Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

deal-risk-scoring(交易风险评分)

deal-risk-scoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

deal-risk-scoring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 36,486。

总安装 1,915周安装 79GitHub Stars 85下载 626核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deal-risk-scoring(交易风险评分)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/deal-risk-scoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

deal-risk-scoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。它通过多信号分析评估单个交易健康状况,用于优先分配辅导时间、干预资源和执行支持。

使用时建议结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring,适用于主流 AI 宿主环境。注意该技能归类为研究检索,建议在使用前进一步验证其适用场景和安全边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/deal-risk-scoring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill deal-risk-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

deal-risk-scoring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

deal-risk-scoring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

deal-risk-scoring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

deal-risk-scoring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

deal-risk-scoring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,915 次,近一周安装 79 次,下载 626 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

deal-risk-scoring 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
deal-risk-scoring

交易风险评分 · 本页

1,91585只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Deal Risk Scoring

Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.

When to Use This Skill

  • Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
  • Before QBRs to identify problem deals
  • When deals stall or push close dates
  • Prioritizing manager coaching time
  • Allocating SE/executive resources

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:

  • Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
  • Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
  • Competitive signals
  • Timeline alignment
  • Champion strength

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Scores deals on risk factorsWhich deals to save vs. let go
Identifies missing elementsResource allocation priorities
Suggests intervention actionsExecutive sponsor assignments
Tracks velocity trendsFinal stage/probability updates
Flags competitive threatsWin strategy adjustments

What This Skill Does

  1. Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
  2. Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
  3. Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
  4. Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
  5. Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time

How to Use

Assess the risk for this deal:

Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X

Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]

Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]

Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]

Instructions

Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Meeting in last 7 days+10
Email response in last 3 days+5
Multiple contacts engaged+5
Prospect initiating contact+5
No activity 14+ days-15

Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Economic Buyer identified+10
Champion confirmed+10
Technical evaluator engaged+5
Only 1 contact-10
No C-level access-5

Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Clear next step scheduled+10
Mutual action plan agreed+10
Decision timeline confirmed+5
Close date pushed 2+ times-15
No defined process-10

Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
No competition+15
Differentiation clear+10
Incumbent advantage-10
Price pressure-5
Unknown competitive status-5

Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score

ScoreHealthAction
75-100🟢 GreenMonitor, standard process
50-74🟡 YellowIntervention needed
25-49🟠 OrangeEscalate, major action
0-24🔴 RedRescue or disqualify

Examples

Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal

Input:

Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28

Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)

Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts

Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global

### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |

### Critical Risks

1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor

2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
   - If John is out, deal is dead

3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
   - John may not have authority to close

### Recommended Actions

**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval

**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot

### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized

### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.

Example 2: Healthy Deal Review

Input:

Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7

Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10

Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo

Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc

### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |

### Strengths

1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally

### Minor Risks

1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines

2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call

### Recommended Actions

**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria

### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Objective risk scoring from available data
  • Identifying gaps in deal coverage
  • Prioritizing which deals need attention
  • Suggesting specific interventions

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Know information not provided (internal politics)
  • Predict competitor moves
  • Replace relationship judgment
  • Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data

When to Escalate to Human

  • Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
  • Deals involving partnerships or M&A
  • Unusual contract structures
  • Competitive intelligence gathering

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
  • "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
  • "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
  • "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks
  2. Take action → Update activity log
  3. Re-score → Track improvement
  4. Weekly review → Trend analysis

Checklists & Templates

Deal Health Checklist

  • Champion identified and engaged this week
  • Economic Buyer met at least once
  • Next step scheduled within 7 days
  • Competition status known
  • Close date validated by prospect

Risk Score Template

## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]

### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]

### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |

### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.

References

  • Gong Deal Intelligence Research
  • Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
  • MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
  • Force Management Command of the Message

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Aggregate deal health into forecast
  • lead-qualification-meddic - Deep qualification framework
  • account-health - Post-sale relationship scoring

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
  • Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map

平台分布

Codex

38.6%
按下载量换算242

Claude

29.58%
按下载量换算185

Cursor

19.03%
按下载量换算119

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算62

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills