Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

competitive-moats(竞争护城河)

competitive-moats 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

competitive-moats 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 34,616。

总安装 2,203周安装 90GitHub Stars 85下载 713核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-moats(竞争护城河)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/competitive-moats
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill competitive-moats
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill competitive-moats

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

使用 Hamilton Helmer 七种力量框架评估可持续优势。提供互斥且完整的护城河枚举分析方法。适用于投资评估、并购目标与战略方向选择。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发外部数据查询。competitive-moats 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/competitive-moats

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill competitiv…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

competitive-moats 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill competitive-moats。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

competitive-moats 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

competitive-moats 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

competitive-moats 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

competitive-moats 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,203 次,近一周安装 90 次,下载 713 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

competitive-moats 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
competitive-moats

竞争护城河 · 本页

2,20385需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Competitive Moats

Build durable competitive advantage using Hamilton Helmer's "7 Powers" framework—the complete, mutually exclusive enumeration of all possible sources of sustainable business moats.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Evaluate your competitive position and identify if you have true Power
  • Choose strategic direction for building durable advantage
  • Analyze competitors to understand their moats and vulnerabilities
  • Advise on M&A whether an acquisition target has defensible value
  • Assess startup investment potential for sustainable returns
  • Plan market entry and determine if you can build Power against incumbents
  • Diagnose strategic weakness when growth isn't translating to profits
  • Prioritize initiatives by their potential to create or strengthen moats

This skill is particularly valuable for:

  • Founders and executives making strategic decisions
  • Investors evaluating businesses for defensibility
  • Product managers prioritizing features that build advantage
  • Strategy consultants analyzing competitive dynamics
  • Anyone who suspects their business is vulnerable to commoditization

Methodology Foundation

Source: Hamilton Helmer - *7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy* (2016)

Core Principle: Power is the set of conditions that enables a business to achieve persistent differential returns. Power requires both a Benefit (something that improves cash flow) AND a Barrier (something that prevents competitors from arbitraging away that benefit).

"A business without Power is a business without a moat, and a business without a moat eventually becomes a commodity."

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Structures content frameworksFinal messaging
Suggests persuasion techniquesBrand voice
Creates draft variationsVersion selection
Identifies optimization opportunitiesPublication timing
Analyzes competitor approachesStrategic direction

What This Skill Does

When invoked, I will guide you through the 7 Powers framework:

  1. Diagnose current Power by evaluating your business against all 7 types
  2. Identify Power potential based on your market position and lifecycle stage
  3. Analyze competitor moats to find vulnerabilities and threats
  4. Develop Power-building strategy with specific initiatives
  5. Evaluate acquisitions or investments for sustainable advantage
  6. Prioritize strategic decisions by their impact on Power

How to Use

Provide information about your strategic situation:

Example prompts:

  • "Analyze my SaaS business for competitive moats—what Power do we have?"
  • "How can we build Network Effects in our marketplace?"
  • "Is our competitor vulnerable to Counter-Positioning?"
  • "What moat strategy should a Series A startup pursue?"
  • "Evaluate whether this acquisition target has durable Power"

Information that helps:

  • Your business model and value proposition
  • Key competitors and their positions
  • Customer segments and behavior
  • Cost structure and margins
  • Company lifecycle stage (startup, growth, mature)
  • Current strategic initiatives

Instructions

Phase 1: Understand the Power Equation

Power = Benefit + Barrier

Both elements are required:

  • Benefit: A condition that materially increases cash flow (lower costs, higher prices, better retention)
  • Barrier: A condition that prevents competitors from offering the same benefit
SituationPower?
Lower costs, competitors can easily matchNo
Premium pricing, brand built over decadesYes
First to market, no structural advantageNo
Network effects with critical mass reachedYes

The Strategy Equation:

Value = Market Size × Power

Both matter. Power in a tiny market yields limited returns. A huge market without Power leads to commoditization.


Phase 2: Evaluate the 7 Powers

Systematically assess your business against each Power type:

1. Scale Economies

Definition: Per-unit costs decline as production volume increases.

Benefit: Lower costs than smaller competitors.

Barrier: Competitors need massive investment with uncertain returns to match your scale.

Identification Questions:

  • Do your fixed costs represent a large share of total costs?
  • Does volume significantly reduce per-unit economics?
  • Are you the scale leader in your market?

Examples:

CompanyScale Advantage
NetflixContent costs spread across 200M+ subscribers
WalmartDistribution network amortized across thousands of stores
IntelFab investment spread over enormous chip volumes

Build Strategy: Race to scale before competitors. "The first to scale wins." Requires aggressive investment and acceptance of near-term losses.


2. Network Effects

Definition: Product value increases as more users adopt it.

Benefit: Higher value to each user, better retention, higher willingness to pay.

Barrier: Competitors face chicken-and-egg problem—can't provide value without network size.

Types:

TypeDefinitionExample
DirectMore users = more valueWhatsApp, Facebook
IndirectMore users attract complementsiOS apps, Uber drivers
DataMore users = better productGoogle Search, Waze

Identification Questions:

  • Does each additional user make the product more valuable?
  • Would users face value loss if others left?
  • Is there a tipping point beyond which growth accelerates?

Examples:

CompanyNetwork Effect
LinkedInProfessional network value grows with members
AirbnbMore hosts = more traveler options = more hosts
VisaMore merchants = more cardholders = more merchants

Build Strategy: Achieve critical mass in a focused segment before expanding. Often requires subsidizing one side of the network.


3. Counter-Positioning

Definition: A newcomer adopts a superior model that incumbents can't copy without damaging their existing business.

Benefit: Better business model (higher margins, better value, etc.).

Barrier: Incumbents face "damned if you do, damned if you don't" dilemma.

Identification Questions:

  • Would copying your model hurt incumbents more than ignoring you?
  • Are incumbents rationally choosing NOT to respond?
  • Is your advantage structural, not just executional?

Examples:

DisruptorIncumbentWhy They Can't Copy
Vanguard index fundsActive managersWould destroy fee income
Netflix streamingBlockbusterWould kill stores/late fees
Tesla direct salesTraditional dealersWould alienate dealer network

Build Strategy: Find business model innovations that create customer value AND are economically painful for incumbents to match.


4. Switching Costs

Definition: Value loss expected by customers when switching to alternatives.

Benefit: Customer retention, higher lifetime value, pricing power.

Barrier: Competitors must compensate for switching costs, not just match value.

Types:

TypeExamples
FinancialContracts, hardware, training investment
ProceduralLearning curve, data migration, workflow disruption
RelationalCustomization loss, relationship continuity

Identification Questions:

  • How much would customers lose by switching?
  • Do switching costs grow over time with usage?
  • Are customers locked in by multiple types of costs?

Examples:

CompanySwitching Cost
SAP/OracleDeep integration, migration costs millions
Apple ecosystemApps, iCloud, iMessage, Watch compatibility
BanksDirect deposits, auto-payments, linked accounts

Build Strategy: Create integration hooks, encourage deep usage, build proprietary data/customization.


5. Branding

Definition: Durable attribution of higher value to an objectively identical offering based on seller reputation.

Benefit: Price premium or preference over equivalent alternatives.

Barrier: Brand building requires time and consistent delivery—cannot be bought or replicated quickly.

Two Types:

TypeDefinitionExample
Affective ValenceEmotional connection, identityLuxury goods, lifestyle brands
Uncertainty ReductionTrust in qualityProfessional services, B2B

Identification Questions:

  • Would customers pay more for your brand vs. identical alternative?
  • Is the brand preference based on more than product attributes?
  • Has the brand been built over significant time?

Examples:

CompanyBrand Power
Tiffany'sIdentical diamond commands premium
Coca-ColaSimilar to store brand, massive preference
McKinsey"No one gets fired for hiring McKinsey"

Build Strategy: Long-term consistent delivery on brand promise. Cannot be shortcut. Requires patience.


6. Cornered Resource

Definition: Preferential access to a coveted asset that independently enhances value.

Benefit: Access to something competitors can't match.

Barrier: The resource is exclusive or extremely difficult to obtain.

Types:

TypeExamples
TalentKey scientists, creatives, executives
IPPatents, proprietary tech, unique data
GeographicPrime locations, regulatory licenses
RelationshipsExclusive partnerships, supplier agreements

Identification Questions:

  • Do you have access to something valuable that others don't?
  • Is the resource both valuable AND exclusive?
  • Could competitors acquire equivalent access?

Examples:

CompanyCornered Resource
PixarCreative "Brain Trust" talent
Pharma patents20-year exclusive drug rights
Sports teamsStar players, local broadcast rights

Build Strategy: Identify resources critical to your industry and secure preferential access before competitors recognize their value.


7. Process Power

Definition: Embedded organization and activities that enable superior performance, matchable only through extended commitment.

Benefit: Operational excellence that can't be replicated by decision.

Barrier: Processes are embedded in culture, tacit knowledge, organizational routines. Copying requires years with uncertain success.

Identification Questions:

  • Do competitors admire and try to copy your operations?
  • Has the capability been built over many years?
  • Could a competitor with unlimited budget replicate it quickly?

Examples:

CompanyProcess Power
ToyotaProduction system took decades to develop and copy
IKEAIntegrated design-manufacturing-retail system
AmazonFulfillment combining tech, logistics, culture

Build Strategy: Long-term investment in organizational capability. Often emerges from founder obsession or cultural DNA.


Phase 3: Map Power to Lifecycle Stage

Different Powers are accessible at different company stages:

StageAvailable PowersCharacteristics
TakeoffCounter-Positioning, Cornered Resource, Scale EconomiesNew entrant, model innovation
GrowthNetwork Effects, Switching Costs, Scale EconomiesBuilding position, locking in advantage
MaturityBranding, Process PowerLong time horizons, organizational investment

Strategic Implications:

  • Startups should focus on Counter-Positioning, Cornered Resource, or racing to Scale
  • Growth companies should invest in Network Effects and Switching Costs
  • Mature companies can build Branding and Process Power

Phase 4: Analyze Competitor Moats

For each significant competitor:

  1. Identify their Power type (if any)
  2. Assess the Barrier strength (how durable?)
  3. Find vulnerabilities (where is their moat weakest?)
  4. Evaluate evolution (is their Power strengthening or eroding?)

Competitor Analysis Matrix:

CompetitorPower TypeBarrier StrengthVulnerability
[Name][Type]Strong/Medium/Weak[Gap]

Phase 5: Develop Power-Building Strategy

Based on your analysis, prioritize initiatives that build or strengthen Power:

Initiative Prioritization:

InitiativePower Type AffectedImpact on BarrierFeasibilityPriority
[Action][Type]High/Medium/LowHigh/Medium/Low[1-5]

Key Questions:

  1. Which Power type is most achievable given your position?
  2. What specific actions would build that Power?
  3. What investment (time, capital) is required?
  4. What milestones indicate Power is being established?

Examples

Example 1: B2B SaaS Company (Marketing Automation)

Company Profile:

  • 5,000 customers, $30M ARR
  • Growth: 40% YoY
  • Market: Mid-market companies ($10M-$500M revenue)
  • Competition: Several well-funded competitors

Power Analysis:

Power TypeAssessmentRating
Scale EconomiesLimited—SaaS costs don't decline dramatically with scaleWeak
Network EffectsNone—each customer uses independentlyNone
Counter-PositioningNo—similar model to competitorsNone
Switching CostsModerate—data/integration dependenciesMedium
BrandingGrowing reputation in categoryWeak
Cornered ResourceNone—no unique assetsNone
Process PowerNone—standard SaaS operationsNone

Diagnosis: Limited Power. Primary advantage is Switching Costs, but they're moderate.

Recommendations:

  1. Strengthen Switching Costs (Primary Strategy)

- Deeper integrations with customer tech stack - Proprietary data that accumulates over time - Custom workflows that would be costly to recreate - Build "Expansion Revenue" features that increase lock-in

  1. Explore Network Effects (Secondary Strategy)

- Customer community with shared benchmarks - Marketplace for templates/integrations - Data network effects (aggregate insights)

  1. Long-term Brand Building

- Thought leadership positioning - Customer success stories - Category association

Priority Actions:

  1. Double down on integration depth (Switching Costs)
  2. Launch customer community (potential Network Effects)
  3. Build proprietary benchmark data (Cornered Resource attempt)

Example 2: DTC Consumer Brand (Premium Coffee)

Company Profile:

  • 3 years old, $15M revenue
  • Direct-to-consumer subscription model
  • Premium positioning ($25/bag vs. $12 grocery average)
  • Competition: Blue Bottle, Stumptown, local roasters, grocery brands

Power Analysis:

Power TypeAssessmentRating
Scale EconomiesNone—roasting doesn't favor scale, sourcing competitiveNone
Network EffectsNone—coffee consumption is individualNone
Counter-PositioningPartial—DTC vs. grocery, but competitors use same modelWeak
Switching CostsLow—easy to try other brandsWeak
BrandingBuilding—premium identity, design-forwardMedium
Cornered ResourceNone—beans available to allNone
Process PowerNone—standard roasting operationsNone

Diagnosis: Primary Power potential is Branding, but it's early and weak. Vulnerable position.

Recommendations:

  1. Double Down on Brand (Primary Strategy)

- Brand isn't just awareness—must create genuine price premium - Focus on affective valence (identity, lifestyle association) - Long time horizon—no shortcuts

  1. Explore Cornered Resource (Secondary Strategy)

- Exclusive farmer relationships - Proprietary processing methods - Unique varietals

  1. Build Switching Costs (Tertiary Strategy)

- Subscription friction (not just convenience) - Personalization based on taste profile - Rewards/loyalty programs

Honest Assessment: Coffee is a challenging category for Power. Most coffee brands compete on quality and marketing without true moats. Strategy should focus on:

  1. Building genuine brand love (not just awareness)
  2. Exploring exclusive sourcing relationships
  3. Considering whether the category supports premium economics long-term

Checklists & Templates

Power Diagnostic Checklist

For each potential Power:

Scale Economies

  • Do fixed costs represent >30% of total costs?
  • Does 2x volume reduce per-unit cost by >15%?
  • Are you in the top 3 for scale in your market?
  • Would achieving your scale require competitors to invest $Xm+?

Network Effects

  • Does each user directly increase value for other users?
  • Is there a measurable tipping point for adoption?
  • Would value collapse if 50% of users left?
  • Are there multiple types of network effects present?

Counter-Positioning

  • Would incumbents damage their core business by copying you?
  • Are incumbents rationally choosing not to respond?
  • Is your model structurally superior, not just operationally?
  • Has enough time passed to confirm incumbents aren't responding?

Switching Costs

  • Can you quantify customer switching costs ($/time)?
  • Do switching costs increase with tenure?
  • Are multiple types of switching costs present?
  • Would competitors need to cover these costs to win customers?

Branding

  • Would customers pay 20%+ premium vs. identical alternative?
  • Is brand preference based on more than product quality?
  • Has the brand been built over 5+ years?
  • Is the brand associated with customer identity?

Cornered Resource

  • Do you have exclusive access to a valuable asset?
  • Would competitors struggle to acquire equivalent access?
  • Is the resource genuinely critical to your offering?
  • Is exclusivity contractual, regulatory, or structural?

Process Power

  • Has the capability taken 10+ years to develop?
  • Have competitors tried and failed to replicate it?
  • Is the capability embedded in culture, not just systems?
  • Could unlimited capital and time replicate it in <5 years?

Power Strategy Template

COMPANY: _______________
DATE: _______________

1. CURRENT POWER ASSESSMENT
Primary Power: _______________
Barrier Strength: Strong / Medium / Weak
Supporting Powers: _______________

2. COMPETITOR POWER MAP
| Competitor | Power Type | Strength | Our Vulnerability |
|------------|-----------|----------|-------------------|
|            |           |          |                   |
|            |           |          |                   |

3. POWER-BUILDING STRATEGY
Target Power: _______________
Why achievable: _______________

Key Initiatives:
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________

Investment Required: $_____ / _____ months
Success Milestones:
- [ ] _______________
- [ ] _______________
- [ ] _______________

4. RISKS & MITIGATIONS
What could prevent Power from developing:
- Risk: _______________
- Mitigation: _______________

M&A / Investment Power Evaluation

TARGET: _______________

POWER ASSESSMENT
Does the target have demonstrable Power? Yes / No / Uncertain

Power Type: _______________
Evidence:
- _______________
- _______________

Barrier Durability:
- Time to erode: _____ years
- What could erode it: _______________

VALUATION IMPLICATIONS
If Power is real: Premium valuation justified
If Power is uncertain: Standard multiples, require earnout
If No Power: Commodity business valuation

RECOMMENDATION:
[ ] Strong Power - Acquire at premium
[ ] Moderate Power - Negotiate standard terms
[ ] Weak/No Power - Reconsider or value as commodity

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring persuasive content
  • Applying copywriting frameworks
  • Creating draft variations
  • Analyzing competitor approaches

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Guarantee conversion rates
  • Replace brand voice development
  • Know your specific audience
  • Make final approval decisions

References

Primary Source:

  • Helmer, Hamilton. (2016). *7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy*. Deep Strategy LLC.

Additional Resources:

  • Sachin Rekhi's "7 Powers: A Comprehensive Primer"
  • Hamilton Helmer lectures and Stanford courses
  • Deep Strategy website and newsletters

Related Skills

  • positioning-dunford - How positioning amplifies or reveals Power
  • competitive-analysis - Broader competitive intelligence framework
  • jobs-to-be-done - Understanding what creates customer value (the Benefit)
  • category-design - Creating new categories as Counter-Positioning strategy
  • pricing-strategy - Monetizing Power through pricing

平台分布

Codex

38.28%
按下载量换算273

Claude

29.24%
按下载量换算208

Cursor

16.86%
按下载量换算120

Gemini CLI

9.29%
按下载量换算66

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills