Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

database-security(数据库安全)

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

database-security 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 44,120。

总安装 938周安装 51GitHub Stars 10下载 420核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:database-security(数据库安全)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/database-security
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill database-security
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill database-security

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

专注数据库层安全加固,特别是 RLS 与零信任架构。实施细粒度访问控制、TLS 加密与审计日志追踪。针对 Supabase、Postgres 和 Convex 提供专项建议。适用于多租户系统与敏感数据保护场景。database-security 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

需配合身份认证服务实现端到端安全防护。

来源仓库内路径:skills/database-security

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill database-security;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

database-security 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill database-security。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

database-security 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

database-security 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

database-security 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

database-security 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 938 次,近一周安装 51 次,下载 420 次,GitHub 10 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

database-security 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
database-security

数据库安全 · 本页

93810需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Audit

Database security auditor specialized in Row Level Security (RLS) enforcement, Zero-Trust database architecture, and forensic audit trails. Focuses on Supabase, Postgres, and Convex data layer security. For general application security (OWASP Top 10, auth patterns, security headers, input validation), use the security skill instead.

Quick Reference

NeedApproach
RLS enforcementEnable on every public table; separate policies per operation
RLS performanceIndex RLS columns; wrap auth.uid() in (select...) subselect
Zero-Trust DBMicro-segmentation, identity propagation, TLS enforcement
Supabase auth in RLSUse (select auth.uid()) and auth.jwt(); never auth.role()
Convex auth guardsCall ctx.auth.getUserIdentity() in every public function
JIT accessTime-bound grants that expire automatically
Audit trailsDatabase triggers with immutable audit_log table
PGAuditExtension for statement-level and object-level SQL auditing
Service role safetyNever use service_role key in client-side code
Views and RLSUse security_invoker = true (Postgres 15+) to enforce RLS
Schema segmentationSeparate public, private, and audit schemas
Database complianceRLS + audit logging + encryption satisfies multiple frameworks

Audit Protocol

Follow this sequence when performing a database security audit:

  1. Attack Surface Mapping: Identify all entry points to the data layer (public APIs, internal dashboards, AI agents, cron jobs)
  2. RLS Coverage Check: Query pg_tables to verify every public schema table has RLS enabled and appropriate policies
  3. Policy Review: Check for logical bypasses, missing WITH CHECK clauses, overly permissive FOR ALL policies
  4. Service Role Audit: Search client code for service_role key exposure; verify it only appears in server-side code
  5. Function Audit: Check for security definer functions in exposed schemas and Convex functions missing auth guards
  6. Access Simulation: Execute queries as anon and authenticated roles to verify enforcement
  7. View Audit: Verify views use security_invoker = true or are not in exposed schemas
  8. Audit Trail Verification: Confirm triggers or PGAudit capture all security-relevant operations
  9. Compliance Validation: Map database controls against applicable regulatory frameworks

Security Principles

PrincipleDatabase Application
Defense in DepthRLS + application checks + schema segmentation
Least PrivilegeMinimal GRANT per role; anon gets near-zero access
Zero TrustVerify identity at DB level even for internal requests
Secure by DefaultRLS enabled on creation; default-deny when no policy
Fail SecurelyPostgres default-deny on RLS; generic error responses
Assume BreachDesign assuming attacker has a valid JWT

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternRisk
Security by obscurity (UUIDs only)Attackers enumerate IDs via IDOR
Anon role with SELECT on sensitive tablesPublic data exposure via Supabase API
RLS columns without indexesProduction performance degradation (100x+)
Frontend-only permission checksAttackers bypass via direct API calls
Standing admin privilegesExcessive blast radius if compromised
service_role key in client-side codeBypasses all RLS policies completely
FOR ALL policies instead of per-operationUnintended write access through broad rule
Security definer functions in public schemaFunctions callable from API, bypass RLS
Views without security_invokerViews bypass RLS silently

Common Mistakes

MistakeCorrect Pattern
Using auth.uid() = user_id without wrapping in (select...)Use (select auth.uid()) = user_id so Postgres caches the result via initPlan
Using FOR ALL instead of separate per-operation policiesCreate separate SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE policies for clarity and safety
Leaving anon role with SELECT on sensitive tablesRestrict anon access; require authenticated role for sensitive data
Relying on UUIDs as the only access controlEnforce RLS policies and explicit auth checks alongside unique identifiers
No index on columns used in RLS USING clausesAdd B-tree indexes on all columns referenced in RLS policy expressions
Convex function missing ctx.auth.getUserIdentity() callEvery public query and mutation must validate identity before accessing data
Using service_role key in client-side codeUse anon key client-side; service_role only in server-side functions
Views bypassing RLS without security_invokerSet security_invoker = true on views in Postgres 15+
Security definer functions in exposed schemasPlace security definer functions in non-exposed schemas with search_path = ''
No audit logging for security-relevant database eventsUse triggers and PGAudit to capture all data access and modifications

Relationship to Security Skill

The application-security skill covers general application security: OWASP Top 10, authentication patterns, input validation, security headers, and compliance overviews. This database-security skill complements it by focusing on database-layer concerns: RLS policy design and performance, Supabase/Postgres-specific patterns, Convex auth guards, PGAudit configuration, and database-specific compliance implementations (SQL functions for GDPR erasure, HIPAA PHI audit triggers, etc.).

Delegation

  • Verify RLS enforcement with access simulations: Use Task agent to run anonymous and authenticated queries against every public table
  • Audit Convex functions for missing auth guards: Use Explore agent to scan all query and mutation handlers for getUserIdentity calls
  • Design zero-trust database architecture: Use Plan agent to map schemas, access policies, JIT grants, and audit log design
  • Generate database compliance evidence: Use Task agent to run audit queries and produce compliance reports

References

  • rls-performance.md -- RLS policy performance, initPlan caching, stable functions, separate policies, EXPLAIN benchmarking
  • zero-trust-database.md -- Micro-segmentation, identity propagation, connection security, JIT access controls
  • audit-logging.md -- Trigger-based auditing, PGAudit extension and log classes, log integrity, tamper-proof storage
  • convex-security.md -- Identity validation, manual RLS in functions, granular functions, role-based access via JWT claims
  • threat-modeling.md -- STRIDE applied to database access, RLS bypass vectors, data layer trust boundaries
  • application-security.md -- Service role management, schema exposure, security definer functions, views and RLS
  • compliance-frameworks.md -- Database-specific GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS requirements and SQL implementations

平台分布

Codex

33.91%
按下载量换算142

Claude

33.06%
按下载量换算139

Cursor

17.08%
按下载量换算72

Gemini CLI

9%
按下载量换算38

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills