Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

decision-toolkit(决策工具包)

decision-toolkit 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

decision-toolkit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 30,203。

总安装 2,916周安装 124GitHub Stars 141下载 1,022核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decision-toolkit(决策工具包)
来源仓库:https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/decision-toolkit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills --skill decision-toolkit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills --skill decision-toolkit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

创建交互式决策辅助材料,而非代替人类做出选择。采用渐进披露与多视角透镜设计降低认知负荷。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。显式标注认知偏见,提供可校验的检查点机制。输出应具备可操作性,直接支撑决策讨论过程。

decision-toolkit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/decision-toolkit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills --skill decision-toolkit;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

decision-toolkit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills --skill decision-toolkit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

decision-toolkit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

decision-toolkit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

decision-toolkit 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

decision-toolkit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,916 次,近一周安装 124 次,下载 1,022 次,GitHub 141 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

decision-toolkit 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
decision-toolkit

决策工具包 · 本页

2,916141只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Decision Toolkit

Overview

Create structured decision support materials that help humans think through significant choices systematically. This skill produces interactive tools, not just analysis — empowering the decision-maker rather than deciding for them.

Philosophy

Principles

  1. Guide, don't decide — Tools illuminate the decision space; humans choose
  2. One thing at a time — Reduce cognitive load through progressive disclosure
  3. Multiple lenses — Same decision viewed through different frameworks reveals blind spots
  4. Biases visible — Make cognitive biases explicit and checkable
  5. Actionable output — End with concrete next steps, not abstract conclusions

Accessibility First

  • Support screen readers (semantic HTML, ARIA labels)
  • Keyboard navigable (tab order, focus states)
  • High contrast by default (WCAG AA minimum)
  • Reduced motion option
  • Works without JavaScript (graceful degradation)
  • Mobile-friendly touch targets (44px minimum)

Cognitive Inclusivity

Different people process decisions differently:

StyleAccommodation
AnalyticalNumbers, matrices, weighted scores
IntuitiveGut-check prompts, "how does this feel?"
VisualDiagrams, progress bars, color coding
VerbalWritten summaries, question prompts
SequentialStep-by-step wizard flow
GlobalDashboard overview option

When to Use

Invoke this skill when user faces:

  • Collaboration/partnership decisions
  • Career or job changes
  • Investment of significant time/money
  • Project prioritization
  • Technology/tool selection
  • Any choice with multiple factors and uncertainty

Not for: Trivial decisions, emergency responses, or when user just needs information.

Decision Types

Type 1: Opportunity Evaluation

*Should I pursue this opportunity?*

  • Partnership, job offer, investment, project

Type 2: Resource Allocation

*Where should I invest my time/money/attention?*

  • Prioritization, budgeting, focus areas

Type 3: Risk Assessment

*What could go wrong and is it worth it?*

  • New ventures, changes, experiments

Type 4: Trade-off Navigation

*Which option among alternatives?*

  • Tool selection, hire decisions, strategic choices

The Decision Journey

Nine steps, each focused on one dimension:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. CONTEXT         What is the decision?                   │
│  2. FIRST PRINCIPLES Does this solve a real problem?        │
│  3. TIMING          Is now the right moment?                │
│  4. STAKEHOLDERS    Who else is involved? Are they stable?  │
│  5. BIASES          What might cloud my judgment?           │
│  6. OPPORTUNITY COST What am I giving up?                   │
│  7. SCENARIOS       What could happen?                      │
│  8. QUESTIONS       What do I still need to learn?          │
│  9. SYNTHESIS       Summary + decision                      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Output Formats

1. Interactive HTML Guide (Primary)

Step-by-step wizard with:

  • Progress indicator
  • One question per screen
  • State persistence across steps
  • Final summary aggregating all inputs
  • Keyboard navigation
  • Print-friendly CSS

2. Markdown Framework

For offline/text-based use:

  • Structured prompts
  • Checkbox-style bias audit
  • Fill-in-the-blank templates

3. Voice Summary

For audio consumption:

  • 5-7 paragraph executive summary
  • Orpheus TTS markup for emotional texture
  • Key decision + rationale

4. PDF Report

For documentation/sharing:

  • Professional formatting
  • All frameworks applied
  • Appendix with raw analysis

Frameworks Reference

First Principles Test

1. What problem does this solve?
2. Can I solve it myself?
3. Is this the best solution?
4. What assumptions am I making?
5. If starting fresh today, would I choose this?

Bias Checklist

□ FOMO — Am I afraid of missing out?
□ Sunk Cost — Am I factoring past investment?
□ Authority — Am I deferring to credentials?
□ Social Proof — Am I following the crowd?
□ Commitment — Do I feel locked in by past statements?
□ Optimism — Am I assuming problems will resolve?
□ Recency — Am I overweighting recent events?
□ Confirmation — Am I seeking validating info only?
□ Shiny Object — Is novelty distracting me?
□ Loss Aversion — Am I overweighting potential losses?

Opportunity Cost Calculator

Hours/week × Weeks × Hourly rate = Direct cost
+ What else could those hours produce?
+ What relationships/opportunities might suffer?
= True opportunity cost

Scenario Matrix

| Scenario | Probability | Outcome | Expected Value |
|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| Worst    | X%          | ...     | ...            |
| Bad      | X%          | ...     | ...            |
| Neutral  | X%          | ...     | ...            |
| Good     | X%          | ...     | ...            |
| Best     | X%          | ...     | ...            |

Pre-mortem

Imagine it's [future date]. This decision failed. Why?

Possible causes:
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Which causes are within my control?
Which warning signs should I watch for?

10-10-10 Framework

How will I feel about this decision in:
- 10 minutes?
- 10 months?
- 10 years?

Regret Minimization

Imagine you're 80 looking back.
Would you regret doing this?
Would you regret NOT doing this?

Implementation Guide

Step 1: Gather Context

Ask user for:

  • What is the decision?
  • What are the options?
  • What's the timeline?
  • What's at stake?
  • Any relevant background?

Or extract from existing documents (meeting transcripts, notes).

Step 2: Choose Output Format

Based on user preference and context:

  • Complex decision + time available → Interactive HTML
  • Quick analysis → Markdown framework
  • On-the-go consumption → Voice summary
  • Need to share with others → PDF report

Step 3: Generate Tool

Use templates in templates/ directory:

  • decision-guide-template.html — Full interactive wizard
  • decision-framework.md — Text-based analysis
  • decision-voice-summary.md — Audio script template

Step 4: Customize

Replace placeholders:

  • {{DECISION_TITLE}} — What's being decided
  • {{CONTEXT}} — Background information
  • {{OPTIONS}} — Available choices
  • {{STAKEHOLDERS}} — People/teams involved
  • {{TIMELINE}} — Relevant dates
  • {{FACTORS}} — Key evaluation criteria

Step 5: Apply Branding (Optional)

If using Agency brand:

  • Import brand-agency skill CSS variables
  • Use neobrutalism styling
  • Apply Geist/EB Garamond typography

Accessibility Implementation

Semantic HTML

<main role="main" aria-label="Decision Guide">
  <nav aria-label="Progress">
    <ol role="list">...</ol>
  </nav>
  <section aria-labelledby="step-title">
    <h1 id="step-title">...</h1>
  </section>
</main>

Keyboard Navigation

// Ensure all interactive elements are focusable
// Tab order follows visual order
// Enter/Space activate buttons
// Arrow keys navigate options

Screen Reader Announcements

<div role="status" aria-live="polite" id="announcer">
  <!-- Announce step changes, selections, results -->
</div>

Color Contrast

/* Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text */
--text-on-light: #000000;  /* 21:1 on white */
--text-on-dark: #ffffff;   /* 21:1 on black */
--text-on-primary: #ffffff; /* Check each color */

Reduced Motion

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  * {
    animation: none !important;
    transition: none !important;
  }
}

Cultural Considerations

Individualist Framing

  • "What do YOU want?"
  • Personal goals and values
  • Individual opportunity cost

Collectivist Framing

  • "How does this affect your team/family?"
  • Relationship implications
  • Group harmony considerations

Power Distance Awareness

  • Some cultures defer to authority figures
  • Bias check should include "Am I deferring inappropriately?"
  • Include stakeholder perspectives explicitly

Uncertainty Tolerance

  • Some prefer detailed scenario analysis
  • Others find it anxiety-inducing
  • Offer both detailed and simplified views

Example Invocations

From Meeting Transcript

User: Analyze this meeting transcript and create a decision toolkit
Claude: [Extracts decision, stakeholders, options from transcript]
        [Generates interactive HTML guide]
        [Creates voice summary]

From Scratch

User: I need to decide whether to take a new job offer
Claude: [Asks clarifying questions]
        [Generates decision framework]
        [Customizes for career decision type]

Quick Analysis

User: Help me think through this partnership decision, just give me the frameworks
Claude: [Provides markdown framework]
        [Skips interactive tool]
        [Focuses on key questions]

Files

  • SKILL.md — This file
  • templates/decision-guide-template.html — Interactive wizard template
  • templates/decision-framework.md — Text-based analysis template
  • templates/decision-voice-summary.md — Audio script template
  • references/bias-encyclopedia.md — Detailed bias descriptions
  • references/framework-deep-dives.md — Extended framework explanations

Integration

Works well with:

  • brand-agency — Apply visual branding
  • transcript-analyzer — Extract decisions from meetings
  • pdf-generation — Create shareable reports
  • elevenlabs-tts — Generate audio summaries

Learnings

2026-01-09

Context: Initial skill creation from Synthius decision session

Key Insight: Dashboard-everything-at-once overwhelms. Step-by-step wizard with one concept per screen dramatically improves usability.

Architecture: 9-step journey covering all major decision dimensions. State object persists selections across steps. Summary aggregates everything.

Accessibility Note: High contrast neobrutalism actually helps accessibility — clear borders, distinct states, no subtle gradients.

平台分布

Claude Code

27.94%
按下载量换算286

windsurf

22.93%
按下载量换算234

OpenCode

16.96%
按下载量换算173

Codex

13.48%
按下载量换算138

Antigravity

8.7%
按下载量换算89

Gemini CLI

3.94%
按下载量换算40

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills