Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ctf-writeup-generator(ctf 写入生成器)

ctf-writeup-generator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ctf-writeup-generator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 3,300。

总安装 45,827周安装 1,872GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 14,676核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ctf-writeup-generator(ctf 写入生成器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akhmittra/ctf-writeup-generator
安装命令:
openclaw skills install ctf-writeup-generator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install ctf-writeup-generator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ctf-writeup-generator 自动生成专业的 CTF 解题报告。适合在 OpenClaw 中需要整理渗透测试过程、撰写技术复盘时使用。自动分类挑战类型、提取关键步骤与工具链说明。

安装命令:openclaw skills install ctf-writeup-generator;建议人工校验技术细节准确性。注意知识产权边界,不得用于非法用途。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install ctf-writeup-generator;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ctf-writeup-generator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install ctf-writeup-generator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ctf-writeup-generator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ctf-writeup-generator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

ctf-writeup-generator 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

ctf-writeup-generator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 45,827 次,近一周安装 1,872 次,下载 14,676 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ctf-writeup-generator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ctf-writeup-generator

ctf 写入生成器 · 本页

45,827—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
ctf-writeup-generator
description
Automatically generate professional CTF writeups from solving sessions with flag detection, challenge categorization, and proper markdown formatting
tags
homepage
https://github.com/yourusername/ctf-writeup-generator

CTF Writeup Generator

Description

This skill helps CTF players, security researchers, and cybersecurity educators automatically generate professional writeups from their solving sessions. It intelligently detects flag formats, categorizes challenges, structures the writeup with proper headings, and includes code blocks with syntax highlighting.

Perfect for:

  • Creating platform-specific writeups (HackTheBox, TryHackMe, OffSec, etc.)
  • Documenting Jeopardy-style CTF solutions
  • Generating educational content for training materials
  • Building a portfolio of security research

When to Use

Use this skill when the user:

  • Says "generate a CTF writeup"
  • Mentions "document my CTF solution"
  • Asks to "create a writeup for [challenge name]"
  • References completing a CTF challenge and needs documentation
  • Wants to format their solving process professionally
  • Needs to extract and format flags from their notes

Features

Flag Format Detection

Automatically detects and validates common CTF flag formats:

  • CTF{...}, FLAG{...}, flag{...}
  • Platform-specific: HTB{...}, THM{...}, SHAASTRA{...}, picoCTF{...}
  • Custom regex patterns for competition-specific formats
  • Case-sensitive validation support

Challenge Categories

Automatically categorizes based on keywords and tools used:

  • Web Exploitation: SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication bypass
  • Binary Exploitation: Buffer overflow, ROP, format strings, heap exploitation
  • Reverse Engineering: Binary analysis, decompilation, obfuscation
  • Cryptography: Classical ciphers, modern crypto, hash cracking
  • Forensics: Steganography, memory forensics, network analysis, disk imaging
  • OSINT: Information gathering, social media analysis
  • PWN: Exploitation, shellcode, privilege escalation
  • Miscellaneous: Mixed or unique challenge types

Structured Output

Generates properly formatted markdown writeups with:

  • Challenge metadata (name, category, difficulty, points)
  • Executive summary
  • Reconnaissance findings
  • Step-by-step solution with code blocks
  • Tools used section
  • Flag submission
  • Key learnings and takeaways
  • Optional: Additional resources and references

Code Formatting

Proper syntax highlighting for:

  • Python, Bash, JavaScript, C/C++
  • Assembly (x86, ARM)
  • SQL queries
  • Command-line tools output
  • Network packet analysis

Instructions

When a user requests a CTF writeup, follow this workflow:

  1. Gather Information

Ask the user for: - Challenge name - Platform/CTF name (e.g., "HackTheBox", "Shaastra CTF") - Category (or detect from description) - Difficulty level (Easy/Medium/Hard or points value) - Flag format if non-standard - Their solving process/notes

  1. Process the Content

- Extract technical steps from their description - Identify tools and commands used - Detect flag format and validate - Categorize the challenge - Structure the flow logically

  1. Generate the Writeup

Create a markdown document with this structure:

   # [Challenge Name] - [Platform] CTF Writeup
   
   **Author**: [Author name or handle]  
   **Date**: [Current date]  
   **Category**: [Category]  
   **Difficulty**: [Difficulty]  
   **Points**: [Points if applicable]
   
   ## Summary
   
   [2-3 sentence overview of the challenge and solution approach]
   
   ## Challenge Description
   
   [Original challenge description if provided]
   
   ## Reconnaissance
   
   [Initial enumeration and information gathering]
   
   ## Solution
   
   ### Step 1: [Phase name]
   
   [Detailed explanation with commands/code]
   

# Commands used

   
   ### Step 2: [Next phase]
   
   [Continue with logical progression]
   
   ## Tools Used
   
   - Tool 1: Purpose
   - Tool 2: Purpose
   
   ## Flag
   

FLAG{...}

   
   ## Key Takeaways
   
   - Learning point 1
   - Learning point 2
   
   ## References
   
   - [Relevant links]
  1. Validate and Enhance

- Check flag format matches the platform - Ensure code blocks have proper syntax highlighting - Add explanatory comments to complex commands - Include alternative approaches if mentioned

  1. Save the Writeup

Save the generated writeup to a markdown file named: [platform]_[challenge-name]_writeup.md

Example Usage

User: "I just solved the 'Binary Bash' challenge from Shaastra CTF. It was a buffer overflow where I had to overwrite the return address. The flag was Shaastra{buff3r_0v3rfl0w_m4st3r}. Can you generate a writeup?"

Agent Response:

  1. Asks for additional details (tools used, exact exploit steps)
  2. Generates a professional writeup with:

- Proper challenge metadata - Binary exploitation category - Step-by-step buffer overflow explanation - Code blocks with assembly/C code - GDB commands used - Flag in correct format - Learning points about memory safety

Platform-Specific Templates

HackTheBox

  • Include machine IP, OS, and difficulty rating
  • Add user/root flag sections
  • Include attack path diagram if complex

OffSec/OSCP

  • Focus on enumeration methodology
  • Document privilege escalation chains
  • Include proof screenshots references

Jeopardy CTF

  • List point values and solve times
  • Include team strategy if relevant
  • Categorize by challenge type

Advanced Features

Multi-Tool Integration

  • Reference other skills for specific tasks:

- ghidra-skill for reverse engineering analysis - burpsuite-skill for web exploitation - volatility-skill for memory forensics

Writeup Templates

Support for different writeup styles:

  • Academic: Detailed with theoretical background
  • Speedrun: Concise with just essential steps
  • Tutorial: Beginner-friendly with extra explanations
  • Portfolio: Professional format for job applications

Export Formats

  • Standard Markdown (.md)
  • PDF via pandoc
  • HTML with custom CSS
  • Platform-specific formats (HTB Academy, Medium, dev.to)

Security Considerations

  • Never include actual credentials or sensitive API keys
  • Sanitize paths that might reveal system information
  • Respect competition rules (don't publish during active CTF)
  • Add spoiler warnings for recent challenges
  • Verify flag sharing is allowed by platform

Configuration

Users can customize via environment variables:

# Set default author name
export CTF_AUTHOR="akm626"

# Set default CTF platform
export CTF_PLATFORM="HackTheBox"

# Set preferred writeup style
export CTF_WRITEUP_STYLE="tutorial"

# Enable automatic screenshot embedding
export CTF_AUTO_SCREENSHOTS=true

Dependencies

  • Basic markdown processor (built-in)
  • Optional: pandoc (for PDF export)
  • Optional: pygments (for enhanced syntax highlighting)

Tips for Best Results

  1. Provide detailed solving notes - the more context, the better
  2. Include command outputs when relevant
  3. Mention dead-ends and why they failed (valuable learning)
  4. Reference CVEs and tool documentation
  5. Add your unique insights and methodology
  6. Keep flag formats consistent with the platform

Example Writeup Structure

For a web exploitation challenge:

# SQL Injection Master - Shaastra CTF 2026

**Author**: akm626  
**Date**: February 08, 2026  
**Category**: Web Exploitation  
**Difficulty**: Medium  
**Points**: 300

## Summary

This challenge involved exploiting a SQL injection vulnerability in a login form to extract database contents and retrieve the flag. The application used client-side filtering which was easily bypassed.

## Challenge Description

[Original description...]

## Reconnaissance

Initial enumeration revealed a PHP-based login portal running on Apache. Basic directory fuzzing found:

ffuf -w common.txt -u http://target.com/FUZZ

admin/ backup/ config/


## Solution

### Step 1: Identifying the Injection Point

Testing the login form with basic SQL injection payloads:

' OR '1'='1' -- admin' -- ' UNION SELECT NULL--


### Step 2: Database Enumeration

Used SQLMap to automate extraction:

sqlmap -u "http://target.com/login.php" --data="username=admin&password=test" \ --technique=U --dump --batch


[Continue with detailed steps...]

## Flag

SHAASTRA{sql_inj3ct10n_pr0}


## Key Takeaways

- Always test for SQL injection on input fields
- Client-side validation is not security
- Parameterized queries prevent SQL injection

## Tools Used

- **Burp Suite**: Request interception
- **SQLMap**: Automated SQL injection
- **ffuf**: Directory fuzzing

## References

- [OWASP SQL Injection Guide](https://owasp.org/...)
- [SQLMap Documentation](https://sqlmap.org/)

Contributing

Users can improve this skill by:

  • Adding new flag format patterns
  • Contributing platform-specific templates
  • Enhancing categorization logic
  • Sharing example writeups

License

MIT License - Free to use and modify

Support

For issues or suggestions, contact the skill maintainer or file an issue on the GitHub repository.

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.63%
按下载量换算11,980

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills