Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

daily-focus-planner(每日焦点计划)

daily-focus-planner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

daily-focus-planner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,973。

总安装 7,474周安装 214GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,354核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:daily-focus-planner(每日焦点计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60
仓库路径:skills/daily-focus-planner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Daily Focus Planner'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Daily Focus Planner'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

daily-focus-planner 制定优先级明确的每日行动计划,明确告诉执行者“今天做什么”而非“发生了什么”。区别于新闻简报,它聚焦 actionable items 与时间分配,最大化 pipeline 推进效率。基于可用时间与目标动态排序任务,但需人工输入精力水平与市场条件等参数以校准结果。

输出为结构化列表,包含任务、预估耗时与理由,帮助 rep 快速决策与承诺执行。本技能假设用户已具备清晰的任务池,不适合从零构思新方向或创意发散场景。

来源仓库内路径:skills/daily-focus-planner

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Daily Focus Pla…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

daily-focus-planner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Daily Focus Planner'。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

daily-focus-planner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

daily-focus-planner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

daily-focus-planner 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

daily-focus-planner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,474 次,近一周安装 214 次,下载 2,354 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

daily-focus-planner 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
daily-focus-planner

每日焦点计划 · 本页

7,474—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Available Context & Tools

@_platform-references/org-variables.md @_platform-references/capabilities.md

Daily Focus Planner

Goal

Create a prioritized daily action plan that tells the rep exactly what to do today and why. This is not a briefing (that is the Daily Brief Planner's job). A briefing answers "What's happening?" A focus plan answers "What should I DO?"

The difference is critical. A briefing is a newspaper; a focus plan is a battle plan. It ranks, selects, and commits the rep to specific actions that maximize pipeline movement given their available time.

The Briefing vs. Focus Plan Distinction

DimensionDaily BriefingDaily Focus Plan
Question answered"What's going on?""What should I do?"
OrientationInformationalPrescriptive
OutputStatus summaryRanked action list + task pack
Decision requiredNone (read and absorb)Yes (commit to top actions)
Time to consume30 seconds (scan)2 minutes (review and commit)
Updates during dayCan re-run for latest statusShould be set once in the morning

Why Prioritized Planning Beats Reactive Selling

Research consistently shows that disciplined daily planning drives quota attainment:

  • Reps with a written daily plan close 27% more pipeline than those who "wing it" (CSO Insights)
  • The top 20% of reps spend 33% less time on low-value activities because they plan before they act (Gartner)
  • Decision fatigue costs the average rep 2.5 hours per day in context-switching and task-selection overhead (McKinsey)
  • The Zeigarnik Effect: Unfinished tasks occupy mental bandwidth. A clear plan with defined scope frees cognitive resources for selling.

The focus plan eliminates the "what should I do next?" question. Every minute spent deciding is a minute not spent selling.

Priority Ranking Methodology

The CVHS Score (Close date x Value x Health x Staleness)

Every deal and action is scored using four weighted factors. Consult references/focus-frameworks.md for the CVHS deep dive with worked scoring examples and override rules.

PRIORITY_SCORE = (Close_Urgency x 0.35) + (Value_Weight x 0.25) + (Health_Risk x 0.25) + (Staleness x 0.15)
Close Urgency (35% weight)

The single strongest signal. Deals closing soon need action NOW.

Close DateScoreLabel
Today or overdue100CRITICAL
This week85Urgent
Next week60High
This month40Medium
Next month+15Low
No close date30Medium (penalized for missing data)
Value Weight (25% weight)

Higher-value deals justify more time investment.

Deal Value vs. AverageScore
3x+ average100
2-3x average80
1-2x average50
Below average25
Unknown value40
Health Risk (25% weight)

At-risk deals need intervention before they die.

Health ScoreScoreInterpretation
0-30100Critical -- likely to lose without immediate action
31-5080At risk -- needs attention this week
51-7050Needs monitoring
71-9020Healthy
91-1005Strong -- minimal attention needed
No health score50Unknown = assume moderate risk
Staleness (15% weight)

Days since last meaningful activity on the deal.

Days StaleScore
14+ days100
10-13 days80
7-9 days60
4-6 days30
0-3 days5

The "One Thing" Principle

After scoring all actions, identify the single highest-impact action. See references/focus-frameworks.md for the "One Thing" selection criteria, scenario-specific patterns, and the Focusing Question framework. This becomes the headline recommendation:

"If you could only do ONE thing today, do this: [action]"

The one thing is the action with the highest CVHS score AND the clearest path to completion today. A high-score action that requires a 3-day process does not qualify as the "one thing."

Selection criteria for the "one thing":

  1. Highest CVHS score among completable-today actions
  2. Has a clear, concrete next step (not "research" or "think about")
  3. Directly moves a deal forward (advances stage, unblocks decision, re-engages champion)
  4. Can be done in under 30 minutes

Capacity-Aware Planning

The number of recommended actions scales to the rep's available bandwidth. See references/capacity-guide.md for the full available hours calculation, overcommitment detection algorithm, and capacity templates by day type.

Capacity LevelActionsTask PackSignal
Busy (back-to-back meetings, travel day)1-21 taskFocus only on the "one thing"
Normal (typical day, some meetings)3-53 tasksBalanced action set
Available (light meeting day, focused time)5-83-5 tasksExpand to include nurture and prospecting

Auto-detection heuristics (when user_capacity is not provided):

  • 5+ meetings today = "busy"
  • 10+ open overdue tasks = "busy" (they're already overwhelmed)
  • 2-4 meetings = "normal"
  • 0-1 meetings = "available"

Never exceed 8 actions regardless of capacity. Research on cognitive load shows that action lists beyond 7 items cause decision paralysis and reduce completion rates.

Action Concreteness Standard

Every recommended action MUST meet the SMART-A standard (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound, Assigned):

Bad Actions (too vague)

  • "Follow up on deal" -- Follow up how? With whom? About what?
  • "Check in with contact" -- What's the purpose? What outcome do you want?
  • "Work on pipeline" -- This is a category, not an action.
  • "Review proposal" -- Review for what? What's the decision point?

Good Actions (concrete and completable)

  • "Send revised pricing proposal to Sarah Chen at Acme Corp, addressing the 15% discount request from Tuesday's call"
  • "Call Mike Ross at TechFlow to re-engage -- he hasn't responded in 9 days. Ask about the budget committee meeting."
  • "Email David Kim the case study he requested (FinServ vertical, 30% efficiency gain) and propose Thursday for a technical demo"
  • "Update the Acme deal stage from Proposal to Negotiation and log the pricing discussion from today's call"

The Concreteness Test

For each action, ask: "Could a colleague execute this action with zero additional context?" If not, add more specifics.

Required elements for every action:

  1. Verb -- What to do (send, call, email, schedule, update, create)
  2. Target -- Who it's directed at (person name and company)
  3. Content -- What the communication/action contains
  4. Context -- Why now (linked to a deal event, timeline, or risk signal)

ROI Rationale Framework

Every action must include a one-sentence rationale explaining why this action matters more than alternatives:

Rationale Templates by Category

Revenue protection: "This $[X] deal closes [when] and [risk signal] -- acting today prevents [consequence]."

  • Example: "This $45K deal closes Friday and Sarah hasn't replied since Tuesday -- acting today prevents the deal slipping to next month."

Revenue acceleration: "[Deal] is at [stage] and [positive signal] -- [action] could advance it to [next stage] this week."

  • Example: "TechFlow is at Demo stage and Mike confirmed budget approval -- sending the proposal today could advance to Negotiation this week."

Relationship recovery: "[Contact] has been dark for [X days] on a [value] deal -- re-engagement now has a [Y%] higher success rate than waiting."

  • Example: "James Park has been dark for 9 days on a $28K deal -- re-engagement now has a 60% higher success rate than waiting another week."

Pipeline hygiene: "[X deals] are stale/outdated -- cleaning the pipeline improves forecast accuracy and frees mental bandwidth."

Task Pack Design

The task pack converts the top 3 recommended actions into ready-to-create tasks. These are designed to be accepted with one click.

Task Pack Requirements

Each task in the pack must include:

FieldDescriptionExample
titleAction-oriented, starts with verb, under 80 chars"Send revised pricing to Sarah Chen (Acme)"
description2-3 sentences with context and a mini-checklistSee below
due_dateISO date, prefer "today" or "tomorrow""2025-01-15"
priorityDerived from CVHS score: >70 = high, 40-70 = medium, <40 = low"high"
deal_idLinked deal if applicable"deal_abc123"
contact_idLinked contact if applicable"contact_xyz789"

Description Template

Context: [Why this task exists -- the deal situation and trigger]
Action: [Exactly what to do]
Checklist:
- [ ] [Step 1]
- [ ] [Step 2]
- [ ] [Step 3 -- log the outcome]

Example Task Pack Entry

{
  "title": "Send revised pricing to Sarah Chen (Acme Corp)",
  "description": "Context: Acme Corp ($45K) is in Proposal stage, closing Friday. Sarah requested a 15% volume discount on Tuesday's call.\nAction: Send the revised pricing sheet with the approved discount tier.\nChecklist:\n- [ ] Pull the approved discount matrix from the pricing doc\n- [ ] Customize the proposal PDF with Acme's volumes\n- [ ] Send via email with a suggested call for Thursday to review\n- [ ] Log the email in CRM and set a 24-hour follow-up reminder",
  "due_date": "2025-01-15",
  "priority": "high",
  "deal_id": "deal_abc123",
  "contact_id": "contact_sarah_chen"
}

Time Estimation Methodology

Each action receives a time estimate to help the rep plan their day:

Action TypeTypical DurationNotes
Send email (with customization)10-15 minIncludes writing, reviewing, personalizing
Phone call (with prep)15-20 minIncludes reviewing notes, making the call, logging
Schedule a meeting5-10 minFinding availability, sending invite
Update CRM records5-10 minStage changes, notes, next steps
Prepare proposal/deck30-60 minCustomization, review, formatting
Research / account review15-30 minReviewing history, news, preparing talking points
Internal sync (manager, SE)15 minQuick alignment before external action

Total time budget: Sum all recommended actions. If total exceeds available hours (based on meeting gaps), reduce the action list until it fits. A plan the rep cannot complete is worse than no plan.

Pipeline Velocity Impact

Connect each action to its pipeline impact using this framework:

ActionPipeline Metric AffectedExpected Impact
Re-engage stale contactCycle time (reduces stall)Prevents 15-30 day deal extension
Send proposalConversion rate (stage advancement)Advances deal to Negotiation
Book next meetingVelocity (keeps momentum)Maintains 3-5 day cadence
Handle objectionWin rateAddresses #1 reason deals stall
Multi-thread (new contact)Win rate (+15-25% with 3+ contacts)De-risks single-champion dependency
Update forecastPipeline accuracyImproves commit reliability

Inputs

  • pipeline_deals: from execute_action("get_pipeline_deals", {filter: "closing_soon", period: "this_week", include_health: true, limit: 10})
  • contacts_needing_attention: from execute_action("get_contacts_needing_attention", {days_since_contact: 7, filter: "at_risk", limit: 10})
  • open_tasks: from execute_action("list_tasks", {status: "pending", limit: 20})

Output Contract

Return a SkillResult with:

  • data.one_thing: object -- The single most important action today

- title: string - description: string - entity_type: "deal" | "contact" - entity_id: string - rationale: string - estimated_time: number (minutes)

  • data.priorities: array of 5-8 priority items

- type: "deal" | "contact" | "task" - id: string - name: string - reason: string (why it needs attention now) - urgency: "critical" | "high" | "medium" - context: string (deal stage, days stale, value, etc.) - cvhs_score: number (0-100, for transparency)

  • data.actions: array of 3-8 next best actions (adjusted by capacity)

- title: string (verb-first, under 80 characters) - description: string (concrete, passes the colleague test) - priority: "urgent" | "high" | "medium" | "low" - entity_type: "deal" | "contact" | "task" - entity_id: string | null - estimated_time: number (minutes) - roi_rationale: string (why this matters more than alternatives) - pipeline_impact: string (which metric this action affects)

  • data.task_pack: array of 3 task previews (top actions, ready to create)

- title: string - description: string (include context and checklist) - due_date: string (ISO date, prefer "today" or "tomorrow") - priority: "high" | "medium" | "low" - deal_id: string | null - contact_id: string | null

  • data.time_budget: object

- total_action_minutes: number - available_minutes: number (estimated from meeting gaps) - capacity_assessment: "busy" | "normal" | "available"

Quality Checklist

Before returning the focus plan, verify:

  • "One thing" is identified and meets the completable-today criteria
  • All actions pass the concreteness test (verb + target + content + context)
  • Action count matches capacity level (busy: 1-2, normal: 3-5, available: 5-8)
  • Every action has an ROI rationale (not just "needs follow-up")
  • Task pack has exactly 3 items (or fewer if capacity is "busy")
  • Task pack descriptions include checklists
  • Time estimates are realistic and total fits available time
  • CVHS scores are calculated, not arbitrary
  • No duplicate actions (e.g., two actions targeting the same contact for the same reason)
  • Priorities are ranked, not just listed
  • Actions cover different deal stages (not all focused on one deal)
  • No fabricated deal data or contact names
  • Entity IDs included for all linked deals and contacts

Error Handling

Empty pipeline (no deals)

Shift focus entirely to tasks and prospecting. Actions should center on:

  • Completing overdue tasks
  • Prospecting new leads
  • Nurturing existing contacts
  • Administrative pipeline hygiene Message: "Your pipeline is empty. Today's focus: building pipeline through prospecting and outreach."

No contacts needing attention

This is a healthy signal. Note it positively: "All contacts are recently engaged -- nice work." Focus actions on deal advancement and tasks instead.

No tasks

Generate actions purely from deal and contact data. Every deal or stale contact implies a natural next action. Include a note: "No pending tasks found. The actions below are generated from your pipeline status."

All deals healthy

When no deals are at risk, shift from defensive to offensive actions:

  • Advance deals to next stage
  • Multi-thread into additional contacts
  • Prepare for upcoming close dates
  • Prospect for new pipeline Message: "Pipeline looks strong. Focus on acceleration and prospecting today."

Conflicting priorities (too many critical items)

When more than 3 items score as "critical," apply tiebreakers in order:

  1. Highest deal value wins
  2. Nearest close date wins
  3. Longest stale period wins Cap critical items at 3 and downgrade the rest to "high."

Capacity mismatch (too many actions for available time)

If total estimated time exceeds available hours by more than 25%, trim from the bottom of the priority list. Add note: "Your day is packed. I've trimmed to the top [X] actions that fit your available time."

Missing health scores

When health data is unavailable, increase the weight of staleness and close date in the CVHS calculation. Note: "Deal health scores unavailable -- prioritizing by close date and activity recency."

Afternoon/evening request

If the focus plan is requested after 2pm, adjust:

  • Remove actions that require morning energy (cold calls, major proposals)
  • Focus on quick wins completable before end of day
  • Include a "tomorrow's top priority" preview
  • Reduce action count by 50% (half the day is gone)

平台分布

Codex

34.61%
按下载量换算815

Claude

30.09%
按下载量换算708

Cursor

19.72%
按下载量换算464

Gemini CLI

8.64%
按下载量换算203

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills