Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

triage-issue(分类问题)

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

triage-issue 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 9,348。

总安装 245周安装 10GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:triage-issue(分类问题)
来源仓库:https://github.com/danielvm-git/skills
仓库路径:skills/triage-issue
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/danielvm-git/skills --skill triage-issue
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/danielvm-git/skills --skill triage-issue

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、 Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作; 涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue 或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限。

来源仓库内路径:skills/triage-issue

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/danielvm-git/skills --skill triage-issue;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

triage-issue 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/danielvm-git/skills --skill triage-issue。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

triage-issue 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

triage-issue 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

triage-issue 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

triage-issue 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 245 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

triage-issue 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
triage-issue

分类问题 · 本页

245—权限未标注未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
triage-issue
description
Triage a bug or issue by exploring the codebase to find root cause, then create a GitHub issue with a TDD-based fix plan. Use when user reports a bug, wants to file an issue, mentions "triage", or wants to investigate and plan a fix for a problem.

Triage Issue

Investigate a reported problem, find its root cause, and create a GitHub issue with a TDD fix plan. This is a mostly hands-off workflow - minimize questions to the user.

Process

1. Capture the problem

Get a brief description of the issue from the user. If they haven't provided one, ask ONE question: "What's the problem you're seeing?"

Do NOT ask follow-up questions yet. Start investigating immediately.

2. Explore and diagnose

Use the Agent tool with subagent_type=Explore to deeply investigate the codebase. Your goal is to find:

  • Where the bug manifests (entry points, UI, API responses)
  • What code path is involved (trace the flow)
  • Why it fails (the root cause, not just the symptom)
  • What related code exists (similar patterns, tests, adjacent modules)

Look at:

  • Related source files and their dependencies
  • Existing tests (what's tested, what's missing)
  • Recent changes to affected files (git log on relevant files)
  • Error handling in the code path
  • Similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase that work correctly

3. Identify the fix approach

Based on your investigation, determine:

  • The minimal change needed to fix the root cause
  • Which modules/interfaces are affected
  • What behaviors need to be verified via tests
  • Whether this is a regression, missing feature, or design flaw

4. Design TDD fix plan

Create a concrete, ordered list of RED-GREEN cycles. Each cycle is one vertical slice:

  • RED: Describe a specific test that captures the broken/missing behavior
  • GREEN: Describe the minimal code change to make that test pass

Rules:

  • Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details
  • One test at a time, vertical slices (NOT all tests first, then all code)
  • Each test should survive internal refactors
  • Include a final refactor step if needed
  • Durability: Only suggest fixes that would survive radical codebase changes. Describe behaviors and contracts, not internal structure. Tests assert on observable outcomes (API responses, UI state, user-visible effects), not internal state. A good suggestion reads like a spec; a bad one reads like a diff.

5. Create the GitHub issue

Create a GitHub issue using gh issue create with the template below. Do NOT ask the user to review before creating - just create it and share the URL.

<issue-template>

Problem

A clear description of the bug or issue, including:

  • What happens (actual behavior)
  • What should happen (expected behavior)
  • How to reproduce (if applicable)

Root Cause Analysis

Describe what you found during investigation:

  • The code path involved
  • Why the current code fails
  • Any contributing factors

Do NOT include specific file paths, line numbers, or implementation details that couple to current code layout. Describe modules, behaviors, and contracts instead. The issue should remain useful even after major refactors.

TDD Fix Plan

A numbered list of RED-GREEN cycles:

  1. RED: Write a test that [describes expected behavior]

GREEN: [Minimal change to make it pass]

  1. RED: Write a test that [describes next behavior]

GREEN: [Minimal change to make it pass]

...

REFACTOR: [Any cleanup needed after all tests pass]

Acceptance Criteria

  • [ ] Criterion 1
  • [ ] Criterion 2
  • [ ] All new tests pass
  • [ ] Existing tests still pass

</issue-template>

After creating the issue, print the issue URL and a one-line summary of the root cause.

平台分布

Codex

33.78%
按下载量换算27

Claude

31.95%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

17.1%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

10.11%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills