commission-intelligence（委员会情报）

Commission Intelligence

Demystify sales compensation by explaining commission calculations, identifying discrepancies, and modeling payout scenarios.

When to Use This Skill

• Reps questioning commission statements
• Designing or updating comp plans
• Modeling quota and OTE scenarios
• Resolving payout disputes
• Planning territory changes

Methodology Foundation

Based on Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design and WorldatWork Incentive Compensation principles, covering:

• Base + variable structures
• Quota attainment mechanics
• Accelerators and decelerators
• Split and overlay rules

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

What This Skill Does

1. Calculation explanation - Break down how commission was computed
2. Discrepancy identification - Find calculation errors or data issues
3. Scenario modeling - Project earnings under different assumptions
4. Plan documentation - Clarify complex comp plan rules
5. Dispute resolution - Provide clear audit trail

How to Use

Explain this commission calculation:

Rep: [Name]
Role: [AE, SDR, etc.]
Quota: $[Amount]/[Period]
Closed this period: $[Amount]

Comp plan rules:
- Base: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: X% of base
- Commission rate: X% up to quota
- Accelerator: X% above quota

Deals closed:
- [List deals with amounts and close dates]

Statement shows: $[Commission Amount]
Rep expected: $[Expected Amount]

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Comp Plan Structure

Common Structures:

Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment % = (Closed Revenue / Quota) × 100

Example:
- Quota: $500,000
- Closed: $450,000
- Attainment: 90%

Step 3: Apply Commission Rules

Standard Calculation:

Base Commission = Closed Revenue × Commission Rate

With Quota Thresholds:
- Below 50% attainment: 0% payout (common)
- 50-100% attainment: Linear payout
- Above 100%: Accelerator rate kicks in

Accelerator Example:

Plan: 10% up to quota, 15% above quota
Quota: $500K, Closed: $600K

Commission:
- First $500K × 10% = $50,000
- Next $100K × 15% = $15,000
- Total: $65,000

Step 4: Handle Special Cases

Step 5: Reconcile Discrepancies

Common Issues:

Examples

Example 1: Commission Explanation

Input:

Explain why Sarah's commission is $12,500:

Rep: Sarah (AE)
Quota: $200,000/quarter
Q4 Closed: $175,000

Comp plan:
- OTE: $200,000 (50/50 split)
- Variable: $100,000/year = $25,000/quarter
- At 100% attainment: Full $25K variable
- Linear payout from 50-100%
- Accelerator: 1.5x above 100%

Deals:
- Acme Corp: $80,000 (Oct 15)
- Beta Inc: $45,000 (Nov 3)
- Gamma LLC: $50,000 (Dec 20)
Total: $175,000

Output:

## Commission Breakdown: Sarah - Q4

### Step 1: Verify Closed Revenue
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | ✓ |
|------|--------|------------|---|
| Acme Corp | $80,000 | Oct 15 | ✓ Q4 |
| Beta Inc | $45,000 | Nov 3 | ✓ Q4 |
| Gamma LLC | $50,000 | Dec 20 | ✓ Q4 |
| **Total** | **$175,000** | | ✓ |

### Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment = $175,000 / $200,000 = 87.5%

### Step 3: Apply Commission Formula

**Plan Rules:**
- 50% threshold: Below 50% = $0
- 50-100%: Linear from $0 to $25,000
- 100%+: 1.5x accelerator

**Calculation:**

Sarah is at 87.5% (between 50% and 100%)

Linear formula: Payout = (Attainment - 50%) / 50% × Full Variable Payout = (87.5% - 50%) / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 37.5% / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 75% × $25,000 Payout = $18,750

### ⚠️ Discrepancy Found!

**Statement shows**: $12,500
**Calculated**: $18,750
**Difference**: $6,250 underpaid

### Likely Cause

If system shows $12,500, it may be calculating:

$12,500 / $25,000 = 50% payout

This would happen if:
1. One deal not credited (Beta Inc $45K?)
2. Wrong formula (% of revenue vs % of variable)
3. Deal attributed to different quarter

### Recommended Action
1. Verify all 3 deals in commission system
2. Check if Beta Inc close date is in Q4
3. Confirm formula is linear 50-100%, not flat rate
4. Escalate to compensation admin with this breakdown

Example 2: Scenario Modeling

Input:

Model commission scenarios for Mike:

Current:
- Quota: $400,000/quarter
- OTE: $240,000 (60/40 split)
- Variable: $96,000/year = $24,000/quarter
- Rate: 6% of revenue up to quota
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

Q1 pipeline:
- Committed: $320,000
- Best case: $450,000
- Upside: $600,000

What would Mike earn in each scenario?

Output:

## Commission Scenarios: Mike - Q1

### Plan Summary
- Quota: $400,000
- At-quota commission: $24,000 (6% × $400K)
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

### Scenario Analysis

#### Scenario 1: Commit Only ($320K)

Attainment: 80% Revenue: $320,000

Commission at 6%: $320,000 × 6% = $19,200

Quarterly Variable: $19,200 Annualized: $76,800 vs OTE Variable ($96K): -$19,200

**Status**: Below quota, standard rate applies

---

#### Scenario 2: Best Case ($450K)

Attainment: 112.5% Revenue: $450,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $50,000 × 9% = $4,500

Total Commission: $28,500

Quarterly Variable: $28,500 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$4,500 (19% bonus)

**Status**: Accelerator kicks in, strong quarter

---

#### Scenario 3: Upside ($600K)

Attainment: 150% Revenue: $600,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $200,000 × 9% = $18,000

Total Commission: $42,000

Quarterly Variable: $42,000 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$18,000 (75% bonus)

**Status**: Excellent quarter, maximizing accelerator

---

### Summary Table

| Scenario | Revenue | Attainment | Commission | vs Plan |
|----------|---------|------------|------------|---------|
| Commit | $320K | 80% | $19,200 | -$4,800 |
| Best Case | $450K | 112% | $28,500 | +$4,500 |
| Upside | $600K | 150% | $42,000 | +$18,000 |

### Key Insights

1. **Break-even point**: $400K (100% attainment)
2. **Accelerator value**: Each $10K above quota = $900 extra
3. **Commit gap**: Need $80K more to hit quota
4. **Upside potential**: 75% more commission if pipeline converts

### Recommendations for Mike
1. Focus on moving $80K from Best Case to Commit
2. Push for upside deals - 9% rate is lucrative
3. Prioritize larger deals for accelerator impact

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

• Explaining commission math step-by-step
• Identifying calculation discrepancies
• Modeling what-if scenarios
• Documenting plan rules clearly

What This Skill Cannot Do

• Access actual payout systems
• Make policy exceptions
• Override approved calculations
• Handle edge cases without rules

When to Escalate to Human

• Policy exceptions or special approvals
• Historical adjustments requiring audit
• Plan design decisions
• Legal or HR compensation issues

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

• "What if Mike closes an extra $50K deal?"
• "Show me the break-even point to hit OTE."
• "Compare this plan to a flat 8% rate."
• "Model the impact of increasing Mike's quota by 20%."

Refinement Cycle

1. Document plan rules clearly
2. Run sample calculations
3. Verify against actual statements
4. Build exception handling guide
5. Create rep-facing FAQ

Checklists & Templates

Commission Dispute Resolution Checklist

• Verify all deals in calculation
• Confirm close dates in pay period
• Check split/overlay credits
• Validate attainment tier
• Review for clawbacks/adjustments
• Compare to plan document

Comp Plan Documentation Template

## [Role] Compensation Plan - [Year]

### Structure
- Base Salary: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: $X (X% of OTE)
- Pay Period: [Monthly/Quarterly]

### Commission Mechanics
- Quota: $X/[period]
- Base Rate: X%
- Accelerator: X% above quota
- Threshold: X% minimum attainment

### Special Rules
- Splits: [Policy]
- Clawbacks: [Policy]
- Ramping: [New hire policy]

### Examples
[Include 3 scenarios at 80%, 100%, 120%]

References

• Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design
• WorldatWork Incentive Compensation Handbook
• Salesforce Sales Cloud Commission Documentation
• Xactly Commission Best Practices

Related Skills

• pipeline-forecasting - Project commission from forecast
• deal-risk-scoring - Prioritize high-commission deals
• quota-planning - Set achievable targets

Skill Metadata

• Domain: RevOps
• Complexity: Advanced
• Mode: centaur
• Time to Value: 15-30 min per analysis
• Prerequisites: Comp plan document, deal data