Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

content-writer(内容作家)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

content-writer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,631。

总安装 644周安装 12GitHub Stars 111下载 97核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:content-writer(内容作家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/chrispangg/deepagentsdk
仓库路径:skills/content-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/chrispangg/deepagentsdk --skill content-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/chrispangg/deepagentsdk --skill content-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

动态选择适配平台与受众的写作风格生成优质内容。支持深度技术博客、LinkedIn 专业帖、X/Twitter 短讯等多种体裁。根据平台、读者群体与深度要求自动匹配最佳表达方式。输出前需确认目标平台与受众特征以确保风格准确。content-writer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/content-writer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/chrispangg/deepagentsdk --skill content-writer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

content-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/chrispangg/deepagentsdk --skill content-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

content-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

content-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

content-writer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

content-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 644 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 97 次,GitHub 111 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

content-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
content-writer

内容作家 · 本页

644111需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Content Writer

Overview

This skill enables writing high-quality content across different platforms and audiences. It dynamically selects the appropriate writing style based on the task, then applies that style consistently. Available styles include deep technical blog posts, social media content (LinkedIn, X/Twitter), tutorials, and more.

Style Selection

Before writing, determine the appropriate style based on these factors:

FactorConsider
PlatformBlog, LinkedIn, X/Twitter, documentation, newsletter
AudienceEngineers, executives, general tech audience, developers
DepthDeep-dive technical, lightweight explainer, announcement
ToneAuthoritative, conversational, promotional, educational
LengthLong-form (2000+ words), medium (500-1500), short (<500), thread

Style Decision Tree

Is this for social media?
├─ Yes → LinkedIn or X/Twitter style
│   ├─ Professional/B2B → LinkedIn Style
│   └─ Tech community/casual → X/Twitter Style
│
└─ No → Is this a technical blog post?
    ├─ Yes → What voice/style?
    │   ├─ Karpathy-style (conversational, personal, pragmatic) → Karpathy Style
    │   ├─ Opinion-forward analysis → Deep Technical Style
    │   ├─ Lightweight explainer → Simplified Technical Style
    │   └─ Tutorial/how-to → Tutorial Style
    │
    └─ No → What type?
        ├─ Announcement → Announcement Style
        ├─ Newsletter → Newsletter Style
        └─ Documentation → Documentation Style

Available Styles

1. Karpathy Style (Conversational Technical)

Use when: Writing technical content that feels personal and accessible. Best for blog posts about AI/ML, tutorials, or technical essays where you want the voice of an expert friend explaining things over coffee.

Characteristics:

  • First-person, conversational tone ("I've found that...", "Here's what I learned...")
  • Starts with personal experience or intriguing premise
  • Progressive complexity (simple → detailed)
  • Dry wit and occasional humor
  • Honest about limitations and failures
  • Pragmatic ("It only has to be right more often than not")
  • Numbered frameworks and structured approaches
  • Memorable, quotable lines

Load: references/karpathy-style.md for comprehensive guidance

Core Philosophy: "Don't be a hero. Start simple. Be patient."

Opening Hooks (choose one):

PatternExample
Personal experience"I still remember when I trained my first recurrent network..."
Intriguing premise"We're going to feed 2 million selfies to a neural network and have it tell us what makes a selfie good."
Leaky abstraction"Neural nets are not 'off-the-shelf' technology the second you deviate slightly from training an ImageNet classifier."
Strong observation"Trees are solidified air."

Example opening:

"I've trained a lot of neural networks over the years and I've come to find that the process isn't nearly as simple as it seems. They are a leaky abstraction. Here's what I've learned."

Tweet/X style (short-form):

  • Pithy observations that compress insight
  • Strong statements (90% true, ignore counterexample police)
  • Unexpected connections between domains
  • Personal candor about struggles and discoveries

2. Deep Technical Style (Opinion-Forward Analysis)

Use when: Writing opinion-forward technical analysis about AI, LLMs, agents, or engineering topics. Best for content targeting senior engineers who want bold takes backed by evidence.

Characteristics:

  • Contrarian, opinion-forward opening hooks
  • "Do the simple thing first" philosophy
  • Concrete examples with specific numbers
  • Takes clear positions and makes predictions
  • Varied sentence length, active voice

Load: references/deep-technical-style.md for comprehensive guidance

Core Philosophy: "Do the simple thing first."

  • Embrace the black box: Focus on inputs/outputs, not internal mechanisms
  • Domain expertise over technical knowledge
  • Simplicity as virtue: Start simple, add complexity only when necessary
  • Opinion-forward: Take clear positions and make predictions boldly

Opening Hooks (choose one):

PatternExample
Contrarian position"The death of prompt engineering has been greatly exaggerated."
Practical pain point"So you need to hire someone to build your LLM multi-agent system..."
Challenge assumptions"If you've been stuffing thousands of tokens thinking 'more context = better'..."
Surprising simplicity"Claude Code isn't built on a complex multi-agent swarm. It's a single-threaded loop."

Example opening:

"Most AI architectures are overengineered. A single-threaded loop often outperforms elaborate multi-agent orchestrations."

3. LinkedIn Style

Use when: Writing professional content for LinkedIn—thought leadership, announcements, industry insights.

Characteristics:

  • Hook in first line (appears before "see more")
  • Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences each)
  • Line breaks between paragraphs for mobile readability
  • Personal angle or story
  • Call-to-action or question at the end
  • Strategic use of emojis (sparingly, professionally)
  • 1300 characters ideal, 3000 max

Structure:

[Hook line that creates curiosity]

[Personal context or story - 2-3 short paragraphs]

[Key insight or lesson - bulleted if multiple points]

[Call-to-action or engaging question]

#relevanthashtags (3-5 max)

Example:

Most AI features never make it to production. Not because the models aren't good enough. Because teams build for demos, not for users. After shipping 50+ AI features, here's what actually matters: → Start with the simplest possible implementation → Measure what users do, not what they say → Treat AI like any other code: test it, monitor it, iterate What's the biggest lesson you've learned shipping AI?

4. X/Twitter Style

Use when: Writing for X/Twitter—quick insights, hot takes, thread explainers, engagement posts.

Characteristics:

  • Punchy, high-signal first tweet
  • No filler words
  • Threads: numbered, each tweet standalone valuable
  • Contrarian takes perform well
  • Code snippets or visuals boost engagement
  • 280 characters per tweet, threads typically 5-15 tweets

Thread structure:

1/ [Bold claim or hook]

2/ [Context or "here's why"]

3-N/ [Key points, one per tweet]

N+1/ [Takeaway or call-to-action]

[Optional: link to longer content]

Example:

Unpopular opinion: RAG is overengineered for most use cases. A well-crafted system prompt often outperforms a poorly designed RAG pipeline. Thread on when to use (and skip) RAG 🧵

5. Simplified Technical Style

Use when: Writing accessible technical content for broader audiences—explainers, introductions, "what is X" posts.

Characteristics:

  • Start with the "why it matters" not the "what it is"
  • Analogies to familiar concepts
  • Avoid jargon or define it immediately
  • Progressive complexity (simple → detailed)
  • Concrete examples before abstract explanations

Example opening:

Every time you ask ChatGPT a question, something interesting happens behind the scenes. The AI doesn't just "know" the answer—it builds one, word by word, based on patterns it learned from millions of conversations.

6. Tutorial Style

Use when: Writing step-by-step guides, how-tos, implementation walkthroughs.

Characteristics:

  • Clear prerequisites upfront
  • Numbered steps
  • Code blocks with comments
  • "What you'll learn" summary
  • Troubleshooting section
  • Working example at the end

Structure:

## What You'll Build
[One sentence + screenshot/diagram]

## Prerequisites
[Bulleted list]

## Steps
### Step 1: [Action verb]
[Explanation + code]

### Step 2: ...

## Troubleshooting
[Common issues + solutions]

## Next Steps
[Where to go from here]

7. Announcement Style

Use when: Announcing features, releases, milestones, company news.

Characteristics:

  • Lead with the news, not the backstory
  • What it is → Why it matters → How to use it
  • Keep it concise
  • Clear call-to-action
  • Links to more detailed content

Example:

We just shipped streaming support for Deep Agent. Now you can see your agent's thinking in real-time—tool calls, responses, everything—as it happens. Why it matters: Debugging agent loops is 10x easier when you can watch them run. Try it: createDeepAgent({model, onEvent: console.log})

Writing Workflow

Step 1: Identify the Style

Ask these questions:

  1. Where will this be published?
  2. Who is the primary audience?
  3. What action should readers take after reading?
  4. How much time will readers spend on this?

Step 2: Load Style Reference

For Deep Technical style, load references/deep-technical-style.md for detailed guidance including:

  • 7 opening hook patterns with examples
  • 5 argumentative structures
  • 10+ rhetorical techniques
  • 8 recurring themes to weave throughout
  • Sentence-level craft patterns
  • Pre-publication checklist

For other styles, refer to the characteristics above.

Step 3: Draft with Style Constraints

Apply the chosen style's characteristics from the start. Don't write generically then "style" it later—the style should inform structure, not just tone.

Step 4: Review Against Style Checklist

Each style has implicit requirements. Before finalizing:

Karpathy Style:

  • First-person, conversational voice?
  • Opens with personal experience or intriguing premise?
  • Honest about limitations ("This might be wrong, but...")?
  • Progressive complexity (simple → detailed)?
  • Contains dry wit or memorable lines?
  • Pragmatic advice, not theoretical?

Deep Technical Style:

  • Contrarian or surprising opening?
  • Specific numbers/examples?
  • Clear position taken?
  • Explains "why" not just "what"?
  • Subheadings as mini-arguments?
  • Active voice throughout?

LinkedIn Style:

  • Hook visible before "see more"?
  • Mobile-friendly spacing?
  • Personal angle included?
  • Ends with engagement prompt?

X/Twitter Style:

  • First tweet standalone compelling?
  • Each tweet <280 chars?
  • No filler words?
  • Thread numbered clearly?

AI Slop Avoidance

Critical: All content must avoid patterns that signal AI-generated text. Load references/ai-slop-avoidance.md for comprehensive guidance.

Quick Reference: Words to Ban

Never use these overused AI words:

CategoryBanned Words
Verbsdelve, embark, unleash, harness, unlock, navigate, revolutionize, foster, elevate
Adjectivesvibrant, bustling, intricate, pivotal, crucial, cutting-edge, robust, seamless, meticulous
Nounstapestry, realm, landscape, paradigm, synergy, beacon, testament, game-changer
Phrases"it's important to note", "in today's digital age", "dive into", "at its core", "a myriad of"

Quick Reference: Patterns to Avoid

PatternProblemFix
Em-dashes (—)Strong AI signal, ban entirelyUse commas, parentheses, periods (hyphens/en-dashes OK)
Uniform sentencesAll ~25-30 wordsMix 5-word punches with 40-word explanations
Excessive hedging"might", "arguably", "perhaps"Take clear positions
Immediate listsJump to bullets without narrativeBuild tension first
Perfect grammarZero typos feels roboticOccasional imperfection is human
Balanced both-sidesArtificial neutralityTake a stance

AI Slop Checklist (Apply to All Content)

  • Zero banned words from the list above?
  • Zero em-dashes (—) in the entire piece?
  • Sentence lengths vary dramatically (some <10 words, some >35)?
  • Contains specific names, numbers, dates?
  • Has personal voice or anecdotes?
  • Takes clear positions without excessive hedging?
  • Avoids "In conclusion" / "To summarize" closings?

Resources

references/

  • karpathy-style.md - Guide for writing in Andrej Karpathy's conversational, pragmatic technical style with blog post patterns, tweet patterns, and recurring themes
  • deep-technical-style.md - Comprehensive guide for opinion-forward technical blog posts with detailed examples, rhetorical techniques, and pre-publication checklist
  • ai-slop-avoidance.md - Detailed guide to avoiding AI-generated content patterns

Extending This Skill

To add new writing styles:

  1. Analyze 5-10 examples of the target style
  2. Extract patterns: opening hooks, structure, tone, length constraints
  3. Create a reference file in references/[style-name]-style.md
  4. Add the style to the decision tree and Available Styles section
  5. Include a checklist for that style in the Review step

平台分布

Claude Code

32.72%
按下载量换算32

Antigravity

23.61%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

17.28%
按下载量换算17

windsurf

12.17%
按下载量换算12

github-copilot

8.93%
按下载量换算9

trae

3.34%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills