Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

conducting-interviews(进行采访)

conducting-interviews 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

conducting-interviews 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 248。

总安装 26,659周安装 1,122GitHub Stars 734下载 8,675核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:conducting-interviews(进行采访)
来源仓库:https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills
仓库路径:skills/conducting-interviews
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill conducting-interviews
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill conducting-interviews

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

行为面试框架取自 75 位产品负责人的招聘经验。

强调基于行为的提问,以揭示实际能力而不是排练的答案;深入钻研“如何”六个层次来发现技术专长 指导特定角色的能力定义、面试结构设计和问题设计,以展现真正的洞察力,而不是自信的交付 标记常见错误:表现性的 STAR 响应、探索不足、假设性问题以及跳过揭示自我意识的失败讨论 引入 PEARL 框架(问题、顿悟、行动、结果、学习),以确保候选人展示独特的洞察力和学习能力,而不仅仅是活动 推荐协作练习和真实的结束时刻(“还有其他吗?

”)来模拟真实的工作关系并解锁坦诚的反应

来源仓库内路径:skills/conducting-interviews

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill conducting-inte…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

conducting-interviews 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill conducting-interviews。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

conducting-interviews 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

conducting-interviews 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

conducting-interviews 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

conducting-interviews 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 26,659 次,近一周安装 1,122 次,下载 8,675 次,GitHub 734 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

conducting-interviews 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
conducting-interviews

进行采访 · 本页

26,659734只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Conducting Interviews

Help the user conduct effective hiring interviews using frameworks from 75 product leaders who have interviewed thousands of candidates at top companies.

How to Help

When the user asks for help with conducting interviews:

  1. Understand the role - Ask what position they're hiring for and what competencies matter most
  2. Design the structure - Help create a consistent, behavioral-based interview process
  3. Craft the questions - Suggest questions that reveal actual capability, not rehearsed answers
  4. Evaluate effectively - Guide them on separating signal from noise and avoiding common biases

Core Principles

Use behavioral-based interviewing

Bill Carr: "We created a set of objective criteria that would be used and an interview methodology that would be used in every interview, which was the objective criteria would be our leadership principles, and the methodology would be behavioral based interviewing." Ask for specific past examples, not hypotheticals.

Look past polished delivery

Jackie Bavaro: "Some people sounded really good because they'd say, 'Well, I'll tell you three things. Number one, number two, number three.' And then when I paid attention to my notes, I'd be like, 'Wait, their three ideas weren't actually good ideas.'" Evaluate substance over structure.

Drill six levels deep

Joe Hudson (on Elon's approach): "You ask them six levels down. You improved sales. How did you do that, exactly? Well, we improved the pipeline. How'd you do that, exactly?" True expertise is revealed by drilling into the technical and process-oriented 'how'.

Ask how they prepared

Austin Hay: "I like to ask people how they prepared for the interview. You're really asking how does the person think? How did they plan? How did they take things seriously or not?" Preparation style reveals planning depth and systems thinking.

End with 'anything else?'

Christopher Lochhead: "At the very end you say, 'Hey, Susan, before we wrap, is there anything else?' And often, the most important thing for that person to communicate comes out then." The formal structure ending unlocks authenticity.

Test failure and learning

Annie Pearl: "Talk me through your biggest product flop. What happened and what did you do about it?... The rawer the answer in terms of how bad it was and why, the better." Look for brutal honesty and genuine learning.

Simulate working together

Noam Lovinsky: "I generally like interview questions that allow us to kind of do some work together... getting into the details and really watching each other exercise our craft is really important." Collaborative exercises reveal true capability.

Use the PEARL framework

Jackie Bavaro: "Problem, Epiphany, Action, Result and Learning. What's the problem that you thought was worth solving? What's your epiphany? What's the insight that you had?" This structure ensures candidates demonstrate unique insight, not just activity.

Questions to Help Users

  • "What competencies are most critical for this specific role?"
  • "Are you testing for skills that can be rehearsed or genuine capability?"
  • "How will you distinguish between confident delivery and quality thinking?"
  • "What signals true ownership versus 'we' statements that hide contribution?"
  • "How are you calibrating across multiple interviewers?"

Common Mistakes to Flag

  • Performative interviews - Rewarding rehearsed STAR responses over actual capability
  • Not probing deeply enough - Accepting surface answers without drilling into specifics
  • High-volume fatigue - Scheduling back-to-back interviews that degrade judgment
  • Hypothetical questions - Testing what candidates say they would do instead of what they have done
  • Skipping the 'failure' question - Missing the chance to test self-awareness and growth mindset

Deep Dive

For all 91 insights from 75 guests, see references/guest-insights.md

Related Skills

  • Writing Job Descriptions
  • Evaluating Candidates
  • Onboarding New Hires
  • Building Team Culture

平台分布

Codex

35.38%
按下载量换算3,069

Claude

31.49%
按下载量换算2,732

Cursor

18.9%
按下载量换算1,640

Gemini CLI

8.97%
按下载量换算778

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills