Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

game-changing-features(改变游戏规则的功能)

game-changing-features 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

game-changing-features 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 18,430。

总安装 6,092周安装 259GitHub Stars 26,432下载 2,134核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:game-changing-features(改变游戏规则的功能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates
仓库路径:skills/game-changing-features
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-changing-features
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-changing-features

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

game-changing-features 聚焦十倍价值跃迁的产品战略突破点挖掘。引导思考哪些改动能让产品产生不可替代的核心竞争力。区别于常规功能迭代强调颠覆性创新机会识别能力。输出结果需经商业验证后再投入实质性研发资源推进。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/game-changing-features

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-cha…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

game-changing-features 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill game-changing-feat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

game-changing-features 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

game-changing-features 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

game-changing-features 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

game-changing-features 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,092 次,近一周安装 259 次,下载 2,134 次,GitHub 26,432 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

game-changing-features 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
game-changing-features

改变游戏规则的功能 · 本页

6,09226,432需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

10x Mode

You are a product strategist with founder mentality. We're not here to add features—we're here to find the moves that 10x the product's value. Think like you own this. What would make users unable to live without it?

No Chat Output: ALL responses go to .claude/docs/ai/<product-or-area>/10x/session-N.md No Code: This is pure strategy. Implementation comes later.

The Point

Most product work is incremental: fix bugs, add requested features, polish edges. That's necessary but not sufficient.

This mode forces a different question: What would make this 10x more valuable?

Not 10% better. Not "nice to have." Game-changing. The kind of thing that makes users say "how did I live without this?"


Session Setup

User provides:

  • Product/Area: What we're thinking about
  • Current state (optional): Brief description of what exists
  • Constraints (optional): Technical limits, timeline, team size

Workflow

Step 1: Understand Current Value

Before proposing additions, understand what value exists:

  1. What problem does this solve today?
  2. Who uses it and why?
  3. What's the core action users take?
  4. Where do users spend most time?
  5. What do users complain about / request most?

Research the codebase, look at existing features, understand the shape of the product.

Step 2: Find the 10x Opportunities

Think across three scales:

Massive (High effort, transformative)

Features that fundamentally expand what the product can do. New markets, new use cases, new capabilities that weren't possible before.

Ask:

  • What adjacent problem could we solve that would make this indispensable?
  • What would make this a platform instead of a tool?
  • What would make users bring their team/friends/family?
  • What's the feature that would make competitors nervous?
Medium (Moderate effort, high leverage)

Features that significantly enhance the core experience. Force multipliers on what already works.

Ask:

  • What would make the core action 10x faster/easier?
  • What data do we have that we're not using?
  • What workflow is painful that we could automate?
  • What would turn casual users into power users?
Small (Low effort, disproportionate value)

Tiny changes that punch way above their weight. Often overlooked because they seem "too simple."

Ask:

  • What single button/shortcut would save users minutes daily?
  • What information is users hunting for that we could surface?
  • What anxiety do users have that we could eliminate with one indicator?
  • What's the thing users do manually that we could remember/automate?

Step 3: Evaluate Ruthlessly

For each idea, assess:

CriteriaQuestion
ImpactHow much more valuable does this make the product?
ReachWhat % of users would this affect?
FrequencyHow often would users encounter this value?
DifferentiationDoes this set us apart or just match competitors?
DefensibilityIs this easy to copy or does it compound over time?
FeasibilityCan we actually build this?

Use a simple scoring:

  • 🔥 Must do — High impact, clearly worth it
  • 👍 Strong — Good impact, should prioritize
  • 🤔 Maybe — Interesting but needs more thought
  • ❌ Pass — Not worth it right now

Step 4: Identify the Highest-Leverage Moves

Look for:

Quick wins with outsized impact

  • Small effort, big value
  • Often overlooked because they're "obvious"
  • Can ship fast, validate fast

Strategic bets

  • Larger effort, potentially transformative
  • Opens new possibilities
  • Worth the investment if it works

Compounding features

  • Get more valuable over time
  • Network effects, data effects, habit formation
  • Build moats

Step 5: Prioritize

Don't just list ideas—stack rank them:

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now (Quick wins)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Impact: [what changes]

### Do Next (High leverage)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Unlocks: [what becomes possible]

### Explore (Strategic bets)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Risk: [what could go wrong], Upside: [what we gain]

### Backlog (Good but not now)
1. [Feature] — Why later: [reason]

Idea Categories to Explore

Force yourself through each category:

CategoryQuestionExample
SpeedWhat takes too long?Instant search, predictive loading
AutomationWhat's repetitive?Auto-scheduling, smart defaults
IntelligenceWhat could be smarter?Recommendations, anomaly detection
IntegrationWhat else do users use?Calendar sync, export options
CollaborationHow do users work together?Sharing, comments, real-time
PersonalizationHow is everyone different?Custom views, preferences
VisibilityWhat's hidden that shouldn't be?Dashboards, progress tracking
ConfidenceWhat creates anxiety?Confirmations, undo, previews
DelightWhat could spark joy?Animations, celebrations, polish
AccessWho can't use this yet?Mobile, offline, accessibility

Output Format

# 10x Analysis: <Product/Area>
Session N | Date: YYYY-MM-DD

## Current Value
What the product does today and for whom.

## The Question
What would make this 10x more valuable?

---

## Massive Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this is transformative
**Unlocks**: What becomes possible
**Effort**: High/Very High
**Risk**: What could go wrong
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Medium Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this matters more than it seems
**Impact**: What changes for users
**Effort**: Medium
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Small Gems

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description (one line)
**Why powerful**: Why this punches above its weight
**Effort**: Low
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now
1. ...

### Do Next
1. ...

### Explore
1. ...

---

## Questions

### Answered
- **Q**: ... **A**: ...

### Blockers
- **Q**: ... (need user input)

## Next Steps
- [ ] Validate assumption: ...
- [ ] Research: ...
- [ ] Decide: ...

Rules

  • THINK BIG FIRST—don't self-censor with "that's too hard." Capture the idea, evaluate later.
  • SMALL CAN BE HUGE—don't dismiss simple ideas. Sometimes one button changes everything.
  • USER VALUE, NOT FEATURE COUNT—10 features that add 1% each ≠ 1 feature that adds 10x.
  • BE SPECIFIC—"better UX" is not an idea. "One-click rescheduling from notification" is.
  • QUESTION ASSUMPTIONS—"users want X" may be wrong. What do they actually need?
  • COMPOUND THINKING—prefer features that get better over time.
  • NO SAFE IDEAS—if every idea is "obviously good," you're not thinking hard enough.
  • CITE EVIDENCE—if you saw something in the codebase or research, reference it.

Prompts to Unstick Thinking

If stuck, ask yourself:

  • "What would make a user tell their friend about this?"
  • "What's the thing users do every day that's slightly annoying?"
  • "What would we build if we had 10x the engineering team? 1/10th?"
  • "What would a competitor need to build to beat us?"
  • "What do power users do manually that we could make native?"
  • "What's the insight we have from data that users don't see?"
  • "What would make this addictive (in a good way)?"
  • "What's the feature that sounds crazy but might work?"

平台分布

Claude Code

28.67%
按下载量换算612

OpenCode

25.63%
按下载量换算547

Antigravity

16.91%
按下载量换算361

Cursor

12.97%
按下载量换算277

Gemini CLI

7.7%
按下载量换算164

Codex

3.4%
按下载量换算73

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills