Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-tasks(create tasks 搜索)

create-tasks 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

create-tasks 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,488。

总安装 612周安装 26GitHub Stars 305下载 214核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-tasks(create tasks 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz
仓库路径:skills/create-tasks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

create-tasks 用于生成高上下文密度的工程任务卡,确保远程开发者无需追问即可实施。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境,适合分布式团队协作场景。每个任务包含交付物、原理、验收标准与依赖关系,适配项目工具链规范。

安装前请确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发文档生成与本地文件写入操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-tasks

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

create-tasks 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-tasks 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-tasks 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

create-tasks 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

create-tasks 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 612 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 214 次,GitHub 305 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-tasks 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-tasks

create tasks 搜索 · 本页

612305需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create Tasks

Creates well-formed tasks that provide large amounts of contexts so that engineers that weren't in conversations can implement the task without any prior knowledge and without asking questions.

Tasks should be created using the tools and documentation conventions in the project the skills is being applied to. If the conventions are not clear, ask the user to clarify and then document them.

What Engineers Need

Every task must provide:

  • What they're building (deliverable)
  • Why it matters (context)
  • Key decisions and principles they must follow
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Dependencies
  • Related code/patterns
  • How to verify it works

Before Creating Tasks: Slice First

🚨 NEVER create a task without validating its size first. A PRD deliverable is NOT automatically a task—it may be an epic that needs splitting.

Example Mapping Discovery

🚨 Never copy PRD bullets verbatim. Use Example Mapping to transform them into executable specifications.

CardWhat You Do
🟡 StoryState the deliverable in one specific sentence
🔵 RulesList every business rule/constraint (3-4 max per task)
🟢 ExamplesFor EACH rule: happy path + edge cases + error cases
🔴 QuestionsSurface unknowns → resolve or spike first

The Examples (🟢) ARE your acceptance criteria. Write them in Given-When-Then format:

Given [context/precondition]
When [action/trigger]
Then [expected outcome]

Edge case checklist — for each rule, systematically consider:

CategoryCheck For
InputEmpty, null, whitespace, boundaries, invalid format, special chars, unicode, too long
StateConcurrent updates, race conditions, invalid sequences, already exists, doesn't exist
ErrorsNetwork failure, timeout, partial failure, invalid permissions, quota exceeded

Example: PRD says "User can search products"

Rules identified: (1) Search by title, (2) Pagination, (3) Empty state

For Rule 1 alone, edge case thinking yields:

  • Given products exist → When search → Then results (happy path)
  • Given no matches → When search → Then empty set
  • Given empty search term → When submit → Then validation error OR all products? (🔴 Question!)
  • Given special chars in search → When search → Then handled safely

Splitting Signals (Task Too Big)

If ANY of these are true, STOP and split:

  • ❌ Can't describe in a specific, action-oriented title
  • ❌ Would take more than 1 day
  • ❌ Title requires "and" or lists multiple things
  • ❌ Has multiple clusters of acceptance criteria
  • ❌ Cuts horizontally (all DB, then all API, then all UI)
  • ❌ PRD calls it "full implementation" or "complete system"

SPIDR Splitting Techniques

When you need to split, use these techniques:

TechniqueSplit ByExample
PathsDifferent user flows"Pay with card" vs "Pay with PayPal"
InterfacesDifferent UIs/platforms"Desktop search" vs "Mobile search"
DataDifferent data types"Upload images" vs "Upload videos"
RulesDifferent business rules"Basic validation" vs "Premium validation"
SpikesUnknown areas"Research payment APIs" before "Implement payments"

Vertical Slices Only

Every task must be a vertical slice—cutting through all layers needed for ONE specific thing:

✅ VERTICAL (correct):
"Add search by title" → touches UI + API + DB for ONE search type

❌ HORIZONTAL (wrong):
"Build search UI" → "Build search API" → "Build search DB"

Task Naming

Formula

[Action verb] [specific object] [outcome/constraint]

Good Names

  • "Add price range filter to product search"
  • "Implement POST /api/users endpoint with email validation"
  • "Display product recommendations on home page"
  • "Enable CSV export for transaction history"
  • "Validate required fields on checkout form"

Rejected Patterns

🚨 NEVER use these—they signal an epic, not a task:

PatternWhy It's Wrong
"Full implementation of X"Epic masquerading as task
"Build the X system"Too vague, no specific deliverable
"Complete X feature"Undefined scope
"Implement X" (alone)Missing specificity
"X and Y"Two tasks combined
"Set up X infrastructure"Horizontal slice

If you catch yourself writing one of these, STOP and apply SPIDR.

Task Size Validation (INVEST)

Every task MUST pass INVEST before creation:

CriterionQuestionFail = Split
IndependentDoes it deliver value alone?Depends on other incomplete tasks
NegotiableCan scope be discussed?Rigid, all-or-nothing
ValuableDoes user/stakeholder see benefit?Only technical benefit
EstimableCan you size it confidently?"Uh... maybe 3 days?"
SmallFits in 1 day?More than 1 day
TestableHas concrete acceptance criteria?Vague or missing criteria

Hard Limits

  • Max 1 day of work — if longer, split it
  • Must be vertical — touches all layers for ONE thing
  • Must be demoable — when done, you can show it working

Task Template

## Deliverable: [What user/stakeholder sees]

### Context
[Where this came from and why it matters. PRD reference, bug report, conversation summary—whatever helps engineer understand WHY. You MUST provide the specific file path or URL for any referenced files like a PRD of bug report - don't assume the engineer knows where things are stored]

### Key Decisions and principles
- [Decision/Principle] — [rationale]

### Delivers
[Specific outcome in user terms]

### Acceptance Criteria
- Given [context] When [action] Then [outcome]

### Dependencies
- [What must exist first]

### Related Code
- `path/to/file` — [what pattern/code to use]

### Verification
[Specific commands/tests that prove it works]

Process

  1. Slice first — Apply Example Mapping. If task has >3-4 rules or fails splitting signals, use SPIDR to break it down.
  2. Discover acceptance criteria — For each rule: generate happy path, edge cases, error cases using the checklist. Write as Given-When-Then. Surface questions.
  3. Name it — Write a specific, action-oriented title. If you can't, the task isn't clear enough.
  4. Validate size — Must pass INVEST. Max 1 day. Must be vertical slice.
  5. Gather context (from PRD, conversation, bug report, etc.)
  6. Identify key decisions that affect implementation
  7. Find related code/patterns in the codebase
  8. Specify verification commands
  9. Output task using template

Checkpoint

Before finalizing any task, verify ALL of these:

CheckQuestionIf No
SizeIs this ≤1 day of work?Split using SPIDR
NameIs the title specific and action-oriented?Rewrite using formula
VerticalDoes it cut through all layers for ONE thing?Restructure as vertical slice
INVESTDoes it pass all 6 criteria?Fix the failing criterion
ContextCan an engineer implement without asking questions?Add what's missing

🚨 If the PRD says "full implementation" or similar, you MUST split it. Creating such a task is a critical failure.

平台分布

Codex

34.37%
按下载量换算74

Claude

32.23%
按下载量换算69

Cursor

20.53%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills