Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-plan(制定计划)

create-plan 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

create-plan 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,122。

总安装 661周安装 27GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 212核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-plan(制定计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/create-plan
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-plan
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-plan

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

制定计划生成高保真实施方案票,严格遵循质量标尺与可追溯要求。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中复杂任务拆解场景。核心能力包括需求穷举、验收标准定义、依赖关系梳理与风险预判。强制关联原始 issue 与 closing keywords,确保闭环管理。

输出为结构化 ticket,包含步骤、责任人、验证方式与回滚预案。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-plan

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-plan;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

create-plan 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-plan。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-plan 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-plan 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

create-plan 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

create-plan 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 661 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 212 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-plan 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-plan

制定计划 · 本页

661—调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create Implementation Plan

Instructions

Create a detailed, high-quality implementation plan as a ticket (tagged plan) that adheres to strict quality standards and provides complete guidance for implementation.

Phase 1: Understanding & Validation

Step 0: Extract Original Issue/Task Requirements (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Before creating any plan, extract ALL requirements from the original issue/task.

# GitHub:
gh issue view <number>

# Forgejo:
tea issue view <number>  # or Forgejo API

# Local tk:
tk show <id>

Create exhaustive requirements list:

  • Every functional requirement stated
  • Every acceptance criterion listed
  • Every edge case mentioned
  • Every error handling requirement
  • Any implicit requirements (derive from context)

Store this list - the plan MUST cover 100% of these requirements.

Step 1: Understand the Request
  • Review the report or analysis that triggered this plan
  • Map each requirement from Step 0 to plan items
  • Identify the type of plan needed:

- Feature: New functionality - Refactor: Code restructuring - Fix: Bug fix or issue resolution - Enhancement: Improvement to existing feature

Step 2: Audit the Codebase

CRITICAL: Never create a plan without thorough codebase understanding

For each item in the report, perform comprehensive analysis:

  1. Use the audit skill if needed for deep investigation
  2. Identify affected files - Which files will change?
  3. Find existing patterns - How is similar code structured?
  4. Check AGENTS.md files - What are the rules for this area?
  5. Analyze types - What existing types can be reused?
  6. Identify dependencies - What depends on what we're changing?
  7. Find naming patterns - How should new files be named?

DO NOT SKIP THIS STEP - Rushed plans lead to bad implementations

Step 3: AGENTS.md Compliance Check

Read ALL relevant AGENTS.md files in:

  • Project root
  • Affected directories
  • Related modules

Extract requirements:

  • Naming conventions
  • Architecture patterns
  • Type requirements
  • File organization rules
  • Code style standards

Phase 2: Plan Structure & Naming

Step 1: Choose Plan Title

Format: Plan: [descriptive title]

Rules:

  • Be specific and descriptive
  • Reflect actual work (not vague like "improvements")
  • Examples:

- Plan: Implement user authentication ✅ - Plan: Refactor database layer ✅ - Plan: New features ❌ (too vague)

Step 2: Determine File Names for Implementation

CRITICAL RULES:

  • ❌ NEVER create migration files like foo_v2.ts, foo-new.ts, foo-enhanced.ts
  • ❌ NEVER use temporary naming like simple-*.ts, temp-*.ts
  • ✅ ALWAYS use proper, final names from the start
  • ✅ ALWAYS follow existing naming patterns in the directory
  • ✅ ALWAYS check AGENTS.md for naming requirements

Process:

  1. Identify existing file naming patterns
  2. Check AGENTS.md for conventions
  3. Choose names that fit the pattern
  4. If unsure, analyze similar existing files
  5. Plan to replace existing files directly (not create duplicates)

Phase 3: Plan Content - Required Sections

Create plan document with ALL of the following sections:

1. Overview & Issue Coverage
# [Plan Title]

## Summary
[2-3 sentences explaining what and why]

## Type
[Feature | Refactor | Fix | Enhancement]

## Source Issue/Task
[Link to source issue/task — GitHub issue URL, Forgejo issue URL, or tk ticket ID]

## Original Requirements (100% Coverage Required)

**ALL requirements from source issue/task that this plan MUST address:**

| # | Requirement | Plan Step(s) |
|---|-------------|--------------|
| 1 | [Requirement from issue] | Step X |
| 2 | [Requirement from issue] | Step Y, Z |
| 3 | [Requirement from issue] | Step W |

**Coverage Check**: X of X requirements mapped to plan steps (must be 100%)

## Status
Open (ticket will be closed when plan is complete)
2. Context & Motivation
## Context
[Why is this needed? What problem does it solve?]

## Current State
[What exists now? What are the limitations?]

## Desired State
[What will exist after? What improvements will we gain?]
3. AGENTS.md Compliance
## AGENTS.md Requirements

### Naming Conventions
- [List relevant naming rules from AGENTS.md]

### Architecture Requirements
- [List relevant architectural rules]

### Type Requirements
- [List type-related rules]

### Other Guidelines
- [Any other relevant rules]
4. Existing Types Analysis
## Existing Types

### Types to Reuse
- `TypeName` from `path/to/file.ts` - [what it represents]
- [List ALL types that can be reused]

### Types to Create
- `NewTypeName` - [what it will represent, why needed]
- [Only create if NO existing type works]

### Type Guidelines
- ❌ NEVER use `any`
- ❌ NEVER use `unknown` (unless absolutely necessary with justification)
- ✅ ALWAYS prefer existing types
- ✅ ALWAYS use strict typing
5. Impact Analysis
## Impact Analysis

### Files to Modify
- `path/to/file1.ts` - [what changes, why]
- `path/to/file2.ts` - [what changes, why]

### Files to Create
- `path/to/newfile.ts` - [purpose, why not existing file]

### Files to Delete
- `path/to/oldfile.ts` - [why removing, what replaces it]

### Dependencies Affected
- [List what depends on changed code]
- [How will dependencies be updated?]

### Breaking Changes
- [List any breaking changes]
- [How will they be handled?]
6. Implementation Steps
## Implementation Steps

Each step should be:
- Specific and actionable
- Single responsibility
- Ordered correctly (dependencies first)

### Step 1: [Descriptive Title]
**File**: `path/to/file.ts`
**Action**: [What to do]
**Why**: [Why this step]
**Details**:
- [Specific implementation detail]
- [Another detail]

### Step 2: [Next Step]
[Same structure]

[Continue for all steps]
7. REMOVAL SPECIFICATION ⚠️
## REMOVAL SPECIFICATION

**CRITICAL**: This section tracks OLD code that must be REMOVED.

### Code to Remove

#### From `path/to/file1.ts`
- **Lines X-Y**: `function oldFunction() {...}`
  - **Why removing**: Replaced by newFunction
  - **Replacement**: Step 3 in implementation
  - **Dependencies**: Used by A, B, C (all updated in steps 5, 6, 7)

#### File to Delete: `path/to/old-file.ts`
- **Why removing**: Functionality moved to new-file.ts
- **Replacement**: Step 2 creates replacement
- **Dependencies**: Imported by X, Y, Z (all updated in steps 8, 9, 10)

### Removal Checklist
- [ ] All deprecated functions removed
- [ ] All old files deleted
- [ ] All imports updated
- [ ] All references updated
- [ ] No dead code remains

**VERIFICATION**: At completion, grep for old symbols to ensure complete removal.
8. Anti-Patterns to Avoid
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ **NEVER** include:
- Migration mechanisms (gradual rollout, feature flags for this)
- Fallback mechanisms (keeping old code "just in case")
- Risk mitigation (running old and new in parallel)
- Backward compatibility layers (unless external API)
- Temporary bridges between old and new

✅ **ALWAYS** instead:
- Replace completely and cleanly
- Make all necessary changes at once
- Remove old code immediately
- Trust the plan and execute fully

**Why**: Half-migrations leave bad code in the codebase forever.
9. Validation Criteria
## Validation Criteria

### Pre-Implementation Checklist
- [ ] All AGENTS.md files reviewed
- [ ] All existing types identified
- [ ] All affected files identified
- [ ] All naming follows patterns
- [ ] Impact fully analyzed

### Post-Implementation Checklist
- [ ] All steps completed
- [ ] All old code removed (per REMOVAL SPEC)
- [ ] TypeScript compiles (`tsc --noEmit`)
- [ ] Linting passes (`npm run lint`)
- [ ] Tests pass (if applicable)
- [ ] No `any` or `unknown` types added
- [ ] AGENTS.md compliance verified
- [ ] Single responsibility maintained

Phase 4: Plan Creation & Validation

Step 1: Write the Plan
  • Create as a ticket using todos_oneshot with tags plan
  • Include ALL required sections above in the ticket description
  • Be thorough - never skip items
Step 2: Validate Plan Completeness

Checklist:

  • 100% of original issue/task requirements mapped to plan steps
  • Overview section complete with requirements table
  • Context & motivation clear
  • AGENTS.md compliance documented
  • Existing types analyzed
  • Impact analysis thorough
  • Implementation steps detailed and ordered
  • Every requirement from issue appears in at least one step
  • REMOVAL SPECIFICATION complete
  • Anti-patterns section included
  • Validation criteria defined
  • No migration/fallback mechanisms
  • No temporary file names
  • No any or unknown types planned
Step 3: Review Against Guidelines

Double-check:

  • ✅ Follows naming conventions from AGENTS.md
  • ✅ Uses existing types where possible
  • ✅ Single responsibility maintained
  • ✅ Complete removal spec included
  • ✅ No migration code planned
  • ✅ All steps are specific and actionable
  • ✅ No items skipped or rushed
Step 4: Final Audit Recommendation

Before finalizing, consider:

  • Should specific areas be audited more deeply?
  • Are there unknowns that need investigation?
  • Is more context needed before implementation?

If yes, recommend using the audit skill for those areas.

Phase 5: Report to User

Provide summary:

# Plan Created: [plan-name]

## Location
Saved as ticket tagged `plan`

## Summary
[Brief description of what the plan covers]

## Key Points
- [Important aspect 1]
- [Important aspect 2]
- [Important aspect 3]

## Files Affected
- X files to modify
- Y files to create
- Z files to delete

## REMOVAL SPEC
- [Summary of what will be removed]

## Ready to Implement
The plan is complete and ready for implementation. All required sections are included, AGENTS.md compliance is verified, and the removal specification is thorough. Use `tk show <ticket-id>` to review.

## Next Steps
Review the plan ticket and begin implementation when ready.

Critical Principles

  • 100% ISSUE COVERAGE - Plan MUST address every requirement from original issue
  • NEVER RUSH - Thorough planning prevents bad implementations
  • NEVER SKIP AUDIT - Always understand the codebase first
  • NEVER CREATE MIGRATIONS - Replace completely, not gradually
  • NEVER USE TEMPORARY NAMES - Use final, proper names from the start
  • NEVER SKIP REMOVAL SPEC - Track what must be deleted
  • NEVER SKIP REQUIREMENT - Every issue requirement MUST have a plan step
  • ALWAYS USE EXISTING TYPES - Create new types only when necessary
  • ALWAYS FOLLOW AGENTS.MD - Read and apply all guidelines
  • ALWAYS BE SPECIFIC - Vague steps lead to bad implementations
  • ALWAYS THINK HOLISTICALLY - Consider full impact of changes
  • COMPLETENESS OVER SPEED - A complete plan prevents future problems

Templates

See templates/ directory for:

  • feature-plan-template.md - Template for new features
  • refactor-plan-template.md - Template for refactoring
  • fix-plan-template.md - Template for bug fixes

平台分布

Claude

31.29%
按下载量换算66

Codex

30.85%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

19.79%
按下载量换算42

Gemini CLI

9.12%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills