Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

customer-reply(客户回复)

customer-reply 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

customer-reply 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,472。

总安装 549周安装 22GitHub Stars 56下载 178核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-reply(客户回复)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills
仓库路径:skills/customer-reply
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill customer-reply
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill customer-reply

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

客户回复技能专注于高效、共情地处理客户沟通,提升服务体验与问题解决效率。适用于售前咨询、售后支持、投诉处理和紧急情况应对等客户服务全流程。强调快速响应、真诚沟通、责任承担和结果清晰四大核心原则。通过预设模板和最佳实践指导标准化回复流程,确保专业性与一致性。使用时应结合具体上下文调整语气,避免机械套用模板导致沟通生硬。

来源仓库内路径:skills/customer-reply

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill customer-reply;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

customer-reply 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill customer-reply。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

customer-reply 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

customer-reply 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

customer-reply 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

customer-reply 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 549 次,近一周安装 22 次,下载 178 次,GitHub 56 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

customer-reply 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
customer-reply

客户回复 · 本页

54956需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Foundational Communication Principles

  1. Acknowledge before solving. Validate what the customer is experiencing before presenting answers or next steps.
  2. Front-load the key point. Busy people skim -- put the most important information in the opening lines.
  3. Tell the truth. Never promise what you cannot deliver, obscure problems behind jargon, or bury bad news.
  4. Be concrete. Replace vague language with specific names, dates, and measurable commitments.
  5. Accept responsibility. Use first-person ownership ("we caused" / "I will") rather than passive deflection ("an error occurred").
  6. End with clarity. Every message must leave the customer knowing exactly what happens next.
  7. Mirror their emotional register. Meet frustration with empathy; match enthusiasm with energy.

Message Architecture

Most customer-facing replies follow four building blocks:

1. Recognition (1-2 sentences)
   Show you understand their situation or question.

2. Substance (1-3 short paragraphs)
   Deliver the answer, update, or resolution.
   Be precise and include supporting details.

3. Action Items (1-3 bullets)
   - Steps YOU are taking and by when
   - Steps THEY may need to take
   - When they will next hear from you

4. Sign-off (1 sentence)
   Warm, professional close with an open door.

Channel-Appropriate Sizing

  • Live chat / instant message: 1-4 sentences. Immediate, conversational, no filler.
  • Ticket reply: 1-3 compact paragraphs. Easy to scan with clear structure.
  • Email: Up to 5 paragraphs. Respect their inbox -- omit anything non-essential.
  • Escalation correspondence: Thorough as needed, but organized under headings for navigation.
  • Executive-level communication: Concise above all else. 2-3 paragraphs, data-forward.

Tone Calibration

ScenarioRegisterCharacteristics
Positive newsWarmCongratulatory, forward-looking, genuine
Standard updateFriendly-professionalInformative, efficient, approachable
Technical explanationPatient-preciseStructured, detailed, jargon-free
Delayed resolutionAccountableHonest about the delay, specific about new timeline
Negative outcomeStraightforwardDirect delivery, empathetic framing, solution-oriented
Service interruptionTransparent-urgentImmediate, factual, calming, action-focused
High-stakes escalationComposed-executiveOwnership-forward, plan-oriented, confident
Financial matterCareful-factualPrecise amounts, clear explanations, empathetic

Adjusting for Relationship Maturity

Early-stage customer (first 90 days):

  • Lean toward formality and thoroughness
  • Provide extra context rather than assuming familiarity
  • Proactively surface helpful resources
  • Prioritize responsiveness to build confidence

Long-standing customer:

  • Warmer, more conversational register
  • Reference shared context and past interactions
  • Communicate more directly and efficiently
  • Demonstrate awareness of their business objectives

Upset or escalated customer:

  • Lead with genuine empathy and validation
  • Respond with urgency in both speed and substance
  • Provide specific, time-bound action plans
  • Shorten the feedback loop between updates

Language Standards

Prefer:

  • Active voice: "We are investigating" rather than "This is being investigated"
  • Personal pronouns: "I" for individual commitments, "we" for team actions
  • Named individuals: "Jordan on our infrastructure team will..." builds trust
  • Customer vocabulary: adopt their terminology instead of internal labels
  • Absolute dates: "by Wednesday March 18" instead of "in a few days"
  • Visual structure: headers and bullet points in longer messages

Avoid:

  • Corporate filler: "synergy," "leverage," "circle back," "paradigm"
  • Blame redirection: never point fingers at other departments, vendors, or "the system"
  • Ownership-dodging passive voice: "mistakes were made" hides accountability
  • Excessive hedging: too many qualifiers erode confidence
  • Unnecessary recipients: only loop in people who need to participate
  • Overuse of exclamation marks: one per message at most

Situational Message Frameworks

Acknowledging a Defect Report

Hi [Name],

Thanks for flagging this -- I understand that [concrete impact] is
disrupting your work.

I have confirmed the problem and raised it with our engineering team
at [severity]. Here is what we know at this point:
- [Current understanding of the behavior]
- [Root cause, if identified]
- [Workaround, if one exists]

I will follow up by [date/time] with a timeline for the fix.
[Workaround details if applicable.]

Please reach out if you notice any additional effects.

Best,
[Name]

Addressing a Billing or Account Problem

Hi [Name],

Thanks for getting in touch -- I understand that billing concerns
deserve fast answers.

After reviewing your account, here is what I found:
- [Factual summary of what occurred]
- [How it affected charges, access, or service]

To correct this, I am taking these steps:
- [Remediation action with expected timeline]
- [Additional action if needed]

[If already resolved: "The adjustment is complete and should appear
within [window]."]
[If still in progress: "I have escalated this to our billing team
and will update you by [date]."]

Sorry for the hassle. Let me know if anything else on your account
looks off.

Best,
[Name]

Declining a Feature Request

Hi [Name],

Thanks for this suggestion -- I see why [capability] would be
useful for [their scenario].

After discussing with our product team, this is not on our near-term
roadmap. The main reason is [straightforward, respectful rationale].

That said, here are some paths that might get you close to your goal:
- [Alternative 1]
- [Alternative 2]
- [API/integration option if relevant]

Your request is captured in our feedback pipeline, and I will let you
know if our plans shift.

Would any of these alternatives work for your team? Happy to explore
them further.

Best,
[Name]

Communicating During an Incident

Hi [Name],

I am reaching out because an issue with [affected service/feature]
is impacting functionality your team depends on.

**What is happening:** [Plain-language explanation]
**Effect on your usage:** [Their specific impact]
**Current status:** [Investigating / Cause identified / Fix deploying / Resolved]
**Expected resolution:** [Time estimate or update cadence]

[If applicable: "As a temporary measure, you can [workaround]."]

I am monitoring this directly and will update you when we have
progress. Live status is also available at [status page URL].

I apologize for the disruption. [Mention prevention steps if known.]

[Name]

Re-engaging After No Response

Hi [Name],

Just circling back -- I sent [description] on [date] and want to
make sure it reached you.

[One-sentence recap of what is pending or offered.]

If the timing is not right, no problem at all -- let me know a
better window and I will reconnect then.

Best,
[Name]

Contextual Personalization

Newer Customers

  • Supply additional background and explanation
  • Point to onboarding resources and getting-started material
  • Introduce self-service options proactively

Experienced Customers

  • Skip foundational explanations they already possess
  • Acknowledge their depth of product knowledge
  • Get to the point quickly and efficiently

Customers Under Stress

  • Prioritize empathy and acknowledgment above all
  • Center the reply around resolving their specific problem
  • Offer tangible action plans with committed deadlines
  • Provide a direct path to further escalation if needed

Follow-up Timing Reference

ContextRecommended Follow-up Window
Unanswered question from customer2-3 business days
Active support issue (high severity)Daily or more frequently per SLA
Active support issue (standard)Every 2-3 business days
Post-meeting action itemsSummary within 24 hours; check at each deadline
After delivering unwelcome news~1 week to gauge impact and sentiment

When to Involve Others

Bring in your manager when:

  • A customer signals potential cancellation or significant downgrade
  • A policy exception is needed beyond your authority
  • Resolution has exceeded SLA boundaries
  • The customer asks for leadership contact
  • Your own error requires senior-level remediation

Bring in product or engineering when:

  • A defect is blocking the customer's core operations
  • A capability gap is causing competitive loss
  • Technical requirements exceed standard support scope
  • Integration-level investigation is necessary

Working Principles

  1. Determine the scenario type first, then select the matching tone and framework.
  2. Factor in relationship maturity and the stakeholder's seniority.
  3. For problems, empathy precedes solutions; for wins, energy matches theirs.
  4. Anchor every commitment to a specific date or measurable outcome.
  5. Guarantee a visible next step in every message.
  6. Re-read the draft as the customer would before sending.
  7. Secure internal alignment before making commitments on sensitive or cross-team topics.
  8. Ruthlessly trim -- every sentence must justify its presence.

平台分布

Codex

35.81%
按下载量换算64

Claude

30.8%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

19.65%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

9.75%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills