Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

competitive-strategist(竞争战略家)

competitive-strategist 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

competitive-strategist 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,839。

总安装 1,663周安装 70GitHub Stars 18下载 582核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-strategist(竞争战略家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills
仓库路径:skills/competitive-strategist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供系统化的竞争情报分析与战略指导,涵盖研究方法和销售支持全流程。聚焦客户真实需求而非单纯模仿对手,强调诚实定位与快速响应能力。结合行业基准与实战案例输出定制化策略方案,避免无效对标陷阱。要求输入自身产品特点、受众画像及定价模型作为分析基础条件。

competitive-strategist 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/competitive-strategist

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

competitive-strategist 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

competitive-strategist 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

competitive-strategist 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

competitive-strategist 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

competitive-strategist 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,663 次,近一周安装 70 次,下载 582 次,GitHub 18 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

competitive-strategist 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
competitive-strategist

竞争战略家 · 本页

1,66318只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Competitive Strategist

Expert competitive intelligence and positioning guidance for winning in crowded markets — from research methodologies to sales enablement and everything in between.

Philosophy

Competitive strategy isn't about copying competitors or tearing them down:

  1. Know yourself first — You can't position against others until you know your own strengths
  2. Focus on customers, not competitors — What they need matters more than what rivals do
  3. Be honest — Lies and FUD destroy credibility faster than any competitor
  4. Stay current — Markets move fast; stale intel costs deals

How This Skill Works

When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:

  • research-* — Competitive research methodologies and intelligence gathering
  • analysis-* — Win/loss analysis and market landscape mapping
  • battlecard-* — Battlecard creation, structure, and maintenance
  • positioning-* — Positioning against alternatives and differentiation
  • messaging-* — Competitive messaging and objection handling
  • enablement-* — Sales enablement for competitive situations
  • monitoring-* — Competitive monitoring systems and alerts

Core Frameworks

The Competitive Intelligence Cycle

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐             │
│   │  GATHER  │───▶│ ANALYZE  │───▶│  SHARE   │             │
│   │  (Intel) │    │ (Insight)│    │ (Enable) │             │
│   └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘             │
│        ▲                                │                   │
│        │          ┌──────────┐          │                   │
│        └──────────│  UPDATE  │◀─────────┘                   │
│                   │ (Iterate)│                              │
│                   └──────────┘                              │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Competitive Positioning Matrix

Positioning TypeWhen to UseKey Approach
Head-to-headYou're stronger on key dimensionsDirect comparison
Niche downCompetitor owns general categoryOwn a specific segment
ReframeCompetitor's strength is irrelevantChange the criteria
LeapfrogNew capability they can't matchFuture-oriented vision
CoexistDifferent jobs to be doneComplement, don't compete

Competitor Tiers

TierDescriptionMonitoring FrequencyDepth of Analysis
PrimaryDirect competitors, same ICPWeeklyDeep battlecards
SecondaryAdjacent solutions, partial overlapMonthlyOverview cards
EmergingStartups, potential disruptorsQuarterlyWatch list
AlternativesStatus quo, DIY, spreadsheetsOngoingPain point mapping

Win/Loss Analysis Framework

Deal Outcome
    │
    ├── Won Against Competitor
    │   ├── What differentiated us?
    │   ├── What did they say about competitor?
    │   └── What would have changed their mind?
    │
    └── Lost to Competitor
        ├── What was the deciding factor?
        ├── Where did we fall short?
        └── What could we have done differently?

The Battlecard Structure

SectionPurposeUpdate Frequency
OverviewQuick context, what they doQuarterly
PositioningHow we win, key differentiatorsMonthly
LandminesQuestions to ask that expose weaknessesAs discovered
Objection HandlingResponses to "Why not [competitor]?"As encountered
Proof PointsCustomer quotes, case studiesAs available
Pricing IntelKnown pricing, packagingAs discovered

Competitive Response Spectrum

SituationResponseExample
They launch feature you haveEmphasize experience, depth"We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned"
They launch feature you don'tRoadmap or reframe"We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more"
They cut priceHold on value"You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison"
They spread FUDCorrect with facts"That's not accurate — here's the truth with proof"
They announce fundingIgnore or pivot to stability"We've been profitable since 2019"

Intelligence Sources (Ranked by Value)

  1. Win/loss interviews — First-party, high signal
  2. Sales call recordings — Real objections, real context
  3. Customer feedback — Why they chose you (and considered others)
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Volume of sentiment data
  5. LinkedIn activity — Hiring, messaging, customer posts
  6. Job postings — Strategic direction signals
  7. Press/funding news — Major moves, positioning shifts
  8. Product trials — Hands-on intel (respect ToS)

Anti-Patterns

  • FUD tactics — Spreading fear, uncertainty, doubt backfires
  • Obsessing over competitors — Customer needs > competitor moves
  • Stale battlecards — Outdated intel loses deals
  • One-size-fits-all — Different competitors need different strategies
  • Ignoring the real competitor — Often it's "do nothing" or spreadsheets
  • Attacking instead of differentiating — Negative selling repels buyers
  • Hoarding intel — Unshared intelligence is worthless
  • Copying competitors — You become undifferentiated

平台分布

Codex

32.54%
按下载量换算189

Claude

32.51%
按下载量换算189

Cursor

19.7%
按下载量换算115

Gemini CLI

8.84%
按下载量换算51

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills