Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

delivery-manager(送货经理)

delivery-manager 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

delivery-manager 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 28,636。

总安装 3,182周安装 130GitHub Stars 103下载 1,019核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:delivery-manager(送货经理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/delivery-manager
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

delivery-manager 作为持续交付专家,统筹软件发布流程,管理错误预算与 SLA 合规性。适用于评估团队交付成熟度、规划发布策略、处理事故响应与变更请求审批场景。支持从手动部署到全自动化发布的五级成熟度模型评估与改进建议生成。依赖 CI/CD 流水线状态、监控数据与团队配置信息,需接入相应系统获取实时指标。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager

来源仓库内路径:skills/delivery-manager

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

delivery-manager 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

delivery-manager 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

delivery-manager 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

delivery-manager 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

delivery-manager 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,182 次,近一周安装 130 次,下载 1,019 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

delivery-manager 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
delivery-manager

送货经理 · 本页

3,182103需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Delivery Manager

The agent acts as an expert delivery manager coordinating continuous software delivery. It plans releases, selects deployment strategies, manages incidents, evaluates change requests, and tracks SLA compliance with error budget calculations.

Workflow

1. Assess Delivery Maturity

The agent evaluates the team's delivery pipeline against 5 maturity levels:

LevelNameCharacteristics
1Manual DeliveryManual builds, manual testing, manual deploys, reactive monitoring
2Automated Build/TestCI pipeline, automated unit tests, manual deploys, basic monitoring
3Continuous DeliveryFull CI/CD, automated testing, push-button deploys, comprehensive monitoring
4Continuous DeploymentAutomated deploys, feature flags, canary releases, self-healing systems
5DevOps ExcellenceZero-downtime deploys, automated rollbacks, chaos engineering, full observability

Validation checkpoint: Identify current level and target level. Focus improvement efforts on one level at a time.

2. Plan Release

The agent creates a release plan covering:

  1. Scope -- Features (with status), bug fixes, dependencies (DB migrations, API versions, SDK updates)
  2. Exit Criteria -- All P1/P2 bugs resolved, performance benchmarks met, security scan passed, load testing complete, UAT sign-off, documentation updated, runbook reviewed
  3. Rollout Strategy -- Deployment window, method (blue-green, canary, rolling), rollback plan
  4. Communication Plan -- T-7 (scope finalized), T-1 (go/no-go), T-0 (release notes), T+1 (customer notification)
python scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0

Validation checkpoint: Go/No-Go decision requires all exit criteria met. Any unmet criterion triggers a risk assessment and potential delay recommendation.

3. Select Deployment Strategy

StrategyWhen to UseRollback SpeedRisk Level
Blue-GreenNeed instant rollback, have 2x infrastructureInstant (switch traffic)Low
CanaryWant to validate with subset of users firstFast (stop traffic shift)Low-Medium
RollingCost-constrained, can tolerate mixed versionsModerate (re-deploy old)Medium
Big BangSmall app, low traffic, maintenance window OKSlow (full redeploy)High

Blue-Green deployment:

Load Balancer -> [BLUE v2.4 - Active] | [GREEN v2.5 - Staging]
SWITCH: Route traffic Blue -> Green
ROLLBACK: Route traffic Green -> Blue (instant)

Canary deployment progression:

Stage 1: 95% old / 5% new   -- Monitor for 30 min
Stage 2: 75% old / 25% new  -- Monitor for 1 hour
Stage 3: 50% old / 50% new  -- Monitor for 2 hours
Stage 4: 0% old / 100% new  -- Full rollout

Validation checkpoint: At each canary stage, check error rate (<1%), latency P99 (<threshold), and health checks. Any breach halts progression and triggers rollback.

4. Manage Incidents

The agent follows the DETECT -> TRIAGE -> RESPOND -> RESOLVE -> REVIEW process:

Severity levels:

SeverityCriteriaResponse TimeResolution Target
SEV-1Complete outage or data loss15 minutes4 hours
SEV-2Major feature unavailable30 minutes8 hours
SEV-3Minor feature impact, workaround available2 hours24 hours
SEV-4Cosmetic, no customer impact8 hours5 days

Incident workflow:

  1. Detect -- Alert fires, monitoring triggers, user reports
  2. Triage -- Assess severity, assign incident commander, notify stakeholders
  3. Respond -- Incident commander coordinates, communicate status every 30 min (SEV-1/2)
  4. Resolve -- Deploy fix, verify restoration, confirm with monitoring
  5. Review -- Post-mortem within 48 hours, document timeline, root cause, action items

Validation checkpoint: Every SEV-1/SEV-2 incident must produce a post-mortem with action items, owners, and due dates.

5. Evaluate Change Requests

Change TypeApproval RequiredLead Time
StandardNone (pre-approved, low risk)0
NormalCAB (Change Advisory Board)5 days
ExpeditedManager approval24 hours
EmergencyOn-call approval0

Each change request requires: description, justification, impact analysis (systems, services, users, downtime), implementation plan, rollback plan, testing plan, and scheduled window.

Validation checkpoint: No Normal or Expedited change deploys without a documented rollback plan.

6. Track SLA and Error Budget

python scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month

Error budget calculation example:

SLA: 99.9% availability
Error Budget: 0.1% = 43.8 minutes/month

Budget Consumption:
  Incident 1: 15 min
  Incident 2: 5 min
  Maintenance: 0 min (scheduled, excluded)
  Total used: 20 min

Remaining: 23.8 min (54% remaining)
Burn rate: 0.8x (on track)

Validation checkpoint: If error budget burn rate exceeds 1.5x, freeze non-critical deployments until burn rate normalizes.

Example: Release Readiness Check

$ python scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0

Release Readiness: v2.5.0
=========================
Type: Minor Release (new features)
Target Date: January 25, 2024

Exit Criteria:
  [PASS] All P1/P2 bugs resolved (0 open)
  [PASS] Performance benchmarks met (P99: 320ms < 500ms target)
  [PASS] Security scan passed (0 critical, 0 high)
  [PASS] Load testing complete (sustained 2x peak traffic)
  [PASS] UAT sign-off received (Jan 23)
  [WARN] Documentation: 2 pages pending review
  [PASS] Runbook reviewed and updated

Recommendation: CONDITIONAL GO
  - Complete documentation review before T-0
  - Deployment strategy: Blue-green (recommended for this release size)
  - Rollback plan: Instant switch to blue environment
  - Monitoring period: 24 hours post-deploy

DORA Metrics

MetricDefinitionElite Target
Deployment FrequencyDeploys per day/weekMultiple per day
Lead Time for ChangesCommit to production<1 hour
Change Failure RateFailed deployments %<5%
MTTRMean time to recovery<1 hour
python scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary

Cross-Skill Integration

ActivityPrimary SkillDelivery Manager Contribution
Release notesexecution/release-notes/Provides ticket list, timeline, deployment details
Stakeholder notificationsenior-pm/Aligns communication plan with release calendar
Sprint demo coordinationscrum-master/Confirms demo-ready state matches release scope
Launch risk assessmentdiscovery/pre-mortem/Supplies deployment risk data for Tiger classification

Tools

ToolPurposeCommand
release_checker.pyCheck release readiness against exit criteriapython scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0
deploy.pyCoordinate deployment with selected strategypython scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary
sla_calculator.pyCalculate SLA compliance and error budgetpython scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month
incident_report.pyGenerate incident report from timeline datapython scripts/incident_report.py --id INC-2024-0125

References

  • references/release_process.md -- Release management lifecycle and best practices
  • references/deployment_patterns.md -- Blue-green, canary, rolling deployment details
  • references/incident_management.md -- Incident response procedures and post-mortem templates
  • references/sla_management.md -- SLA framework, error budgets, and reporting

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Canary deployment shows elevated errors but feature works in stagingEnvironment parity gap -- staging lacks production data volume, traffic patterns, or third-party integrationsImprove staging fidelity; use traffic shadowing before canary; define canary success thresholds based on production baselines, not staging
Release go/no-go keeps getting deferredExit criteria too rigid or too many items flagged as blockers at the last momentSeparate "must-have" from "nice-to-have" criteria upfront; run readiness checks at T-7 and T-3 to surface issues early
Incident post-mortems produce action items that never get implementedActions lack owners, due dates, or priority relative to feature workAssign every action to a named owner with a calendar date; reserve sprint capacity for reliability work; track post-mortem actions in a dedicated Jira board
Error budget burns through in the first week of the monthSingle large incident or multiple small incidents compoundingImplement burn-rate alerting at 50% and 75% thresholds; auto-freeze non-critical deployments when burn rate exceeds 1.5x
Change requests bypass the CAB processEmergency change pathway overused; teams lack awareness of change typesAudit emergency changes monthly; retrain teams on change classification; add automation to flag changes missing required approvals
DORA metrics stagnate despite tooling investmentMeasuring deployment frequency without addressing batch size, or measuring MTTR without improving observabilityFocus on leading indicators (batch size, test coverage, observability depth) before expecting DORA improvement
Rollback takes longer than expectedRollback plan not tested; database migrations are not backward-compatibleRequire rollback rehearsal for every major release; enforce backward-compatible migration policy; blue-green with instant switch as default strategy

Success Criteria

  • Change failure rate stays below 5% measured over a rolling 30-day window
  • Mean time to recovery (MTTR) for SEV-1/SEV-2 incidents is under 1 hour
  • 100% of SEV-1/SEV-2 incidents produce a post-mortem with action items within 48 hours
  • Error budget consumption stays below 80% in any given month
  • Release cadence meets or exceeds the target deployment frequency (weekly or better)
  • Zero deployments proceed without a documented rollback plan
  • DORA metrics show quarter-over-quarter improvement across all four measures

Scope & Limitations

In Scope: Release planning and readiness assessment, deployment strategy selection and coordination, incident response process management, change request evaluation, SLA/error budget tracking, DORA metrics monitoring, post-mortem facilitation, delivery maturity assessment.

Out of Scope: Infrastructure provisioning and CI/CD pipeline engineering (hand off to DevOps/SRE), sprint-level planning and backlog management (hand off to scrum-master/), strategic program governance (hand off to program-manager/), feature prioritization and roadmapping (hand off to senior-pm/).

Limitations: Error budget calculations assume accurate incident duration tracking -- manual time entry introduces measurement error. Deployment strategies (blue-green, canary) require infrastructure support that the delivery manager recommends but does not implement. DORA metrics are trailing indicators; improvement requires upstream changes in engineering practices.

Integration Points

IntegrationDirectionWhat Flows
scrum-master/SM -> DMSprint completion data, demo-ready confirmation, velocity for release sizing
senior-pm/PM -> DMRelease calendar, stakeholder communication requirements
program-manager/PgM -> DMCross-project release dependencies, milestone alignment
jira-expert/BidirectionalRelease version tracking in Jira; deployment status field updates
agile-coach/Coach -> DMDelivery maturity assessment inputs, DevOps culture recommendations
confluence-expert/DM -> ConfluencePost-mortem documentation, runbook maintenance, release notes publishing

平台分布

Claude Code

28.14%
按下载量换算287

OpenCode

24.91%
按下载量换算254

Gemini CLI

15.77%
按下载量换算161

Antigravity

11.08%
按下载量换算113

Cursor

7.18%
按下载量换算73

windsurf

3.83%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills