Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-note(创建笔记)

create-note 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

create-note 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,959。

总安装 291周安装 12GitHub Stars 124下载 95核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-note(创建笔记)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace
仓库路径:skills/create-note
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace --skill create-note
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace --skill create-note

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

创建 Substack 笔记内容,协调研究策略与文案撰写两个子技能完成全流程。根据 newsletter 上下文智能选择笔记类型,保持品牌调性与读者预期一致。实际内容生成委托给底层技能,本技能仅负责流程编排与输出格式管理。使用前应确认 API 密钥有效性,避免因认证失败导致内容无法发布。

create-note 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-note

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

create-note 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace --skill create-not…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-note 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-note 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

create-note 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

create-note 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 291 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 95 次,GitHub 124 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-note 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-note

创建笔记 · 本页

291124只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create Substack Note

Overview

This orchestrator creates Substack Notes by sequencing content-strategy:research for strategic context and writing:copywriting for content generation. It handles newsletter context awareness, note type selection, and output management -- all actual content generation and strategy are delegated to the foundation skills and their references.

Core Principle: This is a thin orchestrator. Strategy lives in content-strategy:research via references/substack-notes-strategy.md. Templates and formatting live in writing:copywriting via references/substack-notes.md. This skill manages the workflow sequence, newsletter context, and user decisions only.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Writing a standalone Substack Note for audience engagement
  • Promoting a newsletter issue through Notes
  • Building engagement between newsletter issues
  • Sharing insights, hot takes, or behind-the-scenes content
  • Creating any short-form Substack content

Prerequisites

Optional: A recent newsletter issue directory at ./newsletter/issues/[issue_name]/ with a plan.md file. This is only needed for issue-linked notes. Standalone notes do not require an issue directory.

Workflow

Execute all steps below in order.

Step 0: Newsletter Context Check

Check if the user has specified a newsletter issue or if an issue directory exists at ./newsletter/issues/[issue_name]/.

If issue directory exists:

  • Read plan.md for issue topic, title, and context
  • Suggest a lifecycle phase based on context:

- Issue not yet published -> pre-newsletter - Issue just published -> issue day - Issue published 3-7 days ago -> post-newsletter

  • Use this context to inform the research invocation in Step 1

If no issue directory:

  • Default to between issues mode
  • Notes will focus on engagement, authority-building, or value delivery
  • Any note type is available

Content Bank Check:

Also check if ./substack/notes/ideas.md (the content bank) exists:

  • If it exists and the user did NOT specify a topic, read the bank and present pending ideas organized by type as topic options
  • If it exists and the user DID specify a topic, check if the topic matches a pending idea in the bank — if so, note the match for status update in Step 5
  • If the bank does not exist, proceed normally — the user provides a topic directly

Step 1: Invoke content-strategy:research

MANDATORY: Invoke content-strategy:research with references/substack-notes-strategy.md to determine the strategic context for this note.

Provide:

  • The lifecycle phase (from Step 0 or user input)
  • The topic
  • The user's stated goal (engagement, promotion, authority, connection, quick value, transparency, positioning)

The research skill will apply the strategy framework to determine:

  • Optimal note type ranking for the context
  • Cadence awareness
  • Strategic rationale for the approach

NOTE: This is a lighter research invocation -- the orchestrator is asking research to apply the strategy framework to the user's context, not to do full competitor analysis.

Step 2: Present Note Type Options

Based on the research output, present the ranked note type options to the user:

  1. Single-Punch Wisdom -- one sharp insight
  2. Income Proof Story -- results-driven credibility
  3. Pattern Observation -- trend or pattern spotted
  4. Contrarian Statement -- against-the-grain take
  5. Problem -> Solution -- actionable fix
  6. Build-in-Public Update -- transparency and progress
  7. List-Based Tactical -- quick-hit value list
  8. Vulnerable Personal Story -- authentic connection
  9. Newsletter Teaser -- drive issue reads
  10. Direct Advice -- straight recommendation

Include the research skill's recommendation for which type best fits the context. User selects their preferred type.

Default to Short (3-5 sentences) unless the message demands more.

Step 3: Invoke writing:copywriting

MANDATORY: Invoke writing:copywriting with references/substack-notes.md to draft the note.

Provide:

  • The selected note type from Step 2
  • The strategic context from Step 1
  • The newsletter context from Step 0 (if applicable)
  • The lifecycle phase and user's stated goal

The writing:copywriting skill will automatically invoke writing:voice for voice consistency. The reference file contains all templates, formatting rules, and structural formulas.

Step 4: Quality Checklist

Verify the drafted note against all eight criteria before presenting to the user:

  • Follows structural formula for chosen note type
  • Opens with strong hook (first line grabs attention)
  • Length matches type guideline
  • Ends with engagement hook (not formulaic)
  • Specific, not vague (numbers, examples, concrete details)
  • Standalone value (interesting without clicking any link)
  • NOT a generic link dump
  • Note type matches the stated goal

If any criterion fails, request a revision from writing:copywriting before presenting to the user.

Step 5: Save Output

Present the final note to the user for approval.

If issue directory exists:

  • After user approval, append to ./newsletter/issues/[issue_name]/notes.md

If no issue directory:

  • Present the final note inline to the user

Content Bank Update:

If the note was based on a content bank idea:

  • Update the idea's status from pending to drafted in ./substack/notes/ideas.md
  • Recalculate the Quick Stats header (pending/drafted/published counts, types needing ideas)

Output Format

When saving to notes.md, use this structure:

## [Type] Note - [Date]

**Type:** [Note type name]
**Context:** [Standalone / Pre-newsletter / Issue Day / Post-newsletter / Between Issues]
**Goal:** [Engagement / Authority / Connection / Promotion / Quick Value / Transparency / Positioning]

### Note Content

[Final note text]

### Notes

- Suggested timing: [from research]
- Engagement hook type: [question / agree-disagree / share / reply]

Multiple notes are appended to the same file with a horizontal rule separator (---) between entries.

Quality Checklist

Verify completion before finalizing:

  • Newsletter context checked (Step 0)
  • content-strategy:research invoked with references/substack-notes-strategy.md -- strategic context determined
  • Note type options presented and user selection received
  • writing:copywriting invoked with references/substack-notes.md -- note drafted
  • Voice consistency maintained (handled by writing skill's writing:voice invocation)
  • All 8 quality criteria passed (Step 4)
  • Note presented to user for approval
  • Output saved to issue directory or presented inline

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Writing templates inline: All templates live in references/substack-notes.md -- do not duplicate them in this orchestrator
  2. Embedding strategy logic: All strategy lives in references/substack-notes-strategy.md -- do not hardcode timing, cadence, or algorithm advice here
  3. Skipping foundation skill invocations: Both content-strategy:research and writing:copywriting must be invoked -- do not generate notes directly
  4. Ignoring newsletter context: Always check for an issue directory first -- it changes the entire strategic approach
  5. Defaulting to "new issue out" link dumps: The research and writing skills are specifically designed to avoid generic link dumps -- trust the foundation skills
  6. Skipping the quality checklist: Every note must pass all 8 criteria before presenting to the user

平台分布

Codex

31.62%
按下载量换算30

Claude

30.5%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

19.77%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

8.67%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills