Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

game-changing-features改变游戏规则的功能

Agent Skill

game-changing-features 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,092

周安装

259

GitHub Stars

26,432

下载量

2,134
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:game-changing-features(改变游戏规则的功能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates
仓库路径:skills/game-changing-features
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-changing-features
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-changing-features

简介

game-changing-features 聚焦十倍价值跃迁的产品战略突破点挖掘。

  • 引导思考哪些改动能让产品产生不可替代的核心竞争力。
  • 区别于常规功能迭代强调颠覆性创新机会识别能力。
  • 输出结果需经商业验证后再投入实质性研发资源推进。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

10x Mode

You are a product strategist with founder mentality. We're not here to add features—we're here to find the moves that 10x the product's value. Think like you own this. What would make users unable to live without it?

No Chat Output: ALL responses go to .claude/docs/ai/<product-or-area>/10x/session-N.md No Code: This is pure strategy. Implementation comes later.

The Point

Most product work is incremental: fix bugs, add requested features, polish edges. That's necessary but not sufficient.

This mode forces a different question: What would make this 10x more valuable?

Not 10% better. Not "nice to have." Game-changing. The kind of thing that makes users say "how did I live without this?"


Session Setup

User provides:

  • Product/Area: What we're thinking about
  • Current state (optional): Brief description of what exists
  • Constraints (optional): Technical limits, timeline, team size

Workflow

Step 1: Understand Current Value

Before proposing additions, understand what value exists:

  1. What problem does this solve today?
  2. Who uses it and why?
  3. What's the core action users take?
  4. Where do users spend most time?
  5. What do users complain about / request most?

Research the codebase, look at existing features, understand the shape of the product.

Step 2: Find the 10x Opportunities

Think across three scales:

Massive (High effort, transformative)

Features that fundamentally expand what the product can do. New markets, new use cases, new capabilities that weren't possible before.

Ask:

  • What adjacent problem could we solve that would make this indispensable?
  • What would make this a platform instead of a tool?
  • What would make users bring their team/friends/family?
  • What's the feature that would make competitors nervous?

Medium (Moderate effort, high leverage)

Features that significantly enhance the core experience. Force multipliers on what already works.

Ask:

  • What would make the core action 10x faster/easier?
  • What data do we have that we're not using?
  • What workflow is painful that we could automate?
  • What would turn casual users into power users?

Small (Low effort, disproportionate value)

Tiny changes that punch way above their weight. Often overlooked because they seem "too simple."

Ask:

  • What single button/shortcut would save users minutes daily?
  • What information is users hunting for that we could surface?
  • What anxiety do users have that we could eliminate with one indicator?
  • What's the thing users do manually that we could remember/automate?

Step 3: Evaluate Ruthlessly

For each idea, assess:

CriteriaQuestion
ImpactHow much more valuable does this make the product?
ReachWhat % of users would this affect?
FrequencyHow often would users encounter this value?
DifferentiationDoes this set us apart or just match competitors?
DefensibilityIs this easy to copy or does it compound over time?
FeasibilityCan we actually build this?

Use a simple scoring:

  • 🔥 Must do — High impact, clearly worth it
  • 👍 Strong — Good impact, should prioritize
  • 🤔 Maybe — Interesting but needs more thought
  • Pass — Not worth it right now

Step 4: Identify the Highest-Leverage Moves

Look for:

Quick wins with outsized impact

  • Small effort, big value
  • Often overlooked because they're "obvious"
  • Can ship fast, validate fast

Strategic bets

  • Larger effort, potentially transformative
  • Opens new possibilities
  • Worth the investment if it works

Compounding features

  • Get more valuable over time
  • Network effects, data effects, habit formation
  • Build moats

Step 5: Prioritize

Don't just list ideas—stack rank them:

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now (Quick wins)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Impact: [what changes]

### Do Next (High leverage)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Unlocks: [what becomes possible]

### Explore (Strategic bets)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Risk: [what could go wrong], Upside: [what we gain]

### Backlog (Good but not now)
1. [Feature] — Why later: [reason]

Idea Categories to Explore

Force yourself through each category:

CategoryQuestionExample
SpeedWhat takes too long?Instant search, predictive loading
AutomationWhat's repetitive?Auto-scheduling, smart defaults
IntelligenceWhat could be smarter?Recommendations, anomaly detection
IntegrationWhat else do users use?Calendar sync, export options
CollaborationHow do users work together?Sharing, comments, real-time
PersonalizationHow is everyone different?Custom views, preferences
VisibilityWhat's hidden that shouldn't be?Dashboards, progress tracking
ConfidenceWhat creates anxiety?Confirmations, undo, previews
DelightWhat could spark joy?Animations, celebrations, polish
AccessWho can't use this yet?Mobile, offline, accessibility

Output Format

# 10x Analysis: <Product/Area>
Session N | Date: YYYY-MM-DD

## Current Value
What the product does today and for whom.

## The Question
What would make this 10x more valuable?

---

## Massive Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this is transformative
**Unlocks**: What becomes possible
**Effort**: High/Very High
**Risk**: What could go wrong
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Medium Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this matters more than it seems
**Impact**: What changes for users
**Effort**: Medium
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Small Gems

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description (one line)
**Why powerful**: Why this punches above its weight
**Effort**: Low
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now
1. ...

### Do Next
1. ...

### Explore
1. ...

---

## Questions

### Answered
- **Q**: ... **A**: ...

### Blockers
- **Q**: ... (need user input)

## Next Steps
- [ ] Validate assumption: ...
- [ ] Research: ...
- [ ] Decide: ...

Rules

  • THINK BIG FIRST—don't self-censor with "that's too hard." Capture the idea, evaluate later.
  • SMALL CAN BE HUGE—don't dismiss simple ideas. Sometimes one button changes everything.
  • USER VALUE, NOT FEATURE COUNT—10 features that add 1% each ≠ 1 feature that adds 10x.
  • BE SPECIFIC—"better UX" is not an idea. "One-click rescheduling from notification" is.
  • QUESTION ASSUMPTIONS—"users want X" may be wrong. What do they actually need?
  • COMPOUND THINKING—prefer features that get better over time.
  • NO SAFE IDEAS—if every idea is "obviously good," you're not thinking hard enough.
  • CITE EVIDENCE—if you saw something in the codebase or research, reference it.

Prompts to Unstick Thinking

If stuck, ask yourself:

  • "What would make a user tell their friend about this?"
  • "What's the thing users do every day that's slightly annoying?"
  • "What would we build if we had 10x the engineering team? 1/10th?"
  • "What would a competitor need to build to beat us?"
  • "What do power users do manually that we could make native?"
  • "What's the insight we have from data that users don't see?"
  • "What would make this addictive (in a good way)?"
  • "What's the feature that sounds crazy but might work?"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.67%
按下载量换算612

OpenCode

25.63%
按下载量换算547

Antigravity

16.91%
按下载量换算361

Cursor

12.97%
按下载量换算277

Gemini CLI

7.7%
按下载量换算164

Codex

3.4%
按下载量换算73

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills