression whose outcome is predetermined but difficult to determine statically; used to obscure control flow
Anti-DebuggingJavaScript techniques to detect and thwart browser DevTools or debugger usage including debugger statements and timing checks
Web SkimmerMalicious JavaScript injected into e-commerce sites to steal payment card data from checkout forms (Magecart attack)

Tools & Systems

  • CyberChef: GCHQ's web-based tool for encoding/decoding transformations useful for unwinding multi-layer obfuscation
  • de4js: Online JavaScript deobfuscator supporting common obfuscation tools (obfuscator.io, JScrambler)
  • Node.js VM Module: Sandboxed JavaScript execution environment for safely evaluating obfuscated code with intercepted APIs
  • Chrome DevTools: Browser developer tools for stepping through JavaScript execution with breakpoints and console access
  • JSDetox: JavaScript malware analysis tool providing execution emulation and deobfuscation

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Deobfuscating a Magecart Web Skimmer

Context: A compromised e-commerce site has obfuscated JavaScript injected into its checkout page. The script needs deobfuscation to identify the data exfiltration endpoint and determine what customer data was stolen.

Approach:

  1. Extract the injected script from the page source (often appended to a legitimate JS file or loaded from an external domain)
  2. Beautify the code and identify the obfuscation technique (typically string array + rotation + hex encoding)
  3. Decode string encoding layers (hex -> Unicode -> base64) using the Python decoder script
  4. Resolve the string array by evaluating the array definition and rotation function
  5. Identify the form targeting logic (querySelector for payment form fields)
  6. Extract the exfiltration URL from the XMLHttpRequest or fetch call
  7. Document stolen data fields and exfiltration endpoint for incident response

Pitfalls:

  • Executing obfuscated scripts on a connected system (the script may phone home during analysis)
  • Not removing anti-debugging traps before using browser DevTools (infinite debugger loops)
  • Missing additional obfuscation layers loaded dynamically from external URLs
  • Overlooking base64-encoded inline images or data URIs that may contain additional scripts

Output Format

JAVASCRIPT MALWARE DEOBFUSCATION REPORT
=========================================
Source:           checkout.js (injected into example-shop.com)
Obfuscation:      obfuscator.io (string array + rotation + hex encoding)
Layers Removed:   3

OBFUSCATION TECHNIQUES IDENTIFIED
[1] String array with 247 entries, rotated by 0x1a3
[2] Hex-encoded string references (\x68\x65\x6c\x6c\x6f)
[3] Base64-wrapped eval chain (2 layers)
[4] Anti-debugging: setInterval debugger trap

DEOBFUSCATED FUNCTIONALITY
Type:             Magecart Payment Card Skimmer
Target Forms:     input[name*="card"], input[name*="cc_"]
Data Captured:    Card number, expiration, CVV, cardholder name
Exfil Method:     POST via XMLHttpRequest
Exfil URL:        hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/collect
Exfil Format:     JSON { "cn": card_number, "exp": expiry, "cv": cvv }
Trigger:          Form submit event on checkout page

EXTRACTED IOCs
Domains:          analytics-cdn[.]com
IPs:              185.220.101[.]42
URLs:             hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/collect
                  hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/gate.js

平台分布

Codex

35.67%
按下载量换算116

Claude

28.53%
按下载量换算93

Cursor

18.99%
按下载量换算62

Gemini CLI

9.08%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills