Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

decision-distiller决策蒸馏器

Agent Skill

decision-distiller 用于补充运维相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接运维相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

7,391

周安装

299

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,320
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decision-distiller(决策蒸馏器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/harrylabsj/decision-distiller
安装命令:
openclaw skills install decision-distiller
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install decision-distiller

简介

提炼会议或决策过程中的背景、选项与结果,形成可追溯的结构化记录。

  • 适用于复盘重要决定或归档团队共识以备未来查阅的场景。
  • 输入讨论要点与决议内容,输出带时间线与责任人标注的决策档案。
  • 需人工校验关键事实,避免仅凭记忆转录导致信息失真。
  • decision-distiller 属于运维类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
decision-distiller
description
Distill decision contexts, options, trade-offs, and outcomes into structured decision records. Use when the user is facing a choice, has made a decision they want to document, or needs to analyze past decisions for patterns. Captures rationale, alternatives considered, and lessons learned.

Decision Distiller

Overview

Decision Distiller helps capture, structure, and learn from decisions made during OpenClaw sessions. It transforms informal decision-making into documented, reviewable records that build organizational knowledge over time.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A user is weighing multiple options and needs clarity
  • A decision has been made and should be documented
  • Past decisions need review or analysis
  • Decision patterns across sessions should be identified
  • The user asks to "document this decision" or "record why we chose X"

Core Concepts

Decision Record

A structured document capturing:

  • Context: Situation requiring a decision
  • Options: Alternatives considered
  • Criteria: How options were evaluated
  • Decision: The choice made
  • Rationale: Why this choice was made
  • Trade-offs: What was gained/lost
  • Outcome: Result of the decision (filled later)
  • Lessons: What was learned

Decision Status

  • pending: Decision not yet made
  • decided: Decision made, awaiting outcome
  • validated: Decision proven correct
  • revised: Decision changed based on new information
  • archived: Decision no longer relevant

Input

Accepts decision information in various forms:

  • Conversation about options
  • Pros/cons lists
  • Direct statements of choice
  • Retrospective analysis

Output

Produces:

  • Dated decision records (Markdown)
  • Decision summaries
  • Pattern analysis across decisions
  • Decision status reports

Workflow

Capturing a New Decision

  1. Identify Context

- What situation required a decision? - What was at stake? - Who was involved?

  1. List Options

- What alternatives were considered? - What was eliminated early? - What made it to final consideration?

  1. Define Criteria

- How were options evaluated? - What mattered most? - Were there constraints?

  1. Record Decision

- What was chosen? - When was it decided? - Who decided?

  1. Document Rationale

- Why was this option selected? - What tipped the balance? - What assumptions were made?

  1. Note Trade-offs

- What was sacrificed? - What risks were accepted? - What opportunities were passed?

Reviewing Past Decisions

  1. Gather Records

- Collect relevant decision records - Filter by topic, date, or status

  1. Analyze Patterns

- Common criteria used - Recurring trade-offs - Typical decision timelines

  1. Extract Lessons

- What worked well? - What would change? - What patterns emerge?

Output Format

Decision Record

# Decision: [Title] - YYYY-MM-DD

**ID**: DEC-2024-001
**Status**: decided
**Decided By**: [Name/Role]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

## Context
[Description of the situation requiring a decision]

## Options Considered

### Option 1: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

### Option 2: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

## Decision Criteria
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: High/Medium/Low
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: High/Medium/Low

## Decision
**Chosen**: [Option X]

## Rationale
[Why this option was selected over others]

## Trade-offs
- **Accepted**: [What we gave up]
- **Mitigated**: [How we reduced risks]

## Expected Outcome
[What we expect to happen]

## Actual Outcome
[Filled in later - what actually happened]

## Lessons Learned
[Filled in later - insights from the outcome]

## Related Decisions
- [Link to related decision]

Commands

Create Decision Record

decision create "Decision title" --status pending

Update Decision

decision update DEC-2024-001 --status validated

List Decisions

decision list --status decided --since 2024-01-01

Analyze Patterns

decision analyze --topic architecture

Quality Rules

  • Be specific: vague decisions teach no lessons
  • Include alternatives: decisions without options aren't decisions
  • Document rationale: future you needs to know why
  • Review outcomes: a decision isn't complete until its outcome is known
  • Link related decisions: build decision networks

Good Trigger Examples

  • "Document this decision: we're going with X"
  • "Help me decide between A and B"
  • "What decisions have we made about architecture?"
  • "Review our deployment decisions from last month"
  • "I decided to use Y instead of Z, record that"

Resources

references/

  • references/decision-templates.md: Variations for different decision types
  • references/analysis-frameworks.md: Tools for analyzing decisions

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.73%
按下载量换算2,151

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills