Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

contract-review-agent合同审查 Agent

Agent Skill

contract-review-agent 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

13,301

周安装

550

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

4,522
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contract-review-agent(合同审查 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/samledger67-dotcom/contract-review-agent
安装命令:
openclaw skills install contract-review-agent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install contract-review-agent

简介

contract-review-agent 分析合同条款、标记风险点并跟踪续订义务。

  • 适用于供应商协议、SaaS 合同或业务合作文本的审查场景。
  • 通过本地分析提取关键信息和建议。
  • 使用前无需联网,但需确保文件可访问。
  • 建议结合法律背景复核输出结论。contract-review-agent 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
contract-review-agent
version
1.0.0
description
>
tags

Contract Review Agent

Analyze contracts quickly: surface risky clauses, extract obligations, track renewals, and generate summaries — without replacing attorney review for high-stakes agreements.


When to Use

  • Reviewing vendor/supplier agreements before signing
  • Auditing SaaS subscription terms (auto-renewal traps, data ownership, liability caps)
  • Extracting obligations and deadlines from active contracts
  • Building a contract renewal calendar
  • Generating executive summaries for leadership review
  • Flagging red-flag clauses (indemnification, limitation of liability, IP assignment)
  • Comparing two contract versions for material changes

When NOT to Use

  • Litigation strategy or legal advice — always involve licensed counsel
  • M&A agreements, securities contracts, complex IP licensing — specialized attorney required
  • Drafting new contracts from scratch — use a legal drafting tool or attorney
  • Regulatory filings that require attorney signature — out of scope
  • Final approval gate — this tool surfaces issues; humans make binding decisions

Key Capabilities

1. Clause Risk Analysis

Identify and score risky clauses across five risk categories:

CategoryExamples
FinancialAuto-renewal, price escalation, penalty clauses, payment terms
LiabilityIndemnification scope, liability caps, consequential damages waivers
TerminationNotice periods, termination for convenience, cure periods
IP & DataIP assignment, data ownership, confidentiality obligations
OperationalSLA commitments, exclusivity, non-compete, change-of-control

Risk scores: 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low


2. Obligation Extraction

Pull structured obligation data from contract text:

OBLIGATIONS EXTRACTED
─────────────────────
Party: [Vendor/Client/Both]
Obligation: [Description]
Deadline/Frequency: [Date or recurring schedule]
Consequence of breach: [Penalty, termination right, etc.]
Owner (internal): [Department or role to assign]

3. Renewal & Deadline Calendar

Build a renewal tracker from extracted dates:

CONTRACT CALENDAR
─────────────────
Contract: [Name / Counterparty]
Effective Date: [Date]
Initial Term: [Duration]
Auto-Renewal: [Yes/No] — [X days notice to cancel]
⚠️  Cancel-by Date: [Date] — [X days from today]
Expiration: [Date]
Next Review: [Recommended review date]

Flag contracts where the cancel-by date is within 60 days.


4. Executive Summary Template

CONTRACT SUMMARY
────────────────
Agreement: [Type] — [Counterparty]
Date: [Effective] | Term: [Duration]
Value: [Contract value / annual spend]

KEY TERMS
• Payment: [Net 30/60, milestones, etc.]
• Liability cap: [Amount or formula]
• Termination: [Notice period, conditions]
• Auto-renewal: [Yes/No + notice window]

TOP RISKS (Flagged)
🔴 [Risk 1 — clause reference]
🟡 [Risk 2 — clause reference]

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. [Action + owner + deadline]
2. [Action + owner + deadline]

ATTORNEY REVIEW NEEDED: [Yes/No — reason]

5. Contract Comparison (Redline Review)

When comparing two versions:

  1. Identify added/removed/modified clauses
  2. Flag material changes (financial impact, rights, obligations)
  3. Summarize net change in risk profile
  4. Highlight any clauses that were previously accepted and are now altered

Workflow: Review a Contract

Step 1 — Ingest

# PDF contract
pdf contract.pdf "Extract all clauses, obligations, dates, and parties"

# Or paste text directly into prompt

Step 2 — Structured Extraction Prompt

Review this contract and provide:

1. PARTIES — Full legal names, roles (buyer/seller/licensor/etc.)
2. TERM — Effective date, duration, renewal terms, notice windows
3. FINANCIAL TERMS — Payment amounts, schedules, escalation clauses, penalties
4. OBLIGATIONS — All commitments by each party with deadlines
5. RISK FLAGS — Rank each flagged clause 🔴/🟡/🟢 with section reference
6. TERMINATION — How can each party exit? What are the conditions?
7. GOVERNING LAW — Jurisdiction, dispute resolution method
8. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS — What needs attorney review? What can be negotiated?

Format as structured sections. Be specific — include section numbers.

Step 3 — Output Artifacts

  • Risk Register: Spreadsheet row per risk (clause, category, severity, owner, action)
  • Obligation Log: Task list with owners and due dates
  • Renewal Calendar: Dates loaded into calendar system
  • Executive Summary: 1-page PDF for leadership sign-off

Common Red Flags by Contract Type

SaaS/Software Agreements

  • Auto-renewal with short cancel window (< 30 days notice)
  • Data ownership vague or assigned to vendor
  • Unlimited liability for IP infringement
  • Unilateral price increase rights
  • Broad "acceptable use" termination triggers

Vendor/Supplier Agreements

  • Price escalation tied to CPI or vendor discretion
  • Indemnification that covers third-party claims broadly
  • Exclusivity clauses limiting your options
  • IP developed jointly assigned fully to vendor
  • Termination fees that exceed remaining contract value

Client Engagement Letters (Accounting/Finance)

  • Scope of services defined too broadly (scope creep risk)
  • Liability cap below engagement fee
  • No limitation on client reliance on deliverables
  • Governing law outside your state
  • No clear change-order process

NDAs

  • One-sided (only you are bound)
  • Perpetual term with no sunset
  • Overly broad definition of "confidential information"
  • No carve-outs for publicly available information
  • Residuals clause allowing retained memory of disclosed info

Contract Inventory Maintenance

Keep a running inventory. Recommended fields:

| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| contract_id | Unique internal ID |
| counterparty | Vendor/client legal name |
| contract_type | NDA / MSA / SOW / SaaS / Lease / etc. |
| effective_date | When it started |
| expiration_date | Hard end date |
| auto_renewal | Yes/No |
| cancel_by_date | Calculated: expiration - notice window |
| annual_value | Dollar amount |
| risk_score | 1-5 overall |
| owner | Internal owner (name/department) |
| location | File path or doc URL |
| last_reviewed | Date of last review |
| notes | Key flags or negotiation history |

Integration with PrecisionLedger Workflows

  • AP/AR: Cross-reference payment terms in contracts against actual invoice terms — flag discrepancies
  • Compliance Monitor: Load contract obligations into compliance calendar alongside regulatory deadlines
  • Financial Reporting: Flag contracts with contingent liabilities (indemnification, guarantees) for disclosure
  • Client Onboarding: Use engagement letter checklist during new client setup
  • Budget Forecasting: Extract contract escalation clauses to model future spend increases

Escalation Rules

Always escalate to licensed attorney when:

  • Contract value > $50,000
  • Indemnification is unlimited or uncapped
  • IP assignment affects core business assets
  • Personal liability clauses (executive sign-off required)
  • Governing law is outside your operating jurisdiction
  • Any clause that waives statutory rights
  • M&A, securities, or financing-related terms appear

Example Run

Input: SaaS vendor agreement PDF

Output:

RISK SUMMARY — Acme SaaS Agreement (2026-03-15)
────────────────────────────────────────────────
🔴 HIGH: Auto-renewal — 7 days cancel notice only (§12.3)
   → Cancel-by date: 2026-03-22. ACTION: Decide NOW.

🔴 HIGH: Data ownership — "all data processed becomes vendor property" (§8.1)
   → Unacceptable. Negotiate or reject.

🟡 MEDIUM: Liability cap — capped at 1 month fees (§15.2)
   → Low coverage for a $24k/year contract. Push for 12 months.

🟡 MEDIUM: Price escalation — up to 15% annual increase, no notice required (§5.4)
   → Budget risk. Request 30-day notice + cap at CPI.

🟢 LOW: Governing law — Texas (§20.1)
   → Acceptable, matches our jurisdiction.

OBLIGATIONS (Your side):
• Pay net-30 from invoice date (§5.1) — Finance/AP
• Provide access credentials within 5 business days of signing (§3.2) — IT
• Report data breaches within 24 hours (§9.4) — Security/Compliance

ATTORNEY REVIEW: YES — §8.1 data ownership clause is non-standard and high-risk.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.93%
按下载量换算4,293

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills