Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维

decision-distiller(决策蒸馏器)

decision-distiller 用于补充运维相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接运维相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

decision-distiller 是运维类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维类的 954 个 Skill 里排第 491。

总安装 7,391周安装 299GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,320核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decision-distiller(决策蒸馏器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/harrylabsj/decision-distiller
安装命令:
openclaw skills install decision-distiller
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install decision-distiller

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

提炼会议或决策过程中的背景、选项与结果,形成可追溯的结构化记录。适用于复盘重要决定或归档团队共识以备未来查阅的场景。输入讨论要点与决议内容,输出带时间线与责任人标注的决策档案。需人工校验关键事实,避免仅凭记忆转录导致信息失真。decision-distiller 属于运维类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install decision-distiller;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

decision-distiller 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install decision-distiller。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

decision-distiller 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

decision-distiller 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

decision-distiller 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

decision-distiller 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,391 次,近一周安装 299 次,下载 2,320 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

decision-distiller 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
docker-essentials

Docker 基础 · OpenClaw

1,005,15130接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
playwright-scraper-skill

Playwright scraper 技能 · OpenClaw

923,55754接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
moltguard

moltguard 搜索 · OpenClaw

825,096110接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
finance-news

财经新闻 · OpenClaw

275,51210需要联网MIT-0有提醒
security-monitor

安全监视器 · OpenClaw

224,1695需要联网MIT-0有提醒
decision-distiller

决策蒸馏器 · 本页

7,391—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
decision-distiller
description
Distill decision contexts, options, trade-offs, and outcomes into structured decision records. Use when the user is facing a choice, has made a decision they want to document, or needs to analyze past decisions for patterns. Captures rationale, alternatives considered, and lessons learned.

Decision Distiller

Overview

Decision Distiller helps capture, structure, and learn from decisions made during OpenClaw sessions. It transforms informal decision-making into documented, reviewable records that build organizational knowledge over time.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A user is weighing multiple options and needs clarity
  • A decision has been made and should be documented
  • Past decisions need review or analysis
  • Decision patterns across sessions should be identified
  • The user asks to "document this decision" or "record why we chose X"

Core Concepts

Decision Record

A structured document capturing:

  • Context: Situation requiring a decision
  • Options: Alternatives considered
  • Criteria: How options were evaluated
  • Decision: The choice made
  • Rationale: Why this choice was made
  • Trade-offs: What was gained/lost
  • Outcome: Result of the decision (filled later)
  • Lessons: What was learned

Decision Status

  • pending: Decision not yet made
  • decided: Decision made, awaiting outcome
  • validated: Decision proven correct
  • revised: Decision changed based on new information
  • archived: Decision no longer relevant

Input

Accepts decision information in various forms:

  • Conversation about options
  • Pros/cons lists
  • Direct statements of choice
  • Retrospective analysis

Output

Produces:

  • Dated decision records (Markdown)
  • Decision summaries
  • Pattern analysis across decisions
  • Decision status reports

Workflow

Capturing a New Decision

  1. Identify Context

- What situation required a decision? - What was at stake? - Who was involved?

  1. List Options

- What alternatives were considered? - What was eliminated early? - What made it to final consideration?

  1. Define Criteria

- How were options evaluated? - What mattered most? - Were there constraints?

  1. Record Decision

- What was chosen? - When was it decided? - Who decided?

  1. Document Rationale

- Why was this option selected? - What tipped the balance? - What assumptions were made?

  1. Note Trade-offs

- What was sacrificed? - What risks were accepted? - What opportunities were passed?

Reviewing Past Decisions

  1. Gather Records

- Collect relevant decision records - Filter by topic, date, or status

  1. Analyze Patterns

- Common criteria used - Recurring trade-offs - Typical decision timelines

  1. Extract Lessons

- What worked well? - What would change? - What patterns emerge?

Output Format

Decision Record

# Decision: [Title] - YYYY-MM-DD

**ID**: DEC-2024-001
**Status**: decided
**Decided By**: [Name/Role]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

## Context
[Description of the situation requiring a decision]

## Options Considered

### Option 1: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

### Option 2: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

## Decision Criteria
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: High/Medium/Low
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: High/Medium/Low

## Decision
**Chosen**: [Option X]

## Rationale
[Why this option was selected over others]

## Trade-offs
- **Accepted**: [What we gave up]
- **Mitigated**: [How we reduced risks]

## Expected Outcome
[What we expect to happen]

## Actual Outcome
[Filled in later - what actually happened]

## Lessons Learned
[Filled in later - insights from the outcome]

## Related Decisions
- [Link to related decision]

Commands

Create Decision Record

decision create "Decision title" --status pending

Update Decision

decision update DEC-2024-001 --status validated

List Decisions

decision list --status decided --since 2024-01-01

Analyze Patterns

decision analyze --topic architecture

Quality Rules

  • Be specific: vague decisions teach no lessons
  • Include alternatives: decisions without options aren't decisions
  • Document rationale: future you needs to know why
  • Review outcomes: a decision isn't complete until its outcome is known
  • Link related decisions: build decision networks

Good Trigger Examples

  • "Document this decision: we're going with X"
  • "Help me decide between A and B"
  • "What decisions have we made about architecture?"
  • "Review our deployment decisions from last month"
  • "I decided to use Y instead of Z, record that"

Resources

references/

  • references/decision-templates.md: Variations for different decision types
  • references/analysis-frameworks.md: Tools for analyzing decisions

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.73%
按下载量换算2,151

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills