Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

customer-research客户研究

Agent Skill

customer-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

482,160

周安装

20,526

GitHub Stars

25,628

下载量

168,920
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-research(客户研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills
仓库路径:skills/customer-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill customer-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill customer-research

简介

customer-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 它作为客户研究专家,帮助挖掘客户真实想法、痛点和行为,支撑产品与市场策略制定。
  • 支持分析现有访谈素材、问卷结果或用户旅程地图,避免依赖假设。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Customer Research

You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.


Two Modes of Research

Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets

You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.

Mode 2: Go Find Research

You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.

Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.


Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets

Asset Types

Customer interview / sales call transcripts

  • Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
  • Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them

Survey results

  • Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
  • Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
  • Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal

Customer support conversations

  • Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
  • Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
  • Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches

Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes

  • Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
  • Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
  • Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes

NPS responses

  • Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
  • Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment

Extraction Framework

For each asset, extract:

  1. Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?

- Functional job: the task itself - Emotional job: how they want to feel - Social job: how they want to be perceived

  1. Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?

- Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language

  1. Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?

- Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something

  1. Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?

- Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases

  1. Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use

- This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"

  1. Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?

- Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally

Synthesis Steps

After extracting from individual assets:

  1. Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
  2. Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
  3. Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
  4. Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
  5. Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?

Research Quality Guardrails

Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:

ConfidenceCriteria
HighTheme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments
MediumTheme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment
LowSingle source; could be an outlier; needs validation

Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.

Sample bias checks:

  • Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
  • Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
  • Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
  • Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"

Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.


Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research

Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.

Where to Look

Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.

ICP TypePrimary Sources
B2B SaaS / technical buyersReddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro
SMB / foundersReddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro
Developer / DevOpsr/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers
B2C / consumerApp store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments
EnterpriseLinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro

Quick decision guide:

  • Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
  • Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
  • Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
  • Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
  • Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis

What to Extract from Each Source

For every piece of content you find:

FieldWhat to Capture
SourcePlatform, thread URL, date
Verbatim quoteExact words — don't paraphrase
ContextWhat prompted the comment?
SentimentPositive / negative / neutral / frustrated
Theme tagPain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language
Customer profile signalsRole, company size, industry hints from the post

Research Synthesis Template

After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:

## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)

### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning

### Theme 2: ...

Persona Generation

Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.

Persona Structure

## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]

**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]

**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]

**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]

**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]

**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]

**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]

**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]

**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"

**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]

Persona Anti-Patterns

  • Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
  • Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
  • Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
  • Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve

Deliverable Formats

Depending on what the user needs, offer:

  1. Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
  2. VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
  3. Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
  4. Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
  5. Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
  6. Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it

Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.


Questions to Ask Before Proceeding

If context is unclear:

  1. What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
  2. What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
  3. Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
  4. What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
  5. What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)

Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.


Related Skills

When to hand offSkill
Writing copy informed by the researchcopywriting
Optimizing a page using VOC insightspage-cro
Building a competitor comparison pagecompetitor-alternatives
Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn researchchurn-prevention
Planning paid ads informed by researchpaid-ads
Writing cold email using research on pain/triggercold-email
Planning content based on discovered topicscontent-strategy

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.85%
按下载量换算60,558

Claude

28.85%
按下载量换算48,733

Cursor

19.59%
按下载量换算33,091

Gemini CLI

10.36%
按下载量换算17,500

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills