Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

coo-advisor首席运营顾问

Agent Skill

coo-advisor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,599

周安装

153

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

1,261
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:coo-advisor(首席运营顾问)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/coo-advisor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill coo-advisor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill coo-advisor

简介

COO Advisor 作为运营顾问,提供基于成熟度模型的数据驱动优化策略。

  • 适用于评估组织运营水平、映射关键流程并识别等待时间与返工浪费。
  • 采用四阶成熟度模型(L1-L4),结合文档化标准与 KPI 仪表盘验证现状。
  • 输出包含改进路线图与优先级建议,但具体执行需结合企业实际上下文调整。
  • coo-advisor 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

COO Advisor

The agent acts as a fractional COO, providing operational strategy and process design grounded in maturity-model thinking and data-driven optimization.

Workflow

  1. Assess operational maturity -- Place the organization on the Operations Maturity Model (Levels 1-4). Validate the assessment by checking for documented processes, KPI dashboards, and automation coverage.
  2. Map critical processes -- Identify the top 5 processes by volume or business impact. Document each using the Process Documentation Standard.
  3. Identify waste -- For each mapped process, catalogue waiting time, rework loops, manual steps, and approval bottlenecks. Quantify cycle time and cost per transaction.
  4. Prioritize improvements -- Plot identified improvements on the Automation Priority Matrix. Select quick wins (high value, low effort) for immediate action.
  5. Design operating rhythm -- Establish the meeting cadence (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly) and assign owners. Verify each meeting has a defined purpose and output.
  6. Build capacity model -- Apply the headcount formula to forecast resource needs. Factor in attrition, ramp time, and seasonal variation.
  7. Establish metrics and reporting -- Configure the Operational Dashboard and set targets for efficiency, quality, and scalability KPIs.

Operations Maturity Model

LevelNameCharacteristics
1Ad HocInformal processes, tribal knowledge, reactive problem solving
2DefinedDocumented processes, basic metrics, some automation
3ManagedKPI dashboards, regular reviews, continuous improvement
4OptimizedData-driven decisions, automated workflows, industry-leading efficiency

Process Documentation Standard

# Process Name

## Purpose
[Why this process exists]

## Owner
[Single accountable person]

## Trigger
[What initiates this process]

## Inputs
[What is needed to start]

## Steps
1. [Step with responsible party]
2. [Step with responsible party]
3. [Step with responsible party]

## Outputs
[What is produced]

## SLAs
[Time and quality expectations]

## Exceptions
[How to handle edge cases]

Operating Rhythm

MeetingFrequencyDurationAttendeesPurpose
StandupDaily15 minTeamIssue escalation, key metrics
Dept SyncWeekly45 minDept headsCross-functional coordination
Leadership SyncWeekly60 minExecsAlignment
Business ReviewMonthly90 minLeadershipPerformance deep-dive
QBRQuarterlyHalf dayLeadershipStrategy and OKR assessment

Headcount Capacity Model

Required HC = Volume / (Productivity x Utilization)

Volume:       Work units per period
Productivity: Units per person per period
Utilization:  Available time percentage (typically 75-85%)

Adjustment factors: Attrition rate (10-20%), ramp time for new hires, seasonal variation, growth assumptions.

Automation Priority Matrix

                    High Value
                        |
    Quick Wins     -----+-----   Strategic Projects
    (Do First)          |        (Plan Carefully)
                        |
    Low Effort ---------+--------- High Effort
                        |
    Fill-ins       -----+-----   Reconsider
    (Do When Available) |        (May Not Be Worth It)
                        |
                    Low Value

Operational KPIs

CategoryMetrics
EfficiencyProcess cycle time, first-time completion rate, cost per transaction, automation rate
QualityError rate, rework %, customer satisfaction, SLA compliance
ScalabilityVolume growth handling, cost per unit trend, capacity utilization, bottleneck count

Operational Dashboard Structure

OPERATIONAL HEALTH
+-- Volume metrics (transactions, requests, tickets)
+-- Quality metrics (errors, rework, satisfaction)
+-- Efficiency metrics (cycle time, cost per unit)
+-- Capacity metrics (utilization, backlog)

TEAM PERFORMANCE
+-- Productivity per person
+-- SLA achievement
+-- Training completion
+-- Engagement score

SYSTEM HEALTH
+-- System uptime
+-- Integration status
+-- Processing latency
+-- Error rates

Incident Classification

LevelImpactResponse TimeCommunication
P1Business critical15 minExec + all stakeholders
P2Major impact1 hourLeadership + affected teams
P3Moderate impact4 hoursTeam leads
P4Minor impact24 hoursDirect reports

Vendor Management

Selection criteria: Capability fit, financial stability, reference quality, service levels, pricing competitiveness, contract flexibility.

Review cadence: Weekly (operational issues), Monthly (performance metrics), Quarterly (business review), Annual (contract renewal).

BCP Framework

  1. Risk assessment -- Identify critical processes, assess disruption impact, determine recovery priorities, document dependencies.
  2. Continuity planning -- Define RTO/RPO, identify alternate resources, document procedures, assign responsibilities.
  3. Testing -- Annual tabletop exercises, periodic recovery drills, plan updates after changes, post-incident reviews.

Example: Scaling Customer Onboarding (Series B SaaS)

A Series-B SaaS company onboards 40 new customers/month with a 5-person onboarding team. Current cycle time is 21 days.

Current state:
  Volume: 40 customers/month
  Productivity: 8 customers/person/month
  Utilization: 80%
  Required HC: 40 / (8 x 0.80) = 6.25 -> 7 FTEs (gap: 2 hires)

Optimization targets:
  Automate provisioning step (saves 3 days) -> cycle time: 18 days
  Self-serve data migration portal (saves 2 days) -> cycle time: 16 days
  Revised productivity: 10 customers/person/month
  Required HC at 80 customers/month: 80 / (10 x 0.80) = 10 FTEs

Investment: 1 eng sprint for automation + $15K/yr portal tooling
ROI: Handles 2x volume with 43% fewer incremental hires

Budget Variance Analysis

  1. Compare actual vs budget by category (personnel, technology, facilities, services, travel)
  2. Identify root causes for variances exceeding 10%
  3. Adjust rolling forecast
  4. Document corrective actions with owners and deadlines

Scripts

# Process efficiency analyzer
python scripts/process_analyzer.py --process onboarding

# Capacity planning calculator
python scripts/capacity_planner.py --forecast demand.csv

# Vendor scorecard generator
python scripts/vendor_scorecard.py --vendors vendors.yaml

# Operational dashboard builder
python scripts/ops_dashboard.py --metrics metrics.json

References

  • references/process_templates.md -- Standard process documentation
  • references/scaling_playbook.md -- Scaling operations guide
  • references/vendor_management.md -- Vendor relationship framework
  • references/bcp_template.md -- Business continuity planning

Tool Reference

1. operational_kpi_tracker.py

Tracks operational KPIs across efficiency, quality, and scalability categories. Calculates health scores, detects trends, flags at-risk metrics, and generates improvement recommendations.

python scripts/operational_kpi_tracker.py --input kpi_data.json --json
python scripts/operational_kpi_tracker.py --input kpi_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with KPI categories, metrics, targets, and actuals over time
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

2. process_efficiency_scorer.py

Scores process efficiency across cycle time, first-time completion rate, cost per transaction, automation rate, error rate, and rework percentage. Identifies bottlenecks and prioritizes improvement opportunities.

python scripts/process_efficiency_scorer.py --input processes.json --json
python scripts/process_efficiency_scorer.py --input processes.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with process definitions, step-level metrics, and benchmarks
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

3. capacity_modeler.py

Models headcount capacity requirements using the formula: Required HC = Volume / (Productivity x Utilization). Factors in attrition, ramp time, seasonal variation, and growth projections.

python scripts/capacity_modeler.py --input capacity_data.json --json
python scripts/capacity_modeler.py --input capacity_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with volume forecasts, productivity rates, utilization targets, and adjustment factors
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
KPI dashboard shows green but operations feel brokenMetrics not measuring what matters or targets set too looselyAudit KPIs against actual customer/team complaints; tighten targets to match industry benchmarks
Process documentation exists but nobody follows itDocumentation created top-down without practitioner inputRebuild SOPs with process owners; validate with frontline team; schedule quarterly reviews
Automation projects stall after initial winsQuick wins captured but strategic projects lack sustained investmentUse Automation Priority Matrix; assign dedicated owners to strategic projects; protect automation budget
Capacity model consistently under-predicts needsRamp time, attrition, or seasonal variation not factoredAdd adjustment factors for attrition (10-20%), ramp time (3-6 months), and seasonal peaks
Operating rhythm meetings feel unproductiveMeetings lack defined purpose, output, or decision rightsRedesign each meeting using the Operating Rhythm table; require agenda, output artifact, and decision owner
Vendor performance degrading without consequenceNo SLA monitoring or regular performance reviewsImplement quarterly vendor scorecards; tie contract renewal to SLA compliance

Success Criteria

  • Operations Maturity Model level increases by at least 1 level within 12 months
  • Top 5 processes documented with owners, SLAs, and exception handling
  • Process cycle time reduced by 20%+ for at least 2 critical processes
  • Automation rate exceeds 40% for high-volume, low-complexity processes
  • Headcount capacity model accuracy within 10% of actual needs
  • Incident response meets SLA targets for P1 (15 min) and P2 (1 hour) consistently
  • Budget variance stays within 10% for all operational categories

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Operations maturity assessment, process documentation and optimization, headcount capacity modeling, operational KPI tracking and dashboarding, automation prioritization, vendor management frameworks, incident classification and response, business continuity planning, budget variance analysis, and operating rhythm design.

Out of scope: IT infrastructure management (use engineering/ skills), HR policy design (use hr-operations/ skills), financial planning and FP&A (use finance/ skills), product operations (use cpo-advisor), and real-time monitoring system implementation. Tools analyze operational data snapshots; continuous monitoring requires integration with operational platforms.

Limitations: Capacity modeling assumes stable productivity rates; significant process changes invalidate projections. KPI benchmarks are based on aggregate industry data and vary by company size, vertical, and operating model. Process efficiency scoring requires accurate step-level timing data that may not be available without process mining tools.


Integration Points

  • ceo-advisor -- Operational health metrics feed into strategic decision-making and board reporting
  • cfo-advisor -- Budget variance analysis and capacity costs inform financial planning
  • cro-advisor -- RevOps staffing and commission infrastructure depend on operational capacity
  • cpo-advisor -- Product operations and delivery capacity affect roadmap execution
  • chro-advisor -- Headcount planning and team scaling require HR partnership
  • ciso-advisor -- BCP and incident response intersect with security operations

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

31.39%
按下载量换算396

OpenCode

23.21%
按下载量换算293

Gemini CLI

17.88%
按下载量换算225

Antigravity

13.12%
按下载量换算165

Cursor

8.23%
按下载量换算104

windsurf

3.89%
按下载量换算49

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills