Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

create-taskscreate tasks 搜索

Agent Skill

create-tasks 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

612

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

305

下载量

214
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-tasks(create tasks 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz
仓库路径:skills/create-tasks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill create-tasks

简介

create-tasks 用于生成高上下文密度的工程任务卡,确保远程开发者无需追问即可实施。

  • 适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境,适合分布式团队协作场景。
  • 每个任务包含交付物、原理、验收标准与依赖关系,适配项目工具链规范。
  • 安装前请确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发文档生成与本地文件写入操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Create Tasks

Creates well-formed tasks that provide large amounts of contexts so that engineers that weren't in conversations can implement the task without any prior knowledge and without asking questions.

Tasks should be created using the tools and documentation conventions in the project the skills is being applied to. If the conventions are not clear, ask the user to clarify and then document them.

What Engineers Need

Every task must provide:

  • What they're building (deliverable)
  • Why it matters (context)
  • Key decisions and principles they must follow
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Dependencies
  • Related code/patterns
  • How to verify it works

Before Creating Tasks: Slice First

🚨 NEVER create a task without validating its size first. A PRD deliverable is NOT automatically a task—it may be an epic that needs splitting.

Example Mapping Discovery

🚨 Never copy PRD bullets verbatim. Use Example Mapping to transform them into executable specifications.

CardWhat You Do
🟡 StoryState the deliverable in one specific sentence
🔵 RulesList every business rule/constraint (3-4 max per task)
🟢 ExamplesFor EACH rule: happy path + edge cases + error cases
🔴 QuestionsSurface unknowns → resolve or spike first

The Examples (🟢) ARE your acceptance criteria. Write them in Given-When-Then format:

Given [context/precondition]
When [action/trigger]
Then [expected outcome]

Edge case checklist — for each rule, systematically consider:

CategoryCheck For
InputEmpty, null, whitespace, boundaries, invalid format, special chars, unicode, too long
StateConcurrent updates, race conditions, invalid sequences, already exists, doesn't exist
ErrorsNetwork failure, timeout, partial failure, invalid permissions, quota exceeded

Example: PRD says "User can search products"

Rules identified: (1) Search by title, (2) Pagination, (3) Empty state

For Rule 1 alone, edge case thinking yields:

  • Given products exist → When search → Then results (happy path)
  • Given no matches → When search → Then empty set
  • Given empty search term → When submit → Then validation error OR all products? (🔴 Question!)
  • Given special chars in search → When search → Then handled safely

Splitting Signals (Task Too Big)

If ANY of these are true, STOP and split:

  • ❌ Can't describe in a specific, action-oriented title
  • ❌ Would take more than 1 day
  • ❌ Title requires "and" or lists multiple things
  • ❌ Has multiple clusters of acceptance criteria
  • ❌ Cuts horizontally (all DB, then all API, then all UI)
  • ❌ PRD calls it "full implementation" or "complete system"

SPIDR Splitting Techniques

When you need to split, use these techniques:

TechniqueSplit ByExample
PathsDifferent user flows"Pay with card" vs "Pay with PayPal"
InterfacesDifferent UIs/platforms"Desktop search" vs "Mobile search"
DataDifferent data types"Upload images" vs "Upload videos"
RulesDifferent business rules"Basic validation" vs "Premium validation"
SpikesUnknown areas"Research payment APIs" before "Implement payments"

Vertical Slices Only

Every task must be a vertical slice—cutting through all layers needed for ONE specific thing:

✅ VERTICAL (correct):
"Add search by title" → touches UI + API + DB for ONE search type

❌ HORIZONTAL (wrong):
"Build search UI" → "Build search API" → "Build search DB"

Task Naming

Formula

[Action verb] [specific object] [outcome/constraint]

Good Names

  • "Add price range filter to product search"
  • "Implement POST /api/users endpoint with email validation"
  • "Display product recommendations on home page"
  • "Enable CSV export for transaction history"
  • "Validate required fields on checkout form"

Rejected Patterns

🚨 NEVER use these—they signal an epic, not a task:

PatternWhy It's Wrong
"Full implementation of X"Epic masquerading as task
"Build the X system"Too vague, no specific deliverable
"Complete X feature"Undefined scope
"Implement X" (alone)Missing specificity
"X and Y"Two tasks combined
"Set up X infrastructure"Horizontal slice

If you catch yourself writing one of these, STOP and apply SPIDR.

Task Size Validation (INVEST)

Every task MUST pass INVEST before creation:

CriterionQuestionFail = Split
IndependentDoes it deliver value alone?Depends on other incomplete tasks
NegotiableCan scope be discussed?Rigid, all-or-nothing
ValuableDoes user/stakeholder see benefit?Only technical benefit
EstimableCan you size it confidently?"Uh... maybe 3 days?"
SmallFits in 1 day?More than 1 day
TestableHas concrete acceptance criteria?Vague or missing criteria

Hard Limits

  • Max 1 day of work — if longer, split it
  • Must be vertical — touches all layers for ONE thing
  • Must be demoable — when done, you can show it working

Task Template

## Deliverable: [What user/stakeholder sees]

### Context
[Where this came from and why it matters. PRD reference, bug report, conversation summary—whatever helps engineer understand WHY. You MUST provide the specific file path or URL for any referenced files like a PRD of bug report - don't assume the engineer knows where things are stored]

### Key Decisions and principles
- [Decision/Principle] — [rationale]

### Delivers
[Specific outcome in user terms]

### Acceptance Criteria
- Given [context] When [action] Then [outcome]

### Dependencies
- [What must exist first]

### Related Code
- `path/to/file` — [what pattern/code to use]

### Verification
[Specific commands/tests that prove it works]

Process

  1. Slice first — Apply Example Mapping. If task has >3-4 rules or fails splitting signals, use SPIDR to break it down.
  2. Discover acceptance criteria — For each rule: generate happy path, edge cases, error cases using the checklist. Write as Given-When-Then. Surface questions.
  3. Name it — Write a specific, action-oriented title. If you can't, the task isn't clear enough.
  4. Validate size — Must pass INVEST. Max 1 day. Must be vertical slice.
  5. Gather context (from PRD, conversation, bug report, etc.)
  6. Identify key decisions that affect implementation
  7. Find related code/patterns in the codebase
  8. Specify verification commands
  9. Output task using template

Checkpoint

Before finalizing any task, verify ALL of these:

CheckQuestionIf No
SizeIs this ≤1 day of work?Split using SPIDR
NameIs the title specific and action-oriented?Rewrite using formula
VerticalDoes it cut through all layers for ONE thing?Restructure as vertical slice
INVESTDoes it pass all 6 criteria?Fix the failing criterion
ContextCan an engineer implement without asking questions?Add what's missing

🚨 If the PRD says "full implementation" or similar, you MUST split it. Creating such a task is a critical failure.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.37%
按下载量换算74

Claude

32.23%
按下载量换算69

Cursor

20.53%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills