Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

java-code-review(Java 代码审查)

用于辅助 Java 项目开发、面向对象设计、Spring 生态、Maven 或 Gradle 依赖和后端工程实践。它适合让 Agent 分析类结构、设计接口、整理服务分层、生成测试或检查常见代码坏味道。使用时需要结合项目已有架构、包结构和依赖版本,不应只按通用教程改代码;涉及数据库、事务、并发或框架配置时,应先确认运行环境和回归测试范围。

java-code-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 19,443。

总安装 5,606周安装 229GitHub Stars 539下载 1,795核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:java-code-review(Java 代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java
仓库路径:skills/java-code-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill java-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill java-code-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

该技能提供 Java 代码审查清单,覆盖异常处理与资源管理。适用于 PR 合并前的质量门禁检查场景。通过 GitHub 仓库安装,按严重程度分级列出改进建议。建议关注 try-with-resources 使用与空指针防护等常见问题。

java-code-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/java-code-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill java-code-re…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

java-code-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill java-code-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

java-code-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

java-code-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

java-code-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

java-code-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,606 次,近一周安装 229 次,下载 1,795 次,GitHub 539 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

java-code-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
java-code-review

Java 代码审查 · 本页

5,606539需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Java Code Review Skill

Systematic code review checklist for Java projects.

When to Use

  • User says "review this code" / "check this PR" / "code review"
  • Before merging a PR
  • After implementing a feature

Review Strategy

  1. Quick scan - Understand intent, identify scope
  2. Checklist pass - Go through each category below
  3. Summary - List findings by severity (Critical → Minor)

Output Format

## Code Review: [file/feature name]

### Critical
- [Issue description + line reference + suggestion]

### Improvements
- [Suggestion + rationale]

### Minor/Style
- [Nitpicks, optional improvements]

### Good Practices Observed
- [Positive feedback - important for morale]

Review Checklist

1. Null Safety

Check for:

// ❌ NPE risk
String name = user.getName().toUpperCase();

// ✅ Safe
String name = Optional.ofNullable(user.getName())
    .map(String::toUpperCase)
    .orElse("");

// ✅ Also safe (early return)
if (user.getName() == null) {
    return "";
}
return user.getName().toUpperCase();

Flags:

  • Chained method calls without null checks
  • Missing @Nullable / @NonNull annotations on public APIs
  • Optional.get() without isPresent() check
  • Returning null from methods that could return Optional or empty collection

Suggest:

  • Use Optional for return types that may be absent
  • Use Objects.requireNonNull() for constructor/method params
  • Return empty collections instead of null: Collections.emptyList()

2. Exception Handling

Check for:

// ❌ Swallowing exceptions
try {
    process();
} catch (Exception e) {
    // silently ignored
}

// ❌ Catching too broad
catch (Exception e) { }
catch (Throwable t) { }

// ❌ Losing stack trace
catch (IOException e) {
    throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());
}

// ✅ Proper handling
catch (IOException e) {
    log.error("Failed to process file: {}", filename, e);
    throw new ProcessingException("File processing failed", e);
}

Flags:

  • Empty catch blocks
  • Catching Exception or Throwable broadly
  • Losing original exception (not chaining)
  • Using exceptions for flow control
  • Checked exceptions leaking through API boundaries

Suggest:

  • Log with context AND stack trace
  • Use specific exception types
  • Chain exceptions with cause
  • Consider custom exceptions for domain errors

3. Collections & Streams

Check for:

// ❌ Modifying while iterating
for (Item item : items) {
    if (item.isExpired()) {
        items.remove(item);  // ConcurrentModificationException
    }
}

// ✅ Use removeIf
items.removeIf(Item::isExpired);

// ❌ Stream for simple operations
list.stream().forEach(System.out::println);

// ✅ Simple loop is cleaner
for (Item item : list) {
    System.out.println(item);
}

// ❌ Collecting to modify
List<String> names = users.stream()
    .map(User::getName)
    .collect(Collectors.toList());
names.add("extra");  // Might be immutable!

// ✅ Explicit mutable list
List<String> names = users.stream()
    .map(User::getName)
    .collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new));

Flags:

  • Modifying collections during iteration
  • Overusing streams for simple operations
  • Assuming Collectors.toList() returns mutable list
  • Not using List.of(), Set.of(), Map.of() for immutable collections
  • Parallel streams without understanding implications

Suggest:

  • List.copyOf() for defensive copies
  • removeIf() instead of iterator removal
  • Streams for transformations, loops for side effects

4. Concurrency

Check for:

// ❌ Not thread-safe
private Map<String, User> cache = new HashMap<>();

// ✅ Thread-safe
private Map<String, User> cache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

// ❌ Check-then-act race condition
if (!map.containsKey(key)) {
    map.put(key, computeValue());
}

// ✅ Atomic operation
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> computeValue());

// ❌ Double-checked locking (broken without volatile)
if (instance == null) {
    synchronized(this) {
        if (instance == null) {
            instance = new Instance();
        }
    }
}

Flags:

  • Shared mutable state without synchronization
  • Check-then-act patterns without atomicity
  • Missing volatile on shared variables
  • Synchronized on non-final objects
  • Thread-unsafe lazy initialization

Suggest:

  • Prefer immutable objects
  • Use java.util.concurrent classes
  • AtomicReference, AtomicInteger for simple cases
  • Consider @ThreadSafe / @NotThreadSafe annotations

5. Java Idioms

equals/hashCode:

// ❌ Only equals without hashCode
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) { ... }
// Missing hashCode!

// ❌ Mutable fields in hashCode
@Override
public int hashCode() {
    return Objects.hash(id, mutableField);  // Breaks HashMap
}

// ✅ Use immutable fields, implement both
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
    if (this == o) return true;
    if (!(o instanceof User user)) return false;
    return Objects.equals(id, user.id);
}

@Override
public int hashCode() {
    return Objects.hash(id);
}

toString:

// ❌ Missing - hard to debug
// No toString()

// ❌ Including sensitive data
return "User{password='" + password + "'}";

// ✅ Useful for debugging
@Override
public String toString() {
    return "User{id=" + id + ", name='" + name + "'}";
}

Builders:

// ✅ For classes with many optional parameters
User user = User.builder()
    .name("John")
    .email("john@example.com")
    .build();

Flags:

  • equals without hashCode
  • Mutable fields in hashCode
  • Missing toString on domain objects
  • Constructors with > 3-4 parameters (suggest builder)
  • Not using instanceof pattern matching (Java 16+)

6. Resource Management

Check for:

// ❌ Resource leak
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
// ... might throw before close

// ✅ Try-with-resources
try (FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file)) {
    // ...
}

// ❌ Multiple resources, wrong order
try (BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(file))) {
    // FileWriter might not be closed if BufferedWriter fails
}

// ✅ Separate declarations
try (FileWriter fw = new FileWriter(file);
     BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(fw)) {
    // Both properly closed
}

Flags:

  • Not using try-with-resources for Closeable/AutoCloseable
  • Resources opened but not in try-with-resources
  • Database connections/statements not properly closed

7. API Design

Check for:

// ❌ Boolean parameters
process(data, true, false);  // What do these mean?

// ✅ Use enums or builder
process(data, ProcessMode.ASYNC, ErrorHandling.STRICT);

// ❌ Returning null for "not found"
public User findById(Long id) {
    return users.get(id);  // null if not found
}

// ✅ Return Optional
public Optional<User> findById(Long id) {
    return Optional.ofNullable(users.get(id));
}

// ❌ Accepting null collections
public void process(List<Item> items) {
    if (items == null) items = Collections.emptyList();
}

// ✅ Require non-null, accept empty
public void process(List<Item> items) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(items, "items must not be null");
}

Flags:

  • Boolean parameters (prefer enums)
  • Methods with > 3 parameters (consider parameter object)
  • Inconsistent null handling across similar methods
  • Missing validation on public API inputs

8. Performance Considerations

Check for:

// ❌ String concatenation in loop
String result = "";
for (String s : strings) {
    result += s;  // Creates new String each iteration
}

// ✅ StringBuilder
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (String s : strings) {
    sb.append(s);
}

// ❌ Regex compilation in loop
for (String line : lines) {
    if (line.matches("pattern.*")) { }  // Compiles regex each time
}

// ✅ Pre-compiled pattern
private static final Pattern PATTERN = Pattern.compile("pattern.*");
for (String line : lines) {
    if (PATTERN.matcher(line).matches()) { }
}

// ❌ N+1 in loops
for (User user : users) {
    List<Order> orders = orderRepo.findByUserId(user.getId());
}

// ✅ Batch fetch
Map<Long, List<Order>> ordersByUser = orderRepo.findByUserIds(userIds);

Flags:

  • String concatenation in loops
  • Regex compilation in loops
  • N+1 query patterns
  • Creating objects in tight loops that could be reused
  • Not using primitive streams (IntStream, LongStream)

9. Testing Hints

Suggest tests for:

  • Null inputs
  • Empty collections
  • Boundary values
  • Exception cases
  • Concurrent access (if applicable)

Severity Guidelines

SeverityCriteria
CriticalSecurity vulnerability, data loss risk, production crash
HighBug likely, significant performance issue, breaks API contract
MediumCode smell, maintainability issue, missing best practice
LowStyle, minor optimization, suggestion

Token Optimization

  • Focus on changed lines (use git diff)
  • Don't repeat obvious issues - group similar findings
  • Reference line numbers, not full code quotes
  • Skip files that are auto-generated or test fixtures

Quick Reference Card

CategoryKey Checks
Null SafetyChained calls, Optional misuse, null returns
ExceptionsEmpty catch, broad catch, lost stack trace
CollectionsModification during iteration, stream vs loop
ConcurrencyShared mutable state, check-then-act
Idiomsequals/hashCode pair, toString, builders
Resourcestry-with-resources, connection leaks
APIBoolean params, null handling, validation
PerformanceString concat, regex in loop, N+1

平台分布

Codex

34.49%
按下载量换算619

Claude

29.67%
按下载量换算533

Cursor

18.31%
按下载量换算329

Gemini CLI

8.43%
按下载量换算151

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills