Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

coordinator-pattern(协调者模式)

coordinator-pattern 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

coordinator-pattern 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 1,958。

总安装 388周安装 16GitHub Stars 8下载 127核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:coordinator-pattern(协调者模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev
仓库路径:skills/coordinator-pattern
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill coordinator-pattern
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill coordinator-pattern

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或文件读写。

coordinator-pattern 属于AI 工具类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/coordinator-pattern

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill coordinat…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

coordinator-pattern 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill coordinator-pattern。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

coordinator-pattern 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

coordinator-pattern 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

coordinator-pattern 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

coordinator-pattern 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 388 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 127 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

coordinator-pattern 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
coordinator-pattern

协调者模式 · 本页

3888只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Coordinator Pattern — Expert Decisions

Expert decision frameworks for Coordinator pattern choices. Claude knows the pattern — this skill provides judgment calls for when coordinators add value and how to structure hierarchies.


Decision Trees

Do You Need Coordinators?

How many navigation flows does your app have?
├─ 1-2 simple flows
│  └─ Skip coordinators
│     NavigationStack + simple Router is enough
│
├─ 3-5 distinct flows
│  └─ Consider coordinators IF:
│     • Flows have complex branching
│     • Deep linking is required
│     • Flows need to share navigation logic
│
└─ 6+ flows or multi-team development
   └─ Coordinators recommended
      • Clear ownership boundaries
      • Parallel development possible
      • Testable navigation logic

The trap: Adding coordinators to simple apps. If your app is 5 screens with linear flow, coordinators add complexity without benefit.

Coordinator Hierarchy Design

Does this flow need to manage sub-flows?
├─ NO (leaf coordinator)
│  └─ Simple coordinator
│     Owns NavigationPath, creates views
│
└─ YES (has sub-flows)
   └─ Parent coordinator
      Manages childCoordinators array
      Delegates to child for sub-flows

SwiftUI vs UIKit Coordinator

Which UI framework?
├─ SwiftUI
│  └─ Coordinator as ObservableObject
│     • Owns NavigationPath
│     • @ViewBuilder for destinations
│     • Pass via EnvironmentObject or explicit injection
│
└─ UIKit
   └─ Coordinator owns UINavigationController
      • Creates and pushes ViewControllers
      • Uses delegation for flow completion
      • Manages childCoordinators manually

Flow Completion Strategy

How does a flow end?
├─ Success (user completed task)
│  └─ Delegate method with result
│     coordinator.didCompleteLogin(user: user)
│
├─ Cancellation (user backed out)
│  └─ Delegate method without result
│     coordinator.didCancelLogin()
│
└─ Automatic (flow naturally ends)
   └─ Parent removes child automatically
      No explicit completion needed

NEVER Do

Child Coordinator Lifecycle

NEVER forget to remove child coordinators:

// ❌ Memory leak — child coordinator retained forever
final class ParentCoordinator {
    var childCoordinators: [Coordinator] = []

    func startLoginFlow() {
        let loginCoordinator = LoginCoordinator()
        childCoordinators.append(loginCoordinator)
        loginCoordinator.start()
        // Never removed! Leaks.
    }
}

// ✅ Remove child on flow completion
final class ParentCoordinator: LoginCoordinatorDelegate {
    var childCoordinators: [Coordinator] = []

    func startLoginFlow() {
        let loginCoordinator = LoginCoordinator()
        loginCoordinator.delegate = self
        childCoordinators.append(loginCoordinator)
        loginCoordinator.start()
    }

    func loginCoordinatorDidFinish(_ coordinator: LoginCoordinator) {
        childCoordinators.removeAll { $0 === coordinator }
    }
}

NEVER use strong parent references:

// ❌ Retain cycle — coordinator never deallocates
final class ChildCoordinator {
    var parent: ParentCoordinator  // Strong reference!
}

// ✅ Weak parent or delegate
final class ChildCoordinator {
    weak var delegate: ChildCoordinatorDelegate?
    // OR
    weak var parent: ParentCoordinator?
}

Coordinator Responsibilities

NEVER put business logic in coordinators:

// ❌ Coordinator doing business logic
final class CheckoutCoordinator {
    func completeOrder() async {
        // Business logic leaked into coordinator!
        let total = cart.items.reduce(0) { $0 + $1.price }
        let tax = total * 0.08
        try await paymentService.charge(total + tax)
    }
}

// ✅ Coordinator orchestrates, ViewModel/UseCase handles logic
final class CheckoutCoordinator {
    func showCheckout() {
        let viewModel = CheckoutViewModel(
            cartService: container.cartService,
            paymentService: container.paymentService
        )
        // ViewModel handles business logic
    }
}

NEVER let views know about coordinator hierarchy:

// ❌ View knows about parent coordinator
struct LoginView: View {
    let coordinator: LoginCoordinator

    var body: some View {
        Button("Done") {
            coordinator.parent?.childDidFinish(coordinator)  // Wrong!
        }
    }
}

// ✅ View only knows its immediate coordinator
struct LoginView: View {
    let coordinator: LoginCoordinator

    var body: some View {
        Button("Done") {
            coordinator.completeLogin()  // Coordinator handles delegation
        }
    }
}

SwiftUI-Specific

NEVER create coordinators as @StateObject in child views:

// ❌ New coordinator created on every parent rebuild
struct ParentView: View {
    var body: some View {
        ChildView()  // Child creates its own coordinator
    }
}

struct ChildView: View {
    @StateObject var coordinator = ChildCoordinator()  // Wrong!
}

// ✅ Parent creates and owns coordinator
struct ParentView: View {
    @StateObject var childCoordinator = ChildCoordinator()

    var body: some View {
        ChildView(coordinator: childCoordinator)
    }
}

NEVER use NavigationLink directly when using coordinators:

// ❌ Bypasses coordinator — navigation untracked
struct UserListView: View {
    var body: some View {
        NavigationLink("User") {
            UserDetailView()  // Coordinator doesn't know about this!
        }
    }
}

// ✅ Delegate navigation to coordinator
struct UserListView: View {
    @ObservedObject var coordinator: UsersCoordinator

    var body: some View {
        Button("User") {
            coordinator.showUserDetail(userId: "123")
        }
    }
}

Essential Patterns

SwiftUI Coordinator Protocol

@MainActor
protocol Coordinator: ObservableObject {
    associatedtype Route: Hashable
    var path: NavigationPath { get set }

    func start() -> AnyView
    func navigate(to route: Route)
    func pop()
    func popToRoot()
}

extension Coordinator {
    func pop() {
        guard !path.isEmpty else { return }
        path.removeLast()
    }

    func popToRoot() {
        path = NavigationPath()
    }
}

Parent-Child Coordinator

@MainActor
protocol ParentCoordinatorProtocol: AnyObject {
    var childCoordinators: [any Coordinator] { get set }
    func addChild(_ coordinator: any Coordinator)
    func removeChild(_ coordinator: any Coordinator)
}

extension ParentCoordinatorProtocol {
    func addChild(_ coordinator: any Coordinator) {
        childCoordinators.append(coordinator)
    }

    func removeChild(_ coordinator: any Coordinator) {
        childCoordinators.removeAll { $0 === coordinator as AnyObject }
    }
}

// Tab coordinator managing child coordinators
@MainActor
final class TabCoordinator: ParentCoordinatorProtocol, ObservableObject {
    var childCoordinators: [any Coordinator] = []

    lazy var homeCoordinator: HomeCoordinator = {
        let coordinator = HomeCoordinator()
        coordinator.parent = self
        addChild(coordinator)
        return coordinator
    }()

    lazy var profileCoordinator: ProfileCoordinator = {
        let coordinator = ProfileCoordinator()
        coordinator.parent = self
        addChild(coordinator)
        return coordinator
    }()
}

Flow Completion with Result

protocol LoginCoordinatorDelegate: AnyObject {
    func loginCoordinator(_ coordinator: LoginCoordinator, didFinishWith result: LoginResult)
}

enum LoginResult {
    case success(User)
    case cancelled
}

@MainActor
final class LoginCoordinator: ObservableObject {
    weak var delegate: LoginCoordinatorDelegate?
    @Published var path = NavigationPath()

    enum Route: Hashable {
        case credentials
        case forgotPassword
        case twoFactor(email: String)
    }

    func completeLogin(user: User) {
        delegate?.loginCoordinator(self, didFinishWith: .success(user))
    }

    func cancel() {
        delegate?.loginCoordinator(self, didFinishWith: .cancelled)
    }
}

Deep Link Integration

@MainActor
final class AppCoordinator: ObservableObject, ParentCoordinatorProtocol {
    var childCoordinators: [any Coordinator] = []
    @Published var path = NavigationPath()

    func handle(deepLink: DeepLink) {
        // Reset to known state
        popToRoot()
        childCoordinators.forEach { removeChild($0) }

        // Navigate to deep link destination
        switch deepLink {
        case .user(let id):
            navigate(to: .userList)
            navigate(to: .userDetail(userId: id))

        case .checkout:
            let checkoutCoordinator = CheckoutCoordinator()
            checkoutCoordinator.delegate = self
            addChild(checkoutCoordinator)
            // Present checkout flow

        case .settings(let section):
            navigate(to: .settings)
            if let section = section {
                navigate(to: .settingsSection(section))
            }
        }
    }
}

Quick Reference

Coordinator Checklist

  • Coordinator owns NavigationPath (SwiftUI) or UINavigationController (UIKit)
  • Parent-child references are weak
  • Child coordinators removed on flow completion
  • Views don't know about coordinator hierarchy
  • Business logic stays in ViewModels/UseCases
  • Deep links handled at appropriate coordinator level

When to Use Coordinators

ScenarioUse Coordinator?
Simple 3-5 screen appNo — simple Router
Multiple independent flowsYes
Deep linking requiredLikely yes
Multi-step wizard flowsYes
Cross-tab navigationYes
A/B testing navigationYes
Team-based feature ownershipYes

Red Flags

SmellProblemFix
childCoordinators grows foreverMemory leakRemove on completion
Strong parent referenceRetain cycleUse weak or delegate
Business logic in coordinatorWrong layerMove to ViewModel/UseCase
View creates NavigationLinkBypasses coordinatorDelegate to coordinator
@StateObject coordinator in childRecreated on rebuildParent owns coordinator
Coordinator creates its own viewsCan't inject dependenciesUse ViewFactory

Coordinator vs Router

AspectCoordinatorRouter
ComplexityHigherLower
Hierarchy supportYes (parent-child)No
Flow isolationStrongWeak
TestingExcellentGood
Learning curveSteepGentle
Best forLarge apps, teamsSmall-medium apps

平台分布

Antigravity

30.28%
按下载量换算38

windsurf

24.54%
按下载量换算31

Claude Code

18.62%
按下载量换算24

OpenCode

12.99%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.55%
按下载量换算11

Codex

3.51%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills