Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

complete-spec(完整规格)

complete-spec 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

complete-spec 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 1,844。

总安装 442周安装 19GitHub Stars 1下载 155核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:complete-spec(完整规格)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/complete-spec
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill complete-spec
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill complete-spec

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

complete-spec 完成逆向工程到规格驱动开发的第五步,澄清需求模糊点。依赖 docs/gap-analysis-report.md 文件作为输入依据。输出更新后的 specs/*.md 文件,标记所有 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] 项。需先完成前四步流程,确保 gap 分析报告已存在。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/complete-spec

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill complete-spec;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

complete-spec 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill complete-spec。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

complete-spec 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

complete-spec 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

complete-spec 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

complete-spec 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 442 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 155 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

complete-spec 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
complete-spec

完整规格 · 本页

4421只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Complete Specification

Step 5 of 6 in the Reverse Engineering to Spec-Driven Development process.

Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes (interactive) Prerequisites: Step 4 completed (docs/gap-analysis-report.md exists with clarifications list) Output: Updated specs in specs/ with all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers resolved

Canonical Paths

ArtifactPath
Gap analysis reportdocs/gap-analysis-report.md
Feature spec filesspecs/*.md
Clarification progressspecs/.clarification-progress.md

Phase 1: Collect Clarifications

Read docs/gap-analysis-report.md. If the file does not exist, report the error to the user and halt: "Gap analysis report not found at docs/gap-analysis-report.md. Run Step 4 (Gap Analysis) first."

Read all spec files matching specs/*.md using Glob.

If any spec file fails to read, report the filename and error to the user and skip that file.

Extract every line containing [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] from the gap analysis report and all spec files. Record for each marker:

  • The source filename
  • The feature name (nearest heading above the marker)
  • The marker text
  • The priority label if present (P0/P1/P2/P3), default to P1 if unlabeled

Zero-Marker Guard

If zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers are found across all files, inform the user: "All specifications are already complete. No clarification markers found. Proceed to Step 6 (Implement from Spec)." Halt execution.

Progress Resume

Check whether specs/.clarification-progress.md exists. If it does, read it and identify which markers have already been resolved. Remove resolved markers from the working list. Report to the user: "Found existing progress file. {N} of {total} markers already resolved. Resuming from marker {next}."

Present Summary

Group remaining markers by feature. Sort groups so P0 features appear first, then P1, P2, P3. Present the grouped list to the user:

Found {N} clarification markers across {M} features:

**P0 - Critical ({count})**
- [feature]: [marker text] (specs/filename.md)
...

**P1 - High ({count})**
...

Starting with P0 items. Ready to begin?

Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.

Signal: "Phase 1 complete. {N} markers identified across {M} features."


Phase 2: Interactive Q&A

For each unresolved marker, starting with P0:

  1. Present the marker's context to the user. State the feature name, the question, and any surrounding context from the spec file.
  2. Ask one focused question at a time. Provide examples of common patterns or industry standards when relevant.
  3. Wait for the user's answer.
  4. If the user answers "I don't know" or expresses uncertainty, suggest common industry patterns and offer to mark it as deferred (P3). If the user agrees to defer, record the deferral and move to the next marker.
  5. If the user's answer contradicts a previously documented requirement, surface the contradiction explicitly: "This conflicts with [previous requirement] in [filename]. Which should take priority?" Wait for resolution before proceeding.

Behavioral Constraints

  • Ask one question per message. Do not combine multiple clarifications.
  • Summarize your understanding of each answer before moving to the next question.
  • Adapt question style and terminology to the actual project domain.

Signal after every 5th marker: "Progress: {resolved}/{total} markers resolved."


Phase 3: Update Specs

After each user answer, immediately update the relevant spec file. Do not batch updates.

Load the operations file for detailed update instructions:

Read: skills/complete-spec/operations/update-spec-file.md

After each file write, re-read the file and verify:

  1. The [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker has been removed.
  2. The new content is present and correctly formatted.
  3. No existing content was accidentally deleted.

If a write operation fails, report the error to the user and retry once. If the retry fails, log the intended change in specs/.clarification-progress.md and continue with the next marker.

After each successful update, append a completion record to specs/.clarification-progress.md:

## {feature-name} - {marker-summary}
- **File:** specs/{filename}.md
- **Status:** Resolved
- **Resolution:** {one-line summary of the answer}
- **Timestamp:** {ISO 8601}

Signal after each update: "Updated specs/{filename}.md. Marker resolved."


Phase 4: Confirm Priorities

After all markers are resolved (or deferred), present the finalized priority breakdown to the user:

All clarifications resolved. Priority summary:
- P0 (Critical): {count} features
- P1 (High): {count} features
- P2 (Medium): {count} features
- P3 (Low/Deferred): {count} features

Review these priorities. Should any features move up or down?

Wait for user confirmation. If the user requests priority changes, update the relevant spec files immediately.

Signal: "Phase 4 complete. Priorities confirmed."


Phase 5: Final Verification

Read all spec files in specs/. Scan every file for remaining [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers.

If any markers remain:

  • Report each remaining marker to the user with its file and location.
  • Ask whether to resolve now or defer to P3.
  • Process accordingly using Phase 2 and Phase 3 procedures.

If zero markers remain, confirm completion:

Final verification passed. Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

Specifications are ready for Step 6 (Implement from Spec).

Delete specs/.clarification-progress.md since all work is complete.

Signal: "Phase 5 complete. All specifications finalized."


Error Recovery Summary

ErrorAction
docs/gap-analysis-report.md not foundHalt. Instruct user to run Step 4 first.
Spec file unreadableSkip file. Report error. Continue with remaining files.
Write operation failsRetry once. On second failure, log to progress file and continue.
Zero markers foundInform user specs are complete. Halt.
User contradicts prior requirementSurface conflict. Wait for resolution.
Session interruptedProgress file preserves state. Resume on next invocation.

平台分布

Claude Code

31.53%
按下载量换算49

OpenCode

21.76%
按下载量换算34

Codex

19.4%
按下载量换算30

github-copilot

13.68%
按下载量换算21

Antigravity

8.28%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

3.47%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills