Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

customer-escalation客户升级

Agent Skill

customer-escalation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

18,899

周安装

772

GitHub Stars

11,668

下载量

6,114
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-escalation(客户升级)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/customer-escalation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-escalation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-escalation

简介

customer-escalation 将支持问题转化为结构化的升级简报,便于跨团队协作处理。

  • 适用于需要整理复现步骤、评估业务影响并确定升级对象的复杂支持事件。
  • 输入问题描述和客户信息后,自动生成包含上下文和行动建议的标准化报告。
  • 需确保连接器配置正确,避免因认证失败导致请求中断。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

/customer-escalation

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Package a support issue into a structured escalation brief for engineering, product, or leadership. Gathers context, structures reproduction steps, assesses business impact, and identifies the right escalation target.

Usage

/customer-escalation <issue description> [customer name or account]

Examples:

  • /customer-escalation API returning 500 errors intermittently for Acme Corp
  • /customer-escalation Data export is missing rows — 3 customers reported this week
  • /customer-escalation SSO login loop affecting all Enterprise customers
  • /customer-escalation Customer threatening to churn over missing audit log feature

Workflow

1. Understand the Issue

Parse the input and determine:

  • What's broken or needed: The core technical or product issue
  • Who's affected: Specific customer(s), segment, or all users
  • How long: When did this start? How long has the customer been waiting?
  • What's been tried: Any troubleshooting or workarounds attempted
  • Why escalate now: What makes this need attention beyond normal support

Use the "When to Escalate vs. Handle in Support" criteria below to confirm this warrants escalation.

2. Gather Context

Pull together relevant information from available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Related tickets, timeline of communications, previous troubleshooting
  • ~~CRM (if connected): Account details, key contacts, previous escalations
  • ~~chat: Internal discussions about this issue, similar reports from other customers
  • ~~project tracker (if connected): Related bug reports or feature requests, engineering status
  • ~~knowledge base: Known issues or workarounds, relevant documentation

3. Assess Business Impact

Using the impact dimensions below, quantify:

  • Breadth: How many customers/users affected? Growing?
  • Depth: Blocked vs. inconvenienced?
  • Duration: How long has this been going on?
  • Revenue: ARR at risk? Pending deals affected?
  • Time pressure: Hard deadline?

4. Determine Escalation Target

Using the escalation tiers below, identify the right target: L2 Support, Engineering, Product, Security, or Leadership.

5. Structure Reproduction Steps (for bugs)

If the issue is a bug, follow the reproduction step best practices below to document clear repro steps with environment details and evidence.

6. Generate Escalation Brief

## ESCALATION: [One-line summary]

**Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium]
**Target team:** [Engineering / Product / Security / Leadership]
**Reported by:** [Your name/team]
**Date:** [Today's date]

### Impact
- **Customers affected:** [Who and how many]
- **Workflow impact:** [What they can't do]
- **Revenue at risk:** [If applicable]
- **Time in queue:** [How long this has been an issue]

### Issue Description
[Clear, concise description of the problem — 3-5 sentences]

### What's Been Tried
1. [Troubleshooting step and result]
2. [Troubleshooting step and result]
3. [Troubleshooting step and result]

### Reproduction Steps
[If applicable — follow the format below]
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]
Expected: [X]
Actual: [Y]
Environment: [Details]

### Customer Communication
- **Last update to customer:** [Date and what was communicated]
- **Customer expectation:** [What they're expecting and by when]
- **Escalation risk:** [Will they escalate further if not resolved by X?]

### What's Needed
- [Specific ask — "investigate root cause", "prioritize fix",
  "make product decision on X", "approve exception for Y"]
- **Deadline:** [When this needs resolution or an update]

### Supporting Context
- [Related tickets or links]
- [Internal discussion threads]
- [Documentation or logs]

7. Offer Next Steps

After generating the escalation:

  • "Want me to post this in a ~~chat channel for the target team?"
  • "Should I update the customer with an interim response?"
  • "Want me to set a follow-up reminder to check on this?"
  • "Should I draft a customer-facing update with the current status?"

When to Escalate vs. Handle in Support

Handle in Support When:

  • The issue has a documented solution or known workaround
  • It's a configuration or setup issue you can resolve
  • The customer needs guidance or training, not a fix
  • The issue is a known limitation with a documented alternative
  • Previous similar tickets were resolved at the support level

Escalate When:

  • Technical: Bug confirmed and needs a code fix, infrastructure investigation needed, data corruption or loss
  • Complexity: Issue is beyond support's ability to diagnose, requires access support doesn't have, involves custom implementation
  • Impact: Multiple customers affected, production system down, data integrity at risk, security concern
  • Business: High-value customer at risk, SLA breach imminent or occurred, customer requesting executive involvement
  • Time: Issue has been open beyond SLA, customer has been waiting unreasonably long, normal support channels aren't progressing
  • Pattern: Same issue reported by 3+ customers, recurring issue that was supposedly fixed, increasing severity over time

Escalation Tiers

L1 → L2 (Support Escalation)

From: Frontline support To: Senior support / technical support specialists When: Issue requires deeper investigation, specialized product knowledge, or advanced troubleshooting What to include: Ticket summary, steps already tried, customer context

L2 → Engineering

From: Senior support To: Engineering team (relevant product area) When: Confirmed bug, infrastructure issue, needs code change, requires system-level investigation What to include: Full reproduction steps, environment details, logs or error messages, business impact, customer timeline

L2 → Product

From: Senior support To: Product management When: Feature gap causing customer pain, design decision needed, workflow doesn't match customer expectations, competing customer needs require prioritization What to include: Customer use case, business impact, frequency of request, competitive pressure (if known)

Any → Security

From: Any support tier To: Security team When: Potential data exposure, unauthorized access, vulnerability report, compliance concern What to include: What was observed, who/what is potentially affected, immediate containment steps taken, urgency assessment Note: Security escalations bypass normal tier progression — escalate immediately regardless of your level

Any → Leadership

From: Any tier (usually L2 or manager) To: Support leadership, executive team When: High-revenue customer threatening churn, SLA breach on critical account, cross-functional decision needed, exception to policy required, PR or legal risk What to include: Full business context, revenue at risk, what's been tried, specific decision or action needed, deadline

Business Impact Assessment

When escalating, quantify impact where possible:

Impact Dimensions

DimensionQuestions to Answer
BreadthHow many customers/users are affected? Is it growing?
DepthHow severely are they impacted? Blocked vs. inconvenienced?
DurationHow long has this been going on? How long until it's critical?
RevenueWhat's the ARR at risk? Are there pending deals affected?
ReputationCould this become public? Is it a reference customer?
ContractualAre SLAs being breached? Are there contractual obligations?

Severity Shorthand

  • Critical: Production down, data at risk, security breach, or multiple high-value customers affected. Needs immediate attention.
  • High: Major functionality broken, key customer blocked, SLA at risk. Needs same-day attention.
  • Medium: Significant issue with workaround, important but not urgent business impact. Needs attention this week.

Writing Reproduction Steps

Good reproduction steps are the single most valuable thing in a bug escalation. Follow these practices:

  1. Start from a clean state: Describe the starting point (account type, configuration, permissions)
  2. Be specific: "Click the Export button in the top-right of the Dashboard page" not "try to export"
  3. Include exact values: Use specific inputs, dates, IDs — not "enter some data"
  4. Note the environment: Browser, OS, account type, feature flags, plan level
  5. Capture the frequency: Always reproducible? Intermittent? Only under certain conditions?
  6. Include evidence: Screenshots, error messages (exact text), network logs, console output
  7. Note what you've ruled out: "Tested in Chrome and Firefox — same behavior" "Not account-specific — reproduced on test account"

Follow-up Cadence After Escalation

Don't escalate and forget. Maintain ownership of the customer relationship.

SeverityInternal Follow-upCustomer Update
CriticalEvery 2 hoursEvery 2-4 hours (or per SLA)
HighEvery 4 hoursEvery 4-8 hours
MediumDailyEvery 1-2 business days

Follow-up Actions

  • Check with the receiving team for progress
  • Update the customer even if there's no new information ("We're still investigating — here's what we know so far")
  • Adjust severity if the situation changes (better or worse)
  • Document all updates in the ticket for audit trail
  • Close the loop when resolved: confirm with customer, update internal tracking, capture learnings

De-escalation

Not every escalation stays escalated. De-escalate when:

  • Root cause is found and it's a support-resolvable issue
  • A workaround is found that unblocks the customer
  • The issue resolves itself (but still document root cause)
  • New information changes the severity assessment

When de-escalating:

  • Notify the team you escalated to
  • Update the ticket with the resolution
  • Inform the customer of the resolution
  • Document what was learned for future reference

Escalation Best Practices

  1. Always quantify impact — vague escalations get deprioritized
  2. Include reproduction steps for bugs — this is the #1 thing engineering needs
  3. Be clear about what you need — "investigate" vs. "fix" vs. "decide" are different asks
  4. Set and communicate a deadline — urgency without a deadline is ambiguous
  5. Maintain ownership of the customer relationship even after escalating the technical issue
  6. Follow up proactively — don't wait for the receiving team to come to you
  7. Document everything — the escalation trail is valuable for pattern detection and process improvement

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.59%
按下载量换算2,176

Claude

29.68%
按下载量换算1,815

Cursor

17.53%
按下载量换算1,072

Gemini CLI

8.2%
按下载量换算501

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills