Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

decisions(decisions 命令行)

decisions 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

decisions 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,143。

总安装 847周安装 36GitHub Stars 41下载 297核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decisions(decisions 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/maragudk/skills
仓库路径:skills/decisions
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/maragudk/skills --skill decisions
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/maragudk/skills --skill decisions

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

维护项目重要决策的时序记录,捕捉架构与设计的取舍细节。主动建议在重大技术选型时添加文档条目,形成知识资产。记录理由而非仅保存结论,确保未来团队理解上下文。适用于需要长期维护技术债务与演进历史的开发项目。decisions 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/decisions

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/maragudk/skills --skill decisions;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

decisions 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/maragudk/skills --skill decisions。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

decisions 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

decisions 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

decisions 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

decisions 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 847 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 297 次,GitHub 41 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

decisions 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
decisions

decisions 命令行 · 本页

84741需要联网MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Decisions

Overview

This skill maintains a chronological record of significant project decisions in docs/decisions.md. It captures important architectural and design decisions, especially those involving tradeoffs, to create a permanent record of why key choices were made.

When to Use This Skill

Proactive (Conservative): Suggest recording decisions only when there is a clearly significant architectural choice, such as:

  • Choosing between database systems (e.g., SQLite vs PostgreSQL)
  • Selecting major frameworks or libraries
  • Deciding on core architectural patterns (e.g., monolith vs microservices, rendering approach)
  • Making fundamental design choices that will shape the project long-term

Do NOT proactively suggest for:

  • Minor implementation details
  • Routine coding decisions
  • Small refactoring choices
  • Trivial technical choices

Manual: Record decisions when explicitly requested by the user with phrases like:

  • "Record this decision"
  • "Document this in the decision log"
  • "Add this to decisions.md"

Recording a Decision

Step 1: Identify the Decision

From the conversation context, identify:

  • What decision was made
  • Why it was needed (context)
  • What alternatives were considered (if applicable)
  • Key tradeoffs evaluated (if applicable)
  • Rationale for the final choice

Step 2: Determine Detail Level

Adapt the level of detail based on decision complexity:

Brief (simple decisions):

  • Title and 1-2 sentence summary
  • Example: Choosing a well-established library

Moderate (typical decisions):

  • Decision description
  • Brief context (why it was needed)
  • The choice made

Detailed (complex decisions):

  • Decision description
  • Context and motivation
  • Alternatives considered
  • Key tradeoffs evaluated
  • Rationale for final choice

Step 3: Format the Entry

Use this format:

## YYYY-MM-DD: [Decision Title]

[Description paragraph(s) adapted to the complexity level]

Example (brief):

## 2025-10-23: Use httprouter for HTTP routing

Chose httprouter for its simplicity and performance. It's a well-established library that fits our needs without unnecessary complexity.

Example (detailed):

## 2025-10-23: Choose SQLite for primary database

After evaluating PostgreSQL and SQLite, we chose SQLite for the following reasons:

Context: Need a reliable database for the application that handles moderate traffic (< 1000 concurrent users) and simple relational data.

Alternatives considered:
- PostgreSQL: More features and better for high concurrency, but adds operational complexity
- SQLite: Simpler deployment, embedded database, sufficient performance for our scale

Tradeoffs: SQLite has limitations with high write concurrency and some advanced features, but offers zero-configuration deployment and excellent read performance. Given our expected load and preference for operational simplicity, these tradeoffs favor SQLite.

Decision: Use SQLite with WAL mode enabled for improved concurrency. We can migrate to PostgreSQL later if scaling needs change.

Step 4: Write to File

  1. Check if docs/ directory exists; create it if needed
  2. Check if docs/decisions.md exists:

- If not, create it with this header: # Project Decisions This document records significant architectural and design decisions made throughout the project's development. - If it exists, read the current content

  1. Append the new decision entry to the bottom of the file
  2. Ensure proper spacing (blank line before the new entry)

Step 5: Confirm with User

After recording the decision, briefly confirm what was recorded. For example:

  • "Recorded the decision to use SQLite in docs/decisions.md"
  • "Added the routing decision to the decision log"

Proactive Suggestion Pattern

When detecting a significant architectural decision during conversation, suggest recording it:

This seems like a significant architectural decision. Would you like me to record it in docs/decisions.md?

Wait for user confirmation before recording.

Important Notes

  • Always append to the bottom (chronological order from oldest to newest)
  • Use today's date (YYYY-MM-DD format) for new entries
  • Maintain formatting consistency with existing entries
  • Don't create duplicate entries for the same decision
  • Create docs/ directory if it doesn't exist
  • Avoid recording trivial decisions that don't have long-term architectural impact

平台分布

Antigravity

29.19%
按下载量换算87

Claude Code

23.76%
按下载量换算71

Codex

16.61%
按下载量换算49

Gemini CLI

13.08%
按下载量换算39

OpenCode

7.84%
按下载量换算23

trae

3.52%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills