- name
- debate-learning-workflow
- description
- Run evidence-backed multi-agent debates (A/B/Opponent3/Judge) with 20-40 rounds, loophole analysis, and universal actionable lesson extraction.
Debate Learning Workflow
Use this skill to run structured, high-rigor debates that produce transferable learning.
Core Rules
- Minimum 20 rounds per topic.
- Judge-gated continuation if critical loopholes remain.
- Hard stop at 40 rounds.
- Openings must include Claim + Evidence + Source.
- Unsupported openings are invalid and must be revised.
- Every round logs:
- loophole found - why loophole exists - concrete fix for next round
Roles
- Debater A
- Debater B
- Opponent3 (alternative/challenger model)
- Judge (evidence quality + unresolved uncertainty)
Output Files
- Topic file:
~/Desktop/debate/YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md - Daily index:
~/Desktop/debate/YYYY-MM-DD-index.md - Lessons append target:
~/Desktop/lessons.md
Universalization Quality Gate
Every generalized lesson must include: 1) Trigger condition 2) Loophole/failure pattern 3) Root cause 4) Corrective action 5) Measurable metric/threshold 6) Boundary conditions 7) Transfer examples in at least 2 other fields
If any field is missing, lesson is INVALID and must be rewritten.