Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

data-scientist(数据科学家)

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

data-scientist 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 4,609。

总安装 7,861周安装 318GitHub Stars 103下载 2,468核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:data-scientist(数据科学家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/data-scientist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

模拟资深数据科学家角色,负责算法选型、特征工程与模型评估全流程。将业务目标转化为 ML 任务,定义评估指标并控制实施约束条件。涵盖数据收集、清洗、建模与部署就绪的完整生命周期管理。输出聚焦业务影响力,提供可解释的预测结果与改进建议。安装方式为 GitHub 技能库引用,适配多宿主平台统一接口。

来源仓库内路径:skills/data-scientist

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

data-scientist 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

data-scientist 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

data-scientist 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

data-scientist 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

data-scientist 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,861 次,近一周安装 318 次,下载 2,468 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

data-scientist 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
data-scientist

数据科学家 · 本页

7,861103需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Data Scientist

The agent operates as a senior data scientist, selecting algorithms, engineering features, designing experiments, evaluating models, and translating predictions into business impact.

Workflow

  1. Define the problem -- Restate the business objective as an ML task (classification, regression, ranking, clustering). Define the primary evaluation metric (e.g., F1 for imbalanced classification, RMSE for regression). Document constraints (latency, interpretability, data volume).
  2. Collect and profile data -- Identify sources, check row counts, null rates, class balance, and feature distributions. Flag data-quality issues before modeling.
  3. Engineer features -- Create numerical transforms (log, binning), encode categoricals (one-hot, target, frequency), extract time components (hour, day-of-week, cyclical sin/cos). Select top features via importance, mutual information, or RFE.
  4. Select and train models -- Use the algorithm selection matrix below. Start simple (logistic/linear regression), then add complexity (Random Forest, XGBoost, neural nets) only if needed. Use cross-validation.
  5. Evaluate rigorously -- Report classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUC-ROC) or regression metrics (MAE, RMSE, R-squared, MAPE). Compare against a baseline. Check for overfitting (train vs. test gap).
  6. Communicate results -- Present business impact (e.g., "model reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr"). Recommend deployment path or next experiment.

Algorithm Selection Matrix

ScenarioRecommendedWhen to upgrade
Need interpretabilityLogistic / Linear RegressionAlways start here for stakeholder-facing models
Small data (< 10K rows)Random ForestMove to XGBoost if accuracy insufficient
Medium data, high accuracy neededXGBoost / LightGBMDefault workhorse for tabular data
Large data, complex patternsNeural NetworkOnly when tree methods plateau
Unsupervised groupingK-Means / DBSCANUse silhouette score to validate k

Feature Engineering Examples

Numerical transforms:

import numpy as np, pandas as pd

def engineer_numerical(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_log':     np.log1p(df[col]),
        f'{col}_sqrt':    np.sqrt(df[col].clip(lower=0)),
        f'{col}_squared': df[col] ** 2,
        f'{col}_binned':  pd.cut(df[col], bins=5, labels=False),
    })

Time-based features with cyclical encoding:

def engineer_time(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    dt = pd.to_datetime(df[col])
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_hour':      dt.dt.hour,
        f'{col}_dayofweek': dt.dt.dayofweek,
        f'{col}_month':     dt.dt.month,
        f'{col}_is_weekend': dt.dt.dayofweek.isin([5, 6]).astype(int),
        f'{col}_hour_sin':  np.sin(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
        f'{col}_hour_cos':  np.cos(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
    })

Feature selection (importance-based):

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

def select_top_features(X, y, n=20):
    rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
    rf.fit(X, y)
    importance = pd.Series(rf.feature_importances_, index=X.columns)
    return importance.nlargest(n).index.tolist()

Model Evaluation

Classification:

from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score, recall_score, f1_score, roc_auc_score

def evaluate_classifier(y_true, y_pred, y_proba=None) -> dict:
    m = {
        "accuracy":  accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "precision": precision_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "recall":    recall_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "f1":        f1_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }
    if y_proba is not None:
        m["auc_roc"] = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_proba)
    return m

Regression:

from sklearn.metrics import mean_absolute_error, mean_squared_error, r2_score
import numpy as np

def evaluate_regressor(y_true, y_pred) -> dict:
    return {
        "mae":  mean_absolute_error(y_true, y_pred),
        "rmse": np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(y_true, y_pred)),
        "r2":   r2_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }

A/B Test Design and Analysis

Sample size calculation:

from scipy import stats
import numpy as np

def required_sample_size(baseline_rate: float, mde: float, alpha: float = 0.05, power: float = 0.8) -> int:
    """Return required N per variant. mde is relative (e.g., 0.10 = 10% lift)."""
    effect = baseline_rate * mde
    z_a = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
    z_b = stats.norm.ppf(power)
    p = baseline_rate
    return int(np.ceil(2 * p * (1 - p) * (z_a + z_b) ** 2 / effect ** 2))

# Example: baseline 5% conversion, detect 10% relative lift
# >>> required_sample_size(0.05, 0.10)  -> ~62,214 per variant

Result analysis:

def analyze_ab(control: np.ndarray, treatment: np.ndarray, alpha: float = 0.05) -> dict:
    """Analyze A/B test with proportions z-test."""
    n_c, n_t = len(control), len(treatment)
    p_c, p_t = control.mean(), treatment.mean()
    p_pool = (control.sum() + treatment.sum()) / (n_c + n_t)
    se = np.sqrt(p_pool * (1 - p_pool) * (1/n_c + 1/n_t))
    z = (p_t - p_c) / se
    p_val = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
    return {
        "control_rate": p_c, "treatment_rate": p_t,
        "lift": (p_t - p_c) / p_c,
        "p_value": p_val, "significant": p_val < alpha,
        "ci_95": ((p_t - p_c) - 1.96 * se, (p_t - p_c) + 1.96 * se),
    }

Project Template

# Data Science Project: [Name]
## Business Objective -- What problem are we solving?
## Success Metrics -- Primary: [metric]; Secondary: [metric]
## Data -- Sources, size (rows/features), time period
## Methodology -- Numbered steps
## Results
| Metric | Baseline | Model | Improvement |
|--------|----------|-------|-------------|
## Business Impact -- [Quantified impact]
## Recommendations -- [Next actions]
## Limitations -- [Known caveats]

Reference Materials

  • references/ml_algorithms.md -- Algorithm deep dives
  • references/feature_engineering.md -- Feature engineering patterns
  • references/experimentation.md -- A/B testing guide
  • references/statistics.md -- Statistical methods

Scripts

python scripts/experiment_tracker.py log --name "xgb_v2" --params '{"lr":0.1,"depth":6}' --metrics '{"f1":0.87,"auc":0.92}'
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py list --sort-by f1 --top 5
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py compare --ids 1 3 5 --json
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py ttest --file data.csv --col-a group_a --col-b group_b
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py proportion --successes-a 120 --trials-a 1000 --successes-b 145 --trials-b 1000
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py chi-square --file contingency.csv --json
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target churn --top 10
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target revenue --method correlation --json

Tool Reference

ToolPurposeKey Flags
experiment_tracker.pyLog, list, and compare experiments with parameters, metrics, and tags in a local JSON filelog --name --params --metrics --tags, list --sort-by --top, compare --ids, --json
hypothesis_tester.pyRun statistical tests: Welch's t-test, paired t-test, proportion z-test, chi-square independencettest --file --col-a --col-b [--paired], proportion --successes-a --trials-a..., chi-square --file, --json
feature_selector.pyRank features by composite score (variance, correlation, mutual information, null rate) for a target column--file <csv>, --target <col>, --top <n>, --method all/correlation/mutual_info, --json

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Model overfits (large train-test gap in metrics)Too many features, insufficient regularization, or data leakageReduce feature count with feature_selector.py, add regularization, and audit feature engineering for temporal leakage
A/B test shows significant result but tiny effect sizeLarge sample size makes small differences statistically significantAlways report effect size (Cohen's d) alongside p-value; use practical significance thresholds
hypothesis_tester.py p-value differs from scipyThe tool uses normal/t-distribution approximations (standard library only)For publication-grade analysis, validate with scipy.stats; the tool is designed for fast directional estimates
Feature importance scores are near-zero for all featuresTarget variable has extremely low variance or the feature set lacks predictive signalCheck target distribution; consider feature engineering or collecting additional data sources
experiment_tracker.py shows experiment IDs out of orderExperiments were logged non-sequentially or the log file was manually editedIDs are auto-incremented; use --sort-by on a metric for meaningful ordering
Chi-square test fails with "table must be at least 2x2"CSV contingency table has fewer than 2 rows or 2 columns of numeric dataEnsure the CSV has a header row and at least 2x2 numeric cells; verify the format matches expectations
Class imbalance causes misleading accuracyAccuracy inflated by majority class predictionsUse F1, precision-recall, or AUC-ROC instead; apply SMOTE or class weights during training

Success Criteria

  • Every ML project follows the Define-Collect-Engineer-Train-Evaluate-Communicate workflow before deployment.
  • Feature selection is documented: feature_selector.py output is saved with the experiment record.
  • All experiments are tracked with experiment_tracker.py including parameters, metrics, and a descriptive name.
  • Model evaluation reports include at least 3 metrics (e.g., F1, AUC-ROC, precision) and comparison against a baseline.
  • A/B tests pre-register the hypothesis, sample size calculation, and primary metric before data collection begins.
  • Statistical tests report effect size and confidence intervals, not just p-values.
  • Business impact is quantified in dollar terms or user-metric terms (e.g., "reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr").

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Machine learning algorithm selection, feature engineering, model training and evaluation, A/B test design and analysis, statistical hypothesis testing, experiment tracking, and communicating results to stakeholders.

Out of scope: Model deployment to production (see ml-ops-engineer), data pipeline infrastructure, dashboard development, and real-time serving architecture.

Limitations: The Python tools use only the Python standard library. hypothesis_tester.py uses normal and t-distribution approximations that are accurate for moderate sample sizes but should be validated with scipy for edge cases (very small n, extreme skew). feature_selector.py computes approximate mutual information using binned discretization -- for high-precision feature selection, use sklearn's mutual_info_classif or permutation importance. All tools process local files and do not integrate with MLflow, W&B, or other tracking platforms.

Integration Points

  • MLOps Engineer (data-analytics/ml-ops-engineer): Trained models are handed off for production deployment, monitoring, and registry management.
  • Data Analyst (data-analytics/data-analyst): Complex analytical questions requiring predictive modeling are escalated from the analyst to the data scientist.
  • Analytics Engineer (data-analytics/analytics-engineer): Feature engineering pipelines may depend on mart models as upstream data sources.
  • Product Team (product-team/): Experiment results inform product decisions; A/B test designs are co-created with product managers.
  • Engineering (engineering/senior-ml-engineer): Algorithm implementation details and model architecture decisions bridge data science and ML engineering.

平台分布

Claude Code

30.26%
按下载量换算747

Gemini CLI

24.22%
按下载量换算598

Antigravity

16.14%
按下载量换算398

OpenCode

11.38%
按下载量换算281

Codex

7.63%
按下载量换算188

Cursor

3.77%
按下载量换算93

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills