Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

database-optimization(数据库优化)

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

database-optimization 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,973。

总安装 599周安装 24GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 194核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:database-optimization(数据库优化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/database-optimization
安装命令:
npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "database-optimization"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "database-optimization"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。适合分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题或生成迁移建议。使用时需明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表。安装方式:github,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。涉及写入操作时应优先 dry-run 或备份以防误操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/database-optimization

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "database-optimization";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

database-optimization 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "database-optimization"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

database-optimization 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

database-optimization 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

database-optimization 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

database-optimization 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 599 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 194 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

database-optimization 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
database-optimization

数据库优化 · 本页

599—需要联网MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Database Optimization

Expert database performance agent for EasyPlatform. Optimizes queries, indexes, and data access patterns for MongoDB, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL.

Common Performance Issues

N+1 Query Problem

// BAD: N+1 queries - one query per employee's department
var employees = await repo.GetAllAsync(e => e.CompanyId == companyId, ct);
foreach (var emp in employees)
{
    var dept = await deptRepo.GetByIdAsync(emp.DepartmentId, ct);  // N queries!
}

// GOOD: Eager loading with loadRelatedEntities
var employees = await repo.GetAllAsync(
    e => e.CompanyId == companyId,
    ct,
    loadRelatedEntities: e => e.Department);  // Single query with join

// GOOD: Batch load related entities
var employees = await repo.GetAllAsync(e => e.CompanyId == companyId, ct);
var deptIds = employees.Select(e => e.DepartmentId).Distinct().ToList();
var departments = await deptRepo.GetByIdsAsync(deptIds, ct);
var deptMap = departments.ToDictionary(d => d.Id);
employees.ForEach(e => e.Department = deptMap.GetValueOrDefault(e.DepartmentId));

Select Only Needed Columns

// BAD: Fetching entire entity when only ID needed
var employee = await repo.GetByIdAsync(id, ct);
return employee.Id;

// GOOD: Projection to fetch only needed data
var employeeId = await repo.FirstOrDefaultAsync(
    query => query
        .Where(Employee.UniqueExpr(userId, companyId))
        .Select(e => e.Id),  // Only fetch ID column
    ct);

Parallel Independent Queries

// BAD: Sequential queries that could run in parallel
var count = await repo.CountAsync(filter, ct);
var items = await repo.GetAllAsync(filter, ct);
var stats = await statsRepo.GetAsync(companyId, ct);

// GOOD: Parallel tuple queries
var (count, items, stats) = await (
    repo.CountAsync((uow, q) => queryBuilder(uow, q), ct),
    repo.GetAllAsync((uow, q) => queryBuilder(uow, q).PageBy(skip, take), ct),
    statsRepo.GetAsync(companyId, ct)
);

Query Optimization Patterns

GetQueryBuilder for Reusable Queries

protected override async Task<Result> HandleAsync(Query req, CancellationToken ct)
{
    // Define query once, reuse for count and data
    var queryBuilder = repo.GetQueryBuilder((uow, q) => q
        .Where(Employee.OfCompanyExpr(RequestContext.CurrentCompanyId()))
        .WhereIf(req.Statuses.Any(), e => req.Statuses.Contains(e.Status))
        .WhereIf(req.DepartmentId.IsNotNullOrEmpty(), e => e.DepartmentId == req.DepartmentId)
        .PipeIf(req.SearchText.IsNotNullOrEmpty(), q =>
            fullTextSearch.Search(q, req.SearchText, Employee.SearchColumns())));

    // Parallel execution
    var (total, items) = await (
        repo.CountAsync((uow, q) => queryBuilder(uow, q), ct),
        repo.GetAllAsync((uow, q) => queryBuilder(uow, q)
            .OrderByDescending(e => e.CreatedDate)
            .PageBy(req.SkipCount, req.MaxResultCount), ct)
    );

    return new Result(items, total);
}

Conditional Filtering with WhereIf

// Builds efficient query with only needed conditions
var query = repo.GetQueryBuilder((uow, q) => q
    .Where(e => e.CompanyId == companyId)  // Always applied
    .WhereIf(status.HasValue, e => e.Status == status)  // Only if provided
    .WhereIf(deptIds.Any(), e => deptIds.Contains(e.DepartmentId))
    .WhereIf(dateFrom.HasValue, e => e.CreatedDate >= dateFrom)
    .WhereIf(dateTo.HasValue, e => e.CreatedDate <= dateTo));

Full-Text Search Optimization

// Define searchable columns in entity
public static Expression<Func<Employee, object?>>[] DefaultFullTextSearchColumns()
    => [e => e.FullName, e => e.Email, e => e.EmployeeCode, e => e.FullTextSearch];

// Use full-text search service
.PipeIf(searchText.IsNotNullOrEmpty(), q => fullTextSearch.Search(
    q,
    searchText,
    Employee.DefaultFullTextSearchColumns(),
    fullTextAccurateMatch: true,  // Exact phrase match
    includeStartWithProps: [e => e.FullName, e => e.EmployeeCode]  // Prefix matching
));

Index Recommendations

MongoDB Indexes

// Single field index - for equality queries
{ "CompanyId": 1 }

// Compound index - for filtered queries
{ "CompanyId": 1, "Status": 1, "CreatedDate": -1 }

// Text index - for full-text search
{ "FullName": "text", "Email": "text", "EmployeeCode": "text" }

// Sparse index - for optional fields
{ "ExternalId": 1, sparse: true }

SQL Server / PostgreSQL Indexes

-- Covering index for common query
CREATE INDEX IX_Employee_Company_Status
ON Employees (CompanyId, Status)
INCLUDE (FullName, Email, CreatedDate);

-- Filtered index for active records
CREATE INDEX IX_Employee_Active
ON Employees (CompanyId, CreatedDate)
WHERE Status = 'Active' AND IsDeleted = 0;

-- Full-text index
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ON Employees (FullName, Email)
KEY INDEX PK_Employees;

Pagination Best Practices

// GOOD: Keyset pagination for large datasets (cursor-based)
var items = await repo.GetAllAsync(q => q
    .Where(e => e.CompanyId == companyId)
    .Where(e => e.Id > lastId)  // Cursor
    .OrderBy(e => e.Id)
    .Take(pageSize), ct);

// GOOD: Offset pagination for moderate datasets
var items = await repo.GetAllAsync(q => q
    .Where(filter)
    .OrderByDescending(e => e.CreatedDate)
    .PageBy(skip, take), ct);  // Platform helper

// BAD: Skip without limit (fetches all then skips)
var items = await repo.GetAllAsync(q => q.Skip(1000), ct);

Bulk Operations

// Bulk insert
await repo.CreateManyAsync(entities, ct);

// Bulk update (with optimization flags)
await repo.UpdateManyAsync(
    entities,
    dismissSendEvent: true,  // Skip entity events for performance
    checkDiff: false,        // Skip change detection
    ct);

// Bulk delete by expression
await repo.DeleteManyAsync(e => e.Status == Status.Deleted && e.DeletedDate < cutoffDate, ct);

Performance Analysis Workflow

Phase 1: Identify Slow Queries

  1. Check application logs for slow query warnings
  2. Review query patterns in handlers
  3. Look for N+1 patterns (loops with DB calls)

Phase 2: Analyze Query Plan

// MongoDB - Check indexes used
db.employees.find({ companyId: "x", status: "Active" }).explain("executionStats")

// SQL Server - Check execution plan
SET STATISTICS IO ON
SELECT * FROM Employees WHERE CompanyId = 'x' AND Status = 'Active'

Phase 3: Optimize

  1. Add missing indexes
  2. Use eager loading for related entities
  3. Add projections for partial data needs
  4. Parallelize independent queries
  5. Implement caching for frequently accessed data

Optimization Checklist

  • N+1 queries identified and fixed?
  • Eager loading for related entities?
  • Projections for partial data needs?
  • Parallel queries for independent operations?
  • Proper indexes for filter/sort columns?
  • Pagination implemented correctly?
  • Full-text search for text queries?
  • Bulk operations for batch processing?

Anti-Patterns

  • Loading entire collections: Always filter and paginate
  • Fetching unused data: Use projections
  • Sequential independent queries: Use parallel tuple queries
  • Index on every column: Only index frequently queried fields
  • Skip without ordering: Always order before pagination

Task Planning Notes

  • Always plan and break many small todo tasks
  • Always add a final review todo task to review the works done at the end to find any fix or enhancement needed

平台分布

Claude Code

28.17%
按下载量换算55

windsurf

23.4%
按下载量换算45

OpenCode

18.7%
按下载量换算36

Codex

13.67%
按下载量换算27

Antigravity

8.35%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

3.96%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills