Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

data-disclosure(数据披露)

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

data-disclosure 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,745。

总安装 275周安装 11GitHub Stars 9下载 89核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:data-disclosure(数据披露)
来源仓库:https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code
仓库路径:skills/data-disclosure
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill data-disclosure
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill data-disclosure

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于检测代码中个人敏感数据的泄露风险点。聚焦 API 处理器、数据模型与日志中的直接/间接披露问题。支持 LINDDUN 威胁模型下的隐私影响评估。需配合权限标记与数据分类策略进行扫描。适用于上线前安全审计与合规检查流程。data-disclosure 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/data-disclosure

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill data-disclos…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

data-disclosure 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill data-disclosure。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

data-disclosure 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

data-disclosure 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

data-disclosure 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

data-disclosure 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 275 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 89 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

data-disclosure 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
data-disclosure

数据披露 · 本页

2759操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Disclosure of Information Analysis (LINDDUN D2)

Analyze source code for disclosure threats where personal data is accessible to unauthorized parties. Focuses specifically on personal and sensitive data rather than general system information. Covers direct disclosure (data breach vectors) and indirect disclosure (third-party sharing, over-collection).

Supported Flags

Read ../../shared/schemas/flags.md for full flag documentation. This skill supports all cross-cutting flags.

FlagDisclosure-Specific Behavior
--scopeDefault changed. Focuses on files handling personal data: API handlers, data models, logging, caching, third-party integrations, and error handling.
--depth quickGrep patterns only: scan for PII in logs, error messages, and third-party data sharing.
--depth standardFull code read, trace personal data flows within each file, check access controls on personal data stores.
--depth deepCross-file personal data flow tracing. Map all paths where PII exits the application boundary.
--depth expertDeep + breach simulation: model what personal data is exposed in each attack scenario.
--severityFilter output. PII in logs is typically high; over-fetching is medium.
--fixGenerate redaction, field-level access control, and data minimization replacements.

Framework Context

LINDDUN D2 -- Disclosure of Information

Disclosure of information in the LINDDUN context refers specifically to unauthorized access to personal data. Read ../../shared/frameworks/linddun.md for the full LINDDUN framework reference including the distinction between LINDDUN disclosure (personal data focus) and STRIDE information disclosure (general system information).

Privacy Property Violated: Confidentiality of Personal Data

STRIDE Mapping: Information Disclosure (LINDDUN narrows focus specifically to personal data rather than general system information)

Workflow

Step 1 -- Determine Scope

  1. Parse --scope flag (default: changed).
  2. Resolve to a concrete file list.
  3. Filter to relevant files: API handlers, data models, logging configuration, error handling, caching logic, third-party SDK integrations, data export endpoints, and serialization logic.
  4. Prioritize files containing: user data structures, PII fields, third-party API calls with user data, log statements, cache writes, and error responses.

Step 2 -- Analyze for Personal Data Disclosure

Read each scoped file and assess personal data exposure vectors:

  1. Check logging for PII: Scan log statements for personal data fields (name, email, phone, address, SSN, health data, financial data).
  2. Assess API response data: Determine whether endpoints return more personal fields than the consumer needs (over-fetching).
  3. Examine third-party data sharing: Identify where personal data flows to external services (analytics, advertising, logging, error tracking).
  4. Check error handling: Look for personal data in error messages, stack traces, and debug output.
  5. Evaluate cache and temporary storage: Determine whether personal data in caches, temp files, or browser storage is properly protected.

At --depth deep or --depth expert, trace all paths where personal data exits the application boundary and map the full disclosure surface.

Step 3 -- Report Findings

Output findings per ../../shared/schemas/findings.md. Each finding needs: DDSCL-NNN id, title, severity (based on data sensitivity and exposure scope), location with snippet, description of what personal data is disclosed and through which channel, impact (unauthorized data access), fix (redaction, minimization, or encryption), and CWE/LINDDUN references.

Analysis Checklist

  1. Do log statements include personal data (names, emails, phone numbers, addresses)?
  2. Are API responses returning full user objects instead of only needed fields?
  3. Is personal data sent to third-party analytics or error tracking services?
  4. Do error messages or stack traces contain personal data values?
  5. Is PII passed through URL query parameters (visible in logs and referrer headers)?
  6. Are personal data fields encrypted at rest, or stored in plaintext?
  7. Do caching layers store personal data without appropriate TTLs or access controls?
  8. Do debug modes expose additional personal data that production would not?

What to Look For

  1. PII in log statements: Personal data written to logs, console, or debug output.

- Grep: log\.\w+\(.*email|logger\.\w+\(.*password|console\.log\(.*ssn|print\(.*credit.card

  1. Over-fetched API responses: Returning complete user objects with unnecessary fields.

- Grep: res\.json\(user\)|response\.send\(userData\)|SELECT \*.*FROM.*user|\.toJSON\(\)

  1. Third-party data sharing: PII sent to analytics, error tracking, or advertising SDKs.

- Grep: Sentry\.captureException.*user|analytics\.track.*email|gtag.*user_id|bugsnag.*user

  1. PII in error responses: Personal data leaked through error handling.

- Grep: res\.status\(.*\.json\(.*user|catch.*res\.send\(.*err|error.*message.*email

  1. Personal data in URLs: PII in query parameters or path segments.

- Grep: \?email=|&phone=|/users/\$\{email\}|encodeURIComponent\(.*email\)|queryString.*ssn

  1. Plaintext PII storage: Personal data stored without encryption.

- Grep: password.*varchar|ssn.*text|credit_card.*string|healthData.*column|plaintext.*pii

  1. Cache with personal data: PII stored in cache layers without protection.

- Grep: cache\.set\(.*user|redis\.set\(.*email|localStorage\.setItem\(.*token|sessionStorage.*user

  1. Missing field-level access control: No column or field restriction on personal data.

- Grep: SELECT \*|findAll\(\)|\.find\(\{\}\)|\.aggregate\(\[|include:.*all

Regulatory Mapping

RegulationProvisionRelevance
GDPR Art. 5(1)(f)Integrity and confidentialityPersonal data must be protected against unauthorized disclosure
GDPR Art. 32Security of processingAppropriate technical measures to protect personal data
GDPR Art. 33-34Breach notificationDisclosure of personal data triggers 72-hour notification
CCPA 1798.100Right to knowConsumers must know what personal data is collected and shared
CCPA 1798.150Private right of actionData breaches exposing personal data create liability
HIPAA 164.312Technical safeguardsProtected health information requires access controls and encryption

Output Format

Use finding ID prefix DDSCL (e.g., DDSCL-001, DDSCL-002).

All findings follow the schema in ../../shared/schemas/findings.md with:

  • references.cwe: CWE-200, CWE-311, or CWE-532 as appropriate
  • references.owasp: A01:2021 (Broken Access Control) or A02:2021 (Cryptographic Failures)
  • metadata.tool: "data-disclosure"
  • metadata.framework: "linddun"
  • metadata.category: "D2"

Summary table after all findings:

| Disclosure Pattern           | Critical | High | Medium | Low |
|------------------------------|----------|------|--------|-----|
| PII in logs                  |          |      |        |     |
| Over-fetched API responses   |          |      |        |     |
| Third-party data sharing     |          |      |        |     |
| PII in error messages        |          |      |        |     |
| Personal data in URLs        |          |      |        |     |
| Plaintext PII storage        |          |      |        |     |
| Cache / temp storage leaks   |          |      |        |     |

Followed by: top 3 priorities, personal data flow map, and overall assessment.

平台分布

Codex

35.06%
按下载量换算31

Claude

29.46%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

18.05%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills