Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

decide(decide 搜索)

decide 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

decide 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 509。

总安装 81,886周安装 3,345GitHub Stars 4下载 26,492核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decide(decide 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ivangdavila/decide
安装命令:
openclaw skills install decide
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install decide

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助前端页面和组件开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目或生成界面时使用。适用于决策模式学习和界面实现检查场景。可结合项目现有设计系统使用。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态。

decide 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install decide;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

decide 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install decide。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

decide 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

decide 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

decide 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

decide 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 81,886 次,近一周安装 3,345 次,下载 26,492 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

decide 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
decide

decide 搜索 · 本页

81,8864需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Decide
slug
decide
version
1.0.1
homepage
https://clawic.com/skills/decide
description
Self-learn your decision patterns to safely build its own decision-making over time.
changelog
Adds structured decision logging, safer setup, and stricter context matching before autonomous choices.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"⚖️","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"],"configPaths":["~/decide/"]}}

Architecture

Decision state lives in ~/decide/. If that folder is missing or empty, run setup.md.

~/decide/
├── memory.md        # Durable decision rules, approval boundaries, and confirmed defaults
├── decisions.md     # Major decisions with question, components, chosen option, and outcome
└── domains/         # Domain-specific decision components, overrides, and exceptions

When to Use

Use when the agent faces a consequential choice that can change architecture, workflow, cost, publish behavior, vendor selection, or long-term project direction.

This skill is for branching decisions, not for generic preferences or execution lessons. It should stay compatible with self-improving: self-improving learns how to work better, while decide learns how to choose safely when the choice has lasting consequences.

Quick Reference

TopicFile
Setup guidesetup.md
Memory templatememory-template.md
Migration guidemigration.md
Decision componentscomponents.md
Confidence calibrationconfidence.md
Exceptions and always-ask casesexceptions.md

Use those files as a decision safety stack: first know the structure, then calibrate confidence, then verify exceptions before reusing any past choice.

Decision Workflow

  1. Frame the decision as a real question, not as a vague feeling.
  2. Gather the components that materially affect the answer.
  3. Read ~/decide/memory.md, then the smallest relevant file in ~/decide/domains/, then check ~/decide/decisions.md for a materially similar record.
  4. Reuse a past choice only if the question, the key components, and the exception boundaries still line up.
  5. If anything important is missing or changed, ask first and log the answer once the human decides.

Core Rules

1. Default Conservative on Consequential Choices

  • Frameworks, architectures, migrations, vendors, publish paths, spending, and irreversible branches should default to asking the human.
  • Safer failure means asking one question too many, not silently picking the wrong branch.
  • A recommendation is good; an unvalidated autonomous choice is not.

2. A Decision Requires Components, Not Vibes

  • Every major decision should be framed as a question plus the components that materially affect the answer.
  • Components can include product surface, client type, reversibility, budget, timeline, team size, project constraints, and long-term maintenance cost.
  • If the needed components are missing, the decision is not ready for autonomy.

3. Reuse Only When the Context Materially Matches

  • A stored rule is reusable only when the question and the key components match closely enough to make the same choice still rational.
  • Matching one signal is not enough. "Same framework choice" is weak if client, surface, constraints, or risk changed.
  • If there is any serious mismatch, ask first.
  • Exceptions beat defaults. A confirmed default is still invalid when a domain override or high-stakes exception changes the branch.

4. Promote Patterns Only After Human Confirmation

  • Repeatedly seeing the same decision in the same context makes a candidate rule, not an autonomous permission.
  • After enough similar decisions, ask: "When this is true plus this plus this, should I default to X?"
  • Only promote the pattern after explicit confirmation.

5. Log the Full Decision, Not Just the Outcome

  • Store the question, components, chosen option, rationale, confidence, and outcome.
  • A naked note like "use React Native" is too weak; it must say when and why.
  • Good logs prevent false autonomy later.

6. Keep Workspace Routing Non-Destructive

  • Use setup to add small AGENTS and SOUL snippets that force decision retrieval before major choices.
  • Show the exact snippet and wait for explicit approval before writing any workspace file.
  • The routing must make it hard to skip the decision log when a consequential branch appears.

7. Never Let Decision Memory Shadow Other Skills

  • Use self-improving for execution quality, corrections, and reusable work habits.
  • Use escalate for ask-vs-act boundaries across actions broadly.
  • Use decide only for major branching choices where the structure of the context determines the answer.

Common Traps

These failures usually come from pattern-matching too early or from collapsing a major decision into a shallow preference.

TrapWhy It FailsBetter Move
Reusing a rule because the question sounds similarImportant components may have changedCompare question plus key components before reusing
Treating one-off emergency choices as defaultsStress decisions rarely generalize wellLog them, but keep them unconfirmed unless repeated
Autodeciding after reading only memory.mdExceptions and domain overrides get missedList domains, read the smallest relevant override, then check decisions
Turning execution preferences into decision rulesBlurs compatibility with self-improvingKeep major branching choices in decide, workflow lessons elsewhere
Applying a framework or vendor rule across clients blindlyClient and surface often change the optimal answerAsk again when client, platform, scope, or constraints differ

Data Storage

Local state lives in ~/decide/:

  • durable decision rules, approval boundaries, and confirmed defaults in ~/decide/memory.md
  • major decision records in ~/decide/decisions.md
  • domain-specific component models, overrides, and exceptions in ~/decide/domains/

The packaged guides components.md, confidence.md, and exceptions.md stay in the skill itself and act as references, not as the user's live memory.

Security & Privacy

  • This skill stores local decision notes in ~/decide/.
  • It may read workspace steering files such as the AGENTS file and SOUL file so that decision retrieval happens before major choices.
  • It may suggest small non-destructive edits to those files during setup, but it must show the snippet and wait for explicit approval before any write.
  • It should prefer asking to guessing whenever a decision can affect money, production, publishing, deletion, contracts, or long-term architecture.
  • It never modifies its own SKILL.md.

Related Skills

Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:

  • escalate - Control broad ask-vs-act boundaries around risky actions
  • self-improving - Learn execution lessons without conflating them with decision rules
  • memory - Keep broader long-term context and user continuity
  • proactivity - Push the next step while respecting confirmed decision defaults

Feedback

  • If useful: clawhub star decide
  • Stay updated: clawhub sync

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.29%
按下载量换算25,509

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills