Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

customer-escalation(客户升级)

customer-escalation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

customer-escalation 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 2,271。

总安装 18,899周安装 772GitHub Stars 11,668下载 6,114核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-escalation(客户升级)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/customer-escalation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-escalation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-escalation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

customer-escalation 将支持问题转化为结构化的升级简报,便于跨团队协作处理。适用于需要整理复现步骤、评估业务影响并确定升级对象的复杂支持事件。输入问题描述和客户信息后,自动生成包含上下文和行动建议的标准化报告。需确保连接器配置正确,避免因认证失败导致请求中断。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/customer-escalation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill cust…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

customer-escalation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-escal…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

customer-escalation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

customer-escalation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

customer-escalation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

customer-escalation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 18,899 次,近一周安装 772 次,下载 6,114 次,GitHub 11,668 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

customer-escalation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 11,668 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
customer-escalation

客户升级 · 本页

18,89911,668需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/customer-escalation

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Package a support issue into a structured escalation brief for engineering, product, or leadership. Gathers context, structures reproduction steps, assesses business impact, and identifies the right escalation target.

Usage

/customer-escalation <issue description> [customer name or account]

Examples:

  • /customer-escalation API returning 500 errors intermittently for Acme Corp
  • /customer-escalation Data export is missing rows — 3 customers reported this week
  • /customer-escalation SSO login loop affecting all Enterprise customers
  • /customer-escalation Customer threatening to churn over missing audit log feature

Workflow

1. Understand the Issue

Parse the input and determine:

  • What's broken or needed: The core technical or product issue
  • Who's affected: Specific customer(s), segment, or all users
  • How long: When did this start? How long has the customer been waiting?
  • What's been tried: Any troubleshooting or workarounds attempted
  • Why escalate now: What makes this need attention beyond normal support

Use the "When to Escalate vs. Handle in Support" criteria below to confirm this warrants escalation.

2. Gather Context

Pull together relevant information from available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Related tickets, timeline of communications, previous troubleshooting
  • ~~CRM (if connected): Account details, key contacts, previous escalations
  • ~~chat: Internal discussions about this issue, similar reports from other customers
  • ~~project tracker (if connected): Related bug reports or feature requests, engineering status
  • ~~knowledge base: Known issues or workarounds, relevant documentation

3. Assess Business Impact

Using the impact dimensions below, quantify:

  • Breadth: How many customers/users affected? Growing?
  • Depth: Blocked vs. inconvenienced?
  • Duration: How long has this been going on?
  • Revenue: ARR at risk? Pending deals affected?
  • Time pressure: Hard deadline?

4. Determine Escalation Target

Using the escalation tiers below, identify the right target: L2 Support, Engineering, Product, Security, or Leadership.

5. Structure Reproduction Steps (for bugs)

If the issue is a bug, follow the reproduction step best practices below to document clear repro steps with environment details and evidence.

6. Generate Escalation Brief

## ESCALATION: [One-line summary]

**Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium]
**Target team:** [Engineering / Product / Security / Leadership]
**Reported by:** [Your name/team]
**Date:** [Today's date]

### Impact
- **Customers affected:** [Who and how many]
- **Workflow impact:** [What they can't do]
- **Revenue at risk:** [If applicable]
- **Time in queue:** [How long this has been an issue]

### Issue Description
[Clear, concise description of the problem — 3-5 sentences]

### What's Been Tried
1. [Troubleshooting step and result]
2. [Troubleshooting step and result]
3. [Troubleshooting step and result]

### Reproduction Steps
[If applicable — follow the format below]
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]
Expected: [X]
Actual: [Y]
Environment: [Details]

### Customer Communication
- **Last update to customer:** [Date and what was communicated]
- **Customer expectation:** [What they're expecting and by when]
- **Escalation risk:** [Will they escalate further if not resolved by X?]

### What's Needed
- [Specific ask — "investigate root cause", "prioritize fix",
  "make product decision on X", "approve exception for Y"]
- **Deadline:** [When this needs resolution or an update]

### Supporting Context
- [Related tickets or links]
- [Internal discussion threads]
- [Documentation or logs]

7. Offer Next Steps

After generating the escalation:

  • "Want me to post this in a ~~chat channel for the target team?"
  • "Should I update the customer with an interim response?"
  • "Want me to set a follow-up reminder to check on this?"
  • "Should I draft a customer-facing update with the current status?"

When to Escalate vs. Handle in Support

Handle in Support When:

  • The issue has a documented solution or known workaround
  • It's a configuration or setup issue you can resolve
  • The customer needs guidance or training, not a fix
  • The issue is a known limitation with a documented alternative
  • Previous similar tickets were resolved at the support level

Escalate When:

  • Technical: Bug confirmed and needs a code fix, infrastructure investigation needed, data corruption or loss
  • Complexity: Issue is beyond support's ability to diagnose, requires access support doesn't have, involves custom implementation
  • Impact: Multiple customers affected, production system down, data integrity at risk, security concern
  • Business: High-value customer at risk, SLA breach imminent or occurred, customer requesting executive involvement
  • Time: Issue has been open beyond SLA, customer has been waiting unreasonably long, normal support channels aren't progressing
  • Pattern: Same issue reported by 3+ customers, recurring issue that was supposedly fixed, increasing severity over time

Escalation Tiers

L1 → L2 (Support Escalation)

From: Frontline support To: Senior support / technical support specialists When: Issue requires deeper investigation, specialized product knowledge, or advanced troubleshooting What to include: Ticket summary, steps already tried, customer context

L2 → Engineering

From: Senior support To: Engineering team (relevant product area) When: Confirmed bug, infrastructure issue, needs code change, requires system-level investigation What to include: Full reproduction steps, environment details, logs or error messages, business impact, customer timeline

L2 → Product

From: Senior support To: Product management When: Feature gap causing customer pain, design decision needed, workflow doesn't match customer expectations, competing customer needs require prioritization What to include: Customer use case, business impact, frequency of request, competitive pressure (if known)

Any → Security

From: Any support tier To: Security team When: Potential data exposure, unauthorized access, vulnerability report, compliance concern What to include: What was observed, who/what is potentially affected, immediate containment steps taken, urgency assessment Note: Security escalations bypass normal tier progression — escalate immediately regardless of your level

Any → Leadership

From: Any tier (usually L2 or manager) To: Support leadership, executive team When: High-revenue customer threatening churn, SLA breach on critical account, cross-functional decision needed, exception to policy required, PR or legal risk What to include: Full business context, revenue at risk, what's been tried, specific decision or action needed, deadline

Business Impact Assessment

When escalating, quantify impact where possible:

Impact Dimensions

DimensionQuestions to Answer
BreadthHow many customers/users are affected? Is it growing?
DepthHow severely are they impacted? Blocked vs. inconvenienced?
DurationHow long has this been going on? How long until it's critical?
RevenueWhat's the ARR at risk? Are there pending deals affected?
ReputationCould this become public? Is it a reference customer?
ContractualAre SLAs being breached? Are there contractual obligations?

Severity Shorthand

  • Critical: Production down, data at risk, security breach, or multiple high-value customers affected. Needs immediate attention.
  • High: Major functionality broken, key customer blocked, SLA at risk. Needs same-day attention.
  • Medium: Significant issue with workaround, important but not urgent business impact. Needs attention this week.

Writing Reproduction Steps

Good reproduction steps are the single most valuable thing in a bug escalation. Follow these practices:

  1. Start from a clean state: Describe the starting point (account type, configuration, permissions)
  2. Be specific: "Click the Export button in the top-right of the Dashboard page" not "try to export"
  3. Include exact values: Use specific inputs, dates, IDs — not "enter some data"
  4. Note the environment: Browser, OS, account type, feature flags, plan level
  5. Capture the frequency: Always reproducible? Intermittent? Only under certain conditions?
  6. Include evidence: Screenshots, error messages (exact text), network logs, console output
  7. Note what you've ruled out: "Tested in Chrome and Firefox — same behavior" "Not account-specific — reproduced on test account"

Follow-up Cadence After Escalation

Don't escalate and forget. Maintain ownership of the customer relationship.

SeverityInternal Follow-upCustomer Update
CriticalEvery 2 hoursEvery 2-4 hours (or per SLA)
HighEvery 4 hoursEvery 4-8 hours
MediumDailyEvery 1-2 business days

Follow-up Actions

  • Check with the receiving team for progress
  • Update the customer even if there's no new information ("We're still investigating — here's what we know so far")
  • Adjust severity if the situation changes (better or worse)
  • Document all updates in the ticket for audit trail
  • Close the loop when resolved: confirm with customer, update internal tracking, capture learnings

De-escalation

Not every escalation stays escalated. De-escalate when:

  • Root cause is found and it's a support-resolvable issue
  • A workaround is found that unblocks the customer
  • The issue resolves itself (but still document root cause)
  • New information changes the severity assessment

When de-escalating:

  • Notify the team you escalated to
  • Update the ticket with the resolution
  • Inform the customer of the resolution
  • Document what was learned for future reference

Escalation Best Practices

  1. Always quantify impact — vague escalations get deprioritized
  2. Include reproduction steps for bugs — this is the #1 thing engineering needs
  3. Be clear about what you need — "investigate" vs. "fix" vs. "decide" are different asks
  4. Set and communicate a deadline — urgency without a deadline is ambiguous
  5. Maintain ownership of the customer relationship even after escalating the technical issue
  6. Follow up proactively — don't wait for the receiving team to come to you
  7. Document everything — the escalation trail is valuable for pattern detection and process improvement

平台分布

Codex

35.59%
按下载量换算2,176

Claude

29.68%
按下载量换算1,815

Cursor

17.53%
按下载量换算1,072

Gemini CLI

8.2%
按下载量换算501

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills