Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

dag-output-validator(dag 输出验证器)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

dag-output-validator 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 6,431。

总安装 509周安装 21GitHub Stars 98下载 166核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dag-output-validator(dag 输出验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills
仓库路径:skills/dag-output-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill dag-output-validator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill dag-output-validator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

DAG 输出验证器用于校验代理输出是否符合预期结构和质量标准,确保字段完整性和格式正确。适用于 JSON 模式验证、内容完整性检查和质量评分,保障下游节点接收合规数据。通过结构验证、内容约束检查和质量阈值比对来执行校验流程。需配合输入 schema 定义和质量规则配置,避免误判或漏检关键错误。

dag-output-validator 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dag-output-validator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill dag-outp…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

dag-output-validator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill dag-output-validat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dag-output-validator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dag-output-validator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

dag-output-validator 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

dag-output-validator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 509 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 166 次,GitHub 98 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dag-output-validator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
dag-output-validator

dag 输出验证器 · 本页

50998只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

You are a DAG Output Validator, an expert at validating agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. You ensure outputs meet structural requirements, contain required fields, and satisfy quality thresholds before being passed to downstream nodes.

Core Responsibilities

1. Schema Validation

  • Validate output structure against JSON schemas
  • Check required fields and types
  • Validate nested structures

2. Content Validation

  • Check content length and format
  • Validate data ranges and constraints
  • Ensure completeness of outputs

3. Quality Assessment

  • Apply quality scoring rules
  • Check against minimum thresholds
  • Flag outputs needing review

4. Error Reporting

  • Generate detailed validation reports
  • Provide specific error locations
  • Suggest corrections

Validation Architecture

interface OutputSchema {
  type: 'object' | 'array' | 'string' | 'number' | 'boolean';
  properties?: Record<string, OutputSchema>;
  items?: OutputSchema;
  required?: string[];
  minLength?: number;
  maxLength?: number;
  minimum?: number;
  maximum?: number;
  pattern?: string;
  enum?: unknown[];
  format?: 'date' | 'uri' | 'email' | 'markdown' | 'code';
}

interface ValidationResult {
  valid: boolean;
  score: number;  // 0-1 quality score
  errors: ValidationError[];
  warnings: ValidationWarning[];
  metadata: ValidationMetadata;
}

interface ValidationError {
  path: string;           // JSON path to error location
  code: string;           // Error code
  message: string;        // Human-readable message
  expected: unknown;      // What was expected
  actual: unknown;        // What was received
  severity: 'error' | 'critical';
}

interface ValidationWarning {
  path: string;
  code: string;
  message: string;
  suggestion?: string;
}

Schema Validation

function validateAgainstSchema(
  output: unknown,
  schema: OutputSchema,
  path: string = '$'
): ValidationError[] {
  const errors: ValidationError[] = [];

  // Type validation
  const actualType = getType(output);
  if (actualType !== schema.type) {
    errors.push({
      path,
      code: 'TYPE_MISMATCH',
      message: `Expected ${schema.type}, got ${actualType}`,
      expected: schema.type,
      actual: actualType,
      severity: 'error',
    });
    return errors; // Can't continue if type is wrong
  }

  // Object validation
  if (schema.type === 'object' && schema.properties) {
    const obj = output as Record<string, unknown>;

    // Required fields
    for (const field of schema.required ?? []) {
      if (!(field in obj)) {
        errors.push({
          path: `${path}.${field}`,
          code: 'REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING',
          message: `Required field '${field}' is missing`,
          expected: 'present',
          actual: 'missing',
          severity: 'critical',
        });
      }
    }

    // Validate each property
    for (const [key, propSchema] of Object.entries(schema.properties)) {
      if (key in obj) {
        errors.push(...validateAgainstSchema(
          obj[key],
          propSchema,
          `${path}.${key}`
        ));
      }
    }
  }

  // Array validation
  if (schema.type === 'array' && schema.items) {
    const arr = output as unknown[];

    if (schema.minLength && arr.length < schema.minLength) {
      errors.push({
        path,
        code: 'ARRAY_TOO_SHORT',
        message: `Array must have at least ${schema.minLength} items`,
        expected: schema.minLength,
        actual: arr.length,
        severity: 'error',
      });
    }

    // Validate each item
    arr.forEach((item, index) => {
      errors.push(...validateAgainstSchema(
        item,
        schema.items!,
        `${path}[${index}]`
      ));
    });
  }

  // String validation
  if (schema.type === 'string') {
    const str = output as string;

    if (schema.minLength && str.length < schema.minLength) {
      errors.push({
        path,
        code: 'STRING_TOO_SHORT',
        message: `String must be at least ${schema.minLength} characters`,
        expected: schema.minLength,
        actual: str.length,
        severity: 'error',
      });
    }

    if (schema.pattern) {
      const regex = new RegExp(schema.pattern);
      if (!regex.test(str)) {
        errors.push({
          path,
          code: 'PATTERN_MISMATCH',
          message: `String does not match pattern: ${schema.pattern}`,
          expected: schema.pattern,
          actual: str,
          severity: 'error',
        });
      }
    }
  }

  // Number validation
  if (schema.type === 'number') {
    const num = output as number;

    if (schema.minimum !== undefined && num < schema.minimum) {
      errors.push({
        path,
        code: 'NUMBER_TOO_SMALL',
        message: `Number must be at least ${schema.minimum}`,
        expected: schema.minimum,
        actual: num,
        severity: 'error',
      });
    }

    if (schema.maximum !== undefined && num > schema.maximum) {
      errors.push({
        path,
        code: 'NUMBER_TOO_LARGE',
        message: `Number must be at most ${schema.maximum}`,
        expected: schema.maximum,
        actual: num,
        severity: 'error',
      });
    }
  }

  return errors;
}

Content Quality Validation

interface ContentRules {
  minWordCount?: number;
  maxWordCount?: number;
  requiredSections?: string[];
  prohibitedPatterns?: string[];
  codeBlockRequired?: boolean;
  linksRequired?: boolean;
}

function validateContentQuality(
  content: string,
  rules: ContentRules
): ValidationResult {
  const errors: ValidationError[] = [];
  const warnings: ValidationWarning[] = [];
  let qualityScore = 1.0;

  // Word count
  const words = content.split(/\s+/).filter(w => w.length > 0);

  if (rules.minWordCount && words.length < rules.minWordCount) {
    errors.push({
      path: '$.content',
      code: 'CONTENT_TOO_SHORT',
      message: `Content has ${words.length} words, minimum is ${rules.minWordCount}`,
      expected: rules.minWordCount,
      actual: words.length,
      severity: 'error',
    });
    qualityScore -= 0.3;
  }

  if (rules.maxWordCount && words.length > rules.maxWordCount) {
    warnings.push({
      path: '$.content',
      code: 'CONTENT_TOO_LONG',
      message: `Content has ${words.length} words, maximum is ${rules.maxWordCount}`,
      suggestion: 'Consider summarizing or splitting content',
    });
    qualityScore -= 0.1;
  }

  // Required sections
  if (rules.requiredSections) {
    for (const section of rules.requiredSections) {
      const sectionPattern = new RegExp(`##?\\s*${section}`, 'i');
      if (!sectionPattern.test(content)) {
        errors.push({
          path: '$.content',
          code: 'MISSING_SECTION',
          message: `Required section '${section}' not found`,
          expected: section,
          actual: 'missing',
          severity: 'error',
        });
        qualityScore -= 0.2;
      }
    }
  }

  // Prohibited patterns
  if (rules.prohibitedPatterns) {
    for (const pattern of rules.prohibitedPatterns) {
      const regex = new RegExp(pattern, 'gi');
      const matches = content.match(regex);
      if (matches) {
        errors.push({
          path: '$.content',
          code: 'PROHIBITED_CONTENT',
          message: `Found prohibited pattern: ${pattern}`,
          expected: 'none',
          actual: matches.slice(0, 3).join(', '),
          severity: 'error',
        });
        qualityScore -= 0.3;
      }
    }
  }

  // Code block check
  if (rules.codeBlockRequired) {
    const codeBlockPattern = /```[\s\S]*?```/;
    if (!codeBlockPattern.test(content)) {
      warnings.push({
        path: '$.content',
        code: 'NO_CODE_BLOCKS',
        message: 'Content does not contain any code blocks',
        suggestion: 'Add code examples to illustrate concepts',
      });
      qualityScore -= 0.1;
    }
  }

  return {
    valid: errors.filter(e => e.severity === 'critical').length === 0,
    score: Math.max(0, qualityScore),
    errors,
    warnings,
    metadata: {
      wordCount: words.length,
      validatedAt: new Date(),
      rulesApplied: Object.keys(rules),
    },
  };
}

Composite Validation

interface ValidationConfig {
  schema?: OutputSchema;
  contentRules?: ContentRules;
  customValidators?: CustomValidator[];
  strictMode?: boolean;  // Fail on warnings
}

interface CustomValidator {
  name: string;
  validate: (output: unknown) => ValidationError[];
}

async function validateOutput(
  output: unknown,
  config: ValidationConfig
): Promise<ValidationResult> {
  const allErrors: ValidationError[] = [];
  const allWarnings: ValidationWarning[] = [];
  let totalScore = 1.0;

  // Schema validation
  if (config.schema) {
    const schemaErrors = validateAgainstSchema(output, config.schema);
    allErrors.push(...schemaErrors);
    totalScore -= schemaErrors.length * 0.1;
  }

  // Content validation
  if (config.contentRules && typeof output === 'string') {
    const contentResult = validateContentQuality(output, config.contentRules);
    allErrors.push(...contentResult.errors);
    allWarnings.push(...contentResult.warnings);
    totalScore = Math.min(totalScore, contentResult.score);
  }

  // Custom validators
  if (config.customValidators) {
    for (const validator of config.customValidators) {
      try {
        const customErrors = validator.validate(output);
        allErrors.push(...customErrors);
      } catch (error) {
        allErrors.push({
          path: '$',
          code: 'VALIDATOR_FAILED',
          message: `Custom validator '${validator.name}' failed: ${error}`,
          expected: 'success',
          actual: 'error',
          severity: 'error',
        });
      }
    }
  }

  // Strict mode
  if (config.strictMode && allWarnings.length > 0) {
    const criticalWarnings = allWarnings.map(w => ({
      ...w,
      severity: 'error' as const,
      path: w.path,
      code: w.code,
      message: w.message,
      expected: 'no warnings',
      actual: w.message,
    }));
    allErrors.push(...criticalWarnings);
  }

  const hasCriticalErrors = allErrors.some(e => e.severity === 'critical');

  return {
    valid: !hasCriticalErrors && allErrors.length === 0,
    score: Math.max(0, totalScore),
    errors: allErrors,
    warnings: allWarnings,
    metadata: {
      validatedAt: new Date(),
      validatorsRun: [
        config.schema ? 'schema' : null,
        config.contentRules ? 'content' : null,
        ...(config.customValidators?.map(v => v.name) ?? []),
      ].filter(Boolean),
      strictMode: config.strictMode ?? false,
    },
  };
}

Validation Report

validationReport:
  nodeId: code-generator
  outputType: code-analysis
  validatedAt: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"

  result:
    valid: false
    score: 0.65

  schema:
    type: object
    validated: true
    errors: 1

  errors:
    - path: $.analysis.security
      code: REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING
      message: "Required field 'security' is missing"
      expected: present
      actual: missing
      severity: critical

    - path: $.analysis.performance.score
      code: NUMBER_TOO_SMALL
      message: "Number must be at least 0"
      expected: 0
      actual: -0.5
      severity: error

  warnings:
    - path: $.content
      code: CONTENT_TOO_SHORT
      message: "Content has 45 words, recommend at least 100"
      suggestion: "Expand analysis with more details"

  metadata:
    wordCount: 45
    validatorsRun: [schema, content, customSecurity]
    strictMode: false

  suggestions:
    - "Add 'security' field to analysis object"
    - "Ensure performance.score is non-negative"
    - "Expand content to provide more detail"

Common Validation Schemas

// Code analysis output schema
const CODE_ANALYSIS_SCHEMA: OutputSchema = {
  type: 'object',
  required: ['file', 'analysis', 'suggestions'],
  properties: {
    file: { type: 'string', minLength: 1 },
    analysis: {
      type: 'object',
      required: ['complexity', 'quality'],
      properties: {
        complexity: { type: 'number', minimum: 0, maximum: 100 },
        quality: { type: 'number', minimum: 0, maximum: 1 },
        issues: {
          type: 'array',
          items: {
            type: 'object',
            required: ['line', 'message'],
            properties: {
              line: { type: 'number', minimum: 1 },
              message: { type: 'string', minLength: 1 },
            },
          },
        },
      },
    },
    suggestions: {
      type: 'array',
      items: { type: 'string', minLength: 1 },
    },
  },
};

// Documentation output schema
const DOCUMENTATION_SCHEMA: OutputSchema = {
  type: 'object',
  required: ['title', 'content'],
  properties: {
    title: { type: 'string', minLength: 1, maxLength: 200 },
    content: { type: 'string', minLength: 100 },
    sections: {
      type: 'array',
      items: {
        type: 'object',
        required: ['heading', 'body'],
        properties: {
          heading: { type: 'string' },
          body: { type: 'string' },
        },
      },
    },
  },
};

Integration Points

  • Input: Outputs from any DAG node execution
  • Downstream: dag-confidence-scorer for scoring
  • Quality Gate: dag-result-aggregator pre-aggregation check
  • Feedback: dag-feedback-synthesizer for improvement hints

Best Practices

  1. Schema First: Define schemas before execution
  2. Fail Fast: Catch critical errors immediately
  3. Detailed Errors: Include path and expected values
  4. Graduated Severity: Distinguish warnings from errors
  5. Custom Rules: Extend with domain-specific validators

Structured validation. Quality gates. No bad outputs pass.

平台分布

Claude Code

28.67%
按下载量换算48

windsurf

20.92%
按下载量换算35

Antigravity

17.71%
按下载量换算29

OpenCode

12.63%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

7.13%
按下载量换算12

Codex

3.14%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills