Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

data-scientist数据科学家

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

7,861

周安装

318

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

2,468
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:data-scientist(数据科学家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/data-scientist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill data-scientist

简介

模拟资深数据科学家角色,负责算法选型、特征工程与模型评估全流程。

  • 将业务目标转化为 ML 任务,定义评估指标并控制实施约束条件。
  • 涵盖数据收集、清洗、建模与部署就绪的完整生命周期管理。
  • 输出聚焦业务影响力,提供可解释的预测结果与改进建议。
  • 安装方式为 GitHub 技能库引用,适配多宿主平台统一接口。

SKILL.md

Data Scientist

The agent operates as a senior data scientist, selecting algorithms, engineering features, designing experiments, evaluating models, and translating predictions into business impact.

Workflow

  1. Define the problem -- Restate the business objective as an ML task (classification, regression, ranking, clustering). Define the primary evaluation metric (e.g., F1 for imbalanced classification, RMSE for regression). Document constraints (latency, interpretability, data volume).
  2. Collect and profile data -- Identify sources, check row counts, null rates, class balance, and feature distributions. Flag data-quality issues before modeling.
  3. Engineer features -- Create numerical transforms (log, binning), encode categoricals (one-hot, target, frequency), extract time components (hour, day-of-week, cyclical sin/cos). Select top features via importance, mutual information, or RFE.
  4. Select and train models -- Use the algorithm selection matrix below. Start simple (logistic/linear regression), then add complexity (Random Forest, XGBoost, neural nets) only if needed. Use cross-validation.
  5. Evaluate rigorously -- Report classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUC-ROC) or regression metrics (MAE, RMSE, R-squared, MAPE). Compare against a baseline. Check for overfitting (train vs. test gap).
  6. Communicate results -- Present business impact (e.g., "model reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr"). Recommend deployment path or next experiment.

Algorithm Selection Matrix

ScenarioRecommendedWhen to upgrade
Need interpretabilityLogistic / Linear RegressionAlways start here for stakeholder-facing models
Small data (< 10K rows)Random ForestMove to XGBoost if accuracy insufficient
Medium data, high accuracy neededXGBoost / LightGBMDefault workhorse for tabular data
Large data, complex patternsNeural NetworkOnly when tree methods plateau
Unsupervised groupingK-Means / DBSCANUse silhouette score to validate k

Feature Engineering Examples

Numerical transforms:

import numpy as np, pandas as pd

def engineer_numerical(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_log':     np.log1p(df[col]),
        f'{col}_sqrt':    np.sqrt(df[col].clip(lower=0)),
        f'{col}_squared': df[col] ** 2,
        f'{col}_binned':  pd.cut(df[col], bins=5, labels=False),
    })

Time-based features with cyclical encoding:

def engineer_time(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    dt = pd.to_datetime(df[col])
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_hour':      dt.dt.hour,
        f'{col}_dayofweek': dt.dt.dayofweek,
        f'{col}_month':     dt.dt.month,
        f'{col}_is_weekend': dt.dt.dayofweek.isin([5, 6]).astype(int),
        f'{col}_hour_sin':  np.sin(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
        f'{col}_hour_cos':  np.cos(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
    })

Feature selection (importance-based):

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

def select_top_features(X, y, n=20):
    rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
    rf.fit(X, y)
    importance = pd.Series(rf.feature_importances_, index=X.columns)
    return importance.nlargest(n).index.tolist()

Model Evaluation

Classification:

from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score, recall_score, f1_score, roc_auc_score

def evaluate_classifier(y_true, y_pred, y_proba=None) -> dict:
    m = {
        "accuracy":  accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "precision": precision_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "recall":    recall_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "f1":        f1_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }
    if y_proba is not None:
        m["auc_roc"] = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_proba)
    return m

Regression:

from sklearn.metrics import mean_absolute_error, mean_squared_error, r2_score
import numpy as np

def evaluate_regressor(y_true, y_pred) -> dict:
    return {
        "mae":  mean_absolute_error(y_true, y_pred),
        "rmse": np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(y_true, y_pred)),
        "r2":   r2_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }

A/B Test Design and Analysis

Sample size calculation:

from scipy import stats
import numpy as np

def required_sample_size(baseline_rate: float, mde: float, alpha: float = 0.05, power: float = 0.8) -> int:
    """Return required N per variant. mde is relative (e.g., 0.10 = 10% lift)."""
    effect = baseline_rate * mde
    z_a = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
    z_b = stats.norm.ppf(power)
    p = baseline_rate
    return int(np.ceil(2 * p * (1 - p) * (z_a + z_b) ** 2 / effect ** 2))

# Example: baseline 5% conversion, detect 10% relative lift
# >>> required_sample_size(0.05, 0.10)  -> ~62,214 per variant

Result analysis:

def analyze_ab(control: np.ndarray, treatment: np.ndarray, alpha: float = 0.05) -> dict:
    """Analyze A/B test with proportions z-test."""
    n_c, n_t = len(control), len(treatment)
    p_c, p_t = control.mean(), treatment.mean()
    p_pool = (control.sum() + treatment.sum()) / (n_c + n_t)
    se = np.sqrt(p_pool * (1 - p_pool) * (1/n_c + 1/n_t))
    z = (p_t - p_c) / se
    p_val = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
    return {
        "control_rate": p_c, "treatment_rate": p_t,
        "lift": (p_t - p_c) / p_c,
        "p_value": p_val, "significant": p_val < alpha,
        "ci_95": ((p_t - p_c) - 1.96 * se, (p_t - p_c) + 1.96 * se),
    }

Project Template

# Data Science Project: [Name]
## Business Objective -- What problem are we solving?
## Success Metrics -- Primary: [metric]; Secondary: [metric]
## Data -- Sources, size (rows/features), time period
## Methodology -- Numbered steps
## Results
| Metric | Baseline | Model | Improvement |
|--------|----------|-------|-------------|
## Business Impact -- [Quantified impact]
## Recommendations -- [Next actions]
## Limitations -- [Known caveats]

Reference Materials

  • references/ml_algorithms.md -- Algorithm deep dives
  • references/feature_engineering.md -- Feature engineering patterns
  • references/experimentation.md -- A/B testing guide
  • references/statistics.md -- Statistical methods

Scripts

python scripts/experiment_tracker.py log --name "xgb_v2" --params '{"lr":0.1,"depth":6}' --metrics '{"f1":0.87,"auc":0.92}'
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py list --sort-by f1 --top 5
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py compare --ids 1 3 5 --json
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py ttest --file data.csv --col-a group_a --col-b group_b
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py proportion --successes-a 120 --trials-a 1000 --successes-b 145 --trials-b 1000
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py chi-square --file contingency.csv --json
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target churn --top 10
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target revenue --method correlation --json

Tool Reference

ToolPurposeKey Flags
experiment_tracker.pyLog, list, and compare experiments with parameters, metrics, and tags in a local JSON filelog --name --params --metrics --tags, list --sort-by --top, compare --ids, --json
hypothesis_tester.pyRun statistical tests: Welch's t-test, paired t-test, proportion z-test, chi-square independencettest --file --col-a --col-b [--paired], proportion --successes-a --trials-a..., chi-square --file, --json
feature_selector.pyRank features by composite score (variance, correlation, mutual information, null rate) for a target column--file <csv>, --target <col>, --top <n>, --method all/correlation/mutual_info, --json

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Model overfits (large train-test gap in metrics)Too many features, insufficient regularization, or data leakageReduce feature count with feature_selector.py, add regularization, and audit feature engineering for temporal leakage
A/B test shows significant result but tiny effect sizeLarge sample size makes small differences statistically significantAlways report effect size (Cohen's d) alongside p-value; use practical significance thresholds
hypothesis_tester.py p-value differs from scipyThe tool uses normal/t-distribution approximations (standard library only)For publication-grade analysis, validate with scipy.stats; the tool is designed for fast directional estimates
Feature importance scores are near-zero for all featuresTarget variable has extremely low variance or the feature set lacks predictive signalCheck target distribution; consider feature engineering or collecting additional data sources
experiment_tracker.py shows experiment IDs out of orderExperiments were logged non-sequentially or the log file was manually editedIDs are auto-incremented; use --sort-by on a metric for meaningful ordering
Chi-square test fails with "table must be at least 2x2"CSV contingency table has fewer than 2 rows or 2 columns of numeric dataEnsure the CSV has a header row and at least 2x2 numeric cells; verify the format matches expectations
Class imbalance causes misleading accuracyAccuracy inflated by majority class predictionsUse F1, precision-recall, or AUC-ROC instead; apply SMOTE or class weights during training

Success Criteria

  • Every ML project follows the Define-Collect-Engineer-Train-Evaluate-Communicate workflow before deployment.
  • Feature selection is documented: feature_selector.py output is saved with the experiment record.
  • All experiments are tracked with experiment_tracker.py including parameters, metrics, and a descriptive name.
  • Model evaluation reports include at least 3 metrics (e.g., F1, AUC-ROC, precision) and comparison against a baseline.
  • A/B tests pre-register the hypothesis, sample size calculation, and primary metric before data collection begins.
  • Statistical tests report effect size and confidence intervals, not just p-values.
  • Business impact is quantified in dollar terms or user-metric terms (e.g., "reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr").

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Machine learning algorithm selection, feature engineering, model training and evaluation, A/B test design and analysis, statistical hypothesis testing, experiment tracking, and communicating results to stakeholders.

Out of scope: Model deployment to production (see ml-ops-engineer), data pipeline infrastructure, dashboard development, and real-time serving architecture.

Limitations: The Python tools use only the Python standard library. hypothesis_tester.py uses normal and t-distribution approximations that are accurate for moderate sample sizes but should be validated with scipy for edge cases (very small n, extreme skew). feature_selector.py computes approximate mutual information using binned discretization -- for high-precision feature selection, use sklearn's mutual_info_classif or permutation importance. All tools process local files and do not integrate with MLflow, W&B, or other tracking platforms.

Integration Points

  • MLOps Engineer (data-analytics/ml-ops-engineer): Trained models are handed off for production deployment, monitoring, and registry management.
  • Data Analyst (data-analytics/data-analyst): Complex analytical questions requiring predictive modeling are escalated from the analyst to the data scientist.
  • Analytics Engineer (data-analytics/analytics-engineer): Feature engineering pipelines may depend on mart models as upstream data sources.
  • Product Team (product-team/): Experiment results inform product decisions; A/B test designs are co-created with product managers.
  • Engineering (engineering/senior-ml-engineer): Algorithm implementation details and model architecture decisions bridge data science and ML engineering.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.26%
按下载量换算747

Gemini CLI

24.22%
按下载量换算598

Antigravity

16.14%
按下载量换算398

OpenCode

11.38%
按下载量换算281

Codex

7.63%
按下载量换算188

Cursor

3.77%
按下载量换算93

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills