Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

conversation-ab-testing(对话 ab 测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

conversation-ab-testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 12下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:conversation-ab-testing(对话 ab 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills
仓库路径:skills/conversation-ab-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill conversation-ab-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill conversation-ab-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

conversation-ab-testing 用于对话级别的消息变体测试与销售机器人优化。聚焦单个回复效果而非整体序列,提升转化率测量精度。帮助构建能自动评估不同话术表现的系统。适用于电商客服、营销自动化等需要精细化沟通策略的场景。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/conversation-ab-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill conversation-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

conversation-ab-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill conversation-ab-testing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

conversation-ab-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

conversation-ab-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

conversation-ab-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

conversation-ab-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

conversation-ab-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
conversation-ab-testing

对话 ab 测试 · 本页

18812权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Conversation A/B Testing at the Message Level

You are an expert in building sales bots that test individual message variants within conversations. Your goal is to help developers create systems that optimize not just sequences, but individual replies for maximum effectiveness.

Why Message-Level Testing Matters

Sequence-Level Limitations

Testing whole sequences:
- Email 1 + Email 2 + Email 3 = Sequence A
- Need hundreds of sends per variant
- Slow to reach significance
- Don't know which message made the difference

Sequence A: 5% reply rate
Sequence B: 7% reply rate
Which message drove the improvement? Unknown.

Message-Level Testing

Testing individual messages:
- Test Email 1 variants across all sequences
- Reach significance faster
- Know exactly what works
- Compound improvements

Email 1A: 15% open, 2% reply
Email 1B: 18% open, 3% reply
Clear winner, immediately usable.

Test Types

Subject Line Tests

Test variants:
A: "Quick question about [Company]"
B: "[Name], question about [pain point]"
C: "Saw your post on [topic]"

Metrics:
- Open rate (primary)
- Reply rate (secondary)
- Spam rate (guardrail)

Sample size: 50-100 per variant minimum

Opening Line Tests

Test variants:
A: "I noticed [Company] just [event]..."
B: "Fellow [industry] professional here..."
C: "Not sure if this is relevant, but..."

Metrics:
- Reply rate (primary)
- Positive vs negative replies
- Conversation continuation

CTA Tests

Test variants:
A: "Worth a 15-minute call?"
B: "Open to learning more?"
C: "What's the best way to continue this?"
D: "Reply with 'yes' if interested"

Metrics:
- Reply rate
- Meeting conversion
- Quality of responses

Tone/Style Tests

Test variants:
A: Formal professional
B: Casual conversational
C: Direct and brief
D: Storytelling approach

Metrics:
- Engagement rate
- Sentiment of responses
- Conversion to meeting

Implementation

Test Architecture

class MessageABTest:
    def __init__(self, test_config):
        self.test_id = generate_id()
        self.variants = test_config.variants
        self.metrics = test_config.metrics
        self.traffic_split = test_config.split  # e.g., [0.5, 0.5]
        self.min_sample = test_config.min_sample
        self.status = "running"
        self.results = {v.id: {"sent": 0, "results": {}} for v in self.variants}

    def select_variant(self, context):
        if self.should_use_winner():
            return self.get_winner()

        # Random assignment with traffic split
        rand = random.random()
        cumulative = 0
        for i, split in enumerate(self.traffic_split):
            cumulative += split
            if rand < cumulative:
                return self.variants[i]

    def record_result(self, variant_id, metric, value):
        self.results[variant_id]["results"].setdefault(metric, []).append(value)
        self.results[variant_id]["sent"] += 1
        self.check_significance()

    def check_significance(self):
        if all(v["sent"] >= self.min_sample for v in self.results.values()):
            winner = self.calculate_winner()
            if winner and winner["confidence"] >= 0.95:
                self.status = "completed"
                self.winner = winner

Variant Selection Logic

def select_message_variant(message_type, context):
    # Find active tests for this message type
    active_tests = get_active_tests(message_type)

    if not active_tests:
        return get_default_message(message_type, context)

    # Select test (if multiple, pick highest priority)
    test = select_test(active_tests, context)

    # Get variant assignment
    variant = test.select_variant(context)

    # Log assignment for tracking
    log_test_assignment(
        test_id=test.test_id,
        variant_id=variant.id,
        context_id=context.conversation_id
    )

    return variant.content

Result Tracking

def track_message_result(message_id, event):
    # Get test assignment
    assignment = get_test_assignment(message_id)
    if not assignment:
        return

    test = get_test(assignment.test_id)

    # Map event to metric
    metric_map = {
        "opened": "open_rate",
        "clicked": "click_rate",
        "replied": "reply_rate",
        "meeting_booked": "conversion_rate",
        "positive_reply": "positive_sentiment_rate"
    }

    metric = metric_map.get(event.type)
    if metric:
        test.record_result(
            variant_id=assignment.variant_id,
            metric=metric,
            value=event.value
        )

Statistical Analysis

Sample Size Calculation

def calculate_sample_size(baseline_rate, min_detectable_effect, power=0.8, alpha=0.05):
    """
    baseline_rate: Current conversion rate (e.g., 0.02 for 2%)
    min_detectable_effect: Minimum relative improvement to detect (e.g., 0.2 for 20%)
    """
    from scipy import stats

    p1 = baseline_rate
    p2 = baseline_rate * (1 + min_detectable_effect)
    effect_size = abs(p2 - p1) / ((p1 * (1-p1) + p2 * (1-p2)) / 2) ** 0.5

    z_alpha = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha/2)
    z_beta = stats.norm.ppf(power)

    n = 2 * ((z_alpha + z_beta) / effect_size) ** 2
    return int(n)

# Example:
# Baseline: 2% reply rate
# Want to detect 25% relative improvement (2% → 2.5%)
# Need ~3,200 sends per variant

Significance Testing

def test_significance(variant_a_results, variant_b_results, metric):
    from scipy import stats

    a_successes = sum(variant_a_results[metric])
    a_trials = len(variant_a_results[metric])
    b_successes = sum(variant_b_results[metric])
    b_trials = len(variant_b_results[metric])

    # Chi-square test for proportions
    contingency = [
        [a_successes, a_trials - a_successes],
        [b_successes, b_trials - b_successes]
    ]

    chi2, p_value, dof, expected = stats.chi2_contingency(contingency)

    return {
        "variant_a_rate": a_successes / a_trials,
        "variant_b_rate": b_successes / b_trials,
        "p_value": p_value,
        "significant": p_value < 0.05,
        "winner": "A" if a_successes/a_trials > b_successes/b_trials else "B"
    }

Multi-Armed Bandit

class ThompsonSampling:
    """
    Balances exploration vs exploitation during testing.
    Automatically shifts traffic to winning variants.
    """
    def __init__(self, variants):
        self.variants = variants
        self.successes = {v: 1 for v in variants}  # Prior
        self.failures = {v: 1 for v in variants}   # Prior

    def select_variant(self):
        samples = {}
        for variant in self.variants:
            # Sample from beta distribution
            samples[variant] = random.betavariate(
                self.successes[variant],
                self.failures[variant]
            )
        return max(samples, key=samples.get)

    def update(self, variant, success):
        if success:
            self.successes[variant] += 1
        else:
            self.failures[variant] += 1

Test Management

Test Lifecycle

1. Hypothesis: "Personalized subject lines increase open rates"
2. Design: Create variants A and B
3. Configure: Set metrics, sample size, traffic split
4. Launch: Begin test
5. Monitor: Track interim results
6. Analyze: Check for significance
7. Conclude: Declare winner or inconclusive
8. Deploy: Roll out winner, archive loser

Concurrent Test Management

def can_run_test(new_test, active_tests):
    """Prevent test interference"""

    for test in active_tests:
        # Same message position = conflict
        if test.message_position == new_test.message_position:
            return False, "Conflict with existing test at same position"

        # Same audience segment = potential conflict
        if overlaps(test.audience, new_test.audience) > 0.5:
            return False, "Audience overlap >50% with active test"

    return True, None

def prioritize_tests(tests, context):
    """When multiple tests could apply, pick one"""

    eligible = [t for t in tests if t.matches_context(context)]

    if not eligible:
        return None

    # Priority: Lower sample progress = higher priority (needs more data)
    return min(eligible, key=lambda t: t.sample_progress)

Metrics & Reporting

Test Dashboard

def generate_test_report(test_id):
    test = get_test(test_id)

    return {
        "test_info": {
            "id": test.test_id,
            "hypothesis": test.hypothesis,
            "start_date": test.started_at,
            "status": test.status
        },
        "variants": [
            {
                "id": v.id,
                "description": v.description,
                "sent": test.results[v.id]["sent"],
                "metrics": calculate_metrics(test.results[v.id])
            }
            for v in test.variants
        ],
        "significance": {
            "is_significant": test.is_significant,
            "p_value": test.p_value,
            "confidence": test.confidence,
            "winner": test.winner
        },
        "recommendation": generate_recommendation(test)
    }

Automated Insights

def generate_insights(completed_tests):
    insights = []

    # Pattern detection across tests
    personalization_tests = [t for t in completed_tests if "personalization" in t.tags]
    if personalization_tests:
        personalized_wins = sum(1 for t in personalization_tests if t.personalized_won)
        insights.append({
            "insight": f"Personalization won {personalized_wins}/{len(personalization_tests)} tests",
            "recommendation": "Prioritize personalization in messages"
        })

    # Identify winning patterns
    winning_variants = [t.winning_variant for t in completed_tests]
    common_patterns = extract_common_patterns(winning_variants)
    for pattern in common_patterns:
        insights.append({
            "insight": f"Pattern '{pattern}' appears in {pattern.frequency}% of winners",
            "recommendation": f"Include '{pattern}' in message templates"
        })

    return insights

Best Practices

Test Design

1. One variable at a time
   - Don't test subject + body + CTA together
   - Isolate the variable

2. Meaningful differences
   - Don't test "Hi" vs "Hello"
   - Test different approaches

3. Representative samples
   - Random assignment
   - Avoid segment bias

4. Sufficient sample size
   - Calculate before starting
   - Wait for significance

Common Pitfalls

Avoid:
- Peeking and stopping early
- Running too many tests at once
- Testing tiny differences
- Ignoring secondary metrics
- Not accounting for seasonality

Do:
- Pre-register hypothesis
- Set sample size in advance
- Consider all relevant metrics
- Account for time-based factors

平台分布

Codex

35.93%
按下载量换算24

Claude

30.87%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.51%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.62%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills