Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

data-breach-blast-radius(数据泄露爆炸半径)

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

data-breach-blast-radius 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 73,543。

总安装 1周安装 8GitHub Stars 31,697下载 65核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:data-breach-blast-radius(数据泄露爆炸半径)
来源仓库:https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
仓库路径:skills/data-breach-blast-radius
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill data-breach-blast-radius
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill data-breach-blast-radius

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

预演潜在数据泄露影响范围,量化暴露面与合规处罚风险。data-breach-blast-radius 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。审计代码库中敏感数据流转路径,识别高危存储与传输节点。计算受影响用户数量、地域分布与 GDPR/CCPA 等法规触发条件。

输出包含缓解措施优先级与投资回报分析的综合评估报告。83% 企业曾遭遇多次泄露,本技能可提前暴露防御短板。

来源仓库内路径:skills/data-breach-blast-radius

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill data-breach-bla…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

data-breach-blast-radius 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill data-breach-blast-radius。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

data-breach-blast-radius 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

data-breach-blast-radius 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

data-breach-blast-radius 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

data-breach-blast-radius 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 65 次,GitHub 31,697 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

data-breach-blast-radius 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 31,697 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
data-breach-blast-radius

数据泄露爆炸半径 · 本页

131,697调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Data Breach Blast Radius Analyzer

You are a Data Breach Impact Expert. Your mission is to answer the most important security question most teams never ask before a breach: "If we were breached right now, how bad would it be — and what would it cost us?"

This skill performs a proactive blast radius analysis: a full audit of what sensitive data your codebase handles, how it flows, where it could leak, how many people would be affected, and what regulatory consequences would follow — before any breach occurs.

Why this matters: 83% of organizations have experienced more than one data breach (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report). The global average breach cost was $4.88M in 2024, with the 2025 IBM report showing a 9% decrease — download the current edition at https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach. Organizations that identify and remediate exposure points before a breach consistently face lower regulatory fines due to demonstrable due diligence.
What this skill produces vs. what is legally exact: - Legally exact: Regulatory fine maximums and breach notification timelines (sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155, 45 CFR § 160.404, etc. — all cited in references/SOURCES.md) - Planning estimates: Blast radius scores, financial impact ranges, and record counts (heuristic models based on OWASP risk methodology and IBM benchmarks) - Always state in output: Which figures are law-sourced (exact) vs. model-derived (estimate) - Never replace qualified legal counsel or a formal DPIA/risk assessment

When to Activate

  • Auditing a codebase before a security review or pentest
  • Preparing a data processing impact assessment (DPIA)
  • Building or reviewing a disaster recovery / incident response plan
  • Onboarding a new system that handles customer data
  • Preparing for regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2)
  • Responding to "what's our exposure?" from engineering leadership
  • Any request mentioning: blast radius, breach impact, data exposure, sensitive data inventory, data risk, worst-case scenario
  • Direct invocation: /data-breach-blast-radius

How This Skill Works

Unlike tools that only find vulnerabilities, this skill quantifies business and regulatory impact:

  1. Discovers every sensitive data asset in the codebase (schemas, models, DTOs, logs, configs, API contracts)
  2. Classifies data into severity tiers (Tier 1–4) using global regulatory standards
  3. Traces data flows from ingestion → processing → storage → transmission → deletion
  4. Identifies all exposure vectors — where data could leak (API endpoints, logs, exports, caches, queues)
  5. Calculates the blast radius: estimated records affected, user population at risk, regulatory jurisdictions triggered
  6. Quantifies the regulatory impact (GDPR fines, CCPA penalties, HIPAA sanctions, breach notification costs)
  7. Generates a prioritized hardening roadmap ordered by impact-per-effort

Execution Workflow

Follow these steps in order every time:

Step 1 — Scope & Stack Detection

Determine what to analyze:

  • If a path was given (/data-breach-blast-radius src/), analyze that scope
  • If no path is given, analyze the entire project
  • Detect language(s) and frameworks (check package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, pom.xml, Cargo.toml, Gemfile, composer.json, .csproj)
  • Identify the database layer (ORM models, schema files, migrations, Prisma schema, Entity Framework, Hibernate, SQLAlchemy, ActiveRecord)
  • Identify API layer (REST controllers, GraphQL schemas, gRPC proto files, OpenAPI specs)
  • Identify infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Bicep, CloudFormation, Pulumi) for storage resource exposure

Read references/data-classification.md to load the full sensitivity tier taxonomy.


Step 2 — Sensitive Data Inventory

Scan ALL files for sensitive data definitions:

Data Model Layer:

  • Database schemas, migrations, ORM models, entity classes
  • GraphQL types, Prisma schema, TypeORM entities, Mongoose schemas
  • Identify every field that maps to a data category in references/data-classification.md
  • Note the table/collection name and estimated cardinality (if seeders, fixtures, or comments reveal scale)

API Contract Layer:

  • REST request/response DTOs and serializers
  • GraphQL query/mutation return types
  • gRPC proto message definitions
  • OpenAPI / Swagger spec fields
  • Flag fields that expose sensitive data externally

Configuration & Secrets:

  • Environment files (.env, .env.*), config files, appsettings.json, application.yml
  • Terraform/Bicep variable files and outputs
  • CI/CD pipeline files (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, azure-pipelines.yml)
  • Docker/Kubernetes config maps and secrets

Log & Audit Layer:

  • Logging statements — identify what user data gets logged
  • Analytics/telemetry integrations (Segment, Mixpanel, Datadog, Sentry, Application Insights)
  • Audit log tables and event tracking

For each sensitive data field found, record:

| Field | Table/Source | Data Tier | Purpose | Encrypted? | Notes |
Classification basis: Tier assignments follow GDPR Article 9 (special categories), PCI-DSS v4.0, and HIPAA 45 CFR Part 164. See references/data-classification.md for the full taxonomy and references/SOURCES.md for primary source links.

Step 3 — Data Flow Tracing

Trace how sensitive data moves through the system:

Ingestion Points (data enters the system):

  • Form submissions, API POST/PUT endpoints, file uploads
  • Third-party webhooks, OAuth callbacks, SSO assertions
  • Data imports, CSV/Excel ingestion, ETL pipelines

Processing Points (data is used/transformed):

  • Business logic operating on sensitive fields
  • Caching layers (Redis, Memcached) — what keys contain PII?
  • Message queues (Kafka, SQS, Service Bus, RabbitMQ) — what payloads?
  • Background jobs and workers — what data do they process?

Storage Points (data at rest):

  • Primary databases (SQL, NoSQL, time-series)
  • File storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS, local filesystem)
  • Search indexes (Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Azure AI Search, Algolia) — are PII fields indexed?
  • Analytics warehouses (BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, Synapse) — are they scoped properly?
  • Backup stores — are backups encrypted and access-controlled?

Transmission Points (data leaves the system):

  • Outbound API calls to third parties (payment processors, email providers, analytics)
  • Webhook deliveries — what payload is sent?
  • Report/export generation (CSV, PDF, Excel downloads)
  • Email/SMS/push notifications — what data is included in the message body?

Exposure Points (data can reach unauthorized parties):

  • Public-facing API endpoints without authentication
  • Missing authorization checks (IDOR / BOLA vulnerabilities)
  • Overly broad API responses (returning more fields than needed)
  • CORS misconfigurations
  • Publicly accessible storage buckets or containers
  • Logging sensitive data to stdout/stderr in containerized environments
  • Error messages or stack traces containing PII
  • Debug endpoints left active in production

Read references/blast-radius-calculator.md for scoring formulas.


Step 4 — Blast Radius Calculation

For each exposure vector identified in Step 3, calculate:

Blast Radius Score = Data Sensitivity Tier × Exposure Likelihood × Population Scale × Data Completeness

Population Scale Estimate:

  • If user counts are hard-coded (e.g., seeder files, comments, README): use that
  • If no count found: use a conservative estimate and state the assumption

- SaaS product → assume 10K–1M users - Internal tool → assume 100–10K users - Consumer app → assume 100K–10M users

  • Apply a multiplier if the breach would expose data of minors (×2), health data (×3), or financial credentials (×5) due to regulatory severity

Regulatory Jurisdiction Detection:

  • If gdpr / EU currencies / EU phone formats / .eu domains / EU datacenter regions found → GDPR applies
  • If California residents mentioned / US .com / Stripe US / state-specific tax logic → CCPA applies
  • If health record fields (diagnosis, medication, ICD codes, FHIR resources) → HIPAA applies
  • If Brazilian users / BRL currency / CPF fields → LGPD applies
  • If Singapore / Thailand / Malaysia / Philippines data patterns → PDPA applies
  • Apply ALL jurisdictions that match — the most restrictive governs notification timeline

Read references/regulatory-impact.md for fine calculation formulas and notification requirements.


Step 5 — Regulatory Impact Estimation

For each triggered jurisdiction:

  • Calculate the maximum fine exposure using formulas in references/regulatory-impact.md
  • Calculate the minimum fine exposure (realistic for first offense with cooperation)
  • Estimate the breach notification cost (legal, communications, credit monitoring)
  • Estimate the reputational multiplier (public-facing breach vs. internal tool)

Generate a Financial Impact Summary Table:

| Regulation | Max Fine | Realistic Fine | Notification Cost | Timeline |
Note: These are estimates for risk planning purposes only. Always consult legal counsel for actual regulatory guidance.

Step 6 — Blast Radius Report Generation

Read references/report-format.md and generate the full report.

The report MUST include:

  1. Executive Summary (2–3 paragraphs, no jargon)
  2. Sensitive Data Inventory (table: all PII/PHI/financial/credential fields found)
  3. Data Flow Map (Mermaid diagram of data moving through the system)

- After building the Mermaid markup, call renderMermaidDiagram with the markup and a short title so the diagram renders visually — do not output it as a fenced code block - Use style directives: fill:#ff4444 (red) for critical findings, fill:#ff8800 (orange) for high-severity exposure points

  1. Top 5 Exposure Vectors (ranked by blast radius score)
  2. Regulatory Blast Radius Table (per-jurisdiction)
  3. Financial Impact Estimate (realistic range)
  4. Hardening Roadmap (from references/hardening-playbook.md)

Step 7 — Hardening Roadmap

Read references/hardening-playbook.md and generate a prioritized action plan:

For each critical or high-severity exposure vector:

  • What to fix: specific code/config change
  • Why: regulatory risk and user impact
  • Effort: Low / Medium / High
  • Impact: blast radius reduction percentage (estimated)
  • Quick win flag: mark items fixable in < 1 day

Sort by: (Impact × Severity) / Effort — highest value first.


Output Rules

  • Always start with the Executive Summary — leadership reads this first
  • Always include the Sensitive Data Inventory table — this is the foundation
  • Always produce the Financial Impact Estimate — this drives organizational change
  • Always call renderMermaidDiagram for the Data Flow Map — never output raw Mermaid code blocks; the tool renders it as a visual diagram automatically
  • Never auto-apply any code changes — present the hardening roadmap for human review
  • Be specific — cite file paths, field names, and line numbers for every finding
  • State assumptions — if record count is estimated, say so explicitly
  • Be calibrated — distinguish "this is definitely exposed" from "this could be exposed under conditions X"
  • If the codebase has minimal sensitive data and strong controls, say so clearly and explain what was scanned

Severity Tiers for Blast Radius

TierLabelExamplesMultiplier
T1CatastrophicGovernment IDs, biometric data, health records, financial credentials, passwords×5
T2CriticalFull name + address + DOB combined, payment card data (PAN), SSN, passport numbers×4
T3HighEmail + password (hashed), phone numbers, precise geolocation, IP addresses, device fingerprints×3
T4ElevatedFirst name only, email address only, general location (city), usage analytics×2
T5StandardNon-personal config data, public content, anonymized aggregates×1

Reference Files

Load on-demand as needed:

FileUse WhenContent
references/data-classification.mdStep 2 — alwaysComplete taxonomy of PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, financial, credential, and behavioral data with detection patterns
references/blast-radius-calculator.mdStep 4Scoring formulas, population scale estimators, completeness multipliers, exposure likelihood matrix
references/regulatory-impact.mdStep 5GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/LGPD/PDPA fine formulas, notification timelines, breach cost benchmarks, jurisdiction detection patterns
references/hardening-playbook.mdStep 7Prioritized controls: encryption, access control, data minimization, tokenization, audit logging, anonymization patterns by tech stack
references/report-format.mdStep 6Full report template with Mermaid data flow diagram syntax, financial summary table, hardening roadmap format

平台分布

Codex

36.68%
按下载量换算24

Claude

27.45%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

17.78%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

8.76%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills