Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

github-workflow-automation(GitHub 工作流自动化)

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

github-workflow-automation 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 272。

总安装 7,104周安装 296GitHub Stars 26,406下载 2,368核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:github-workflow-automation(GitHub 工作流自动化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates
仓库路径:skills/github-workflow-automation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill github-workflow-automation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill github-workflow-automation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

github-workflow-automation 提供 PR 审核、CI/CD 集成与 Git 操作自动化模板。支持 AI 驱动的 issue 分类、rebase 与 cherry-pick 等高级协作流程。通过 YAML 工作流定义自动化规则,提升团队协作效率与一致性。

涉及敏感操作时应限制 token 权限范围,遵循最小特权原则。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/github-workflow-automation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill github-w…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

github-workflow-automation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill github-workflow-au…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

github-workflow-automation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

github-workflow-automation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

github-workflow-automation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

github-workflow-automation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,104 次,近一周安装 296 次,下载 2,368 次,GitHub 26,406 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

github-workflow-automation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 来源仓库有 26,406 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
github-workflow-automation

GitHub 工作流自动化 · 本页

7,10426,406接触敏感数据MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

🔧 GitHub Workflow Automation

Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by Gemini CLI and modern DevOps practices.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Automating PR reviews with AI
  • Setting up issue triage automation
  • Creating GitHub Actions workflows
  • Integrating AI into CI/CD pipelines
  • Automating Git operations (rebases, cherry-picks)

1. Automated PR Review

1.1 PR Review Action

# .github/workflows/ai-review.yml
name: AI Code Review

on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize]

jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Get changed files
        id: changed
        run: |
          files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
          echo "files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

      - name: Get diff
        id: diff
        run: |
          diff=$(git diff origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
          echo "diff<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "$diff" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

      - name: AI Review
        uses: actions/github-script@v7
        with:
          script: |
            const { Anthropic } = require('@anthropic-ai/sdk');
            const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });

            const response = await client.messages.create({
              model: "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
              max_tokens: 4096,
              messages: [{
                role: "user",
                content: `Review this PR diff and provide feedback:

                Changed files: ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}

                Diff:
                ${{ steps.diff.outputs.diff }}

                Provide:
                1. Summary of changes
                2. Potential issues or bugs
                3. Suggestions for improvement
                4. Security concerns if any

                Format as GitHub markdown.`
              }]
            });

            await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
              owner: context.repo.owner,
              repo: context.repo.repo,
              pull_number: context.issue.number,
              body: response.content[0].text,
              event: 'COMMENT'
            });
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

1.2 Review Comment Patterns

# AI Review Structure

## 📋 Summary

Brief description of what this PR does.

## ✅ What looks good

- Well-structured code
- Good test coverage
- Clear naming conventions

## ⚠️ Potential Issues

1. **Line 42**: Possible null pointer exception

// Current user.profile.name; // Suggested user?.profile?.name ?? "Unknown";

  1. Line 78: Consider error handling // Add try-catch or.catch()

💡 Suggestions

  • Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function
  • Add JSDoc comments for public methods

🔒 Security Notes

  • No sensitive data exposure detected
  • API key handling looks correct
### 1.3 Focused Reviews

Review only specific file types

  • name: Filter code files

run: | files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | \ grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go)$' || true) echo "code_files=$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

Review with context

  • name: AI Review with context

run: | # Include relevant context files context="" for file in ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}; do if [[ -f "$file" ]]; then context+="=== $file ===\n$(cat $file)\n\n" fi done

# Send to AI with full file context


---

## 2. Issue Triage Automation

### 2.1 Auto-label Issues

.github/workflows/issue-triage.yml

name: Issue Triage

on: issues: types: [opened]

jobs: triage: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: issues: write

steps: - name: Analyze issue uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const issue = context.payload.issue;

// Call AI to analyze const analysis = await analyzeIssue(issue.title, issue.body);

// Apply labels const labels = [];

if (analysis.type === 'bug') { labels.push('bug'); if (analysis.severity === 'high') labels.push('priority: high'); } else if (analysis.type === 'feature') { labels.push('enhancement'); } else if (analysis.type === 'question') { labels.push('question'); }

if (analysis.area) { labels.push(area: ${analysis.area}); }

await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, labels: labels });

// Add initial response if (analysis.type === 'bug' && !analysis.hasReproSteps) { await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, body: `Thanks for reporting this issue!

To help us investigate, could you please provide:

  • Steps to reproduce the issue
  • Expected behavior
  • Actual behavior
  • Environment (OS, version, etc.)

This will help us resolve your issue faster. 🙏` }); }


### 2.2 Issue Analysis Prompt

const TRIAGE_PROMPT = ` Analyze this GitHub issue and classify it:

Title: {title} Body: {body}

Return JSON with: { "type": "bug" | "feature" | "question" | "docs" | "other", "severity": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical", "area": "frontend" | "backend" | "api" | "docs" | "ci" | "other", "summary": "one-line summary", "hasReproSteps": boolean, "isFirstContribution": boolean, "suggestedLabels": ["label1", "label2"], "suggestedAssignees": ["username"] // based on area expertise } `;


### 2.3 Stale Issue Management

.github/workflows/stale.yml

name: Manage Stale Issues

on: schedule: - cron: "0 0 * * *" # Daily

jobs: stale: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/stale@v9 with: stale-issue-message: | This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

If this issue is still relevant: - Add a comment with an update - Remove the stale label

Thank you for your contributions! 🙏

stale-pr-message: | This PR has been automatically marked as stale. Please update it or it will be closed in 14 days.

days-before-stale: 60 days-before-close: 14 stale-issue-label: "stale" stale-pr-label: "stale" exempt-issue-labels: "pinned,security,in-progress" exempt-pr-labels: "pinned,security"


---

## 3. CI/CD Integration

### 3.1 Smart Test Selection

.github/workflows/smart-tests.yml

name: Smart Test Selection

on: pull_request:

jobs: analyze: runs-on: ubuntu-latest outputs: test_suites: ${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suites }}

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Analyze changes id: analyze run: | # Get changed files changed=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)

# Determine which test suites to run suites="[]"

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/api/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["api"]') fi

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/frontend/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["frontend"]') fi

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/database/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["database", "api"]') fi

# If nothing specific, run all if [ "$suites" = "[]" ]; then suites='["all"]' fi

echo "suites=$suites" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

test: needs: analyze runs-on: ubuntu-latest strategy: matrix: suite: ${{ fromJson(needs.analyze.outputs.test_suites) }}

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Run tests run: | if [ "${{ matrix.suite }}" = "all" ]; then npm test else npm test -- --suite ${{ matrix.suite }} fi


### 3.2 Deployment with AI Validation

.github/workflows/deploy.yml

name: Deploy with AI Validation

on: push: branches: [main]

jobs: validate: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Get deployment changes id: changes run: | # Get commits since last deployment last_deploy=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || echo "") if [ -n "$last_deploy" ]; then changes=$(git log --oneline $last_deploy..HEAD) else changes=$(git log --oneline -10) fi echo "changes<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "$changes" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: AI Risk Assessment id: assess uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | // Analyze changes for deployment risk const prompt = ` Analyze these changes for deployment risk:

${process.env.CHANGES}

Return JSON: { "riskLevel": "low" | "medium" | "high", "concerns": ["concern1", "concern2"], "recommendations": ["rec1", "rec2"], "requiresManualApproval": boolean } `;

// Call AI and parse response const analysis = await callAI(prompt);

if (analysis.riskLevel === 'high') { core.setFailed('High-risk deployment detected. Manual review required.'); }

return analysis; env: CHANGES: ${{ steps.changes.outputs.changes }}

deploy: needs: validate runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - name: Deploy run: | echo "Deploying to production..." # Deployment commands here


### 3.3 Rollback Automation

.github/workflows/rollback.yml

name: Automated Rollback

on: workflow_dispatch: inputs: reason: description: "Reason for rollback" required: true

jobs: rollback: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Find last stable version id: stable run: | # Find last successful deployment stable=$(git tag -l 'v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1) echo "version=$stable" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Rollback run: | git checkout ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }} # Deploy stable version npm run deploy

- name: Notify team uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1 with: payload: | { "text": "🔄 Production rolled back to ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}", "blocks": [ { "type": "section", "text": { "type": "mrkdwn", "text": "*Rollback executed*\n• Version: ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}\n• Reason: ${{ inputs.reason }}\n• Triggered by: ${{ github.actor }}" } } ] }


---

## 4. Git Operations

### 4.1 Automated Rebasing

.github/workflows/auto-rebase.yml

name: Auto Rebase

on: issue_comment: types: [created]

jobs: rebase: if: github.event.issue.pull_request && contains(github.event.comment.body, '/rebase') runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: Setup Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"

- name: Rebase PR run: | # Fetch PR branch gh pr checkout ${{ github.event.issue.number }}

# Rebase onto main git fetch origin main git rebase origin/main

# Force push git push --force-with-lease env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: Comment result uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: context.issue.number, body: '✅ Successfully rebased onto main!' })


### 4.2 Smart Cherry-Pick

// AI-assisted cherry-pick that handles conflicts async function smartCherryPick(commitHash: string, targetBranch: string) { // Get commit info const commitInfo = await exec(git show ${commitHash} --stat);

// Check for potential conflicts const targetDiff = await exec( git diff ${targetBranch}...HEAD -- ${affectedFiles} );

// AI analysis const analysis = await ai.analyze(` I need to cherry-pick this commit to ${targetBranch}:

${commitInfo}

Current state of affected files on ${targetBranch}: ${targetDiff}

Will there be conflicts? If so, suggest resolution strategy. `);

if (analysis.willConflict) { // Create branch for manual resolution await exec( git checkout -b cherry-pick-${commitHash.slice(0, 7)} ${targetBranch} ); const result = await exec(git cherry-pick ${commitHash}, { allowFail: true, });

if (result.failed) { // AI-assisted conflict resolution const conflicts = await getConflicts(); for (const conflict of conflicts) { const resolution = await ai.resolveConflict(conflict); await applyResolution(conflict.file, resolution); } } } else { await exec(git checkout ${targetBranch}); await exec(git cherry-pick ${commitHash}); } }


### 4.3 Branch Cleanup

.github/workflows/branch-cleanup.yml

name: Branch Cleanup

on: schedule: - cron: '0 0 * * 0' # Weekly workflow_dispatch:

jobs: cleanup: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Find stale branches id: stale run: | # Branches not updated in 30 days stale=$(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/remotes/origin \ --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' | \ grep -E '[3-9][0-9]+ days|[0-9]+ months|[0-9]+ years' | \ grep -v 'origin/main\|origin/develop' | \ cut -d' ' -f1 | sed 's|origin/||')

echo "branches<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "$stale" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Create cleanup PR if: steps.stale.outputs.branches != '' uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const branches = ${{ steps.stale.outputs.branches }}.split('\n').filter(Boolean);

const body = `## 🧹 Stale Branch Cleanup

The following branches haven't been updated in over 30 days:

${branches.map(b => - \${b}\``).join('\n')}

Actions:

  • [ ] Review each branch
  • [ ] Delete branches that are no longer needed
  • Comment \/keep branch-name\ to preserve specific branches

`;

await github.rest.issues.create({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, title: 'Stale Branch Cleanup', body: body, labels: ['housekeeping'] });


---

## 5. On-Demand Assistance

### 5.1 @mention Bot

.github/workflows/mention-bot.yml

name: AI Mention Bot

on: issue_comment: types: [created] pull_request_review_comment: types: [created]

jobs: respond: if: contains(github.event.comment.body, '@ai-helper') runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Extract question id: question run: | # Extract text after @ai-helper question=$(echo "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" | sed 's/.*@ai-helper//') echo "question=$question" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Get context id: context run: | if [ "${{ github.event.issue.pull_request }}" != "" ]; then # It's a PR - get diff gh pr diff ${{ github.event.issue.number }} > context.txt else # It's an issue - get description gh issue view ${{ github.event.issue.number }} --json body -q .body > context.txt fi echo "context=$(cat context.txt)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: AI Response uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const response = await ai.chat(` Context: ${process.env.CONTEXT}

Question: ${process.env.QUESTION}

Provide a helpful, specific answer. Include code examples if relevant. `);

await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: context.issue.number, body: response }); env: CONTEXT: ${{ steps.context.outputs.context }} QUESTION: ${{ steps.question.outputs.question }}


### 5.2 Command Patterns

Available Commands

CommandDescription
@ai-helper explainExplain the code in this PR
@ai-helper reviewRequest AI code review
@ai-helper fixSuggest fixes for issues
@ai-helper testGenerate test cases
@ai-helper docsGenerate documentation
/rebaseRebase PR onto main
/updateUpdate PR branch from main
/approveMark as approved by bot
/label bugAdd 'bug' label
/assign @userAssign to user

---

## 6. Repository Configuration

### 6.1 CODEOWNERS

.github/CODEOWNERS

Global owners

  • @org/core-team

Frontend

/src/frontend/ @org/frontend-team *.tsx @org/frontend-team *.css @org/frontend-team

Backend

/src/api/ @org/backend-team /src/database/ @org/backend-team

Infrastructure

/.github/ @org/devops-team /terraform/ @org/devops-team Dockerfile @org/devops-team

Docs

/docs/ @org/docs-team *.md @org/docs-team

Security-sensitive

/src/auth/ @org/security-team /src/crypto/ @org/security-team


### 6.2 Branch Protection

Set up via GitHub API

  • name: Configure branch protection

uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | await github.rest.repos.updateBranchProtection({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, branch: 'main', required_status_checks: { strict: true, contexts: ['test', 'lint', 'ai-review'] }, enforce_admins: true, required_pull_request_reviews: { required_approving_review_count: 1, require_code_owner_reviews: true, dismiss_stale_reviews: true }, restrictions: null, required_linear_history: true, allow_force_pushes: false, allow_deletions: false });


---

## Best Practices

### Security

- Store API keys in GitHub Secrets
- Use minimal permissions in workflows
- Validate all inputs
- Don't expose sensitive data in logs

### Performance

- Cache dependencies
- Use matrix builds for parallel testing
- Skip unnecessary jobs with path filters
- Use self-hosted runners for heavy workloads

### Reliability

- Add timeouts to jobs
- Handle rate limits gracefully
- Implement retry logic
- Have rollback procedures

---

## Resources

- [Gemini CLI GitHub Action](https://github.com/google-github-actions/run-gemini-cli)
- [GitHub Actions Documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions)
- [GitHub REST API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest)
- [CODEOWNERS Syntax](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners)

平台分布

Claude Code

29.05%
按下载量换算688

OpenCode

25.05%
按下载量换算593

Cursor

18.64%
按下载量换算441

Gemini CLI

11.37%
按下载量换算269

Antigravity

7.32%
按下载量换算173

Codex

3.52%
按下载量换算83

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills