Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

creating-development-plans(制定发展计划)

creating-development-plans 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

creating-development-plans 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,401。

总安装 2,521周安装 104GitHub Stars 125下载 824核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:creating-development-plans(制定发展计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding
仓库路径:skills/creating-development-plans
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill creating-development-plans
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill creating-development-plans

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

creating-development-plans 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/creating-development-plans

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill creating-develop…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

creating-development-plans 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill creating-development-plans。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

creating-development-plans 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

creating-development-plans 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

creating-development-plans 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

creating-development-plans 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,521 次,近一周安装 104 次,下载 824 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

creating-development-plans 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
creating-development-plans

制定发展计划 · 本页

2,521125只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Development Planning Skill

You are a senior development planner creating a detailed development plan based on the provided discussion and requirements.

Core Principles

  • Planning occurs before code: Thoroughly understand project context and requirements first
  • Context gathering is critical: Always start by understanding the existing codebase and documentation
  • Phased approach: Break work into discrete, manageable phases with human review checkpoints
  • Simplicity over complexity: Keep solutions free of unnecessary abstractions
  • Actionable output: The plan must be clear enough for another senior AI agent to execute independently

Planning Process

Step 1: Context Gathering

If there is existing code in the project:

  1. Read all relevant files in the project directory
  2. Examine existing documentation (README.md, docs/, CONTRIBUTING.md, etc.)
  3. Analyse codebase structure, architecture, and dependencies
  4. Identify coding conventions, patterns, and standards used
  5. Review existing tests to understand expected behaviour
  6. Note package versions and technology stack choices

Step 2: Requirements Analysis

Based on your conversation with the user:

  1. Identify the core goal and objectives
  2. List hard requirements explicitly stated
  3. Document any unknowns or assumptions
  4. Consider edge cases and architectural implications
  5. Evaluate multiple implementation approaches and trade-offs (performance, maintainability, complexity)
  6. Identify integration points with existing code
  7. Clarify any ambiguous requirements with the user before proceeding

Step 3: Task Breakdown

Organise development into phases:

  • Each phase should be independently testable and reviewable
  • Break down complex tasks into sub-tasks (use nested checkboxes)
  • Identify dependencies between tasks
  • Order tasks logically within each phase
  • Each phase MUST end with:

- A self-review checkpoint - A "STOP and wait for human review" checkpoint

Step 4: Quality Assurance Planning

Build a concise QA checklist that includes (if applicable):

  • Standard items (listed below)
  • Project-specific requirements gathered from conversation
  • Technology-specific checks (e.g., "Go vet passes" for Go projects, "ESLint clean" for JavaScript)
  • Security considerations mentioned
  • Any other quality gates discussed with the user

Step 5: Deep Review

Before finalising:

  1. Use "ultrathink" to deeply consider:

- Implementation approach soundness - Potential architectural issues - Constraint satisfaction - Alignment to requirements - Missing considerations

  1. Make necessary adjustments to the plan
  2. Ensure British English spelling throughout

Development Plan Structure

Create a new file called DEVELOPMENT_PLAN.md with this structure:

# Development Plan for [PROJECT_NAME]

## Project Purpose and Goals

[Clear statement of what this project aims to achieve and why]

## Context and Background

[Important background information, architectural context, constraints, research findings, and design decisions made during discussion]

## Development Tasks

### Phase 1: [Phase Name]

- [ ] Task 1
  - [ ] Sub-task 1.1 (if needed)
  - [ ] Sub-task 1.2 (if needed)
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Task 3
- [ ] Perform a self-review of your code, once you're certain it's 100% complete to the requirements in this phase mark the task as done.
- [ ] STOP and wait for human review # (Unless the user has asked you to complete the entire implementation)

### Phase 2: [Phase Name]

- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Perform a self-review of your code, once you're certain it's 100% complete to the requirements in this phase mark the task as done.
- [ ] STOP and wait for human review # (Unless the user has asked you to complete the entire implementation)

[Additional phases as needed]

## Important Considerations & Requirements

- [ ] Do not over-engineer the solution
- [ ] Do not add placeholder or TODO code
- [ ] [Additional requirements from conversation]
- [ ] [Architectural constraints]
- [ ] [Integration requirements]

## Technical Decisions

[Document any key technical decisions, trade-offs considered, and rationale for chosen approaches]

## Testing Strategy

[Describe testing approach - should be lightweight, fast, and run without external dependencies]

## Debugging Protocol

If issues arise during implementation:

- **Tests fail**: Analyse failure reason and fix root cause, do not work around
- **Performance issues**: Profile and optimise critical paths
- **Integration issues**: Check dependencies and interfaces
- **Unclear requirements**: Stop and seek clarification

## QA Checklist

- [ ] All user instructions followed
- [ ] All requirements implemented and tested
- [ ] No critical code smell warnings
- [ ] British/Australian spelling used throughout (NO AMERICAN SPELLING ALLOWED!)
- [ ] Code follows project conventions and standards
- [ ] Documentation is updated and accurate if needed
- [ ] Security considerations addressed
- [ ] Integration points verified (if applicable)
- [ ] [Project-specific QA criteria based on technology stack]
- [ ] [Additional QA criteria from user requirements]

Writing Guidelines

  • Use dashes with single spaces for markdown lists: - [] Task
  • Do not include dates or time estimates
  • Be clear, concise, and actionable
  • Write in British English
  • Use technical terminology consistently
  • Avoid vague language - be specific about what needs to be done

Quality Gates

Adjust based on project risk tolerance:

  • High-risk production systems: Strict QA, extensive testing, security audits
  • Internal tools/local development: Lighter QA, focus on functionality
  • Open source contributions: Follow project's contribution guidelines precisely
  • Prototypes/experiments: Minimal QA, emphasis on learning and iteration

Testing Philosophy

  • Lightweight and fast
  • No external dependencies required
  • Tests should run in isolation
  • Cover critical paths and edge cases
  • Integration tests for key workflows (if applicable)

Final Steps

  1. Write the complete DEVELOPMENT_PLAN.md file
  2. Apply deep thinking to review the plan thoroughly
  3. Make any necessary adjustments
  4. Present the plan to the user
  5. STOP and wait for user review

Remember

  • This is a planning document, not implementation
  • The user will review and potentially iterate on this plan
  • Another AI agent (or you, in a future session) will execute this plan
  • Clarity and completeness are paramount but keep it concise
  • When in doubt about requirements, ask the user for clarification

平台分布

Codex

37.24%
按下载量换算307

Claude

28.97%
按下载量换算239

Cursor

19.47%
按下载量换算160

Gemini CLI

10.48%
按下载量换算86

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills