Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-worker(创建工人)

create-worker 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

create-worker 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,433。

总安装 652周安装 28GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 228核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-worker(创建工人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/create-worker
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

该技能指导如何创建和管理 Claude Code 中的专用 AI 助手(Worker),实现任务委派与上下文隔离。适用于需要特定专长、保持对话上下文独立或提升复杂流程处理效率的场景。通过配置自定义系统提示词、工具集和权限来定义 Worker 行为,支持多实例并行运行。

安装方式:GitHub 仓库,使用 npx 命令添加;注意权限设置及是否涉及进程或资源管理。create-worker 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-worker

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

create-worker 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-worker 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-worker 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

create-worker 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

create-worker 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 652 次,近一周安装 28 次,下载 228 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-worker 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-worker

创建工人 · 本页

652—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create Worker

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating and configuring workers in Claude Code.

Understanding Workers

Workers are specialized AI assistants that Claude Code can delegate tasks to. Each worker:

  • Operates in its own context window (preserving main conversation context)
  • Has a specific purpose and expertise area
  • Can be configured with specific tools and permissions
  • Includes a custom system prompt guiding its behavior

When to Create Workers

Create a worker when:

  • Tasks require specialized expertise that benefits from focused instructions
  • Context preservation is important (workers don't pollute main context)
  • The same specialized workflow is needed repeatedly
  • Different tool permissions are needed for different tasks
  • Parallel execution of independent tasks is desired

Choose skills instead when:

  • The capability extends your knowledge without needing separate context
  • No specialized agent persona is needed
  • Tool restrictions are sufficient without full agent isolation

Choose slash commands when:

  • Users need explicit control over when to invoke functionality
  • The workflow should be user-initiated, not model-initiated

Two Approaches to Workers

Approach 1: File-Based Agents

Persistent worker definitions stored as Markdown files.

Locations (in priority order):

LocationScopePriority
.claude/agents/Current projectHighest
~/.claude/agents/All projectsLower

File Format:

---
name: agent-name
description: Description of when this agent should be used
tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep  # Optional - omit to inherit all
model: sonnet  # Optional - sonnet, opus, haiku, or inherit
permissionMode: default  # Optional - see permission modes below
skills: skill1, skill2  # Optional - skills to auto-load
---

Your agent's system prompt goes here. This defines the agent's
role, capabilities, approach, and constraints.

Include:
- Role definition and expertise areas
- Step-by-step workflow for common tasks
- Constraints and rules to follow
- Output format expectations
- Examples of good behavior

Approach 2: Teams Delegation

Dynamic worker delegation using teams for on-demand agents.

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{
  text: '<the agent\'s instructions and task>',
  assignee: 'worker-name'
}])

Workers are delegated with a task description and an assignee name. Multiple workers can be delegated in parallel by including multiple tasks in the array.

Configuration Reference

Required Fields

FieldDescription
nameUnique identifier (lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only, max 64 chars)
descriptionWhen the agent should be used (include "PROACTIVELY" for auto-invocation)

Optional Fields

FieldOptionsDescription
toolsComma-separated listSpecific tools to allow. Omit to inherit all.
modelsonnet, opus, haiku, inheritModel to use. Default: inherit from session.
permissionModeSee belowHow permissions are handled
skillsComma-separated listSkills to auto-load when agent starts

Permission Modes

ModeBehavior
defaultNormal permission prompting
acceptEditsAuto-accept file edits
bypassPermissionsSkip all permission prompts
planPlanning mode (research only)
ignoreIgnore this agent

Available Tools

File Operations: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep Execution: Bash, BashOutput Web: WebFetch, WebSearch Specialized: Task, NotebookEdit, TodoWrite, Skill

Creating a Worker

Step 1: Define the Purpose

Answer these questions:

  1. What specialized task does this agent handle?
  2. What expertise or personality should it have?
  3. What tools does it need (or shouldn't have)?
  4. Should it be invoked automatically or explicitly?

Step 2: Choose the Approach

Use file-based agents when:

  • The agent will be reused across sessions
  • Team sharing via version control is desired
  • Configuration should persist

Use teams delegation when:

  • One-off or dynamic worker dispatch is needed
  • Workers are spawned as part of a workflow
  • Parallel execution is required

Step 3: Write the System Prompt

Structure the agent's prompt with these sections:

<role>
Define who this agent is and what it excels at.
</role>

<constraints>
<hard-rules>
- ALWAYS do X
- NEVER do Y
</hard-rules>
<preferences>
- Prefer A over B
- Prefer C over D
</preferences>
</constraints>

<workflow>
## How to Approach Tasks

1. **Phase 1**: Description
2. **Phase 2**: Description
3. **Phase 3**: Description
</workflow>

<examples>
Good patterns and anti-patterns.
</examples>

Step 4: Configure Tools and Permissions

Restrictive (read-only analysis):

tools: Read, Glob, Grep

Standard development:

tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep

Full access (omit tools field):

# tools field omitted - inherits all tools

Step 5: Test and Iterate

  1. Invoke the agent with a representative task
  2. Observe where it struggles or deviates
  3. Update the system prompt with clarifications
  4. Add examples of correct behavior
  5. Repeat until reliable

Agent Templates

Code Reviewer Agent

---
name: code-reviewer
description: Expert code review specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after any code changes. Reviews for quality, security, and maintainability.
tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
model: inherit
---

<role>
You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality and security.
</role>

<workflow>
## Review Process

1. **Gather Context**: Run git diff, understand the changes
2. **Analyze Each File**: Check for issues systematically
3. **Prioritize Findings**: Critical > High > Medium > Low
4. **Provide Actionable Feedback**: Specific fixes, not vague suggestions

## Review Checklist

- [ ] Code clarity and readability
- [ ] Proper error handling
- [ ] Security vulnerabilities
- [ ] Test coverage
- [ ] Performance considerations
- [ ] Consistency with existing patterns
</workflow>

<output-format>
Organize feedback by priority:
1. **Critical**: Must fix before merge
2. **High**: Should fix
3. **Medium**: Consider improving
4. **Low**: Nice to have
</output-format>

Debugger Agent

---
name: debugger
description: Debugging specialist for errors and unexpected behavior. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering failures, test errors, or bugs.
tools: Read, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---

<role>
You are an expert debugger specializing in root cause analysis.
</role>

<workflow>
## Debugging Protocol

1. **Capture**: Get error message, stack trace, reproduction steps
2. **Hypothesize**: Form theories about root cause
3. **Investigate**: Add logging, trace execution, check state
4. **Isolate**: Find the exact failure point
5. **Fix**: Apply minimal, targeted fix
6. **Verify**: Confirm fix works, no regressions

## Three-Strike Rule

- Strike 1: Targeted fix based on evidence
- Strike 2: Step back, reassess assumptions
- Strike 3: STOP - question the approach entirely
</workflow>

<constraints>
- NEVER fix symptoms without understanding root cause
- ALWAYS reproduce before fixing
- ALWAYS verify fix works
</constraints>

Research Agent

---
name: researcher
description: Deep research agent for complex questions requiring multi-source investigation. Use for architectural analysis, refactoring plans, or documentation questions.
tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetch
model: opus
---

<role>
You are a research specialist who finds comprehensive answers through thorough investigation.
</role>

<workflow>
## Research Process

### Phase 1: Plan Investigation
- Identify what needs to be researched
- Map out search strategies
- List relevant code areas

### Phase 2: Deep Exploration
- Search codebase thoroughly
- Read relevant files completely
- Use web search for external docs
- Trace dependencies

### Phase 3: Synthesize
- Cross-reference findings
- Identify patterns and gaps
- Form coherent understanding

### Phase 4: Report
- Direct answer with evidence
- File paths and line numbers
- Confidence level and caveats
- Recommended next steps
</workflow>

<principles>
- Go deep, not shallow
- Cite specific evidence
- Connect dots across sources
- Acknowledge uncertainty
</principles>

Parallel Worker Patterns

Pattern: Parallel Execution

Delegate multiple workers simultaneously for independent tasks:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [
  {text: 'Task 1: Review authentication module...', assignee: 'auth-reviewer'},
  {text: 'Task 2: Review authorization module...', assignee: 'authz-reviewer'},
  {text: 'Task 3: Review session handling...', assignee: 'session-reviewer'}
])

Pattern: Divergent Exploration (Delphi)

Delegate multiple workers with identical prompts for diverse perspectives:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-1'},
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-2'},
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-3'}
])

Each worker explores independently, potentially discovering different clues.

Pattern: Synthesis After Parallel Work

After parallel workers complete:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{
  text: 'Read all review tickets and synthesize findings...',
  assignee: 'synthesizer'
}])

Best Practices

Prompt Engineering

  1. Be specific about the role: Define expertise and personality clearly
  2. Include constraints: Hard rules prevent unwanted behavior
  3. Provide workflow: Step-by-step process guides execution
  4. Add examples: Show good and bad patterns
  5. Define output format: Structure expectations

Tool Selection

  1. Principle of least privilege: Only grant needed tools
  2. Read-only for analysis: Use Read, Glob, Grep for review agents
  3. Full access rarely needed: Most agents don't need all tools
  4. Bash is powerful but risky: Consider if really needed

Description Writing

For automatic invocation, include trigger phrases:

  • "Use PROACTIVELY when..."
  • "MUST BE USED for..."
  • "Automatically invoke for..."

For explicit invocation, be descriptive:

  • "Use when user asks to..."
  • "Invoke for..."

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternBetter Approach
Vague descriptionsSpecific trigger conditions
Overly long promptsProgressive disclosure via skills
All tools for every agentMinimal necessary tools
Generic "helper" agentsFocused, specialized agents
No constraintsClear hard rules and preferences

CLI-Based Agents

Define agents dynamically via command line:

claude --agents '{
  "quick-review": {
    "description": "Fast code review. Use proactively after changes.",
    "prompt": "You are a quick code reviewer. Focus on obvious issues only.",
    "tools": ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"],
    "model": "haiku"
  }
}'

CLI agents have lower priority than file-based project agents but higher than user-level agents.

Integration with Skills

Agents can auto-load skills:

---
name: data-analyst
description: Data analysis specialist
skills: query-builder, visualization
---

The specified skills are loaded when the agent starts, giving it access to that specialized knowledge.

Troubleshooting

Agent Not Being Invoked

  1. Check description includes clear trigger conditions
  2. Add "PROACTIVELY" if automatic invocation is desired
  3. Verify file is in correct location with correct frontmatter
  4. Check for name conflicts with higher-priority agents

Agent Using Wrong Tools

  1. Verify tools field syntax (comma-separated, no brackets)
  2. Check tool names are exactly correct (case-sensitive)
  3. If tools should inherit, omit the field entirely

Agent Behaving Incorrectly

  1. Add more specific constraints
  2. Include examples of correct behavior
  3. Add "NEVER" rules for unwanted behaviors
  4. Consider if the prompt is too long (move details to skills)

Quick Reference

Create project agent:

mkdir -p .claude/agents
# Create .claude/agents/my-agent.md with frontmatter

Create user agent:

mkdir -p ~/.claude/agents
# Create ~/.claude/agents/my-agent.md with frontmatter

Delegate via teams:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{text: '...', assignee: 'worker-name'}])

View/manage agents:

/agents

平台分布

Codex

35.14%
按下载量换算80

Claude

29.87%
按下载量换算68

Cursor

19.22%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

8.84%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills