Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-hat-collection(create HAT collection 搜索)

create-hat-collection 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

create-hat-collection 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,393。

总安装 734周安装 30GitHub Stars 2,802下载 238核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-hat-collection(create HAT collection 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator
仓库路径:skills/create-hat-collection
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator --skill create-hat-collection
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator --skill create-hat-collection

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境,支持多 Agent 工作流配置。通过命令行安装,需结合来源仓库文档核验具体用法,确保输出结构化 YAML 预设。

安装前建议确认权限范围,避免触发未授权的联网或文件操作。create-hat-collection 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-hat-collection

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator --skill create-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

create-hat-collection 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator --skill create-hat-collec…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-hat-collection 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-hat-collection 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

create-hat-collection 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

create-hat-collection 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 734 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 238 次,GitHub 2,802 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-hat-collection 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-hat-collection

create HAT collection 搜索 · 本页

7342,802只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create Hat Collection

Overview

This skill generates Ralph hat collection presets through a guided, conversational workflow. It asks clarifying questions about your workflow, validates the configuration against schema constraints, and produces a production-ready YAML preset file.

Output: A complete .yml preset file in the presets/ directory.

When to Use

  • Creating a new multi-agent workflow from scratch
  • Transforming a workflow idea into a structured preset
  • Need guidance on hat design patterns and event routing

Not for: Modifying existing presets (use /creating-hat-collections reference instead)

Workflow

Phase 1: Understand the Workflow

Ask clarifying questions to understand:

  1. Purpose: What problem does this workflow solve?
  2. Pattern: Which architecture pattern fits best?

- Pipeline: A→B→C linear flow (analyze→summarize) - Critic-Actor: One proposes, another critiques (code review) - Supervisor-Worker: Coordinator delegates to specialists - Scientific: Observe→Hypothesize→Test→Fix (debugging)

  1. Roles: What distinct agent personas are needed?
  2. Handoffs: When should each role hand off to the next?
  3. Completion: What signals the workflow is done?

Phase 2: Design Event Flow

Map the workflow as an event chain:

task.start → [Role A] → event.a → [Role B] → event.b → [Role C] → LOOP_COMPLETE
                                                    ↓
                                         event.rejected → [Role A]

Constraints to validate:

  • Each trigger maps to exactly ONE hat (no ambiguous routing)
  • task.start and task.resume are RESERVED (never use as triggers)
  • Every hat must publish at least one event
  • Chain must eventually reach LOOP_COMPLETE

Phase 3: Generate Preset

Create the YAML file with these sections:

# <Preset Name>
# Pattern: <Architecture Pattern>
# <One-line description>
#
# Usage:
#   ralph run --config presets/<name>.yml --prompt "<example prompt>"

event_loop:
  starting_event: "<first.event>"  # Ralph publishes this

hats:
  hat_key:
    name: "<Emoji> Display Name"
    description: "<Short description of the hat's purpose>"
    triggers: ["event.triggers.this"]
    publishes: ["event.this.publishes", "alternate.event"]
    default_publishes: "event.this.publishes"
    instructions: |
      ## <HAT NAME> MODE

      <Clear role definition - what this hat does>

      ### Process
      1. <Step one>
      2. <Step two>
      3. Publish appropriate event

      ### Event Format

<event topic="event.name"> key: value </event>


      ### DON'T
      - <Common mistake to avoid>
      - <Another mistake>

Schema Reference

Required Top-Level Fields

FieldDescription
event_loop.starting_eventFirst event Ralph publishes

Hat Definition Fields

FieldRequiredDescription
nameYesDisplay name with optional emoji (e.g., "🔍 Analyzer")
descriptionYesShort description of the hat's purpose (one sentence)
triggersYesEvents this hat responds to (list)
publishesYesEvents this hat can emit (list)
default_publishesRecommendedFallback event if hat forgets to publish
instructionsYesRole-specific prompt (use `\` for multiline)

Fields That DON'T Exist

Never use these—they're not in the schema:

  • emoji (put emoji in name instead)
  • system_prompt (use instructions)
  • subscriptions / publications (use triggers / publishes)

Event Naming Conventions

<phase>.ready / <phase>.done      # Phase transitions
<thing>.approved / <thing>.rejected  # Review gates
<noun>.found / <noun>.missing     # Discovery events
<action>.request / <action>.complete # Request-response

Examples: analysis.complete, review.approved, build.blocked, spec.rejected

Validation Checklist

Before finalizing the preset, verify:

  • Each trigger maps to exactly ONE hat
  • No hat uses task.start or task.resume as triggers
  • Every hat has name, description, triggers, publishes, and instructions
  • default_publishes is set for hats with multiple publish options
  • Event chain can reach LOOP_COMPLETE
  • No orphan events that never get handled (warning only)
  • Instructions include role definition, process steps, event format, and DON'Ts

Output Location

Save generated presets to: presets/<name>.yml

For minimal/embedded presets: presets/minimal/<name>.yml

Testing the Preset

After generation, test with:

# Dry run to validate config parsing
cargo run --bin ralph -- run -c presets/<name>.yml -p "test prompt" --dry-run

# Run smoke tests
cargo test -p ralph-core smoke_runner

Use /evaluate-presets for comprehensive validation.

Example Conversation

User: I want a preset for doing code reviews with a security focus.

Assistant: I'll help create a security-focused code review preset. Let me ask a few questions:

  1. Review depth: Should this be a quick scan or thorough analysis?
  2. Roles needed: I'm thinking: Does this cover your needs, or should we add/remove roles?

- Security Analyst (finds vulnerabilities) - Code Reviewer (checks logic/style) - Summarizer (creates final report)

  1. Iteration: If issues are found, should the code be fixed, or just reported?

User: Thorough analysis, those roles work, just report issues don't fix.

Assistant: Here's the event flow I'm designing:

task.start → [Security Analyst] → security.complete
                                        ↓
          → [Code Reviewer] → review.complete
                                        ↓
          → [Summarizer] → LOOP_COMPLETE

Let me generate the preset...

[Generates YAML with three hats following the schema]

Common Patterns Reference

Pipeline (Sequential)

A → B → C → done

Use for: analysis workflows, document processing

Critic-Actor (Review Loop)

Actor → Critic → approved/rejected
                    ↓
         rejected → Actor (retry)

Use for: code review, quality gates

Supervisor-Worker

Supervisor → worker.task → Worker → work.done → Supervisor

Use for: complex task decomposition

Scientific Method

Observe → Hypothesize → Test → confirmed/rejected
                                    ↓
                         rejected → Observe

Use for: debugging, investigation

平台分布

Claude Code

27.19%
按下载量换算65

Gemini CLI

21.69%
按下载量换算52

Antigravity

17.61%
按下载量换算42

windsurf

13.52%
按下载量换算32

trae

7.71%
按下载量换算18

Codex

3.23%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills